scholarly journals URGENSI KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM (KHI) DAN METODE IJTIHAD DALAM MENGHADAPI PERKEMBANGAN HUKUM ISLAM DI INDONESIA

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachmat Syafe’i

The tradition of Islamic law in Indonesia's Muslim population can not be separated from values, legal norms, and legal products. Therefore, the position of ijtihad is one of the important instruments in Islam. In this context, a mujtahid in general perform several steps in formulating Islamic rules from the sources, that are the Quran and Hadith. The position of Islamic law in the legal system in Indonesia is increasingly gaining recognition juridically. One of that is  enactment of the Marriage Law Num­ber 1 Year 1974 and Presidential Decree Number 1 Year 1991 on the Compilation of Isla­mic Law. Thus the actualization of Islamic law must be carried out systematically by con­crete actions. Actualization of Islamic law is not enough, it will even harm if done only for political action which campaign demanding the implementation of Shari'a. One of the problems encountered in attempts to actualize Islamic law is the absence of a clear conception of the legal matter that must be actualized in national law, both of which apply specifically to Muslims and generally applicable.

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-316
Author(s):  
Ibnu Elmi Achmat Slamat Pelu ◽  
Jefry Tarantang

The Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) has an important role in answering the increasingly complex problems of Muslims through fatwas. However, in the Indonesian legal system, fatwas are not considered a source of material law that has legal validity as a solution to the problems of Muslims in Indonesia. Therefore, this study aims to describe the position of fatwas in the legal system in Indonesia and the existence of the fatwas of the Indonesian Ulema Council in addressing the problems of the ummah. This research is a normative legal research using three types of approaches consisting of a statutory approach, a historical approach, and a conceptual approach. The results of this study concluded that: firstly, the position of fatwas in the construction of Islamic law has a high position. Fatwas are seen as a solution that can break the ice in legal development that is not accommodated by the texts of the Quran. So, substantively and sociologically, fatwas have a strong and binding position in Islamic law. Secondly, the existence of the fatwa of the Indonesian Ulema Council in responding to the problems of the Ummah can be seen in two aspects. The first aspect, fatwas in the perspective of Islamic legal authority are binding sociologically in substance. This is because fatwas are explanations and interpreters of the texts of the Quran regarding Islamic law. The second aspect, fatwas from the perspective of the hierarchy of laws and regulations, legally and formally, do not have any position in the ranking of legal norms. However, it is constitutionally guaranteed through Article 29 of the 1945 Constitution that guarantees the realization of the fulfillment of all Islamic law for Muslims in Indonesia.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Panji Adam

