scholarly journals Off-label Use of Drugs in Childhood Asthma

2015 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
António J Cabral ◽  
Mário Morais-Almeida ◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

Asthma is among the most common illnesses in childhood and may require off-label drug use for adequate symptom control. Several studies have assessed that this use is common mainly due to a lack of clinical research. The leading concerns are the increased risk of adverse drug reactions and prescription errors. However, off-label prescriptions are not necessarily incorrect. The European Medicines Agency released the Paediatric Regulation to promote research in the medicines for children; yet, recent data suggest only a minor impact.

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 19-26
Author(s):  
D. V. Ivashchenko ◽  
N. I. Buromskaya ◽  
A. D. Malakhova ◽  
N. A. Tsarkova ◽  
L. M. Savchenko ◽  
...  

Antipsychotics are often used to treat children and adolescents. Because of their age, there are a lot of off-label prescribed antipsychotics in that population. However, the off-label use of medications is considered to be potentially unsafe.Objective: to evaluate whether the off-label prescription of antipsychotics outside of the approved age group increased the risk of adverse drug reactions in adolescents experiencing an acute psychotic episode.Patients and methods. We analyzed 450 charts of adolescents hospitalized due to an acute psychotic episode (only completed cases). In addition, we evaluated adverse drug reactions adjusted by off-label antipsychotics prescription outside the approved age group using the Global Trigger Tool (GTT). We also registered prescriptions with duplicates drug classes and potentially dangerous drug interactions.Results and discussion. Off-label antipsychotics prescription outside the approved age group was less frequently associated with adverse drug reactions (3.2% vs. 10.5%; p=0.013). The logistic regression analysis did not show any significant associations between the off-label antipsychotic use and increased risk of adverse drug reactions (Odds ratio=0.994 (95% confidence interval 0.572-1.726), p=0.982). Although, patients with off-label use of antipsychotics were more likely to have potentially dangerous drug interactions (35.2% vs. 16.15%; p=0.0001) and prescriptions with duplicates drug classes (39.6% vs. 15.43%; p=0.0001).Conclusion. Off-label antipsychotic prescription outside the approved age group in adolescents with acute psychotic episode does not increase the risk of adverse drug reactions. However, an increase in potentially dangerous drug interactions and prescriptions with duplicates drug classes frequency could be considered red flags. Therefore, we have concluded that the concerns about off-label antipsychotics prescription outside of approved age groups in adolescents with acute psychotic episodes were overrated.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea D. Pratico ◽  
Laura Longo ◽  
Silvana Mansueto ◽  
Lucia Gozzo ◽  
Ignazio Barberi ◽  
...  

Pharmaceutics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 1176
Author(s):  
Bethany Faulkner ◽  
M. Begoña Delgado-Charro

This work aimed to establish whether paediatric needs in cardiovascular diseases have been met by paediatric investigation plans (PIPs) produced since the development of the European Union Paediatric Regulation in 2007. The European Medicines Agency repository was searched for patterns in the development of paediatric medicines in general. Next, positive PIPs related to cardiovascular diseases were scrutinized for outcomes and compared to specific paediatric cardiovascular needs. In total, 1866 PIPs were identified with 12% corresponding to decisions taken for cardiovascular medicines. However, despite this therapeutic area having the greatest number of overall PIPs, only 14% of established needs in paediatric cardiovascular diseases were addressed by PIPs with positive decisions. Further, 71.9% of PIPs with decisions in cardiovascular disease corresponded to full waivers, so the product would not be studied in paediatrics. Despite the progress found in overall numbers of PIPs published, cardiovascular products are still commonly used off-label in paediatrics. Particularly, there is a need to develop products to treat heart failure and hypertension, two areas with clear unmet clinical needs in paediatrics. A case study on valsartan showed that industry, regulators, health technology assessment bodies, and prescribers should work together to reduce off-label use of paediatric cardiovascular diseases (CVD).


