scholarly journals PENERAPAN PASAL 178 AYAT (2) HIR DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH SYAR’IYAH ACEH NOMOR 45/PDT.G/2017/MS.ACEH TENTANG CERAI TALAK

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-144
Author(s):  
H Hidayatullah ◽  
Burhanuddin Hamnach
Keyword(s):  
High Court ◽  
Cause And Effect ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law And Legislation ◽  
Court Of Appeal ◽  
Case Number ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The judiciary is organized into two levels, the first level of justice is Religious Court/Syar'iyah Court,  and the court of appeal is the Religious High Court/Provincial Syar'iyah Court. These two trials are referred to as judex facti. The judex facti function is carried out through several stages, is: formulating facts, looking for cause and effect relationships and figuring out probabilities. So, the background of this research is related to the application of judex facti in Aceh Syar'iyah Court. Based on the analysis of the data carried out, it is concluded that the Judex Facti of the Aceh Syar'iyah Court in trying and deciding divorce case Number 45/Pdt.G/2017/MS.Aceh has tried to apply in accordance with the principles of law and legislation in force. That is in the ruling the Aceh Syar'iyah Court panel of judges had given maximum consideration to the reasons for the comparison in filing an appeal. However, there are still shortcomings and anomalies related to the reasons for the comparison in submitting a request so that the 10-grand dowry that has not been paid in full is not granted by the panel of judges of the Syar'iyah Court.  Because of this, the judiciary of the Aceh Syar'iyah Court was judged to have shortcomings and was not optimal in applying the law. Although in authority the panel of judges may not grant the demands of the comparator as long as they do not conflict with applicable laws and regulations. If judged from the whole, the judex facti of the Aceh Syar'iyah Court has implemented it in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations.

scholarly journals JUDEX FACTI MAHKAMAH SYAR’IYAH PROVINSI ACEH DALAM MENANGANI PERKARA CERAI TALAK (Analisis Putusan Nomor 45/Pdt.G/2017/MS.Aceh)

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-70
Author(s):  
H Hidayatullah ◽  
H Burhanuddin
Keyword(s):  
High Court ◽  
Cause And Effect ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law And Legislation ◽  
Court Of Appeal ◽  
Case Number ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The judiciary is organized into two levels, the first level of justice is Religious Court/Syar'iyah Court,  and the court of appeal is the Religious High Court/Provincial Syar'iyah Court. These two trials are referred to as judex facti. The judex facti function is carried out through several stages, is: formulating facts, looking for cause and effect relationships and figuring out probabilities. So, the background of this research is related to the application of judex facti in Aceh Syar'iyah Court. Based on the analysis of the data carried out, it is concluded that the Judex Facti of the Aceh Syar'iyah Court in trying and deciding divorce case Number 45/Pdt.G/2017/MS.Aceh has tried to apply in accordance with the principles of law and legislation in force. That is in the ruling the Aceh Syar'iyah Court panel of judges had given maximum consideration to the reasons for the comparison in filing an appeal. However, there are still shortcomings and anomalies related to the reasons for the comparison in submitting a request so that the 10-grand dowry that has not been paid in full is not granted by the panel of judges of the Syar'iyah Court.  Because of this, the judiciary of the Aceh Syar'iyah Court was judged to have shortcomings and was not optimal in applying the law. Although in authority the panel of judges may not grant the demands of the comparator as long as they do not conflict with applicable laws and regulations. If judged from the whole, the judex facti of the Aceh Syar'iyah Court has implemented it in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations.

scholarly journals The Law Regarding Pension Interest in South Africa has been settled! Or has it? With Reference to Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Motseotsile Clement Marumoagae
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
High Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Golden Opportunity ◽  
The Law ◽  
Court Of Appeal

This article reflects on the law relating to pension interest in South Africa. In particular, it assesses whether the Supreme Court of Appeal in Ndaba v Ndaba had adequately clarified how this area of law should be understood. In light of the inconsistent approaches from various divisions of the High Court, it has not always been clear how the courts should interpret the law relating to pension interest in South Africa. In this paper, aspects of this area of law which have been clarified by the Supreme Court of Appeal are highlighted. This paper further demonstrates aspects of this area of law which the Supreme Court of Appeal did not settle and would potentially be subject to future litigation. This paper is based on the premise that while Ndaba v Ndaba is welcomed, the Supreme Court of Appeal nonetheless, missed a golden opportunity to authoritatively provide a basis upon which the law relating to pension interest in South Africa should be understood. 

