scholarly journals Disability and progression in Afro-descendant patients with multiple sclerosis

2016 ◽  
Vol 74 (10) ◽  
pp. 836-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana Calvet Kallenbach Aurenção ◽  
Claudia Cristina Ferreira Vasconcelos ◽  
Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler ◽  
Regina Maria Papais Alvarenga
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
African Ancestry ◽  
Clinical Aspects ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Therapeutic Decision ◽  
Disease Outcomes ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Clinical Characteristic

ABSTRACT Multiple sclerosis (MS) prevalence is higher in Caucasian (CA) populations, narrowing the analysis of the impact of Afro-descendant (AD) populations in disease outcomes. Even so, recent studies observed that AD patients have a more severe course. The main objective of this study is to confirm and discuss, through a systematic review, that being AD is a risk factor for disability accumulation and/or severe progression in patients with MS. A systematic review of published data in the last eleven years was performed, which evaluated clinical aspects and long term disability in patients with MS. Fourteen studies were included. Of these fourteen articles, thirteen observed a relationship between ancestry and poorer outcome of MS. African ancestry is a condition inherent in the patient and should be considered as an initial clinical characteristic affecting prognosis, and influencing which therapeutic decision to make in initial phases.

ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF MINDFULNESS ON QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (06) ◽  
pp. 378-388
Author(s):  
Vitória Mallmann Fedeger ◽  
Erica Pedri ◽  
Rosiane Guetter Mello ◽  
Alexandre Leal Laux
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
General Quality ◽  
Detailed Assessment ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Brazilian Studies

This study aimed to investigate the impact of the mindfulness-based interventions program on the quality of life of patients with Multiple Sclerosis. A systematic review was carried out based on the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes). For an updated perspective on the topic, the selected articles were published from March 2014 to March 2019. Thus, 10 articles were included in the review and were thoroughly compared. A detailed assessment was carried out to measure the impact of the mindfulness protocol both on the general quality of life and on its specific domains. It can be observed that there is some homogeneity of the results regarding the benefits of the practice of mindfulness in the patients’ general quality of life. Moreover, there was greater evidence of the effects of meditative practice on the psychological domain when compared to the physical domain. Hence, the present study considers the mindfulness program a viable tool to address quality of life in patients with Multiple Sclerosis. The lack of Brazilian studies in the area is highlighted. Also, further studies to evaluate the practice of mindfulness continuously, such as cohort studies, are necessary to elucidate the long-term effects of the protocol. 

scholarly journals Efficacy of Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Factors

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1141
Author(s):  
Gianpaolo Marte ◽  
Andrea Tufo ◽  
Francesca Steccanella ◽  
Ester Marra ◽  
Piera Federico ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Multidisciplinary Treatment ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
The Impact

Background: In the last 10 years, the management of patients with gastric cancer liver metastases (GCLM) has changed from chemotherapy alone, towards a multidisciplinary treatment with liver surgery playing a leading role. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of hepatectomy for GCLM and to analyze the impact of related prognostic factors on long-term outcomes. Methods: The databases PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles from January 2010 to September 2020. We included prospective and retrospective studies that reported the outcomes after hepatectomy for GCLM. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of prognostic factors was performed. Results: We included 40 studies, including 1573 participants who underwent hepatic resection for GCLM. Post-operative morbidity and 30-day mortality rates were 24.7% and 1.6%, respectively. One-year, 3-years, and 5-years overall survival (OS) were 72%, 37%, and 26%, respectively. The 1-year, 3-years, and 5-years disease-free survival (DFS) were 44%, 24%, and 22%, respectively. Well-moderately differentiated tumors, pT1–2 and pN0–1 adenocarcinoma, R0 resection, the presence of solitary metastasis, unilobar metastases, metachronous metastasis, and chemotherapy were all strongly positively associated to better OS and DFS. Conclusion: In the present study, we demonstrated that hepatectomy for GCLM is feasible and provides benefits in terms of long-term survival. Identification of patient subgroups that could benefit from surgical treatment is mandatory in a multidisciplinary setting.