ABSTRAK Legislasi adalah proses yang berlangsung di lembaga legislatif, yakni pembuatan dan pengundangan peraturan perundang-undangan. Materi hukum Islam dapat menjadi muatan dalam proses legislasi melalui mekanisme positivisasi. Salah satu sub bidang dalam kajian hukum Islam adalah hukum ekonomi syariah. Hukum ekonomi syariah merupakan subsistem dalam sistem hukum Islam yang dari waktu ke waktu mengalami perkembangan yang cukup signifikan. Oleh karena itu perlu adanya positivisasi hukum melalui upaya legislasi hukum. Tujuan penelitian ini pertama untuk mengetahui kedudukan hukum ekonomi syariah menurut konsep sistem hukum; kedua, untuk mengetahu produk regulasi hukum ekonomi syariah apa sajakah yang bersumber dari norma hukum Islam. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa, pertama, komponen sistem hukum terdiri atas 3 unsur, yaitu struktur, substansi dan budaya hukum. Kedudukan hukum ekonomi syariah dalam ketiga sistem hukum tersebut sudah teraplikasikan. Hal ini dapat dilihat dari banyaknya lembaga-lembaga atau pranata-pranata ekonomi yang berbasiskan nilai-nilai syariah. Terdapat beberapa regulasi dibidang hukum ekonomi syariah yang telah dibuat oleh lembaga legislatif yang bersumber dari norma-norma hukum Islam; kedua, produk-produk regulasi dibidang hukum ekonomi syariah yang bersumber dari noma-norma hukum Islam antara lain adalah sebagai berikut: (1) UU No. 23 Tahun 2011 tentang Pengelolaan Zakat; (2) UU No. 41 Tahun 2004 tentang Wakaf; (3) UU No. 19 Tahun 2008 tentang Surat berharga Syariah Negara; dan (4) UU No. 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah.  Kata Kunci: Legislasi, Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Regulasi   ABSTRACT Legislation is the process that takes place in the legislature, namely the making and enactment of laws and regulations. Islamic legal material can be the content of the legislative process through the positivisation mechanism. One sub-field in the study of Islamic law is sharia economic law. Sharia economic law is a subsystem in the Islamic legal system that from time to time experiences significant development. Therefore, it is necessary to have legal positivisation through legal legislation efforts. The purpose of this study is first to determine the position of sharia economic law according to the concept of the legal system; secondly, to find out what products of Islamic economic law regulation derive from Islamic legal norms. The results of the study show that, first, the legal system component consists of 3 elements, namely the structure, substance and culture of law. The position of Islamic economic law in the three legal systems has been applied. This can be seen from the number of economic institutions or institutions based on Islamic values. There are several regulations in the field of sharia economic law that have been made by the legislature which are derived from Islamic legal norms; second, regulatory products in the field of Islamic economic law derived from Islamic legal norms include the following: (1) Law No. 23 of 2011 concerning the Management of Zakat; (2) Law No. 41 of 2004 concerning Waqf; (3) Law No. 19 of 2008 concerning State Sharia Securities; and (4) Law No. 21 of 2008 concerning Islamic Banking. Keyword: Legislation, Sharia Economic Law, Regulation  


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tutik Nurul Janah

Islamic Law System is generally applied in Islamic countries. An Islamic state is a country that uses Islamic law as the formal law of the state. Indonesia is a country with a dominant legal system using the Civil Law System. However, despite the dominant use of the Civil Law System, the Islamic Law System is also quite influential in Indonesia, especially in Privat law and economic law. The influence of the Islamic Law System in Indonesian economic law can be seen from the passing of the Law on Sharia Banking and other Legislation relating to Islamic economics. The dynamics of the speed of the needs of economic actors for legislation makes economic law the most dynamic field of law among other fields of legal study. Nevertheless, the legal norms must not be in conflict with human rights and humanity in order to achieve social justice for all Indonesian people.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 134
Author(s):  
Mohammad Masduki

