scholarly journals Constitutional Law Basis of Parliamentary Law of Russia

Lex Russica ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 62-69
Author(s):  
A. S. Koshel
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Separation Of Powers ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Constitutional State ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Independent Branch

The article deals with the constitutional and legal basis for determining the system of parliamentary law: The subject matter, methods, and sources. It is stated that legal norms characterized by common features, internal unity and different from the norms of other branches of law form an independent branch (a sub-branch of constitutional) law. For now, the institutions of parliamentary law are studied within the framework of the theory of state and law, constitutional (state) law, and, to some extent, administrative law, and parliamentary procedural law is distinguished. In this regard, the article notes that the development of democracy and parliamentarism, the increasing importance of Parliament in the implementation of the principle of separation of powers always compels the legal doctrine to separate parliamentary law. The author substantiates the conclusion that constitutional law, as the leading branch of public law, regulates social relations that are usually called basic (constitutional) — or fundamental — in each area of life, while parliamentary law has theoretical and legal prerequisites for being separated into an independent branch (sub-branch of constitutional) law without violating the organic unity of constitutional law. Thus, the author believes that at the present level of democracy development it is possible to state the presence of prerequisites for the formation of a new branch (sub — branch) of law — parliamentary law.

scholarly journals “The Subject Matter of the Branch Gets its Actual Expression in the System:” Prof. Ekaterina I. Kozlova about the System of Constitutional Law and its Institutions

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 26-34
Author(s):  
K. A. Kononov
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
State Law ◽  
Constitutional State ◽  
The Subject

The paper has analyzed the academic heritage of Prof. Ekaterina I. Kozlova in the part of her research of fundamental issues of the theory of constitutional (state) law, namely: the system of the branch under consideration and public law institutions. The author focuses on suggested by Prof. Ekaterina I. Kozlova innovative division of the system of the branch of constitutional law and the structure of the Constitution, the substantive approach to the construction of the institution of state law, consistent defense of the concept of unity of the system of constitutional (state) law. The author has determined the current significance of the conclusions made by Prof. Ekaterina E. Kozlova concerning the development of constitutional law institutions: complication of their structure, expansion and specialization of constitutional law norms and, as a consequence, the emergence of complex institutions and the problem of subsectors; an increase in the number of norms, i.e. principles and procedural rules in constitutional law.

scholarly journals MEDICAL AND PROCEDURAL-LEGAL ASPECTS OF INPATIENT AND OUTPATIENT FORENSIC PSYCHIATRIC EXAMINATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (7) ◽  
pp. 1533-1538
Author(s):  
Sandra Kaija ◽  
Inga Kudeikina ◽  
Nataliya Gutorova
Keyword(s):  
Medical Practitioner ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
Psychiatric Examination ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Forensic Psychiatric

The aim: The aim of the study is to define the legal framework of forensic psychiatric examination commissioned by the court in relation to the competence of medical practitioners and the position of the subject as a patient in the process of forensic psychiatric examination in order to determine the correlation of special legal regulation with criminal and civil procedure regulation and to make proposals for the enhancement of the legal regulation. Materials and methods: This study is based on the analysis of international law, medical civil procedure and criminal procedure legislation, juridical practice, medical law legal doctrine. The following methods were used in this research: the method of interpretation of legal norms, analysis of legal acts, and the induction-deduction method, upon which the conclusions were drawn and recommendations were provided. Conclusion: The current regulatory framework does not provide for the procedure by which the subject’s medical treatment is conducted during forensic psychiatric examination, nor does it determine the criteria for the admissibility of treatment of the persons concerned and the extent of treatment. During the examination, the medical practitioner who is in the expert’s procedural position in relation to the subject under examination in the particular examination should not carry out the treatment of the subject.

scholarly journals CONTRADICTIONS BETWEEN SCIENTIFIC TERMINOLOGY AND THE TERMINOLOGY OF THE LEGISLATION ON THE DEFINITION OF SUBJECTS AND PARTICIPANTS IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS

2019 ◽  
pp. 70-73
Author(s):  
I. L. Zheltobriukh
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Administrative Process ◽  
Scientific Terminology ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
State Of Affairs ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Enforcement Activity

This paper explores the existing contradictions between the scientific terminology and the terminology of legislation regarding the definition of subjects and participants in the administrative process. It is noted that acquaintance with the scientific and educational- methodological literature shows that even today there is no clear justification of the relation between the terms “subject of administrative process” and “participant of administrative process”. The main reason for this state of affairs is due to differences in the laws of development of national administrative procedural legislation and the laws of development of science of administrative procedural law. It is concluded that there is a long-standing need to offer the scientific community and practitioners such a concept of relation between the terms “subject of administrative process” and “participant in administrative process”, which would reconcile the contradictions of the otological and epistemological terminology used in the CAS. The necessity to use in the science of administrative law and process justifies the concept according to which the administrative process should be considered as law enforcement activity of administrative courts related to the consideration and resolution of public law disputes. In such a case, the administrative court will always be the subject of the administrative court, whereas the parties, third parties, representatives, assistant judge, court secretary, court administrator, witness, expert, law expert, translator, specialist are only participants in the administrative process that is, persons involved in the enforcement of administrative law.

