Good Practice for the Assessment and Safe Handling of Nanomaterials

2009 ◽  
Vol 1209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve M. Hankin

AbstractNanotechnology has the potential to greatly improve our lives through medical, environmental and consumer products. Properties at the nanoscale are being exploited in new products, but they could also influence how the particles interact with humans and the environment. There is increasing consensus that for nanotechnology to reach its maximum potential, we must work to understand the hazards and exposure routes in order to minimise the risks. Good practice, founded on the principles of risk assessment and industrial hygiene, are applicable to a wide range of nanomaterials and nanostructured materials including nanoparticles, nanofibres, nanopowders, nanotubes, as well as aggregates and agglomerates of these materials. There is still considerable uncertainty about many aspects of effective risk assessment of nanomaterials, including the hazardous potential of many types of nanoparticles and the levels below which individuals might be exposed, with minimal likelihood of adverse health effects. It is prudent therefore to understand how to develop an appropriate strategy for the risk assessment, handling and disposing of nanomaterials, in the light of known and unknown hazards and exposures. This paper presents a perspective of the key components of risk assessment applicable to nanotechnology and novel materials.

Author(s):  
Martinus Løvik ◽  
Livar Frøyland ◽  
Margaretha Haugen ◽  
Sigrun Henjum ◽  
Kristin Holvik ◽  
...  

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), assessed the risk of "other substances" in food supplements and energy drinks sold in Norway. VKM has assessed the risk of doses given by NFSA. These risk assessments will provide NFSA with the scientific basis while regulating "other substances" in food supplements. "Other substances" are described in the food supplement directive 2002/46/EC as substances other than vitamins or minerals that have a nutritional and/ or physiological e ffect. It is added mainly to food supplements, but also to energy drinks and other foods. In this series of risk assessments of "other substances" the VKM has not evaluated any claimed beneficial effects from these substances, only possible adverse effects. The present report is a risk assessment of specified doses of L-threonine in food supplements, and it is based on previous risk assessments and articles retrieved from literature searches. According to information from NFSA, L-threonine is an ingredient in food supplements sold in Norway. NSFA has requested a risk assessment of 1000, 1200, 1500, 2000 and 2400 mg/day of L-threonine from food supplements.  L-threonine is an essential amino acid not known to cause any adverse health effects. Previous reports do not indicate a tolerable upper intake level, apart from an approval of a dose of 1150 mg/day by the Scientific Committee of the Spanish Agency for Food Safety and Nutrition (AESAN). Long-term studies in humans were not found. The only available human studies were: a small uncontrolled one-year pilot study with doses ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 g/day, one eight-week randomised controlled trial (RCT) using a dose of 7.5 g/day, and two 2-week RCTs using doses of 6 and 4.5 g/day. No adverse effects (diary method of registration of adverse effects) were reported in the eight-week clinical trial, and the only adverse effects observed in the two-week trials were one case of indigestion and one case of diarrhoea. A four-week rodent toxicity study indicated a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 854.3 mg/kg bw per day (only dose tested, no adverse effects observed).  The value used for comparison with the estimated exposure in the risk characterisation is the NOAEL defined in an 8-week randomised placebo controlled study in humans, 7500 mg/day. For a 70-kg individual, this corresponds to 107 mg/kg bw per day. Two human two-week studies and a small one-year pilot study support the notion that this dose will be well tolerated. The overall mean threonine intake according to NHANES III (3 g/day) is slightly larger than the doses requested for evaluation in the present risk assessment. No studies in children (10 to <14 years) and adolescents (14 to <18 years) were identified. Based on the included literature there was no evidence indicating that age affects the tolerance for relevant doses of threonine. Therefore, in this risk characterisation a tolerance as for adults, based on body weight, was assumed for these age groups. VKM concludes that: In adults (≥18 years), the specified doses 1000, 1200, 1500, 2000 and 2400 mg/day L-threonine in food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects. In adolescents (14 to <18 years), the specified doses 1000, 1200, 1500, 2000 and 2400 mg/day L-threonine in food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects. In children (10 to <14 years), the specified doses 1000, 1200, 1500, 2000 and 2400 mg/day L-threonine in food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects. Children younger than 10 years were not within the scope of the present risk assessment.


1993 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 439-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco J. R. Paumgartten

Virtually all chemical substances may cause adverse health effects, depending on the dose and conditions under which individuals are exposed to them. Toxicology - the study of harmful effects of chemicals on living organisms - provides the scientific data base on which risk assessment of adverse health effects stands. Risk assessment (RA) is the process of estimating the probability that a chemical compound will produce adverse effects on a given population, under particular conditions of exposure. Risk assessment process consists of four stages: Hazard Identification (HI), Exposure Assessment (EA), Dose-Response Assessment (DRA), and Risk Characterization (RC). The risk assessment process as a whole makes it possible to carry out cost(risk)/benefit analysis, and thus risk management, on a rational basis. A capacity to undertake risk assessment is thus sine qua non for making decisions that are concerned with achieving a balance between economic development and adequate protection of public health and the environment.