 Indonesia adalah negara dengan penduduk mayoritas beragama Islam. Menurut perhitungan statistik yang dikeluarkan pemerintah pada tahun 2010, sebanyak 87,18 persen penduduk Indonesia adalah muslim. Sistem hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia adalah sistem hukum campuran (Mix Legal System), yakni hukum Eropa Kontinental, hukum adat, hukum Islam, dan bahkan Anglo Saxon. Yusril Ihza Mahendra merupakan salah satu tokoh nasional dan pakar hukum tata negara yang tertarik dalam persoalan transformasi Syari’at Islam ke dalam Hukum Nasional. Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu untuk menganalisis pemikiran Yusril Ihza Mahendra tentang Transformasi Syari’at Islam ke dalam Hukum Nasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif. Sehingga metode pengambilan bahan hukum menggunakan metode kepustakaan dan wawancara langsung. Yusril Ihza Mahendra mengatakan transformasi Syari’at Islam ke dalam Hukum Nasional sangat relevan untuk dilaksanakan di Indonesia, mengingat Indonesia adalah negara yang mayoritas berpenduduk muslim. Suatu undang-undang akan berjalan dengan baik dan efektif apabila substansinya sesuai dengan keyakinan masyarakat itu sendiri, dimana hukum Islam adalah hukum yang hidup di tengah-tengah masyarakat Indonesia. Transformasi syariat Islam ke dalam hukum nasional memerlukan proses perubahan bentuk (transformasi) dan perumusan (formulasi) kaidah-kaidah hukum Islam yang bersumber dari ayat-ayat Quran dan Hadis hukum (syariat Islam) ke dalam hukum nasional melalui pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan (proses legislasi). Untuk itu diperlukan institusi-institusi kekuasaan negara atau daulah yang sah yang berfungsi untuk menegakkan norma hukum nasional agar dipatuhi dan dijalankan oleh publik. Proses pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan yang (sebagian) bersumber dari syariat Islam merupakan sebuah proses politik. Hal ini memerlukan kesadaran dengan menumbuhkan jiwa Islami kepada para penguasa, karena mereka yang punya hak dalam perancangan dan pengesahan suatu peraturan perundang-undangan.Kata kunci: Transformasi, Syari’at Islam, Hukum Nasional  Indonesia is a country with a majority Muslim population. Statistical calculations released by the government shows that that 87.18 percent of Indonesia's population is Muslim. However, the current applicable legal system is the Continental European legal system, the Anglo Saxon legal system and a small part of customary law and Islamic law. Yusril Ihza Mahendra is one of the national figures and experts in constitutional law who is interested in the issue of the transformation of Islamic Shari’ah into National Law. This study aims to analyze Yusril Ihza Mahendra's thoughts on the Transformation of Islamic Shari'ah into National Law. The type of this research is normative legal research. So that the taking of legal materials using the library method  is reinforced by direct interviews. Yusril Ihza Mahendra said that the transformation of Islamic Shari’ah into national law was very relevant to implement, considering that Indonesia is a country with a majority Muslim population. Legislative drafting that is in line with the community's beliefs will likely work, whereas Islamic law is the living law in Indonesian society. However various formulation processes are required. That is by formulating the principles of Islamic law and then pouring it into a form that can be implemented in reality. In addition, it is necessary to have institutions of power called legitimate state to impose a legal norm so that it is carried out and obeyed by the public. Furthermore, the process of legislative drafting is the political process. This process requires awareness by cultivating an Islamic spirit of the rulers because they have the right to draft regulation or legislation.Keywords: Transformation, Islamic Shari'ah, National Law


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-60
Author(s):  
Miftahul Huda

The reality of the difference in applying Islamic law in the context of marriage law legislation in modern Muslim countries is undeniable. Tunisia and Turkey, for example, have practiced Islamic law of liberal nuance. Unlike the case with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates that still use the application of Islamic law as it is in their fiqh books. In between these two currents many countries are trying to apply the law in their own countries by trying to bridge the urgent new needs and local wisdom. This is widely embraced by modern Muslim countries in general. This paper reviews typologically the heterogeneousness of family law legislation of modern Muslim countries while responding to modernization issues. Typical buildings seen from modern family law reforms can be classified into four types. The first type is progressive, pluralistic and extradoctrinal reform, such as in Turkey and Tunisia. The second type is adaptive, unified and intradoctrinal reform, as in Indonesia, Malaysia, Morocco, Algeria and Pakistan. The third type is adaptive, unified and intradoctrinal reform, represented by Iraq. While the fourth type is progressive, unifiied and extradoctrinal reform, which can be represented by Somalia and Algeria.


Author(s):  
Muchimah MH

Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975 related to the implementation of marriage was made to support and maximize the implementation of Law No. 1 of 1974 which had not yet proceeded properly. This paper examines Government Regulations related to the implementation of marriage from the perspective of sociology and anthropology of Islamic law. Although the rules already exist, some people still carry out marriages without being registered. This is anthropologically the same as releasing the protection provided by the government to its people for the sake of a rule. In the sociology of Islamic law, protection is a benchmark for the assessment of society in the social environment. Therefore the purpose of this paper is to find out how the implementation of marriage according to PP. No. 9 of 1975 concerning the Marriage Law in the socio-anthropological perspective of Islamic Law.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-37
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Kustra-Rogatka