Homework under the law

2021 ◽  
Vol LXXXII (2) ◽  
pp. 153-160
Author(s):  
Michał Długosz
Keyword(s):  
Social Problem ◽  
International Agreements ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Constitutional State ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

Giving too much complex homework has become a significant social problem and the subject of unsuccessful activities of constitutional state authorities. In light of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, international agreements that Poland is bound by, as well as domestic regulations, the practice of giving homework to students seems to be unjustified or even to be in breach with numerous legal norms.

scholarly journals Doctrinal approaches to the definition of civil procedural law

2021 ◽  
pp. 82-90
Author(s):  
Olena Shtefan
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
International Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Civil Process ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of

Keywords: civil procedural law, civil process, civil proceedings, subject of civil procedurallaw The process of reforming procedural legislation, its harmonization, harmonization with theprinciples and standards of international law, as well as other processes taking place insociety and the state are the factors that affect the need to revise the doctrinal definitions of civil procedural law. One of the most developed issues in the theory of civil procedurallaw is its definition. In turn, the development of science is impossible without reviewingeven established doctrinal approaches and provisions.An analysis of the special literature, mostly educational, led to the conclusion thatscholars use approaches to the definition of the term "civil procedural law", which weredeveloped and included in the theory of civil procedural law in the 50s-60s of the twentiethcentury. Modern definitions of civil procedural law are based on the provisions of theold invalid legislation, or on the provisions of the legislation of other countries (for example,the Russian Federation). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to review the existingdefinitions in the theory of civil procedural law and their harmonization with theprovisions of current legislation of Ukraine.In the process of researching doctrinal approaches to the definition of civil procedurallaw, it was found that researchers invest in the definition of the subject, purpose of thisbranch of law, as well as additional characteristics of civil procedural law (participants,sectoral affiliation, stage, etc.).The lack of a single doctrinal approach to the definition of the subject of civil procedurallaw, which is part of the definition of civil procedural law, prompted to study thesubject of civil procedural law and propose its author's definition.Based on the provisions of current legislation, the article presents the author's definitionof civil procedural law as a branch of law, set and system of legal norms, the subjectof which are public relations arising in civil proceedings on the basis of fair, impartialand timely consideration and resolution of civil cases in order to effectively protect violated,unrecognized or disputed rights, freedoms or interests of individuals, rights and interestsof legal entities, the interests of the state.

scholarly journals Procedural problems in cases of tax violations discovered in the course of tax audits (Article 101 of the Taxation Code of the Russian Federation)

2020 ◽  
pp. 46-57
Author(s):  
Konstantin Evgenevich Shilekhin
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Document Analysis ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Empirical Material

The goal of this article lies in studying the problems of administration of law in the course of brining taxpayers to tax liability and formulation of recommendations of their elimination. The object of this research is the social relations characterizing tax liability and procedural order in this regard. The subject is the legal norms establishing liability for tax violations, as well as regulation the activity of tax and judicial bodies pertinent to application of the fiscal legislation of the Russian Federation. Research methodology is based on the dialectical method of cognition of social reality. For collection, processing, generalization, analysis and interpretation of empirical material, the author uses the methods of induction and deduction, statistical analysis and document analysis. The conclusion is made on the weakness of normative legal regulation of separate procedures of legal investigation on tax violation in terms of the Article 101 of the Taxation Code of the Russian Federation. The author suggest making a number of amendments to the fiscal legislation to improve the mechanism of holding the taxpayers liable.

scholarly journals THE JUSTIFICATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES

2021 ◽  
pp. 54-58
Author(s):  
A. Matat
Keyword(s):  
Structural Analysis ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Legal Practice ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Fundamental Part ◽  
Science Paper ◽  
The Law