2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Parsons ◽  
Kathryn G. McIntosh

Lead poisoning is a preventable condition caused by exposure to environmental sources such as lead-containing dust or lead-painted consumer products. The history of lead poisoning prevention has been defined to some extent by the quality of the analytical methods available for lead measurements whether in environmental samples or biological tissues and fluids. The quality of blood lead methods has improved so greatly over the last three decades that we now know far more about the adverse health effects from low-level exposures. Recent evidence suggests that effects such as deficit in IQ occur below the current (periodically revised) U.S. CDC threshold of 10μg/dL, such that no safe threshold appears to exist for children. Improvements in analytical techniques have also had an impact on the environmental measurement quality, yet many environmental thresholds have remained unchanged for decades. In light of our current understanding of the adverse health effects at low levels of exposure, new thresholds for lead in children’s products have been introduced by the U.S. CPSC. The adequacy of current analytical techniques to detect lead accurately at the new, lower thresholds is questionable. XRF offers the advantage of being rapid and nondestructive compared to techniques such as AAS that require extensive sample preparation. However, the accuracy of handheld XRF determinations of lead in painted toys is generally limited. A brief comparative study on the performance of several analytical techniques for the determination of lead in toys is presented at the end of this paper.


Author(s):  
Tonje Holte Stea ◽  
Livar Frøyland ◽  
Margaretha Haugen ◽  
Sigrun Henjum ◽  
Kristin Holvik ◽  
...  

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), assessed the risk of "other substances" in food supplements and energy drinks sold in Norway. VKM has assessed the risk of doses given by NFSA. These risk assessments will provide NFSA with the scientific basis while regulating "other substances" in food supplements. "Other substances" are described in the food supplement directive 2002/46/EC as substances other than vitamins or minerals that have a nutritional and / or physiological effect. It is added mainly to food supplements, but also to energy drinks and other foods. In this series of risk assessments of "other substances" the VKM has not evaluated any claimed beneficial effects from these substances, only possible adverse effects. The present report is a risk assessment of specified doses of L-serine in food supplements, and it is based on previously published risk assessments and scientific papers retrieved from a comprehensive literature search.  L-serine is a non-essential amino acid which is produced endogenously and is supplied from the diet. In addition to its role in protein synthesis, L-serine has an important role as a major contributor to the one-carbon pool and is involved in the metabolism of several key compounds, including glycine, cysteine, taurine, and phospholipids and of D-serine. According to information from NFSA, L-serine is an ingredient in food supplements sold in Norway. NSFA has requested a risk assessment of 50, 500, 1000, 1250, 1500 and 1750 mg/day of L-serine from food supplements. Most dietary proteins contain about 4-5% L-serine. Rich sources of proteins are meat, dairy products, legumes, fish, nuts, seeds, eggs and whole grains. Dietary intake of L-serine in Norway is not known, but results show an overall mean intake of L-serine from food and food supplements of 3.5 g/day in the United States (NHANES III, USA). In the first phase of the present evaluation of "other substances", previous reports that have assessed the safety of L-serine supplementation in humans were identified. In the second phase, a systematic literature search was performed to retrieve scientific papers published before 11 May 2016 (human studies literature search) and before 28 July 2016 (animal studies literature search). Based on this search, we did not identify any long-term studies in healthy individuals that could be used for safety evaluations. On the other hand, three relevant animal studies were included in this report. The animal studies revealed no adverse health effects as a result of the tested doses of Lserine (840-3000 mg/kg bw per day). For the risk characterisation of L-serine, in the absence of long-term studies in healthy individuals, VKM based the value of comparison on the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL), 3000 mg/kg bw per day which was the highest dose tested in a 90-days toxicological study in rats. This value was used to calculate the Margin of Exposure (MOE) values for daily intake of 50, 500, 1000, 1250, 1500 and 1750 mg L-serine in children (10 to <14 years), adolescents (14 to <18 years) and adults (≥18 years). The MOE-values ranged from 74 to 4200, which were considered acceptable since L-serine is a nutrient that does not cause any well documented adverse effects and because studies indicate a high endogenous production (Snell, 1986) and a high dietary intake of L-serine (NHANES III, USA) compared to the doses considered in the present risk assessment. Thus, VKM concludes that: In adults (≥18 years), the specified doses 50, 500, 1000, 1250, 1500 and 1750 mg/day L-serine in food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects.  In adolescents (14 to <18 years), the specified doses 50, 500, 1000, 1250, 1500 and 1750 mg/day L-serine in food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects. In children (10 to <14 years), the specified doses 50, 500, 1000, 1500 and 1800 mg/day L-serine in food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects. Children younger than 10 years were not within the scope of the present risk assessment.