Summary The paper deals with the changes in the centralized (Kelsenian) model of constitutional review resulting from a state’s membership of the EU, which unequivocally demonstrates the decomposition of the classic paradigm of constitutional judiciary. The main point raised in the paper is that European integration has fundamentally influenced on the four above-mentioned basic elements of the Kelsenian model of constitutional review of legislation, which are the following: the assumption of the hierarchical construction of a legal system; the assumption of the supreme legal force of the constitution as the primary normative act of a given system; a centralised model of reviewing hierarchical conformity of legal norms; coherence of the system guaranteed by a constitutional court’s power to declare defectiveness of a norm and the latter’s derogation. All its fundamental elements have evolved, i.e. the hierarchy of the legal system, the overriding power of the constitution, centralized control of constitutionality, and the erga omnes effect of the ruling on the hierarchical non-conformity of the norms. It should be noted that over the last decade the dynamics of these changes have definitely gained momentum. This has been influenced by several factors, including the “great accession” of 2004, the pursuit of formal constitutionalization of the EU through the Constitutional Treaty, the compromise solutions adopted in the Treaty of Lisbon, the entry into force of the Charter, and the prospect of EU accession to the ECHR. The CJEU has used these factors to deepen the tendencies towards decentralization of constitutional control, by atomising national judicial systems and relativizing the effects of constitutional court rulings within national legal systems. The end result is the observed phenomenon, if not of marginalisation, then at least of a systemic shift in the position of constitutional courts, which have lost their uniqueness and have become “only ones of many” national courts.


2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Ahmed Akgunduz

AbstractIslamic Law is one of the broadest and most comprehensive systems of legislation in the world. It was applied, through various schools of thought, from one end of the Muslim world to the other. It also had a great impact on other nations and cultures. We will focus in this article on values and norms in Islamic law. The value system of Islam is immutable and does not tolerate change over time for the simple fact that human nature does not change. The basic values and needs (which can be called maṣlaḥa) are classified hierarchically into three levels: (1) necessities (Ḍarūriyyāt), (2) convenience (Ḥājiyyāt), and (3) refinements (Kamāliyyāt=Taḥsīniyyāt). In Islamic legal theory (Uṣūl al‐fiqh) the general aim of legislation is to realize values through protecting and guaranteeing their necessities (al-Ḍarūriyyāt) as well as stressing their importance (al‐ Ḥājiyyāt) and their refinements (taḥsīniyyāt).In the second part of this article we will draw attention to Islamic norms. Islam has paid great attention to norms that protect basic values. We cannot explain all the Islamic norms that relate to basic values, but we will classify them categorically. We will focus on four kinds of norms: 1) norms (rules) concerned with belief (I’tiqādiyyāt), 2) norms (rules) concerned with law (ʿAmaliyyāt); 3) general legal norms (Qawā‘id al‐ Kulliyya al‐Fiqhiyya); 4) norms (rules) concerned with ethics (Wijdāniyyāt = Aḵlāqiyyāt = Ādāb = social and moral norms).