Company Directors: Duties, Liabilities, and Remedies

2017 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Case Law ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Cayman Islands ◽  
Market Abuse ◽  
Company Directors ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Law And Legislation ◽  
Court Of Appeal

This is a new edition of the established authority on the law relating to directors of companies incorporated under the UK Companies Acts. The new edition features all important developments in the law including the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 which improves transparency (including requiring directors to be natural persons unless exceptions apply), simplifies company filing requirements, clarifies the application of general duties to shadow directors, modernises directors’ disqualification and reforms insolvency law to facilitate proceedings where there has been wrongdoing. There has been a wealth of new case law relevant to directors’ duties before the English courts, all of which are analysed and explained, including the Supreme Court decisions in Prest v Petrodel Resources, Jetivia v Bilta (UK), FHR European Ventures v Cedar Capital Partners and Eclairs Group v JKX Oil & Gas, the Court of Appeal decisions in Smithton Ltd v Naggar and Newcastle International Airport v Eversheds as well as the important High Court decisions in Universal Project Management Services v Fort Gilkicker, Madoff Securities International v Raven and the wrongful trading case, Re Ralls Builders. Non-UK cases are also analysed including Weavering Macro Fixed Income Fund Ltd v Peterson in the Cayman Islands’ Court of Appeal and the 2016 decision of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Chen v Jason. In keeping with developments in case law and legislation the book now includes expanded coverage of multiple derivatives claims, directors’ exposure to third party claims and a new chapter on civil remedies for market abuse. The third edition is a complete reference work on the law relating to company directors and is the first port of call for all serious corporate lawyers and scholars on this subject.

Presumption of Marriage in Uganda

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamil Ddamulira Mujuzi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
International Law ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
African Countries ◽  
High Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Living Together ◽  
Law And Legislation ◽  
Court Of Appeal

Abstract Case law, amongst other sources, shows that many people in Uganda are living together as husband and wife although they are not married. Unlike legislation in other African countries such as Tanzania and Malawi, in Uganda, the pieces of legislation governing marriages are silent on the issue of presumption of marriage. Likewise, unlike in Kenya and South Africa where legislation does not provide for presumption of marriage but courts have held that such a presumption exists based on long cohabitation, Ugandan courts, the High Court, and the Court of Appeal, have held that Ugandan law does not recognise marriage based on long cohabitation (marriage by repute). However, courts will presume the existence of a marriage where a marriage ceremony took place. Since 2003, attempts to enact legislation to provide for the presumption of marriage in Uganda have not been successful. In this article, the author argues that there is still room for the Supreme Court to hold, on the basis of common law, that Ugandan law recognises the principle of presumption of marriage. This recognition would also be in line with Uganda’s international law obligation as the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women has called upon States Parties to CEDAW to enact legislation giving effect to de facto unions. The author relies on case law and legislation from some African countries to suggest ways in which the Supreme Court could deal with the issue of presumption of marriage.

Hearsay evidence in Uganda: Understanding its meaning, admissibility and probative value

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 418-439
Author(s):  
Jamil Ddamulira Mujuzi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Direct Evidence ◽  
Case Law ◽  
High Court ◽  
Probative Value ◽  
The Law ◽  
Hearsay Rule ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Hearsay Evidence ◽  
Court Of Appeal

In Uganda legislation requires witnesses to adduce direct evidence in court. However, this may not be possible in all cases and the law provides for circumstances in which hearsay may be admissible. The Evidence Act is the main piece of legislation which governs the issue evidence. In this article, the author relied on 539 cases in which the Ugandan High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court have dealt with hearsay evidence to establish the principles which these courts have developed on this issue. This case law shows, inter alia, that there are three major issues that Ugandan courts are still grappling with when it comes to hearsay evidence: the definition of hearsay; the admissibility of hearsay (exceptions to the hearsay rule) and the probative value of hearsay evidence. The author suggests ways in which courts can handle these issues.

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTIMBANGAN MAJLIS HAKIM TERHADAP ALAT BUKTI DALAM KASUS PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA /GONO GINI (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Surabaya Nomor 308/Pdt.G/2017/PTA.Sby)

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Sholahuddin Fathurrahman ◽  
Ali Wasiin
Keyword(s):  
Common Property ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
High Court ◽  
Empirical Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Case Number ◽  
Joint Property

Division of joint property due to this divorce the authors want to review further that is by doing research on the Implementation of Sharing of Joint Property in Practice in High Religious Court Surabaya No. 308 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PTA.Sby The plaintiff/Appel made a legal effort ( Appeals) after the plaintiff/complaint lawsuit in the Religious Court of Nganjuk with the case number,1339/Pdt.G/2016/PA Ngj dated 5 April 2017 the rejectThe formulation of the problem in this thesis is: (1) What is the judge judge's consideration in the distribution of common property in the High Court of Religion Surabaya Number 308 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PTA.Sby? (2) How is the execution / execution of the sharing of common property in the High Court of Religion Surabaya in case No. 308 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PTA.Sby?The type of this research is Empirical law research which depart from the study of the validity of the Law is a legal research that examines the comparison between the Law Reality with Ideal Law.The results of this study are: (1) The distribution of joint property in the High Court of Religion Surabaya Number 308 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PTA.Sby conducted on the basis of Law Number 1 Year 1974 on Marriage and Compilation of Islamic Law, the assets acquired whether the husband or wife is a joint right so long as no other is specified in the marriage agreement and if the marriage is terminated, each is entitled 1/2 (half) of the property, because during the marriage there is a common property, the Judge here gives a decision on the magnitude part of each. The court shall determine the division of such joint property ½ (half) to the plaintiff and 1/2 (half) of the part for the defendant. (2) Implementation of the execution of the sharing of common property in the High Religious Court of Surabaya The case number 308 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PTA.Sby is voluntary by the parties because they are less concerned about the decision of the Nganjuk Religious court, because their main purpose (the plaintiff and defendant) is divorced

