scholarly journals IMPROVING FEDERAL INFORMATION TOOL IN THE DIRECTION OF FORMING A REGIONAL DIGITAL COLLECTION OF HUMAN COMPETENCES AT WORK FOR EXAMPLE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROMISING SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE SIBERIAN FEDERAL DISTRICT

Author(s):  
B.S. Burichin ◽  
O.A. Zatepyakin ◽  
D.Yu. Yasinskiy
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 1266-1285
Author(s):  
Sn.P. Mongush

Subject. This article explores the various aspects of the concept of Spatial Development. Objectives. The article aims to develop a conceptual basis for the spatial socio-economic development of the collaborating regions. Methods. For the study, I used the methods of comparative and statistical analyses. Results. The article shows how cooperation between the subjects of the Russian Federation increases the potential of economically united regions. Conclusions. When preparing national strategic planning documents, it is necessary to take into account the specifics of regions, their capacity, available resources, and focus on the relationship between regions.


Author(s):  
Larisa Sokolova ◽  
Irina Kazantseva

The strategic planning features of Russian regional socio-economic development in modern conditions are shown. The issue includes the use of strategic planning tools at various economic development levels of the country and its methodological development lack has been revealed. Indicators for determining the gender reserve of labor potential for the regional economic and social sphere are proposed. Indicators for the index of the gender balance in Irkutsk region and the constituent territories of the Siberian Federal District have been calculated. On the basis of the structure of the gender balance index for the constituent territories of the Siberian Federal District, the priorities of the areas of regional social development have been hilighted.


Author(s):  
Olga N. Gurova ◽  

The article discusses the mechanism of complex development of the territory, organized through the creation of Priority Socio-Economic Development Areas (PSEDA). The purpose of the article is to study the features of PSEDA in the Siberian part of the Russian Federation, the object of the study is the Baikal region and the regions of the Siberian Federal District and their settlements that received this status. The relevance is determined by the fact that PSEDA are created in order to solve the problems of monospecialized cities: to diversify their economy and reduce dependence on city-forming enterprises, it is assumed that they will become points of economic growth, improve the investment climate. The basis of the work was the statistical information of the regions of the Siberian Federal District, information resources of federal and regional authorities and directly territories with this status. The article summarizes these territories, investment projects within the PSEDA, areas of activity that receive support under this mechanism in Siberia. In the Siberian regions on the territories of PSEDA, investment projects prevail in a wide range of industrial production: wood processing, food, light industry. Many projects have not yet begun implementation or are at the stage of infrastructure construction. In the case of successful implementation of these projects, the development of manufacturing industries in resource regions, in which investment projects are implemented mainly in the field of natural resource extraction, will take place. Prospects for the study is related to a further comparative analysis of the socio-economic dynamics of the region and settlement with a fully functioning PSEDA: how much do the parameters of regional development improve after the formation of PSEDA, does the growth of socio-economic indicators occur.


2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-102
Author(s):  
T. V. Ostaschenko

This paper presents the author’s approach to the assessment and analysis of regional intellectual and innovation activities and its components: regional intellectual and innovation potential, climate and capital. The assessment of regional intellectual and innovation activities and its components was made by the example of the regions of the Central Federal District and the Siberian Federal District. The influence of intellectual and innovation activities on regional socio-economic development is considered.


2021 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-56
Author(s):  
G. N. Stroeva ◽  

At the legislative level, it is established that the culture of Russia, as well as natural resources, is the property of the country and an important resource for the socio-economic development of all its territories and improving the quality of life of the population. Improving the management process and strategic planning of development of the sphere of culture is due to the need for more efficient use of public finances and the level of investment attractiveness of the industry. Strategic planning tools play an important role in optimizing the process of managing of the sphere of culture. The analysis of state programs and strategies sections of the socio-economic development of the eleven regions of FEFD on the development of the sphere of culture, revealed the structural and methodological problems of the development of regional strategic planning documents in the sphere of culture. The main problems include: inconsistency of the structure and content of strategies and programs with methodical instructions (recommendations) and the procedure for their development; lack of a unified methodological approach to understanding the essence and basic components of strategies and programs; lack of a unified approach to the number, composition and presentation of target indicators; insufficient level of interconnection of regional strategic planning documents. A serious problem in the development of strategies and programs is the lack of uniform requirements for indicators for assessing the implementation of strategic goals and objectives, measures of government programs, as well as an interconnected system for assessing strategic planning documents developed at different levels of management. Differences in the structural elements and inconsistencies with the stated criteria are noted in the reviewed documents of all FEFD regions. The main reason for the discrepancy – is the lack of a unified methodology for the development of both regional strategies and government programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document