Author(s):  
Livar Frøyland ◽  
Margaretha Haugen ◽  
Kristin Holvik ◽  
Martinus Løvik ◽  
Tor A. Strand ◽  
...  

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), assessed the risk of "other substances" in food supplements and energy drinks sold in Norway. VKM has assessed the risk of doses given by NFSA. These risk assessments will provide NFSA with the scientific basis while regulating the addition of "other substances" to food supplements.  "Other substances" are described in the food supplement directive 2002/46/EC as substances other than vitamins or minerals that have a nutritional and/or physiological effect. It is added mainly to food supplements, but also to energy drinks and other foods. VKM has not in this series of risk assessments of "other substances" evaluated any claimed beneficial effects from these substances, only possible adverse effects.  The present report is a risk assessment of L-phenylalanine and DL-phenylalanine and is based on previous risk assessments. According to information from the Norwegian Food Safety Authority, L- and DL-phenylalanine are ingredients in food supplements sold in Norway. NFSA has requested a risk assessment of the following doses of L-phenylalanine and DL-phenylalanine in food supplements: L-phenylalanine 100, 250, 500, 750 and 1000 mg/day and DL-phenylalanine 50 and 75 mg/day.  L-phenylalanine is an essential amino acid which means it has to be obtained from the diet. Amino acids are building blocks for proteins and present in protein rich food such as milk, meat, fish, eggs and cheese.  No data on adverse health effects after chronic ingestion of supplemental phenylalanine in apparently healthy subjects are available, thus no tolerable upper intake level (UL) can be established. Patients with phenylketonuria (PKU), a genetic disorder that impairs phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH), an enzyme involved in the metabolism of phenylalanine, must keep plasma levels of phenylalanine low in order to maintain normal growth and brain development. In Norway, all newborns are routinely screened for PKU three days after birth.  The mean dietary intake of phenylalanine in the EU population range from 0.4-4.1 g/day corresponding to 79.0 mg/kg bw per day for adolescents (10-17 years) and 58.7 mg/kg bw per day for adults, respectively (EFSA, 2013). The sweetener aspartame contains phenylalanine. Taking the molecular weight of phenylalanine into account, the proportion of to phenylalanine exposure from aspartame is 56%. The ADI of 40 mg aspartame/day/kg bw (providing 22.4 mg phenylalanine/day/kg bw) JECFA (1981) was re-evaluated and maintained in 2013, based on the notion that elevated plasma levels of phenylalanine in pregnant women leads to developmental toxicity in their children (EFSA, 2013).  The literature search did not provide novel information on adverse health effects related to intake of L-phenylalanine and no information related to DL-phenylalanine.  VKM concludes that:  In adults (≥ 18 years), the specified doses 100, 250, 500, 750 and 1000 mg/day L-phenylalanine in food supplements are considered unlikely to cause adverse health effects. In adolescents (14 to < 18 years), the specified doses 100, 250, 500, 750 and 1000 mg/day L-phenylalanine in food supplements are considered unlikely to cause adverse health effects. In children (10 to < 14 years), the specified doses 100, 250, 500, 750 and 1000 mg/day L-phenylalanine in food supplements are considered unlikely to cause adverse health effects. Although the highest dose provides 23 mg/kg bw per day which slightly exceeds 22.4 mg/kg bw per day, it is considered unlikely to cause adverse health effects in healthy children 10 to < 14 years. None of the above conclusions are applicable for patients with phenylketonuria (PKU). No conclusion can be made regarding DL-phenylalanine.  Children below 10 years were not included in the terms of reference.


Author(s):  
MD Petrova ◽  
NYu Mal’kova

Introduction: With the spread of laser technologies in various spheres of human activity, the number of exposures to laser radiation of a wide range of users unfamiliar with specifics of its health effects, including those in everyday life, has increased, thus resulting in an increased number of traumas in the general population in recent years. Objectives: To search for data on the biological mechanisms of action of visible laser radiation in Russian and foreign scientific literature and to analyze adverse health effects of this exposure encountered in domestic and international practice. Methods: We searched for Russian and foreign full-text open access literary sources in Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) and PubMed databases of biomedical publications for 1969–2019 and selected the most appropriate ones for review. Results: Both Russian and foreign researchers note that human exposure to laser radiation induces specific and non-specific responses at all tissue levels of organization. The extent and nature of developing morphological changes depend on the radiation wavelength, exposure time, power, energy and its density per unit of the irradiated surface. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that portable laser pointers and powerful laser projectors may cause retinal damage, traumatic macular holes and, in some cases, loss of vision. Despite frequently registered good visual recovery, general availability of commercial laser devices poses potential danger, especially for minors, and substantiates the need to raise public awareness of laser safety.