This paper deals with the study of the justification of constitutional principles as a fundamental category of constitutional law. Legal principles are an important conception in the legal doctrine and the legal practice of democratic countries. Ukrainian legal doctrine studies legal principles in the two paradigms, namely fundamental principles and general principles. However, this approach does not result in the understanding of principles in constitutional law. That is why principles in constitutional law are an actual topic. The article aims to examine the fundamental concepts to find the justifications of constitutional principles. Hence, the author pays attention to the content of constitutional law and constitutionalism as principles-based categories. First, constitutional law is a fundamental part of the law in the legal system, and all the parts of the law are dependent on constitutional law. Second, the universal constitutional principles are the same for all legal systems. After all, constitutionalism doctrine consists of the limitation of power, and nowadays, this is expressed through the constitution and different constitution principles. The author uses comparative legal, phenomenological, and system-structural analysis as a valid methodology for this research. Finally, the research investigation contains the following conclusions that enable the author to prove the motivation of the science paper to study the outlined topic. First, constitutional law is the basis of the legal system, which embodies constitutional principles; constitutional law has the same effect on public law and private law. Second, constitutionalism is a source for finding constitutional principles. Third, the system of constitutional principles includes the following characteristics: universality and specificity. The system of constitutional principles is open and depends on the interpretation of constitutions. The paper aims to contribute to the growing research highlighting the current issues of constitutional principles. Keywords: principles, constitutional principles, constitutional law, constitutionalism, the system of constitutional principles.

scholarly journals On the relevant questions of usage of information technologies for preventive purposes in oversight activity of the executive branch of government

2020 ◽  
pp. 27-37
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Nikolaevna Smirnova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Information Technologies ◽  
Digital Technologies ◽  
Executive Branch ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Close Integration

The subject of this research is the legal norms regulating the usage of digital technologies in oversight activity of the executive branch of government, as well as law enforcement practice of utilization of digital technologies for preventive purposes in oversight activity of the executive branch of government. The object of this research is the social relations establishing in the process of digitalization of the prevention of violations of mandatory requirements. The author examines such aspects as usage of artificial intelligence in prevention of violations of mandatory requirements, as well as analyzes the implementation of “digital control” preventive purposes of oversight activity of the executive branch of government. The main conclusions of the conducted research consists in determination of positive experience from implementation of digital technologies for preventing violations of mandatory requirements, as well as in proposal of the new ways of using digital technologies for improving the effectiveness of implementation of preventive vector of oversight activity. The author also revealed a number of problems that may arise in case of close integration of digital technologies into preventive vector of oversight activity. The novelty consists in the fact that this article is first to explore the question of digitalization of prevention of violations of mandatory requirements, analyze the prospects of usage of digital technologies, as well as outline the “problematic” aspects of the phenomenon under consideration.

Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Loveland
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Social History ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Historical Sources ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Core Elements ◽  
The Subject

Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights provides an in-depth cross disciplinary introduction to the subject of public law, covering the core elements of a constitutional and administrative law syllabus. In addition, it explores the latest ongoing debates around potential constitutional reforms. The book draws heavily on historical sources and on ideas from political science and political theory as well as legal and social history. It also includes detailed coverage of the UK’s proposed departure from the European Union after the 2016 referendum and the subsequent Miller litigations, as well as the negotiations on the terms of departure. It looks at the polarised positions of ‘soft brexit’ and ‘hard brexit’ and examines what brexit might actually mean for the United Kingdom.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS ON THE DEFINITION OF THE SUBJECT OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL LAW

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Оlena Shtefan ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Judicial Reform ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Relationship

The subject of this article was one of the fundamental and debatable provisions of the doctrine of civil procedural law - its subject. The author on the basis of the analysis of scientific sources, the legislation carried out the retrospective analysis of formation and development of scientific thought concerning definition of a subject of civil procedural law. The paper identifies two main approaches to understanding the subject of the industry and elements of its structure. Analyzing the "narrow" approach to defining the subject of civil procedural law and certain areas of its coverage in the works of scholars, the author substantiates the position on the relationship between procedural activities and social relations that arise between the court and the parties. Particular attention is paid to the history of inclusion in the subject of civil procedural law enforcement proceedings. The author's position on the subject and system of civil procedural law is substantiated. The essence of the "broad" approach to the definition of the subject of the industry by including in its structure of non-jurisdictional forms of legal protection is revealed. The essence of two opposite tendencies in scientific researches concerning structure of a subject of civil procedural law is revealed: the first tendency is reduced to expansion of a subject at the expense of inclusion in it of economic procedural law, at ignoring independent character of this branch of law; the second - the narrowing of the subject of civil procedural law by removing from its structure of enforcement proceedings, the relations arising in the consideration of labor cases. The connection between the definition of the subject of civil procedural law and the jurisdiction of the court defined in the legislation is substantiated. It is proved that the tendency to narrow the subject of civil procedural law was embodied in the legislation of the country as a result of judicial reform in 2016, which led to conflicts in legislation and problems in law enforcement. Based on the theoretical model of determining the subject of legal regulation and using the analogy of determining its structure, the elements of the structure of the subject of civil procedural law are distinguished and its definition is formulated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document