Overview: The Effects of Chemical Pollutants on the Fetus and Child
What I have to say in my summary will be very personal. It concerns information that has filtered through those remaining neurones, and perhaps reflects certain prejudices which result from a good many years of association with a rather comparable field, the prevention of infectious diseases and the development and introduction of vaccines. This work has many problems similar to those pertaining to chemical pollutants. Throughout this Conference we have emphasized repeatedly the peculiar susceptibility of the fetus and young child to environmental chemical pollutants. It has been pointed out that, in addition to the periods of special vulnerability (particularly evident in early fetal life), the infant and child are more subject to certain environmental risks at different stages of development (e.g., the high incidence of poisonings in toddlers). Our special concern for the fetus and the young child is not based on these considerations alone. Clearly, any adverse happening to an individual early in life, particularly if it affects intellectual achievement, provides a great burden on the social system; and, the longer the period this person must be supported by society, the greater the burden and the greater the cost-not just in money but in many other ways. Death from the socioeconomic point of view is relatively unimportant, compared to a chronic disability. Behavioral psychologists have taught us about imprinting, which is particularly evident in some animals but has not been demonstrated in children. Dr. Holland's comments about the effect of air pollution in the first year of life, and its sequelae in later life are of great importance, and certainly need to be subjected to further study.