Therapies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Gérard ◽  
Serena Romani ◽  
Audrey Fresse ◽  
Delphine Viard ◽  
Nadège Parassol ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renske Caminada ◽  
Max Polano ◽  
Anna M. G. Pasmooij ◽  
Violeta Stoyanova-Beninska

Aim: Off-label prescription is not regulated on the European Union (EU) level and therefore not harmonised in the EU Member States (MS). Despite this, the use of medicines outside of the drug label occurs in clinical practice, and it can be included in treatment guidelines and/or reimbursed in some cases. It is, however, currently not clear to what extent off-label use can be included in regulatory discussions at a European level at the different committees at the European Medicines Agency. In this article, we provide an overview of the current legislation on MS level regarding off-label prescription in order to support EU regulatory discussions. Methods: Relevant national legislation regarding off-label prescription from MS was identified by distributing a questionnaire to EMACOLEX. Case law was excluded. The identified categorical elements and prerequisites in the national legislation were then categorised. Subsequently, a comparison was made to the five Good Off-Label Use Practice (GOLUP) principles. Results: Based on the obtained responses from 10 MS, we observed a large heterogeneity in the legislation of MS regarding off-label prescription. Five (out of 10) MS regulate off-label prescription explicitly and seven (out of 10) MS have prerequisites. One or more prerequisites per MS were reflected in the GOLUP principles as formulated in 2017. Conclusion: The main contribution of this work is to flag that off-label prescription actually needs to be well defined and understood before it can be appropriately taken into consideration in regulatory discussions. There is a heterogeneity in legislation regarding off-label prescription in the investigated MS, which may lead to different perspectives. A common understanding of the concept and more alignment in off-label prescription practices and their regulation at MS level may contribute to further regulatory discussions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. e53-e55
Author(s):  
Laurence Gariépy-Assal ◽  
Simon Marcoux ◽  
Jerome Coulombe ◽  
Julie Powell ◽  
Sandrine Essouri ◽  
...  

Abstract Primary Subject area Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Background Vascular anomalies (VA) represent a heterogeneous group of disorders associated with an abnormal development and proliferation of blood and/or lymphatic vessels displaying variable clinical presentations and severity. Infantile hemangiomas, venous, and lymphatic malformations, for example, are commonly encountered in children. Other, less frequent diagnostics include Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome and PIK-3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS). Severe phenotypes can alter organ function and/or lead to pain and chronic functional impairment, and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Management includes surgical, interventional radiology, and pharmacologic modalities. Drugs are administered by systemic (e.g., oral, intravenous) or local (topical, intralesional) routes, or by sclerotherapy (endovascular or percutaneous venous, lymphatic, or arterial injection). Off-label drug use is common in pediatrics and in rare diseases, two characteristics applying to vascular anomalies (VA). Off-label use is associated with an increased risk of adverse drug reactions. Objectives To quantify off-label drug use in VA and assess its safety. Design/Methods A guidelines search was conducted to extract a list of drugs used in VA management. The labelling status and safety of each drug was assessed based on the product monograph, Micromedex, and the FDA data. A drug was considered to have significant safety concerns if a black box warning (the FDA’s most stringent warning dedicated to serious or life-threatening risks) or if a serious adverse drug reaction was reported in at least 1% of the patients (leading to hospitalization, congenital malformation, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, life-threatening condition, or death). Results Among 87 drugs, 13 were unlicensed and 73 off-label. Figure 1 describes the reason for considering the 73 drugs off-label. Among 74 licensed drugs, only the oral solution of propranolol hydrochloride (Hemangeol®) for the treatment of infantile hemangiomas (IH) is approved. 98.9% of the drugs are used off-label or unlicensed. Except infantile hemangioma, all other VA are exclusively treated with off-label drugs. Significant safety issues concerned 73% of the drugs and were more frequent among systemic than locally delivered drugs (Figure 2). Conclusion This first study determining the rate of off-label drug use in vascular anomalies shows that off-label drug use in VA is the rule and not the exception. Significant safety concerns are common. It is needed to carefully weigh risk and benefits for every patient when using systemic and local treatments carrying safety concerns. Patients and families should be openly informed and involved in the decision-making process.


