scholarly journals On the question of the potential of human rights commissioners in the Russian Federation to develop human rights and freedom law enforcement practices (based on the experience of the Republic of Tatarstan)

2021 ◽  
pp. 134-141
Author(s):  
S. Kh. Saburskaya
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
Subjective Experience ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
State Protection

To date, in public opinion, as well as in the scientific community, there have been polar assessments of the activities of the ombudsmen in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as the Ombudsman): from “bureau for redirecting complaints” to “a unique institution for the protection of human and civil rights and freedoms”. The spectrum of opinions, as a rule, is formed through the study of analytical materials (annual and special reports), or it can be formed from the subjective experience of a researcher (respondent) addressing the Ombudsman, taking into account the results of a specific complaint consideration.The activities of ombudsmen to ensure state protection of human and civil rights and freedoms are quite versatile.Therefore, in this article, we made an attempt to analyze the human rights activities of the Ombudsman not from the standpoint of the effectiveness of decisions made on complaints received in a particular sphere of relations, but through the prism of its ability to generally influence the law enforcement practice of state authorities, local governments and organizations, performing publicly significant functions.

scholarly journals Политика Уполномоченного По Правам Человека На Государственной Службе В Республике Татарстан, Россия (Policies of The Commissioner For Human Rights In Public Service In The Republic of Tatarstan, Russia)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanislav Vladimirov Mladenov ◽  
Gine Putri Pertiwi ◽  
Refly Setiawan ◽  
Siti Indarini Nur Faizah ◽  
Abdurrahman Abdurrahman
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
State Agencies ◽  
The People ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Government Institution

AbstractThe Commissioner for Human Rights is a government institution that provides protection for the rights of the people in the Republic of Tatarstan, Russia. The establishment of the Human Rights Commissioner in the Russian Federation as a state body is one of the most important achievements of the transformation of democracy in Russia. In the Republic of Tatarstan, the Institute of Commissioners for Human Rights was established in 2000 in accordance with the Constitution of the Republic of Tatarstan to strengthen guarantees of state protection of human and civil rights and freedoms, to promote their observance and respect. by state agencies, local governments and officials. This study aims to explain how the Policies of the Commissioner for Human Rights in the Republic of Tatarstan are related to public services and to find out how the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Republic of Tatarstan provides the best service for the entire community. The method used in this research is a qualitative research method with a descriptive analysis approach. The results show that the Commissioner for Human Rights in the Republic of Tatarstan has made a policy that is appropriate for the welfare of the community and carries out its duties properly based on the main duties and functions of the Commissioner for Human Rights in the Republic of Tatarstan.Keywords: Policy, Commissioner for Human Rights, Public Services, Society of the Republic of Tatarstan, Russia AbstrakKomisaris Hak Asasi Manusia merupakan sebuah lembaga pemerintahan yang memberikan perlindungan terhadap hak masyarakat di Republik Tatarstan, Rusia. Pembentukan lembaga Komisaris Hak Asasi Manusia di Federasi Rusia sebagai badan negara merupakan salah satu capaian terpenting dari transformasi demokrasi di Rusia. Di Republik Tatarstan, Lembaga Komisaris Hak Asasi Manusia didirikan pada tahun 2000 sesuai dengan Konstitusi Republik Tatarstan untuk memperkuat jaminan perlindungan negara atas hak asasi dan kebebasan manusia dan sipil, untuk mempromosikan ketaatan dan penghormatan mereka. oleh badan-badan negara bagian, pemerintah daerah dan pejabat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan bagaimana Kebijakan Komisaris Hak Asasi Manusia di Republik Tatarstan terkait dengan pelayanan public dan untuk mengetahui bagaimana Komisaris Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Tatarstan dalam memberikan pelayanan yang terbaik bagi seluruh masyarakat. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif analisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Komisaris Hak Asasi Manusia di  Republik Tatarstan telah membuat suatu kebijakan yang tepat bagi kesejahteraan masyarakat dan menjalankan tugasnya dengan baik berdasarkan tugas pokok dan fungsi Komisaris Hak Asasi Manusia di Republik Tatarstan.Kata Kunci: Kebijakan,  Komisaris Hak Asasi Manusia, Pelayanan Publik, Masyarakat Republik Tatarstan, Rusia АннотацияУполномоченный по правам человека - это государственное учреждение, обеспечивающее защиту прав людей в Республике Татарстан, Россия. Создание Уполномоченного по правам человека в Российской Федерации как государственного органа - одно из важнейших достижений трансформации демократии в России. В Республике Татарстан Институт уполномоченных по правам человека был создан в 2000 году в соответствии с Конституцией Республики Татарстан с целью усиления гарантий государственной защиты прав и свобод человека и гражданина, содействия их соблюдению и уважению. государственными органами, органами местного самоуправления и должностными лицами. Это исследование направлено на объяснение того, как политика Уполномоченного по правам человека в Республике Татарстан связана с государственными услугами, и на то, чтобы выяснить, как Уполномоченный по правам человека Республики Татарстан предоставляет наилучшие услуги для всего сообщества. Метод, использованный в этом исследовании, представляет собой качественный метод исследования с подходом описательного анализа. Результаты показывают, что Уполномоченный по правам человека в Республике Татарстан разработал политику, которая соответствует благосостоянию общества и выполняет свои обязанности должным образом, исходя из основных обязанностей и функций Уполномоченного по правам человека в Республике Татарстан. Татарстан.Ключевые слова: Политика, Уполномоченный по правам человека, Государственные службы, Общество Республики Татарстан, Россия  

