Control of threading dislocations in lattice-mismatched heteroepitaxy

1992 ◽  
Vol 263 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.J. Schowalter ◽  
A.P. Taylor ◽  
J. Petruzzello ◽  
J. Gaines ◽  
D. Olego

ABSTRACTIt is generally observed that strain relaxation, which occurs by misfit dislocation formation, in lattice-mismatched heteroepitaxial layers is accompanied by the formation of threading dislocations. However, our group and others have observed that strain-relaxed epitaxial layers of In1−xGaxAs on GaAs substrates can be grown without the formation of threading dislocations in the epitaxial layer. We have been able to grow strain-relaxed layers up to 13% In concentration without observable densities of threading dislocations in the epilayer but do observe a large number of dislocations pushed into the GaAs substrate. The ability to grow strain-relaxed, lattice-mismatched heteroepitaxial layers has important practical applications. We have succeeded in growing dislocation-free layers of ZnSe on appropriately lattice-matched layers of In1−xGaxAs.

1983 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Ueda ◽  
S. Isozumi ◽  
S. Komiya ◽  
T. Kusunoki ◽  
I. Umebu

ABSTRACTDefects in InGaAsP and InGaP crystals lattice-matched to (001)-oriented GaAs substrate successfully grown by liquid phase epitaxy, have been investigated by TEM and STEM/EDX. Typical defects observed by TEM are composition-modulated structures, dislocation loops, non-structural microdefects, and stacking faults.


1992 ◽  
Vol 70 (10-11) ◽  
pp. 838-842
Author(s):  
P. Maigné ◽  
A. P. Roth ◽  
C. Desruisseaux ◽  
D. Coulas

The structural properties of partially relaxed InxGa1−xAs layers grown on (100) GaAs substrates have been investigated, using high-resolution X-ray diffraction, in order to better understand the mechanisms responsible for the relaxation of the mismatch strain. From symmetric [400] reflections recorded as functions of the azimuthal angle [Formula: see text], the (100) InGaAs planes are found to be tilted with respect to the (100) GaAs substrate planes. The tilt magnitude is first seen to decrease then to increase with layer thickness. The direction of the tilt changes from [01-1] to [00-1] in the range of thickness investigated. From [422] asymmetric reflections, the average in-plane lattice parameter, the indium composition as well as the percentage of relaxation can be measured. Our values for relaxation are in qualitative agreement with the Dodson and Tsao model of strain relaxation (Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 1710 (1987)). In addition, our data show an anisotropy in residual strain along <011> directions. This anisotropy increases with the amount of strain relieved and changes the crystal symmetry of the cell from tetragonal to monoclinic. This monoclinic symmetry can be characterized by an angle β that measures the angle between 90° and the inner angles of the new crystallographic cell. As for the anisotropy in residual strain, |3 increases with the amount of strain relieved. Correlations between tilt magnitude and tilt direction with the formation of 60° type dislocations are discussed.


MRS Bulletin ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 45-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leo J. Schowalter

The advantage that epitaxy offers the electronics and optoelectronics industries is that it allows the possibility of producing precisely controlled layers of very high crystal quality. Heteroepitaxy of different materials offers the promise of tailoring device layers in clever ways that nature did not intend. However unlike fruit juices, nature has made it difficult to epitaxially combine different materials. As the preceding articles have clearly pointed out, it is very difficult to obtain smooth epitaxial layers that are free both of defects and strain when there is a lattice mismatch between the layers and their substrates.As already discussed in this issue, a uniform network of dislocations at the interface between a flat, uniform epitaxial layer and its substrate can completely relieve strain in the majority of the epitaxial layer. This would be a satisfactory situation for many devices so long as the active region of the device could be kept away from the interface. The problem is how to introduce the dislocations in an appropriate way. When an epitaxial layer has a larger lattice parameter than the underlying substrate, a misfit dislocation running along the interface represents a plane of atoms that has been removed from the epitaxial layer. (One would insert a plane of atoms if the epitaxial lattice parameter was smaller. For simplicity however we will continue to assume that the epitaxial layer has a larger lattice parameter.) It is not possible for a whole half plane of atoms, bounded by the dislocation at the interface and the substrate edges along the two sides, to be removed at once. The boundary between where the extra plane of atoms has been removed and where the epitaxial layer has not relaxed yet will represent a threading dislocation. This threading dislocation would continue to move as the size of the misfit dislocation along the interface grows. Ideally it moves all the way out to the substrate edge and vanishes there while the misfit dislocation along the interface would end up extending from one side of the substrate to the other. However other dislocations and other kinds of defects can effectively pin the threading dislocation resulting in an epitaxial layer with many threading dislocations. Unfortunately these threading dislocations are generally detrimental to most kinds of devices. It is precisely this high density of threading dislocations that limits applications of many heteroepitaxial layers.