Biomonitoring ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Hartmann ◽  
Wolfgang Raffesberg ◽  
Sigrid Scharf ◽  
Maria Uhl

AbstractPerfluoroalkylated substances (PFASs) are a class of synthetic chemicals used in a wide range of processes and products due to their unique physicalchemical properties. Through intake of PFASs via food or several consumer products, humans can be exposed. Long-chain PFASs have been associated with adverse effects in laboratory animals, and there is also evidence for adverse health effects in humans. Although investigations of human exposure are mainly conducted in blood samples, some studies have shown that especially short-chain PFASs can be detected in human urine. In the present study, a sensitive analytical method was adapted for the measurement of 12 PFASs in human urine samples by HPLC-MS/MS. For verifying this method, concentrations in 11 male and female participants aged 25-46 years were analysed. In the study population, ranges of urinary PFASs concentrations were n.d.- 8.5 ng/l for perfluoropentanoic acid, <LOQ-3.0 ng/l for perfluorohexanoic acid, n.d.-1.8 ng/l for perfluorohexane sulphonate, n.d.-0.99 ng/l for perfluoroheptanoic acid, 0.79-5.1 ng/l for perfluorooctanoic acid, <LOQ-4.9 ng/l for perfluorooctane suphonate, and <LOQ-0.57 ng/l for perfluorononanoic acid. For the other investigated PFASs, no urinary exposure could be identified in any of the samples. The present study shows that several shortchain PFASs are detectable in human urine.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (22) ◽  
pp. 498
Author(s):  
Sunisa Chaiklieng ◽  
Chuthamas Chagkornburee ◽  
Piyada Songsermsakul ◽  
Vichai Pruktharathikul

Paraquat (PQ) is widely used as a herbicide in Thailand. The aim of this study was to evaluate the health risk and protective effect of respirators during simulated PQ spraying operations in an experimental chamber. Additional data were collected from the interviews of PQ sprayers. Airborne PQ concentrations were collected from an experimental spray chamber employing controlled-rate sprayers of solutions (paraquat dichloride in water) and were lower than 50 µg/m3 (the standard regulation). Air sampling through a polytetrafluoroethylene filter membrane was performed under the conditional settings of inside and outside respirators, and analysed by using a HPLC-UV detector following NIOSH method 5003. The average PQ concentrations inside the certified respirators (cartridge, cup-shaped mask, surgical mask) were significantly lower than those outside of the respirators (4.30 ± 2.63 µg/m3 vs. 19.12 ± 16.65 µg/m3), which was not found with convenient sponge masks. Human health risk assessment on short-term and long-term exposure following US.EPA guide estimation showed that cartridge respirators and cup-shaped masks significantly decreased the risk (hazard quotient) of adverse health effects (p-value < 0.05) among the PQ sprayers. As a result, the PQ sprayers should be aware of preventive action and use a qualified mask/respirator to protect against exposure to airborne PQ and chronic health effects. HIGHLIGHTS The estimated human health risk from paraquat (PQ) exposure lower than the occupational exposure limit (OEL: 50 µg/m3) during the spraying operation was unacceptable for some sprayers The average PQ concentrations inside the certified respirators (cartridge respirator and cup-shaped mask) were significantly lower than outside of the respirators that was not seen with the convenient sponge mask, a common type used by the sprayers The cartridge respirator and cup-shaped mask significantly decreased the risk estimation of the PQ sprayers with regard to adverse health effects both from short-term and long-term PQ exposure It is important for preventive action on exposure to PQ of the sprayers by the use of qualified respirators or masks to protect against inhalation of PQ and decrease health risks GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT


2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-20
Author(s):  
Teresa D. Tetley ◽  
Andrew J. Thorley

Nanotechnology is a relatively new discipline which is growing rapidly and is used in a broad-spectrum of applications such as engineering, medicine, cosmetics, sports goods and textiles. The number of consumer products that employ nanotechnology is steadily increasing. Nanomaterials have novel and diverse properties very different to those of the same materials on a macroscopic scale, exhibiting unique optical, electronic and magnetic properties. Not surprising then that these engineered materials are being used to create new products and applications, and to improve existing products.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document