scholarly journals Institute of the high commissioner for human rights in the Russian Federation in the context of public request for social justice

2021 ◽  
pp. 54-63
Author(s):  
I. V. Chechelnitsky
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Sharp Increase ◽  
Legal Education ◽  
High Commissioner ◽  
Principle Of Justice ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Sociological Studies

The results of the latest sociological studies indicate a sharp increase in the demand for justice and an emerging tendency for citizens to understand the category of justice in a human rights context. Based on the analysis of the work of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation, approaches to the implementation of the principle of justice through the restoration of violated rights, lawmaking in the field of human and civil rights, international cooperation in the field of human rights and legal education on human rights and freedoms, forms and methods of their protection are revealed. The proposals on the need to improve legislation and law enforcement practice are substantiated.

Human Rights Activities as a Function of the Prosecutor’s Office

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 88-93
Author(s):  
K.N. Golikov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Main Function ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The subject of this article is the problems of the nature, essence and purpose of prosecutorial activity. The purpose of the article is to study and justify the role of the human rights function in prosecutorial activities in the concept of a modern legal state. At the heart of prosecutorial activity is the implementation of the main function of the Prosecutor’s office – its rights and freedoms, their protection. This means that any type (branch) of Prosecutor's supervision is permeated with human rights content in relation to a citizen, society, or the state. This is confirmed by the fact that the Federal law “On the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation” establishes an independent type of Prosecutor's supervision-supervision over the observance of human and civil rights and freedoms. It is argued that the legislation enshrines the human rights activities of the Prosecutor's office as its most important function. It is proposed to add this to the Law “On the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation”.

scholarly journals Communication Models of Local Self-Government as a Subject of Modern Russian Policy (Based on Local Self-Government Bodies of the Republic of Tatarstan)

2021 ◽  
pp. 246-254
Author(s):  
Galina Morozova ◽  
◽  
Diana Fatikhova ◽  
Elmira Ziiatdinova ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Local Government ◽  
Public Relations ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Local Authorities ◽  
Symmetrical Model ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Introduction. The article presents the results of a study of communication in the system of local self-government of the Republic of Tatarstan as a subject of the Russian Federation conducted by the authors in November – December 2019. The study included a survey of representatives of regional media and press services of local authorities of the Republic of Tatarstan in order to determine the model of communication in the local government system and the role of PR-activities in the regulation of social interaction in the region. Methods and materials. The main method of studying was the method of expert survey. The authors developed a questionnaire, which was used during an interview with experts. When choosing an expert – a media representative for the interview – the authors took into account three factors: the rating of the represented media, the experience of the respondent in the regional media (at least five years) and the authority to make a key decision on the publication of the material. In order to identify the experts who are representatives of local self-government bodies, the authors of the article determined the following criteria: implementation of information and analytical activities in the structure of local self-government bodies, at least 5 years of experience as a head of a structural unit (public relations / media relations department) of local self-government bodies. Analysis. The analysis showed that the development of social media accelerates the process of establishing a two-way model of communication between the government and the public. Social media have become a full-fledged source of information both for the journalistic community and for the press services of local governments. Moreover, with the help of the content posted in posts on official accounts on social networks, local governments can attract residents of the municipal territory to participate in solving local issues. Constant monitoring, responding to comments, tracking negative content on social media are becoming everyday practices in the work of press services. Results. The results of the study indicate that over the past decade in the Russian Federation the necessary prerequisites have been formed for the formation of a bilateral symmetrical model of communication between local authorities and the population. This model is aimed at providing effective feedback that allows the local government to quickly respond to the aspirations and needs of the population, monitor their dynamics, constantly monitor the attitude and assessments of citizens of decisions made on the development of the city or region.