scholarly journals The impact of physical exercise on the fatigue symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nazanin Razazian ◽  
Mohsen Kazeminia ◽  
Hossein Moayedi ◽  
Alireza Daneshkhah ◽  
Shamarina Shohaimi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Physical Exercise ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Ageing, limb-loss and military veterans: a systematic review of the literature

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 1582-1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
NICK CADDICK ◽  
HELEN CULLEN ◽  
AMANDA CLARKE ◽  
MATT FOSSEY ◽  
MICHAEL HILL ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Military Service ◽  
Military Veterans ◽  
Limb Loss ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Long Term Impact ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACTThe impact of losing a limb in military service extends well beyond initial recovery and rehabilitation, with long-term consequences and challenges requiring health-care commitments across the lifecourse. This paper presents a systematic review of the current state of knowledge regarding the long-term impact of ageing and limb-loss in military veterans. Key databases were systematically searched including: ASSIA, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Medline, Web of Science, PsycArticles/PsychInfo, ProQuest Psychology and ProQuest Sociology Journals, and SPORTSDiscus. Empirical studies which focused on the long-term impact of limb-loss and/or health-care requirements in veterans were included. The search process revealed 30 papers relevant for inclusion. These papers focused broadly on four themes: (a) long-term health outcomes, prosthetics use and quality of life; (b) long-term psycho-social adaptation and coping with limb-loss; (c) disability and identity; and (d) estimating the long-term costs of care and prosthetic provision. Findings present a compelling case for ensuring the long-term care needs and costs of rehabilitation for older limbless veterans are met. A dearth of information on the lived experience of limb-loss and the needs of veterans’ families calls for further research to address these important issues.

The impact of myosteatosis on outcomes following surgery for gastro-intestinal malignancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15540-e15540
Author(s):  
Andrew MacCormick ◽  
Mark Puckett ◽  
Adam Streeter ◽  
Somaiah Aroori
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Mesh Terms ◽  
Similar Term ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
The Impact

e15540 Background: Recent research has demonstrated the impact that body composition parameters can have on the outcomes following cancer surgery. Adipose tissue deposition in muscle, known as myosteatosis, can be detected on pre-operative imaging. This systematic review aims to analyse the impact of pre-operative myosteatosis on long-term outcomes following surgery for gastro-intestinal malignancy. Methods: Using MeSH terms, a systematic search of the databases PubMed MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL and AMED was performed. Studies were included if they reported hazard ratios (HR) analysing the impact of pre-operatively defined myosteatosis, or similar term, on the long-term outcomes following surgery for gastro-intestinal malignancy. A total of 39 full texts articles were reviewed for inclusion, with 19 being included after the inclusion criteria were applied. A sub-group analysis was performed for those studies reporting outcomes for colorectal cancer patients only. Results: The total number of included patients across all studies was 14,481. Patients with myosteatosis had a significantly poorer overall survival, according to univariate (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.67 – 1.99) and multivariable (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.49 – 1.86) analysis. This was also demonstrated with regards to cancer-specific survival (univariate HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.18 – 2.22, multivariable HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.48 – 2.03) and recurrence-free survival (univariate HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10 – 1.48, multivariable HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.07 – 1.77). Conclusions: This review demonstrates that patients with pre-operative myosteatosis have poorer long-term outcomes following surgery for gastro-intestinal malignancy. Therefore, myosteatosis should be used for pre-operative optimisation and as a prognostic tool before surgery. More standardised definitions of myosteatosis and further cohort studies of patients with non-colorectal malignancies are required.

Endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2009 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 545-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abtin Tabaee ◽  
Vijay K. Anand ◽  
Yolanda Barrón ◽  
David H. Hiltzik ◽  
Seth M. Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pituitary Surgery ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Short Term ◽  
The Impact

