scholarly journals Evolução do Relatório de Sustentabilidade Global Reporting Initiative – GRI: 20 anos de aplicação ## Evolution of the Global Reporting Initiative - GRI Sustainability Report: 20 years of application

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 294
Author(s):  
Rosany Corrêa ◽  
Henrique César Melo Ribeiro

ResumoO estudo verificou através do Report List GRI desde sua publicação em 1999 até 2018, o nível de evolução destes relatórios de sustentabilidade da Global Reporting Initiative nas empresas do Brasil e do mundo. A GRI tem suas bases de relatórios na quarta geração do modelo, GRI-G4, o que mostra um empenho na melhoria contínua dos indicadores e sua adoção por diferentes países. Foi realizada uma pesquisa bibliográfica e uso de dados secundários. A pesquisa mostrou que houve evolução na aplicação dos relatórios. Confirmando a consolidação e a legitimação da metodologia da GRI de divulgação de relatórios de sustentabilidade. As Diretrizes da GRI G4 representam um código de conduta e um padrão de desempenho, vistos com materialidade, evidenciado nas 3235 empresas que usam esse nível no mundo, dos quais 6% são empresas brasileiras, propiciando assim maior credibilidade das informações socioambientais aos seus stakeholders. AbstractThe objective of the article is to verify the level of adoption and evolution of sustainability reports of the Global Reporting Initiative - GRI in companies. GRI has its reporting bases in the fourth generation of the GRI-G4 model, which shows a commitment to the continuous improvement of indicators and their adoption by different countries. The methodology used was qualitative, through a bibliographical survey and secondary data. As a tool for analysis, the GRI Report List was adopted since its publication in 1999 until 2018. The analysis showed a significant evolution in the adoption of the GRI model by companies in the three levels, world, Brazil and Corporate Sustainability Index. The survey results show the ongoing evolution of the reports, in search of the most improved level of sustainability report, and with significant adoption in Brazil, which legitimizes the Global Reporting Initiative's sustainability reporting model.

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burcu Demirel ◽  
Murat Erdogan

<p>In recent years, there is a growing focus on corporate operations especially since the publication of the first environmental reports in 1989. Companies have started to publish information about its environmental, social and sustainability policies. The study examines the sustainability reporting elements of Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index (BIST) in Turkey and to evaluate which elements is most vital in this context. This study will begin with the sustainability reporting that will be examined under the roof of corporation sustainability and end with the examination of sustainability reports of 15 firms, which are included in the BIST Sustainability Index in Turkey, and a content analysis. The reports of companies under study were taken from special web site and GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) database of companies. Being the first study in examining the sustainability report of companies in BIST Sustainability Index, it is expected to contribute in literature about sustainability reporting recently started to gain importance in Turkey. Overall our findings suggest that the sustainability index established in Turkey is still in development stage, but the enterprises in the endeavor are working day by day to develop the sustainability qualities.</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Putu Sukma Kurniawan

Corporate sustainability report has become a new paradigm in the evolution of corporate reporting. This study aims to create a map of information materiality contained in the sustainability report of the banking industry in Indonesia.The method used is analyze content of sustainability reports of the banking industry in Indonesia. Data collection is done by looking for secondary data through page of Indonesia Stock Exchange or company official website. Data analysis was done descriptively by analyzing the contents of sustainability report. The analysis is done by comparing the contents of the sustainability report with the disclosure items contained in the GRI G4 reporting standard (Fourth Generation of Global Reporting Initiative), especially in GRI G4 Sector Disclosures Financial Services.The results of this study produce maps containing material information in the sustainability report of the banking industry. The results of this study may contribute to the management of the company to identify the material information that can be submitted to the company's stakeholders. Keyword : Map of Information Materiality, Sustainability Reporting, Sustainability Report, Banking Industry


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Putu Sukma Kurniawan

This research aims to provide an overview of information that is material in sustainability reporting in Indonesia, especially material information in sustainability report in mining industry in Indonesia. The design of this research is document analysis. In this context, this study try to achieve an understanding of the document's contents from corporate sustainability report. This research used sustainability report published by companies in mining industry fields, particularly mining companies which competed in Indonesia Sustainability Reporting Award (ISRA) in 2014, 2015 and 2016. Data was collected by secondary data through the official website of Indonesia Stock Exchange as well as the company's official website. The data of sustainability reports were analyzed descriptively by analyzing the content of the sustainability report. This study can help to build a new perspective about material information in sustainability report in Indonesian mining industry. Keywords: Information Materiality Map, Sustainability Reporting, Sustainability Report, Mining Industry


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Putu Sukma Kurniawan

Corporate sustainability report has become a new paradigm in the evolution of corporate reporting. Corporate sustainability report is a form of corporate management responsibility to all of the stakeholders. This study aims to create a map of information materiality contained in the sustainability report of the banking industry in Indonesia.The method used is analyze content of sustainability reports of the banking industry in Indonesia. Data collection is done by looking for secondary data through page of Indonesia Stock Exchange or company official website. Data analysis was done descriptively by analyzing the contents of sustainability report. The analysis is done by comparing the contents of the sustainability report with the disclosure items contained in the GRI G4 reporting standard (Fourth Generation of Global Reporting Initiative), especially in GRI G4 Sector Disclosures Financial Services. The results of this study produce maps containing material information in the sustainability report of the banking industry. The results of this study may contribute to the management of the company to identify the material information that can be submitted to the company's stakeholders.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuğçe Uzun Kocamiş ◽  
Gülçin Yildirim

