scholarly journals Mediation of the inhibitory effect of thyroid hormone on proliferation of hepatoma cells by transforming growth factor-beta

2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Che Yen ◽  
Ya-Hui Huang ◽  
Chu-Yu Liao ◽  
Cheng-Jung Liao ◽  
Wan-Li Cheng ◽  
...  

Thyroid hormone (triiodothyronine, T3) regulates growth, development and differentiation. To examine the influence of T3 on hepatoma cell growth, thyroid receptor (TR)α1 or TRβ1 over-expressing HepG2 cell lines were used. Growth of the HepG2-TR stable cell line was inhibited by over 50% following treatment with T3. However, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β neutralizing antibody, but not the control antibody can reverse the cell growth inhibition effect of T3. Flow cytometric analysis indicated that the growth inhibition was apparent at the transition point between the G1 and S phases of the cell cycle. The expression of major cell cycle regulators was used to provide further evidence for the growth inhibition. Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (cdk2) and cyclin E were down-regulated in HepG2-TR cells. Moreover, p21 protein or mRNA levels were up-regulated by around 5-fold or 7.3-fold respectively following T3 treatment. Furthermore, phospho-retinoblastoma (ppRb) protein was down-regulated by T3. The expression of TGF-β was studied to delineate the repression mechanism. TGF-β was stimulated by T3 and its promoter activity was enhanced six- to eight-fold by T3. Furthermore, both T3 and TGF-β repressed the expression of cdk2, cyclin E and ppRb. On the other hand, TGF-β neutralizing but not control antibody blocked the repression of cdk2, cyclin E and ppRb by T3. These results demonstrated that T3 might play a key role in liver tumor cell proliferation.

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1509-1519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Erickson ◽  
Xuedong Liu

Disruption of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) pathway is observed in the majority of cancers. To further understand TGF-β pathway inactivation in cancer, we stably expressed the v-ErbA oncoprotein in TGF-β responsive cells. v-ErbA participates in erythroleukemic transformation of cells induced by the avian erythroblastosis virus (AEV). Here we demonstrate that expression of v-ErbA was sufficient to antagonize TGF-β–induced cell growth inhibition and that dysregulation of TGF-β signaling required that v-ErbA associate with the Smad4 which sequesters Smad4 in the cytoplasm. We also show that AEV-transformed erythroleukemia cells were resistant to TGF-β–induced growth inhibition and that TGF-β sensitivity could be recovered by reducing v-ErbA expression. Our results reveal a novel mechanism for oncogenic disruption of TGF-β signaling and provide a mechanistic explanation of v-ErbA activity in AEV-induced erythroleukemia.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3584-3584
Author(s):  
Jan K. Davidson-Moncada ◽  
Taotao Zhang ◽  
Piali Mukherjee ◽  
Paul Hakimpour ◽  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3584 Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is typically characterized by defects in programmed cell death rather than alterations in cell cycle regulation. Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ), a ubiquitously expressed growth factor, regulates multiple normal cellular responses including proliferation, differentiation, migration and apoptosis. Loss of growth inhibition by TGFβ is thought to contribute to the development and progression of a variety of tumors including CLL (DeCoteau et al., PNAS 1997). Approximately 40% of patients contain mutations in the signal sequence of TGFβ receptor 1 (TBR-1) in the form of substitutions or deletions (Schiemann et al., Cancer Detect Prev 2004). In the wild type form, the signal sequence contains a nine alanine stretch, which if truncated has been shown to impair signaling through the receptor and specifically, a truncated, six alanine form is associated with increased cancer risk (Pasche et al., Cancer Res 1999). TGFβ signaling can regulate expression of micoRNAs (miRNA), which are ~22 nucleotide-long RNA gene regulators. Deregulated miRNA expression has been implicated in tumorigenesis, including CLL. Several miRNAs have been shown to be over-expressed in CLL as compared to normal B cells (Fulci et al., Blood 2007). This includes miR-155, which is part of a 13-miRNA signature that has prognostic implications, including a shorter need-for-treatment interval (Calin et al., N Engl J Med 2005). Interestingly, miR-155 has been shown to be upregulated by TGFβ in murine mammary gland cells (Kong et al., Mol Cell Biol 2008). The goals of our study are to investigate the link between TGFβ signaling and miR-155 in CLL and to determine how the interaction between the two may contribute to the pathogenesis of CLL. Here we show that miR-155 is in fact upregulated by TGFβ in mouse splenic B cells and in human peripheral blood B cells. In CLL, miR-155 expression inversely correlates with the proportion of CLL cells harboring signal sequence mutation in TBR-1, consistent with miR155 regulation by TGFβ in vivo. To understand the role of TGFβ-induced miR-155 in CLL pathobiology, identification of specific target genes in the context of this disease is essential. To this end, we compared the gene (cDNA) expression profile between CLL with high miR-155 vs. low miR-155 expression and identified putative miR-155 target genes by selecting those genes that are differentially expressed in SAM analysis with lower expression in the high miR-155 group, and which harbor predicted miR-155 binding sites in their 3’ untranslated region (UTR). Based on this algorithm, we have identified casein kinase 1 gamma 2 (CSK1γ2) as a target for miR155 in CLL. CSK1γ2 is a negative modulator of the TGFβ signaling pathway by targeting the phosphorylated form of SMAD3 for degradation (Guo et al., Oncogene 2008). MiR-155 represses luciferase reporter gene expression by specific binding to the miR-155 site in the CSK1γ2 3’UTR. In addition, we found that CSK1γ2 itself is upregulated in B cells upon TGFβ stimulation, and treatment of human B cells with PNA miR-155 inhibitor (Fabani et al., Nucleic Acids Research 2010) further increases CSK1γ2 mRNA levels. Surprisingly, comparison of CSK1γ2 protein levels between CLLs with high or low miR-155 by Western blotting revealed higher CSK1γ2 protein expression despite lower CSK1γ2 mRNA levels, suggesting that miR-155 may enhance CSK1γ2 translation in CLL cells and implying an intriguing regulatory interaction between miR-155 and CSK1γ2. In summary, our data indicates that the variation of miR-155 seen in CLL is primarily a function of TGFβ signaling activity. Moreover, miR-155 is an important player in a complex auto-regulatory network in TGFβ signaling by fine-tuning the negative feedback mechanism on TGFβ signaling mediated by CSK1γ2. In CLL cells harboring TBR-1 with wild-type signal sequence, higher miR-155 levels may help modulate the TGFβ signaling activity to a level optimal for the survival or other pathobiological functions of CLL. Furthermore, since CLL cells are predominantly non-proliferating, our findings that miR-155 may enhance translation of CSK1γ2 provide support to the model of cell cycle dependence of microRNA functions (Vasudevan et al., Cell Cycle 2008). Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (18) ◽  
pp. 6694-6701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prakash Rao ◽  
Tom Kadesch