Object Surgery on the pituitary gland is increasingly being performed through an endoscopic approach. However, there is little published data on its safety and relative advantages over traditional microscope-based approaches. Published reports are limited by small sample size and nonrandomized study design. A meta-analysis allows for a description of the impact of endoscopic surgery on short-term outcomes. Methods The authors performed retrospective review of data from their institution as well as a systematic review of the literature. The pooled data were analyzed for descriptive statistics on short-term outcomes. Results Nine studies (821 patients) met inclusion criteria. Overall, the pooled rate of gross tumor removal was 78% (95% CI 67–89%). Hormone resolution was achieved in 81% (95% CI 71–91%) of adrenocorticotropic hormone secreting tumors, 84% (95% CI 76–92%) of growth hormone secreting tumors, and 82% (95% CI 70–94%) of prolactin secreting tumors. The pooled complication rates were 2% (95% CI 0–4%) for CSF leak and 1% (95% CI 0–2%) for permanent diabetes insipidus. There were 2 deaths reported in the literature that were both related to vascular injury, giving an overall mortality rate of 0.24%. Conclusions The results of this meta-analysis support the safety and short-term efficacy of endoscopic pituitary surgery. Future studies with long-term follow-up are required to determine tumor control.

scholarly journals Long-term manifestations and modifiers of prevalence estimates of the post-COVID-19 syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel De-la-Rosa-Martínez ◽  
Marco Antonio Delaye-Martínez ◽  
Omar Yaxmehen Bello-Chavolla ◽  
Alejandro Sicilia-Andrade ◽  
Isaac David Juárez-Cruz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Population Characteristics ◽  
Published Data ◽  
System Disease ◽  
Prevalence Estimates ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
Meta Regression Analysis

Background: Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) is a multi-system disease comprising persistent symptomatology after the acute phase of infection. Long-term PACS effects significantly impact patient outcomes, but their incidence remains uncharacterized due to high heterogeneity between studies. Therefore, we aimed to summarize published data on PACS, characterizing the clinical presentation, prevalence, and modifiers of prevalence estimates. Method: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we research MEDLINE for original studies published from January 1st, 2020, to January 31st, 2021, that reported proportions of PACS manifestations. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they included patients aged ≥18 years with confirmed COVID-19 by RT-PCR or antigen testing and a minimum follow-up of 21 days. The prevalence of individual manifestations across studies was pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. For evaluating determinants of heterogeneity, meta-regression analysis was performed. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019125025). Results: After screening 1,235 studies, we included 29 reports for analysis. Twenty-seven meta-analyses were performed, and 61 long-term manifestations were described. The pooled prevalence of PACS was 56% (95%CI 45-66%), with the most common manifestations being diminished health status, fatigue, asthenia, dyspnea, myalgias, hyposmia and dysgeusia. Most of the included studies presented high heterogeneity. After conducting the meta-regression analysis, we identified that age, gender, number of comorbidities, and reported symptoms significantly modify the prevalence estimation of PACS long-term manifestations. Conclusion: PACS is inconsistently reported between studies, and population characteristics influence the prevalence estimates due to high heterogeneity. A systematized approach for the study of PACS is needed to characterize its impact adequately.

Do patient and proxy agree? Long-term changes in multiple sclerosis physical impact and walking ability on patient-reported outcome scales

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 1616-1623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith M Sonder ◽  
Lisanne J Balk ◽  
Libertje VAE Bosma ◽  
Chris H Polman ◽  
Bernard MJ Uitdehaag
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Walking Ability ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Proxy Responses ◽  
Physical Impact ◽  
The Impact

Background: Patient-reported outcome scales (PROs) are useful in monitoring changes in multiple sclerosis (MS) over time. Although these scales are reliable and valid measures in longitudinal studies in MS patients, it is unknown what the impact is when obtaining longitudinal data from proxies. Objective: The objective of this paper is to compare longitudinal changes in patient and proxy responses on PROs assessing physical impact of MS and walking ability. Methods: In a prospective observational study, data on the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29 physical) and Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) were obtained from 137 patient-proxy couples at baseline and at two-year follow-up. Demographic and disease-related variables explaining agreement or disagreement between patients and proxies were investigated using linear regression analyses. Results: Full agreement was found in 56% (MSIS) and 62% (MSWS) of the patient-proxy couples. Complete disagreement was very rare for both scales (2% MSIS, 5% MSWS). When patients were more positive than proxies, a higher age, longer disease duration, longer patient-proxy relationship and increased levels of depression, anxiety and caregiver burden in proxies were observed. Conclusion: In the majority of the patient-proxy couples there was agreement. Proxies can serve as a valuable source of information, but caution remains essential when using scores from proxies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document