scholarly journals The prosecutor’s office on the defense human and civil rights and freedoms in the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China

2021 ◽  
pp. 87-92
Author(s):  
T. I. Otcheskaya
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
People’S Republic Of China ◽  
Labor Rights ◽  
People's Republic Of China ◽  
Republic Of China ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

The article is devoted to topical issues of protection of human and civil rights and freedoms by an important state body — the prosecutor’s offi ce in two states — the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China. The author investigated the issue of the formation of prosecutorial supervision in the European space in the mechanism of statehood on the example of the Russian Federation and in the Asian space on the example of the People’s Republic of China.At the same time, the approaches of the two states to the protection of human rights at the constitutional level, which are regulated by the Constitution of the PRC and the Constitution of the Russian Federation, have been studied. The achievements of the Russian prosecutor’s offi ce in protecting human and civil rights and freedoms, which are the responsibility of the state, including on issues of observance of the labor rights of citizens, the right of citizens to protect life and health, are consecrated.The state program of action in the fi eld of human rights adopted by the State Council of the People’s Republic of China has also been studied in detail. Achievements in the social sphere are shown, which are provided not only by the state, but also by the prosecutor’s offi ce. The approaches of legal science in the two states are consecrated not only in the regulation of human and civil rights and freedoms, but also in their provision.Based on the material studied, the author concluded that it is possible to use the positive experience of Russia and China, mutually in both states, in order to ensure the protection of human and civil rights and freedoms in each of them.

scholarly journals Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation: evaluation of effectiveness and measures for its improvement

2021 ◽  
pp. 868-877
Author(s):  
Boris Gavrilov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Dialectical Logic ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Procedural Code ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Historical Comparative

Introduction: the article analyzes provisions of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation and its impact on the implementation of key legal institutions designed to ensure respect for the rights and legitimate interests of criminal proceedings participants by law enforcement and judicial authorities. Purpose: having studied effectiveness of the amendments made in the CPC and conducted statistical analysis of the results of criminal cases investigation, the author presents shortcomings in the legislation identified by the scientific community and law enforcement practice and proposes measures to improve both certain legal norms of the CPC RF and its procedural institutions in order to ensure constitutional provisions on the state protection of human and civil rights and freedoms. Methods: the researcher used historical, comparative legal and empirical methods for describing quality and legality issues in the investigation of criminal cases; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic. Private scientific and legal technical methods, as well as the method for interpreting specific legal norms were applied. Results: the analysis of development of Russian and foreign criminal procedural legislation and law enforcement practice objectively indicates that the absolute majority of the amendments made to the Code contributed to enhancing performance of pre-trial investigation or initial inquiry bodies in implementing the provisions of Article 6 of the CPC. It stipulates protection of the rights and lawful interests of the persons and organizations, who (which) have suffered from the crimes, as well as their protection from unlawful accusations and conviction, and other restrictions of their rights and freedoms. Betterment of the criminal procedural legislation is also aimed at overcoming formalization of its individual provisions and bureaucratization of actions of the inquirer, investigator, prosecutor’s office and judicial community in the investigation and trial of criminal cases. Conclusions: to adapt the modern Russian criminal process to modern realities (new types of crimes and methods of their commission, increased requirements for ensuring legality in activities of pre-trial investigation bodies, their compliance with procedural deadlines in criminal cases and improving investigation quality) it is necessary to make changes in pre-trial proceedings, in particular, to reorganize procedural rules for commencement of criminal proceedings; bringing investigation terms into line with the provisions of Article 61 of the CPC on a reasonable period of criminal proceedings; differentiating investigation forms, etc. All this is focused on improving effectiveness of the fight against crime and its most dangerous types.