scholarly journals Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 501 K/ PDT.SUS-PHI/ 2016 Tentang Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-148
Author(s):  
Sonhaji Sonhaji
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Employment Agreement ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Industrial Dispute ◽  
The Law ◽  
Case Number ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The purpose of this study is to know that the Certain Working Agreement on Oral Time is not allowed in the legislation, the Supreme Court judges consideration in deciding the case Number 501 K / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2016 and the conformity of the decision with the law applicable in Indonesia. This study uses normative juridical method, which is analytical descriptive, with data collection method in the form of library study and supported by interview with judges. The results of the research show that First, the judge's decision is unfair to both parties litigation because the defendant is not punished to pay the wage of suspension (wage process) with emphasis on the consideration of unwritten PKWT so that by law become PKWTT. Second The process wage demands which are not accepted by the judge are contrary to the laws and regulations on employment and on the settlement of industrial relations disputes because the law requires that workers and employers continue to perform their obligations until the establishment of an Industrial Dispute Settlement Institution, including the obligation of employers to pay the wage of a suspension (wages process). So the Supreme Court Decision Number 501 K / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2016 is less in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations in Indonesia. Keywords: Oral Employment Agreement, Termination Dispute, Employment

Education and Legislation

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir Simaika ◽  
Nevine Henein
Keyword(s):  
Private Schools ◽  
Ministry Of Education ◽  
High Court ◽  
Government Grants ◽  
Legislative Council ◽  
Leading Role ◽  
The Law ◽  
Court Of Appeal ◽  
Legislative Assembly

This chapter discusses Marcus Simaika's career in the fields of education and legislation. Simaika was appointed to the Legislative Council in 1906—the year of his retirement from the Egyptian State Railways—to fill the vacancy for a Coptic member created by the death of Basili Pasha Tadrus, a former judge of the High Court of Appeal. He was chosen by the British Agency in preference to Scandar Fahmi. As a member of the Superior Council of Education, Simaika played a leading role in the promulgation of the law regarding government grants to private schools, subject to the supervision of the Ministry of Education. He also proposed the founding of a large Coptic college for girls, resulting in the establishment of the Coptic Girls College in Abbasiya in 1910. The chapter also considers Simaika's work in the Egyptian legislature, first at the Legislative Council and then at the Legislative Assembly.

The Application of the Principles of Vicarious Liability in Minister of Safety and Security v Morudu: A Critical Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thembinkosi W Maseko
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Bill Of Rights ◽  
Constitutional Democracy ◽  
High Court ◽  
Vicarious Liability ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Law ◽  
Court Of Appeal

The past twenty years of South Africa’s constitutional democracy have been challenging for the courts. However, the courts have managed to develop the common-law principle of vicarious liability in conformity with the spirit, purport and objects of the Constitution. What is concerning, though, is that the courts are still grappling with the application of the law of vicarious liability, despite this area of the law having been developed by the Constitutional Court. A case in point is Minister of Safety and Security v Morudu 2016 (1) SACR 68 (SCA), where the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) incorrectly rejected the decision of the High Court that the state was vicariously liable. This article argues that the SCA should have upheld the decision of the High Court on the basis of the factors that point to a close connection between the conduct of the policeman and his employment. The factors include that the actions of the policeman violated the rights of his victims and that the nature of his employment presented him with an opportunity to commit the crime. The failure of the SCA to consider these factors and uphold the decision of the High Court is therefore at odds with the Bill of Rights and contrary to the law of vicarious liability as developed by the Constitutional Court.

scholarly journals THE LAW APPLICABLE TO THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT: TOWARDS TRANSNATIONAL PRINCIPLES

2016 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 681-703
Author(s):  
Renato Nazzini
Keyword(s):  
International Level ◽  
English Court ◽  
High Court ◽  
System A ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
The World ◽  
National Legal System ◽  
The Law ◽  
International Convergence ◽  
Court Of Appeal

AbstractThis article examines the problem of the law governing the validity of the arbitration agreement. The cases of Sulamérica in the English Court of Appeal and of FirstLink in the High Court of Singapore demonstrate that leading arbitration jurisdictions around the world can come to diametrically opposite results. In particular, there are currently diverging views as to whether the law applicable to the arbitration agreement should be the law chosen by the parties to govern their substantive legal relationship or the law of the seat of the arbitration. The issue is unlikely to be settled soon at international level. However, without embracing extreme approaches that purport to determine the validity of the arbitration agreement without reference to any national legal system, a more ‘transnational’ approach should be encouraged. This may emerge, based on three structured principles which would be desirable for international convergence, namely the non-discrimination principle, the estoppel principle and the validation principle. These principles can be developed without conflicting with the conventional conflicts-of-laws approach which was adopted by the English Court of Appeal in Sulamérica.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document