Sustainability reporting is a responsibility practice that towards sustainable development goals as related to corporate performance measurement, explaining and being accountable to internal and external stakeholders. Non-financial information relating to operating activities can be disclosed through sustainability reports. Sustainability reporting is a vital step of managing change towards a sustainable global economy—one that combines long-term profitability with environmental care and social justice. Sustainability reports developed using the GRI Reporting Framework covers results and consequences the emerged in the context of organization's commitments, strategy and management approach during the reporting period. Through the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Sustainability Reporting Framework, the GRI works to increase the transparency and exchange of sustainability-related information. The Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index, published since 2014 is an important development for the business in Turkey which is aimed sustainable development. Sustainability reports have been prepared on a voluntary basis in Turkey and in many countries. In line with global developments the number of business is increasing who prefer to explain activities of economic, environmental and social dimensions through corporate sustainability reports in Turkey as well. This study conceptually reviews sustainability reporting and its benefits for the business. In order to see the effectiveness of the sustainability reports, sustainability reports of business in the BIST sustainability index will be subjected to content analysis basis GRI Reporting Principles on voluntary basis.


Author(s):  
Patrick Ojera ◽  
Collins Otieno Odoyo

Corporate sustainability reporting, also known as Triple-bottom-line reporting, involves reporting nonfinancial and financial information to a broader set of stakeholders than just shareholders and seek to fortify an organization’s ability to manage key risks. The current case is that, the quality, rigor, and utility of sustainability reporting remains contentious with concerns about the suitability of the criteria or standards used to prepare the reports. Despite the rapid increase in the number of companies around the world adopting Global Reporting Initiative standards, little is known about the extent of practice of corporate sustainability reporting in public universities in Kenya. The study selected five universities that had their 2017-18 audited financial reports available online for the readers, which served as the main source of secondary data. The guidelines on corporate sustainability reporting was derived from literature review, which provided key indicators upon which the data from each university was evaluated. It was observed that almost all the institutions recognize the critical role of both internal and external independent audit of financial statements. In conclusion, financial reporting sustainability is guided by strict compliance to the factors of sustainability.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Putu Sukma Kurniawan

Corporate sustainability report has become a new paradigm in the evolution of corporate reporting. Corporate sustainability report is a form of corporate management responsibility to all of the stakeholders. This study aims to create a map of information materiality contained in the sustainability report of the banking industry in Indonesia.The method used is analyze content of sustainability reports of the banking industry in Indonesia. Data collection is done by looking for secondary data through page of Indonesia Stock Exchange or company official website. Data analysis was done descriptively by analyzing the contents of sustainability report. The analysis is done by comparing the contents of the sustainability report with the disclosure items contained in the GRI G4 reporting standard (Fourth Generation of Global Reporting Initiative), especially in GRI G4 Sector Disclosures Financial Services. The results of this study produce maps containing material information in the sustainability report of the banking industry. The results of this study may contribute to the management of the company to identify the material information that can be submitted to the company's stakeholders.


2021 ◽  
pp. 135481662110626
Author(s):  
Amal Hamrouni ◽  
Abdullah S Karaman ◽  
Cemil Kuzey ◽  
Ali Uyar

Drawing on institutional theory, this study tests how the ethical behaviors of firms, in interaction with public officials and through the strength of accountability regulations, influence sustainability reporting practices in the hospitality and tourism (H&T) sector. The results indicate that firms operating in a highly ethical business environment are less likely than those in a less ethical environment to disclose a sustainability report. However, accountability yields the opposite result; firms established in environments characterized by high accountability are more likely than low accountability environments to issue a sustainability report, which implies a complementary effect between the strength of the accountability and the firms’ sustainability disclosures. This verifies that the weakness or strength of informal and formal institutional forces exert considerable influence on firms’ desire to carry out sustainability reporting. However, this influence is not true of the acquisition of external assurance statements and following Global Reporting Initiative guidelines, with which accountability has a negative and insignificant association, respectively.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 3233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susie Wu ◽  
Changliang Shao ◽  
Jiquan Chen

Recent decades have seen a surge in corporate sustainability reports (SRs); their proliferation, however, does not ensure effective and consistent reporting on materiality. To improve the completeness, consistency and uniformity of SRs, this study aims at providing a review on the definition and identification of materiality and to propose screening methods for materiality assessments using publicly available resources. We found that most acknowledged standards and initiatives diverge in their definitions and approaches towards materiality. Four screening methods are proposed, including two that are directly usable: (1) Sustainability Accounting Standards Board Materiality Map™ and (2) Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Sustainability Topics for Sectors; and two involving more desktop research: (3) GRI’s Sustainability Disclosure Database and (4) modeling from a life-cycle perspective. The second and third approaches are tested through a comparison study for the apparel and energy industries in selected regions using content analysis. The results indicate that the two approaches, with different levels of complexity, yield inconsistency in obtaining the most (i.e., the top three) material topics. The GRI’s Sustainability Disclosure Database is recommended for practitioners due to its balanced disclosure on management, economic, environmental and social sustainability themes.


2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 74-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Dingwerth ◽  
Margot Eichinger

In this contribution, we explore the tensions that seem inherent in the claim that transparency policies “empower” the users of disclosed information vis-àvis those who are asked to provide the information. Since these tensions are particularly relevant in relation to voluntary disclosure, our analysis focuses on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) as the world's leading voluntary corporate non-financial reporting scheme. Corporate sustainability reporting is often hailed as a powerful instrument to improve the environmental performance of business and to empower societal groups, including consumers, in their relations with the corporate world. Yet, our analysis illustrates that the relationship between transparency and empowerment is conflictual at all four levels of activity examined in this article: in the rhetoric and policies of the GRI as well as in the actual reporting practice and in the activities of intermediaries in response to the organization's disclosure standard.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document