scholarly journals Business clinics qualified for the in vitro governmental programme with the legal status up to the end of 2016

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 42-52
Author(s):  
Magdalena Debita
Keyword(s):  
Public Discourse ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Municipal Government ◽  
Infertility Treatment ◽  
In Vitro Fertilisation ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
The Public ◽  
State Participation ◽  
Law And Justice

The article presents the issue of state participation in the financing of couples’ infertility treatment with in vitro fertilization. The author emphasizes that highly interesting topic of clinics recommended for infertility treatment has not been sufficiently developed. This subject is systematically developed in the public discourse, but the society, which still remains divided in the matter of state and municipal government participation in the funding of couples' infertility treatment with in vitro. The author presents the evolution of Ministry’s of Health In Vitro Fertilisation Programmes which came under the governance of the Law and Justice party (PiS) in 2016.

scholarly journals Participation of the Roman Catholic Church in the Public Debate about Legal Regulations on In Vitro Fertilisation in Poland in 2007-2015. Selected Aspects of Religious, Political and Media Discourse

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020(41) (4) ◽  
pp. 69-79
Author(s):  
Zbigniew Jacek Przybyłek ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Catholic Church ◽  
Public Discourse ◽  
Roman Catholic ◽  
Roman Catholic Church ◽  
In Vitro Fertilisation ◽  
Media Discourse ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
The Public ◽  
Analyze Case

In publication, which is about public discourse, done analyze case polish Roman Catholic Church, as a social actor which participate in permanent dispute about law regulations about in vitro fertilization in VI and VII cadency of polish first house parliament. Done comparison religious, political and media discourse.

Problems and prerequisites for determining the legal regime preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Russian legislation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.A. Altinnik , S.S. Zenin , V.V. Komarova et all ,
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis ◽  
Human Embryo ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Genetic Diagnosis ◽  
Legal Regime ◽  
Vitro Fertilization

Сurrent problems and prerequisites for the formation of the legal regime of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) are considered in Russian legislation with account the existing approaches to determining the legal status of a “pre-implantation” embryo obtained in the framework of the in vitro fertilization procedure (IVF) are discussed. The authors substantiates the conclusion that it is necessary to legally determine PGD as one of the stages of using IVF, as well as establishing generally binding requirements for the procedure, conditions and features of this diagnosis, taking into account the need to minimize the damage caused to the human embryo.

scholarly journals Results of modern tuboperitoneal infertility treatment

2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Drenka Turjacanin-Pantelic ◽  
Dragana Bojovic-Jovic ◽  
Biljana Arsic ◽  
Eliana Garalejic
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Infertility Treatment ◽  
P Value ◽  
Modern Approach ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

Background/Aim. A modern approach to surgical treatment of tuboperitoneal infertility is based on laporascopic techniques. The aim of this study was to compare results of tuboperitoneal infertility treatment by the use of laparoscopy and classical laparotomy. Methods. A retrospectiveprospective study on 66 women treated operatively form tuboperitoneal infertility was performed. Data from patient's anamnesis and those related to the surgical treatment results, obtained by the use of an inquiry, were used in retrospective and prospective analysis, respectively. Chi-square test was used in statistical analysis. P value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results. Classical laparotomy was used on 34 women in a period from 1996 to 1997, while 32 women were operated laparoscopically in a period from 1999 to 2000. The results were as follows: a total number of conceived women was 16 (24%), seven in the group I (20.6%) and nine in the group II (28.1%); 13 women were with one pregnancy, six in the group I (17.6%) and seven in the group II (22%). Twice pregnant were three women, one in the group I (2.9%) and two in the group II (6.2%). The resulting pregnancies were: five women with abortion spontaneous, two in the group I (5.9%) and three in the group II (9.4%); two women with extrauterine pregnancy in the group I (5.9%); three with pretemporal birth, one in the group I (2.9%) and two in the group II (6.2%), while six women were with the temporal birth, two in the group I (5.9%) and four in the group II (12.5%). Statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the results between these two groups. Conclusion. Surgical treatment of tubeperitoneal infertility, regardless of the used methods (classical laparotomy or laparoscopy) was successful in a great number of women. These methods have a great advantage over in vitro fertilization, and they should not be ignored.

scholarly journals Why Are the Proportions of In-Vitro Fertilisation Interventions for Same Sex Female Couples Increasing?

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1657
Author(s):  
Catherine Meads ◽  
Laura-Rose Thorogood ◽  
Katy Lindemann ◽  
Susan Bewley
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilisation ◽  
Donor Insemination ◽  
Same Sex ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Human Fertilization ◽  
Frozen Semen ◽  
First Choice ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Uk

Same-sex female couples who wish to become pregnant can choose donor insemination or in-vitro fertilization (IVF)—a technique intended for infertile women. In general, women in same-sex female partnerships are no more likely to be infertile than those in opposite sex partnerships. This article investigates data available from the Government Regulator of UK fertility clinics—the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority, which is the only data available worldwide on same-sex female couples and their fertility choices. IVF is increasing both in absolute numbers and relative proportions year on year in the UK, compared to licensed donor insemination for same-sex female couples. As IVF has greater human and financial costs than donor insemination, policies should not encourage it as the first choice for fertile women requiring sperm. Commercial transactions are taking place where fertile lesbians receive cut price, and arguably unnecessary, IVF intervention in exchange for selling their eggs to be used for other infertile customers. If women are not told about the efficacy of fresh vs. frozen semen, and the risks of egg ‘sharing’ or intra-couple donation, exploitation becomes possible.

scholarly journals The Methodology and Stylistic Approach of Imam Tahavi in Tafseer “Ahkam ul Quran

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
dr. hafiz muhammad sani
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Infertility Treatment ◽  
Reproductive Technology ◽  
Sex Selection ◽  
Human Reproduction ◽  
Religious Values ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Minimum Number ◽  
Natural Way

In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) has emerged as one of the most popular byproduct of Assistant Reproductive Technology (ART) in our time. It has proven attractive to people across the globe for variety of reasons including infertility treatment and pre-natal sex selection. People of various cultures have reacted to its use in line with their own code of morality and religious values on human procreation, sexual purity and lineage exactitude. In the case of Muslims, its application for overcoming infertility has received general juridical approval with minimum number of caveats. A cursory of the existing fatwas, however reveals that the juristic deliberation on the implications of IVF in terms of destroying the excess embryos generated in the process is scanty. Accordingly, this study argues that if we equate legitimate use of IVF with natural way of human reproduction, then the ethicality of its casualties in terms of surplus embryo destruction should not be trivialized.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document