scholarly journals Evaluation of the Governmental Agency Effectiveness in the Russian Federation

Lex Russica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 68-76
Author(s):  
S. A. Lubennikova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Methodological Approach ◽  
Social Indicators ◽  
National Level ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Public Control ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article is devoted to topical issues of determining the effectiveness of the work of governmental agencies in the Russian Federation. The relevance of the study’s subject matter is determined by the lack of comprehensive examination of the subject matter from the perspective of methodology and practice. Public authorities’ activities in the Russian Federation are changing acquiring new qualities. Thus, clear and uniform criteria for their assessment are necessary. Evaluation criteria should be closer to social indicators and should meet the demands of society. The author analyzes the normative-legal regulation of this issue. to this end, the paper provides examination of the Decrees of the President of the Russian Federation that have been issued since 2007 to establishing indicators for assessing the effectiveness of the activities of the executive authorities of the Russian Federation. It is possible to observe a constant change in the methodological approach to the number, formulation and content of the criteria for assessing the effectiveness of the executive authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Between 2007 and 2012, the evaluation criteria were based on public control over the public services effectiveness exercised by citizens. Currently, the approach has changed — public control has been removed from the system under consideration and is now governed by a separate regulatory act. For the first time, to recognize executive authorities’ activities as effective the determination of the level of evaluation criteria to be met by executive authorities is used.The normative regulation of the evaluation of the effectiveness of the executive power at the federal level is also investigated. At the national level there is no any regulatory framework for assessing the activities of federal executive authorities of the Russian Federation. The author draws conclusions about the lack of a uniform approach to the evaluation of governmental authorities’ activities at both federal and regional levels. The conclusions can be used in law-making activities of state bodies.

LEGAL REGULATION OF PUBLIC CONTROL OVER RIGHTSENFORCEM ENTAS WELL AS LEGITIMATE INTERESTS OF PERSONS IN PENAL INSTITUTIONS

2020 ◽  
pp. 43-52
Author(s):  
Евгений Николаевич Зиньков
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Mass Media ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Public Control ◽  
The Public ◽  
Control Functions ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

В настоящей статье рассматривается процедура правовой регламентации общественного контроля, который предоставляет возможность открыто и доступно осуществлять наблюдение за деятельностью органов государственной власти. В ст. 1 Конституции Российской Федерации отмечается, что Россия - правовое государство, следовательно, обеспечение и защита прав и свобод человека и гражданина является высшей ценностью. Сам общественный контроль, как правило, является отдельной частью и не входит в систему контрольной власти государства, он реализуется, прежде всего, путем самоорганизации граждан. На сегодняшний день в России существует множество нормативных документов, регламентирующих деятельность общественных объединений. В Российской Федерации лица, находящиеся в местах изоляции от общества (подозреваемые, обвиняемые и осужденные), обладают всем комплексом прав, что и другие граждане нашего государства, за исключением тех ограничений, которые были установлены приговором суда и федеральными законами. Ст. 32 Конституции РФ наделяет граждан правом участия в управлении некоторых государственных дел, что и позволяет общественности осуществлять контрольные функции. Однако далеко не все общественные объединения обладают полномочиями по детальному изучению той или иной сферы государственной деятельности, к примеру, средства массовой информации (далее - СМИ) имеют возможность лишь поверхностно осветить деятельность конкретного объекта внимания. Однако это тоже является неким способом общественного контроля, так как позволяет общественности получить определенную информацию об изучаемом феномене. This article discusses the procedure for legal regulation of public control, which provides an opportunity to openly and easily monitor the activities of public authorities. Article 1 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation States that Russia is a legal state, therefore, ensuring and protecting human and civil rights and freedoms is the highest value. Public control itself, as a rule, is a separate part and is not included in the system of control power of the state, it is implemented primarily by self-organization of citizens. Today, in Russia there are many regulatory documents regulating the activities of public associations. In the Russian Federation, persons who are in places of isolation from society (suspects, accused and convicted) have all the rights that other citizens of our state have, with the exception of those restrictions that were established by a court verdict and Federal laws. Article 32 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation grants citizens the right to participate in the management of certain state Affairs, which allows the public to exercise control functions. However, not all public associations have the authority to study a particular sphere of state activity in detail.for example, mass media (hereinafter referred to as mass media) can only cover the activities of a specific object of attention. At the same time, this is also a way of public control, since it allows the public to get certain information about the phenomenon being studied.

DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: LEGAL ASPECTS

2021 ◽  
pp. 220-228
Author(s):  
O.L. Alferov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Information Society ◽  
Digital Technologies ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
The Russian Federation

This review analyzes the experience of Russia and a number of foreign countries in implementing digital technologies in public administration, and describes the main regulatory legal acts adopted at the three stages of the formation of the information society in the Russian Federation. The focus is on the problems of legal regulation of the digitalization of public authorities.

scholarly journals Federal Districts in Russia: Practices of Improving Public Administration

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 33-40
Author(s):  
M.G. Shishkin ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Federal Districts ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Creation

Goals and reasons for the creation of federal districts in the Russian Federation and the institution of plenipotentiary representatives of the President of the Russian Federation in federal districts are studied. The problematics of the study is the current normative legal regulation of the federal districts functioning. The author proposes amending legislation on federal districts in order to systematize legal regulation in the sphere of interaction of public authorities located on a federal district territory.

scholarly journals PUBLIC CONTROL IN THE SYSTEM OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT: BASES AND FEATURES

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-332
Author(s):  
Nikolay L. Peshin
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Municipal Government ◽  
State Power ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Public Power ◽  
Public Control ◽  
The Russian Federation

Legal regulation of issues of public control and supervision is one of the problems of legal theory and practice. Underestimating of the place and features of municipal control in the system of public control and supervision is the cause of the poor quality of legal decisions taken, as well as legislation adopted at the level of both the Russian Federation and individual constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Municipal control in the system of public control and supervision, developing recommendations aimed at overcoming the shortcomings of legal regulation and practice of implementing municipal control. Methods: general and private scientific methods of cognition of objective reality (analysis, synthesis, abstraction, analogy, comparative legal, formal legal, and other methods of scientific cognition). The article deals with issues of relationship between state and municipal (public) control carried out by local self-government bodies - as a rule, due to the need to solve tasks that fall within the competence of state power. The problems of its independent implementation are studied based on the principles of local self-government - self-organization and self-control. A detailed analysis of the current legislation, allowing local governments to act as “controlling agents” of state power, is conducted, and based on this analysis, conclusions are made about the existing of municipal public control in the system of local self-government as a specific public phenomenon combining elements of public law and private law regulation. As a state, the Russian Federation is faced with the task of drastically improving the system of control (supervision) as a function of public power, and therefore the already initiated legal reform in this area will undoubtedly continue. In the context of the development of civil society and an open state, the development of forms of public control is also necessary, the lack of which creates a sense of “permissiveness” among the subjects of public power and inevitably leads to a decrease in the efficiency of public authority. Municipal public control within the framework of this system of public-state control should be oriented, including intra-system, at identifying deficiencies in the work of the bodies and officials of local self-government that impede the improvement of the quality of management and organizations. As a result, municipal public control should contribute to a safer for citizens to work and provide services to individuals and legal entities. Sphere of constitutional, administrative and municipal law; questions of the organization of state power and local self-government in the subjects of the Russian Federation; questions of control and supervisory activities. Separate existence of municipal authority does not mean the lack of interaction of local selfgovernment with state administration, non-coincidence of municipal formations under the influence of state-governmental structures, denial of influence of state on local self-government. State power has a significant impact on development of basic social processes predetermining the peculiarities of the implementation of public control by the municipal government. The implementation of supervisory activities, including at the local government level, is an important part of the stable, uninterrupted functioning of the state.

scholarly journals PROCEDURE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND IN THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS

2016 ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Екатерина Ганичева ◽  
Ekaterina Ganicheva
Keyword(s):  
Soviet Union ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Former Soviet Union ◽  
Practical Interest ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Constitutional Justice ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic

The article is devoted to the problems of development of legislation which determines the procedure of the constitutional proceedings, the procedural status and terms of participants’ activity in the Russian Federation and in the Republic of Belarus. Constitutional justice is a relatively new Institute in a legal system of Russia and other former Soviet republics. Conditions for its formation in the former Soviet Union have common as well as specific features. The comparison of the place and role of the constitutional court in system of public authorities and the procedural legal regulation of the constitutional justice is of obvious scientific and practical interest now because a clear, systematic regulation is very important for creating the conditions to allow objectively and comprehensively examine and resolve the constitutional conflict. Highlighting the characteristic features of the Federal constitutional law «On the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation» and the Law of the Republic of Belarus «On constitutional proceedings», the author comes to the conclusion about the necessity of development and specifying of the activity of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation by improving the using of traditional procedural-legal institutions taking into account the unique status of the highest judicial body of the constitutional control.

scholarly journals Russian legislation on public control

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 374-382
Author(s):  
Vitaly Viktorovich Goncharov ◽  
Tatiana N. Mikhaleva ◽  
Grigory A. Vasilevich ◽  
Evgeny Sergeevich Streltsov ◽  
Aleksandra Alekseevna Milkova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Civil Society ◽  
International Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Public Control ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Mechanism

This article is devoted to constitutional legal analysis of international legal bases of the legislation of the Russian Federation on public control. The work substantiates the position that to understand the constitutional legal mechanism of public control in Russia it is necessary to study the international legal framework of control of civil society over public authority in connection with the implementation of generally recognized principles and norms of international law in the legal system of the Russian Federation as a priority the rules of the legal regulation under Part 4 of Article 15 of the Constitution.

scholarly journals Legal Regulation of Public Control Institution: International and Foreign Experience

2019 ◽  
pp. 155-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Goncharov
Keyword(s):  
Civil Society ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Public Control ◽  
Foreign Experience ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Historical Comparative ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Control Institution ◽  
Goals And Objectives

The paper is devoted to the analysis of the limits and the possibility of using international and foreign experience of its organization and functioning in optimizing the institution of public control in the Russian Federation. The author defines the concept of public control in the Russian Federation. The necessity of using international and foreign experience in the organization and functioning of the institution of public control in the process of optimizing this institution of civil society in Russia in the following areas is substantiated: 1) regarding the formulation of the concept of the institution of civil society control over public authority; 2) in terms of its consolidation in regulatory legal acts; 3) by definition of its basic principles, goals and objectives; 4)on consolidation of the list of objects in respect of which control is exercised; 5) on the development and implementation of the main forms and methods of this control; 6) to institutionalize the diversity of its subjects, as well as their authority. In this regard, a number of amendments and additions to the current legislation of the Russian Federation regulating issues of public control are proposed. The author applies a number of methods of scientific research, in particular: historical, comparative legal, and formal logical analysis. This will not only solve modern problems that arise during the organization and functioning of public control in the Russian Federation, but also ensure its full development as a promising civil society institution. The paper proposes a number of changes and additions to the current legislation of Russia, regulating issues of public control. The results can be used both in educational and scientific, and in practical activities, including in lawmaking.

scholarly journals Anti-Depopulation Policy as a Method for Boosting Russia’s National Security

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.38) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Julia Vladimirovna Gnezdova ◽  
Vasiliy Iosifovich Deren ◽  
Elena Nikolaevna Rudakova ◽  
Irina Vladimirovna Karapetyants ◽  
Anastasia Anatolievna Safronova
Keyword(s):  
National Security ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Social Economic ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Economic Determinants ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Natural Terrain ◽  
Political Economic ◽  
Demographic Policy

This paper makes a case for that declines in population size must be counteracted via a well-substantiated anti-depopulation policy. Russia’s current anti-depopulation policy has yet to live up to its potential. The linkage between depopulation and social/economic processes taking place across the Russian Federation may well be associated with the nation’s rather inhomogeneous, polarized natural-terrain, territorial-economic, and settlement structure and marked differentiation in terms of major demographic and natural/economic determinants. By its subject matter, the issue of depopulation has long stopped being strictly scientific – it now also has a political, economic, and ethnocultural ring to it. In this context, ‘The Concept on Demographic Policy in the Russian Federation for the Period through to 2025’ expressly sets out the goals, principles, objectives, and key focus areas for Russia’s demographic policy, as well as the mechanisms for implementing it and curbing depopulation. However, all these postulates have thus far failed to be a factor for rational activity and greater responsibility for implementing set objectives on the part of relevant public authorities, which is affecting the nation’s geopolitical security.   

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document