ABSTRACT Notch signaling influences a variety of cell fate decisions during development, and constitutive activation of the pathway can provoke unbridled cell growth and cancer. The mechanisms by which Notch affects cell growth are not well established. We describe here a novel link between Notch and cell cycle control. We found that Mv1Lu epithelial cells harboring an oncogenic form of Notch (NICD) are resistant to the cell cycle-inhibitory effects of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β). NICD did not affect TGF-β signaling per se but blocked induction of the Cdk inhibitor p15INK4B. c-Myc, whose down-regulation by TGF-β is required for p15INK4B induction, remained elevated in the NICD-expressing cells. c-Myc expression was also maintained in low serum, indicating that Notch's effects on c-Myc are not specific to TGF-β. Our results are consistent with a model in which a strong Notch signal indirectly deregulates c-Myc expression and thereby renders Mv1Lu epithelial cells resistant to growth-inhibitory signals.


1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 3654-3663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minna Tsubari ◽  
Jussi Taipale ◽  
Erja Tiihonen ◽  
Jorma Keski-Oja ◽  
Marikki Laiho

ABSTRACT Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) potently suppresses Mv1Lu mink epithelial cell growth, whereas hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) counteracts TGF-β-mediated growth inhibition and induces Mv1Lu cell proliferation (J. Taipale and J. Keski-Oja, J. Biol. Chem. 271:4342–4348, 1996). By addressing the cell cycle regulatory mechanisms involved in HGF-mediated release of Mv1Lu cells from TGF-β inhibition, we show that increased DNA replication is accompanied by phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein and alternative regulation of cyclin-Cdk-inhibitor complexes. While TGF-β treatment decreased the expression of Cdk6, this effect was counteracted by HGF, followed by partial restoration of cyclin D2-associated kinase activity. Notably, HGF failed to prevent TGF-β induction of p15 and its association with Cdk6. However, HGF reversed the TGF-β-mediated decrease in Cdk6-associated p27 and cyclin D2-associated Cdk6, suggesting that HGF modifies the TGF-β response at the level of G1 cyclin complex formation. Counteraction of TGF-β regulation of Cdk6 by HGF may in turn affect the association of p27 with Cdk2-cyclin E complexes. Though HGF did not differentially regulate the total levels of p27 in TGF-β-treated cells, p27 immunodepletion experiments suggested that upon treatment with both growth factors, less p27 is associated with Cdk2-cyclin E complexes, in parallel with restoration of the active form of Cdk2 and the associated kinase activity. The results demonstrate that HGF intercepts TGF-β cell cycle regulation at multiple points, affecting both G1and G1-S cyclin kinase activities.


Cell Research ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing Hong ZHOU ◽  
Jun Song CHEN ◽  
Ming Qiang CHAI ◽  
Sheng ZHAO ◽  
Jun LIANG ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document