Editorial
What is the meaning of the word "applied" in our pages? It seems to us that most of our articles fall in one of the following four categories: 1) The description and analysis of some social situation in largely theoretical terms. The case may be from the United States or from some other part of the world. It may deal with a group or a community or an organization. If it is a good study, it at least has implications for action. And, if it is a good study, we will be happy to publish it, but we will be even happier to publish a good theoretical statement that fits into one of the categories below. 2) The failure story. Here the researcher describes how a practitioner handled a problem and got it badly bungled up because he failed to act in terms of the principles of applied anthropology which the author points out. We will continue to print good articles along this line, yet with diminishing enthusiasm. When the mistakes have been committed, it is all too easy to recognize them, but let's not make life too easy for ourselves. (Maybe someday a practitioner will write an article for us on "Blunders I Have Seen Researchers Make.") 3) The success story. Here the author reports how the practitioner handled a human problem successfully—and analyzes the factors underlying this success. Excellent examples of this type can be found in F. L. W. Richardson's special issue on "Five Case Studies of Successful Experiments In Increasing Food Production" published in far-off 1943.