Author(s):  
J.M. Bonar ◽  
R. Hull ◽  
R. Malik ◽  
R. Ryan ◽  
J.F. Walker

In this study we have examined a series of strained heteropeitaxial GaAs/InGaAs/GaAs and InGaAs/GaAs structures, both on (001) GaAs substrates. These heterostructures are potentially very interesting from a device standpoint because of improved band gap properties (InAs has a much smaller band gap than GaAs so there is a large band offset at the InGaAs/GaAs interface), and because of the much higher mobility of InAs. However, there is a 7.2% lattice mismatch between InAs and GaAs, so an InxGa1-xAs layer in a GaAs structure with even relatively low x will have a large amount of strain, and misfit dislocations are expected to form above some critical thickness. We attempt here to correlate the effect of misfit dislocations on the electronic properties of this material.The samples we examined consisted of 200Å InxGa1-xAs layered in a hetero-junction bipolar transistor (HBT) structure (InxGa1-xAs on top of a (001) GaAs buffer, followed by more GaAs, then a layer of AlGaAs and a GaAs cap), and a series consisting of a 200Å layer of InxGa1-xAs on a (001) GaAs substrate.


2001 ◽  
Vol 673 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Maxwell Andrews ◽  
J.S. Speck ◽  
A.E. Romanov ◽  
M. Bobeth ◽  
W. Pompe

ABSTRACTAn approach is developed for understanding the cross-hatch morphology in lattice mismatched heteroepitaxial film growth. It is demonstrated that both strain relaxation associated with misfit dislocation formation and subsequent step elimination (e.g. by step-flow growth) are responsible for the appearance of nanoscopic surface height undulations (0.1-10 nm) on a mesoscopic (∼100 nm) lateral scale. The results of Monte Carlo simulations for dislocation- assisted strain relaxation and subsequent film growth predict the development of cross-hatch patterns with a characteristic surface undulation magnitude ∼50 Å in an approximately 70% strain relaxed In0.25Ga0.75As layers. The model is supported by atomic force microscopy (AFM) observations of cross-hatch morphology in the same composition samples grown well beyond the critical thickness for misfit dislocation generation.


1980 ◽  
Vol 19 (S3) ◽  
pp. 321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seiji Mukai ◽  
Jun'ichi Shimada

2013 ◽  
Vol 1493 ◽  
pp. 245-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongkun Sin ◽  
Stephen LaLumondiere ◽  
Brendan Foran ◽  
William Lotshaw ◽  
Steven C. Moss ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTMulti-junction III-V solar cells are based on a triple-junction design that employs a 1eV bottom junction grown on the GaAs substrate with a GaAs middle junction and a lattice-matched InGaP top junction. There are two possible approaches implementing the triple-junction design. The first approach is to utilize lattice-matched dilute nitride materials such as InGaAsN(Sb) and the second approach is to utilize lattice-mismatched InGaAs employing a metamorphic buffer layer (MBL). Both approaches have a potential to achieve high performance triple-junction solar cells. A record efficiency of 43.5% was achieved from multi-junction solar cells using the first approach [1] and the solar cells using the second approach yielded an efficiency of 41.1% [2]. We studied carrier dynamics and defects in bulk 1eV InGaAsNSb materials and InGaAs layers with MBL grown by MOVPE for multi-junction solar cells.


1995 ◽  
Vol 399 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.G. Cullis

ABSTRACTThe manner in which misfit strain can influence the morphology of heteroepitaxial layers is reviewed. Following a brief consideration of theoretical modelling, examples of experimental observations for two important materials systems, SiGe/Si and InGaAs/GaAs, are given. It is demonstrated that the formation of undulations of specific types is driven by partial elastic stress-relief and a lowering of the system free energy. Under these conditions, islands of deposit can be formed during initial growth and ripples can be produced upon continuous layers. Furthermore, the presence of surface morphological distortions and the accompanying strain fluctuations also can have a significant impact upon misfit dislocation introduction. Relationships between these fluctuations and dislocation source behaviour are described.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document