scholarly journals DESIGN OF AN INTELLIGENT NITROGEN INJECTION SYSTEM FOR FIRE SAFTEY OF POWER TRANSFORMER

2015 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. 536-541
Author(s):  
Priya N. Gokhale .
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaxi Gao ◽  
Yuedong Yao ◽  
He Bao ◽  
Jinjiang Shen

Abstract: Yanchang Oilfield conducts systematic research on nitrogen injection to enhance oil recovery. Through the research of this project, the energy supplement method of horizontal wells suitable for the study area is determined, and its injection system and process parameters are optimized and determined. The optimal energy replenishment method selected by the mine field test achieves the following economic and technical indicators: Provide a nitrogen suitability evaluation plan; Complete the nitrogen flooding matching process design of the target well; Complete the design of the injection-production plan for the target well; Compare with other energy supplement methods. Through the analysis of two supplementary energy methods of water injection and gas injection in indoor and similar reservoirs, the following understandings have been obtained: (1) Nitrogen is insoluble in water, slightly soluble in oil, good swelling, large elastic energy, is an inert gas, exists widely in the atmosphere, inexhaustible, inexhaustible, has a wide range of sources. (2) the recovery rate of nitrogen flooding is significantly higher than that of water flooding. (3) The field test results of water injection and nitrogen test in similar reservoirs show that the supplementary formation energy of nitrogen injection is suitable for the later development of Chang 64 and Chang 71 in the Haobasi oil field. (4) Compared with deep ultra-low permeability reservoirs, it is more economical to use nitrogen to supplement formation energy and change oil. The rate is higher. From the above analysis, it can be seen that the supplementary energy of Chang 64 and Chang 71 reservoirs in the Haobasi oil area should be nitrogen injection as the main supplement, and water injection as a supplement. Gas/water alternate injection is used to adjust the gas injection profile to slow down the escape of injected nitrogen. . Although water injection supplements the formation energy with greater uncertainty, it can be used as a technical means of fluidity control in the gas injection process and is relatively economical.


Author(s):  
Malath I. Arar

Gas Turbines (GT) applied to integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plants utilizing Nitrogen injection to reduce emission and increase power output. This redesign process reduced the customer’s equipment and the operational cost for GT’s with Nitrogen injection. This project focused on reducing nitrogen supply pressure required by the GT. Customer’s cost of electricity (COE) is reduced, translating to additional potential revenue of $3.0MM over the life of the plant. This has been achieved through six sigma methodology of design optimization of the Nitrogen injection manifold, reduced combustion chamber pressure entry loss and optimizing the control system. Statistical analysis combined with various engineering tools was used to optimize, validate and verify the new design. The new design is applicable to all GT frame sizes. It also, can be applied as an upgrade to existing units.


1983 ◽  
Vol 23 (02) ◽  
pp. 339-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Ahmed ◽  
D. Menzie ◽  
H. Crichlow

Summary Miscible-displacement processes have generally been recognized by the petroleum industry as an important enhanced oil recovery (EOR) method. Nitrogen flooding has become an attractive method for economical EOR. Since no previous studies have been undertaken to observe miscibility conditions directly during their development in an oil reservoir, a research program was initiated to investigate experimentally the mechanism by which miscibility could be achieved in a reservoir model undergoing high-pressure nitrogen injection. Several experiments were conducted in a low-permeability, consolidated sandpacked stainless-steel tube 125 ft long and 0.435 in. in diameter. The apparatus was designed to allow sampling at selected locations along the core tube enabling researchers to investigate fluid behavior during the process. A more-detailed representation of the nitrogen displacement process is formulated and the graphical chromatographic results are presented to illustrate the nitrogen miscibility in consolidated cores. Introduction Previous researchers have investigated, experimentally and theoretically, the problem of predicting the effects of dry-gas injection into a reservoir. Most earlier experimental studies were concerned primarily with the effects of changing pressure, temperature, and gas solubility on oil recovery during gas injection. Vogel and Yarborough conducted a number of laboratory tests on several different reservoir fluids to determine the effect of nitrogen contact by varying the amounts of nitrogen. They reported that the solution-gas gravity, oil density, and oil viscosity increased with continued contact by nitrogen. No previous studies have been conducted to observe miscibility conditions directly during their development in an oil reservoir. This experimental work was initiated to investigatecompositional changes taking place during displacing of crude oil by continuous high-pressure nitrogen injection,change in properties of the liquid and vapor phases during the nitrogen injection,miscible pressures for nitrogen displacement, anddistance from the injection point at which miscibility would be achieved. Experimental Apparatus and Materials Apparatus The experiment was designed to studyvaporization of oil by high-pressure nitrogen injection,mechanisms of nitrogen multiple contact miscibility displacement, andcompositional changes that take place between nitrogen and in-situ oil during the test. Fig. 1 shows a schematic of the equipment used to perform the experimental study. For the purpose of description, the laboratory apparatus may be divided into three parts: a laboratory oil reservoir model, an injection system, and a production and analytical system. SPEJ P. 339^


Author(s):  
Dr. Hitesh Paghadar

Increasing environment noise pollution is a matter of great concern and of late has been attracting public attention. Sound produces the minute oscillatory changes in air pressure and is audible to the human ear when in the frequency range of 20Hz to 20 kHz. The chief sources of audible sound are the magnetic circuit of transformer which produces sound due to magnetostriction phenomenon, vibration of windings, tank and other structural parts, and the noise produced by cooling equipments. This paper presents the validation for sound level measurement scale, why A-weighted scale is accepted for sound level measurement, experimental study carried out on 10MVA Power Transformer. Also presents the outcomes of comparison between No-Load sound & Load sound level measurement, experimental study carried out on different transformer like - 10MVA, 50MVA, 100MVA Power Transformer, to define the dominant factor of transformer sound generation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document