scholarly journals Unrestricted (absolute) rights and freedoms of man and citizen in the Constitution of the Russian Federation of 1993 and international acts

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (4) ◽  
pp. 69-75
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Podmarev
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Religious Affiliation ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Individual

The 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation as one of the principles of the legal status of an individual establishes the possibility of restricting human and civil rights and freedoms, while also providing for the necessary conditions for imposing such restrictions (the existence of a constitutional goal of restriction; setting restrictions only by federal law; proportionality; compliance with international standards of restrictions; prohibition restrictions on rights based on social, racial, national, linguistic or religious affiliation). The need for the existence of restrictions on the rights and freedoms of the individual is due to various reasons: the protection of the foundations of the constitutional order, the rights and freedoms of other persons, and the interests of the state. However, certain human rights and freedoms cannot be restricted under any circumstances; this so-called absolute rights and freedoms. But neither national legislation nor international law contain a precisely defined list of absolute rights and freedoms. The aim of the article is to identify in the Constitution of the Russian Federation of 1993 and in international acts unrestricted (absolute) rights and freedoms of a person and citizen. The relevance of the research topic for the Russian constitutional legal science is due to the fact that certainty in the understanding of the list of unrestricted rights and freedoms is necessary for the improvement of lawmaking and law enforcement activities. The article examines the provisions of the Constitution of Russia, the main international legal acts on human rights, the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals Legal awareness and legal education as a form of implementation of legal initiative

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Red'ko
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Society ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Education ◽  
Modern Society ◽  
Objective Reality ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Destructive Processes ◽  
The Right

The modern society of the Russian Federation is faced with the massive incompetence of specialists in various fields of activity and branches of knowledge. The situation reached such a climax that a person and a citizen began to be openly afraid to get sick, to turn to law enforcement or human rights bodies, to delve into the essence or content of laws in the event of any kind of tort. Setting ourselves the goal of understanding such destructive processes for the state, as well as the ways of their counteraction, we came to the conclusion that these phenomena of objective reality are associated with both external and internal causes, and one of the ways to eliminate them may be recognition and the development of the right of active citizens and civil society to legal initiative. Considering that the sphere of research interests was in the plane of law, it became possible to conduct a study in the field of legal awareness and legal education, which does not exclude the possibility of using the identified positive and negative aspects for other spheres of human and citizen's life.

scholarly journals Problems of protection of human rights in criminal procedure under the conditions of pandemic

2020 ◽  
pp. 23-32
Author(s):  
Lyudmila Mil'tonovna Volodina
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Current Situation ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Nonstandard Conditions ◽  
The Russian Federation

The object of this research is the relations on protection of human rights in criminal procedure justice in under the conditions of pandemic. The subject of this research is analysis of the activity of law enforcement and judicial systems in the country’s current situation. The proliferation of coronavirus infection in the Russian Federation generated pervasive problems in this area. Recommendations contained in the Decisions of the Presidium of the Supreme Court and the Presidium of the Council of Judges of the Russian Federation of March 18, 2020 and April 8, 2020 did not clarify the law enforcement practice, which led to ambiguity in the interpretation of certain provisions of these documents. The situation that formed in the country as a result of COVID-19 pandemic requires rationalization of a number of issues on the protection of human rights in nonstandard conditions of the work of judicial and law enforcement systems. Information from the open sources published on the Internet served as the foundation for this research. The conducted analysis is valuable for understanding the current situation, as well as for making appropriate decisions that are instrumental for the future. Based on the acquired results, the makes recommendations aimed at improvement of separate institutions of criminal law and criminal procedure law, namely Institution of the statute of limitations, institution of the suspension of proceedings in a criminal case. The scientific novelty consists in the exact wording of indicated recommendations on amending the current criminal procedure legislation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document