Author(s):  
Gunjeet Singh ◽  
ShashankShekhar Gautam ◽  
Anshu Gupta ◽  
Pankaj Saini

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5622-5622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Maria Quinto ◽  
Elena De March ◽  
Monica Castelli ◽  
Francesco Piazza ◽  
Fausto Adami ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and objectives. Infectionsare commonandpotentially fatal events affecting patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Predisposing factors that are likely to be associated with increased risk of infections in MDS patients are neutropenia and/or neutrophil functional impairment; B-, T- and NK-cell defects; secondary iron overload related to red blood cell transfusions; comorbidities; treatment toxicity; previous severe infections. Few data are available on the incidence and pathogens involved in infectious events, most of these originating from retrospective studies or clinical trials with primary end points other than infection. An Italian single Center real-life experience assessing the incidence, risk factors and impact of infections on outcome of patients with MDS treated with hypomethylating agents is herein reported. Design and methods. From March 2008 to October 2013, 50 patients, aged 40 years and older (median age: 69, 40-84 years) with diagnosis of MDS (WHO2008 categories: 22.4% RA/RCMD, 32.6% RAEB-1, 28.5% RAEB-2, 12.2% CMML, 4% AML), were treated with 5-azacitidine (75 mg/m2/die for 7 days every 4 weeks), both in on-label and off-label drug use setting. Forty-four percent of patients had intermediate-2 or high International Prognostic Scoring System, 68% were neutropenic and 12% had high MDS-Comorbidity Index. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered to 12 patients (24%), prophylactic antifungal to 17 patients (34%) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered to 24 patients (48%). Results. Median number of cycles received by a single patient was 5 (range 1-21); 48% received more than 6 cycles of therapy. 30.4% of the entire cohort was considered responsive to treatment (14.4% hematologic improvement, 8% partial response, 8% complete response, according to IWG2006 criteria); 24% of patients achieved a stable disease. Out of 50 patients, 25 (50%) developed 25 infectious events (1 for each patient), during 325 treatment cycles (7.7%); 14/25 (56%) events required hospitalization. Only one patient died from an infectious complication. Twenty-two of 25 infectious events (84%) were bacterial, mostly pneumonia; 3 (12%) were fungal (invasive aspergillosis) and 1 (4%) was viral (H1N1). Infectious events did not significantly affect overall survival (27 vs 18 months, p=0.606), progression free survival (6.0 vs 6.1 months, p=0.48) or overall response to therapy (13 vs 17.4%, p=0.693). However, no complete responses were documented in the cohort of patients who suffered from infectious episodes. In a univariate analysis, age, sex, low neutrophil count, high comorbidity index, antibiotic prophylaxis and use of G-CSF were not found to be associated with infections. Only high IPSS and the presence of pancytopenia, seemed to be correlated with an increased risk for infections. Conclusions. Infectious events, specifically bacterial infections, are one of the most frequent complications during therapy with azacitidine in patients with MDS. These data suggest that there are not predisposing risk factors for infection in patients except those connected with disease severity (high IPSS and pancytopenia). Routine antibiotics, antifungal prophylaxis and/or use of G-CSF appear not to reduce the incidence of infectious events. Moreover, bearing in mind the risk of bacterial and fungal resistance associated with extended use of anti-infective drugs, they should be used with caution in selected subsets of MDS patients. Disclosures Off Label Use: Off-label use of azacitidine for low risk MDS patients with severe transfusions dependence after ESAs failure (primary resistance or relapse after a response).


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2617
Author(s):  
Federico Semeraro ◽  
Giovanni Corona ◽  
Tommaso Scquizzato ◽  
Lorenzo Gamberini ◽  
Anna Valentini ◽  
...  

Background: The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) is an assessment scale of in-hospital patients’ conditions. The purpose of this study was to assess the appropriateness of a potential off-label use of NEWS by the emergency medical system (EMS) to facilitate the identification of critical patients and to trigger appropriate care in the pre-hospital setting. Methods: A single centre, longitudinal, prospective study was carried out between July and August 2020 in the EMS service of Bologna. Home patients with age ≥ 18 years old were included in the study. The exclusion criterion was the impossibility to collect all the parameters needed to measure NEWS. Results: A total of 654 patients were enrolled in the study. The recorded NEWS values increased along with the severity of dispatch priority code, the EMS return code, the emergency department triage code, and with patients’ age (r = 0.135; p = 0.001). The aggregated value of NEWS was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization (OR = 1.30 (1.17; 1.34); p < 0.0001). Conclusion: This study showed that the use of NEWS in the urgent and emergency care services can help patient assessment while not affecting EMS crew operation and might assist decision making in terms of severity-code assignment and resources utilization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document