Author(s):  
Munawar Haque

Abstract  The purpose of this article is to explore the views of Sayyid Abul AÑlÉ MawdËdÊ[1] on ijtihÉd.[2] It intends to trace the origins of MawdËdÊ’s ideas within the social, cultural and political context of his time, especially the increasing influence of modernity in the Muslim world.  The study will show that MawdËdÊ’s understanding of ijtihÉd and its scope demonstrates originality.  For MawdËdÊ, ijtihÉd is the concept, the process, as well as the mechanism by which the SharÊÑah,[3] as elaborated in the Qur’Én and the Sunnah[4] is to be interpreted, developed and kept alive in line with the intellectual, political, economic, legal, technological and moral development of society.  The notion of ijtihÉd adopted by MawdËdÊ transcends the confines of Fiqh[5] (jurisprudence) and tends therefore to unleash the dormant faculties of the Muslim mind to excel in all segments of life.   [1] Sayyid Abul AÑlÉ MawdËdÊ was born on September 25, 1903 in Awrangabad, a town in the present Maharashtra state of India in a deeply religious family.  His ancestry on the paternal side is traced back to the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him).  The family had a long-standing tradition of spiritual leadership, for a number of MawdËdÊ’s ancestors were outstanding leaders of ØËfÊ Orders.  One of the luminaries among them, the one from whom he derives his family name, was KhawÉjah QuÏb al-DÊn MawdËd (d. 527 AH), a renowned leader of the ChishtÊ ØËfÊ Order. MawdËdÊ died on September 22, 1979. See Khurshid Ahmad and Zafar Ishaq Ansari, “MawlÉnÉ Sayyid Abul AÑlÉ MawdËdÊ: An Introduction to His Vision of Islam and Islamic Revival,”, in Khurshd Ahmad and Zafar Ishaq Ansari (eds.) Islamic Perspectives: Studies in Honour of MawlÉnÉ Sayyid Abul A’lÉ MawdËdÊ,  (Leicester: The Islamic Foundation,1979), 360. [2]  In Islamic legal thought, ijtihÉd is understood as the effort of the jurist to derive the law on an issue by expending all the available means of interpretation at his disposal and by taking into account all the legal proofs related to the issue.  However, its scope is not confined only to legal aspect of Muslim society.  MawdËdÊ’s concept of ijtihÉd is defined as the legislative process that makes the legal system of Islam dynamic and makes its development and evolution in the changing circumstances possible.  This results from a particular type of academic research and intellectual effort, which in the terminology of Islam is called ijtihÉd.  The purpose and object of ijtihÉd is not to replace the Divine law by man made law.  Its real object is to properly understand the Supreme law and to impart dynamism to the legal system of Islam by keeping it in conformity with the fundamental guidance of the SharÊÑah and abreast of the ever-changing conditions of the world.  See Sayyid Abul AÑlÉ MawdËdÊ, The Islamic Law and Constitution, translated and edited by Khurshid Ahmad, (Lahore: Islamic Publications Ltd, 1983), 76.[3] SharÊÑah refers to the sum total of Islamic laws and guidance, which were revealed to the Prophet MuÍammad (peace be upon him), and which are recorded in the Qur’Én as well as deducible from the Prophet’s divinely guided lifestyle (called the Sunnah). See Muhammad ShalabÊ, al-Madkhal fÊ at-TaÑ’rÊf  b alil-Fiqh al-IslÉmÊ, (Beirut: n.p., 1968),.28.[4]Sunnah is the way of life of the Prophet (peace be upon him), consisting of his sayings, actions and silent approvals. It is also used to mean a recommended deed as opposed to FarÌ or WÉjib, a compulsory one.[5]  Originally Fiqh referred to deliberations related to one’s reasoned opinion, ra’y.  Later the expression Fiqh evolved to mean jurisprudence covering every aspect of Islam.  It is also applied to denote understanding, comprehension, and profound knowledge. For an excellent exposition on the meaning of Fiqh, see Imran Ahsan Khan Nyazee, Theories of Islamic law: The methodology of ijtihÉd, (Delhi: Adam Publishers & Distributors, 1996), 20-22.


Author(s):  
Sayyid Mohammad Yunus Gilani ◽  
K. M. Zakir Hossain Shalim

AbstractForensic evidence is an evolving science in the field of criminal investigation and prosecutions. It has been widely used in the administration of justice in the courts and the Western legal system, particularly in common law. To accommodate this new method of evidence in Islamic law, this article firstly, conceptualizes forensic evidence in Islamic law.  Secondly, explores legal frameworks for its adoption in Islamic law. Keywords: Forensic Evidence, legal framework, Criminal Investigation, Sharīʿah.AbstrakBukti forensik adalah sains yang sentiasa berkembang dalam bidang siasatan jenayah dan pendakwaan. Ia telah digunakan secara meluas dalam pentadbiran keadilan di mahkamah dan sistem undang-undang Barat, terutamanya dalam undang-undang common (common law). Untuk menampung kaedah pembuktian baru ini dalam undang-undang Islam, artikel ini, pertamanya, konseptualisasikan bukti forensik dalam undang-undang Islam. Kedua, ia menerokai rangka kerja undang-undang untuk penerimaannya dalam undang-undang Islam.Kata Kunci: Bukti Forensik, Rangka Kerja Guaman, Siasatan Jenayah, Sharīʿah.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document