scholarly journals Variations in Receipt of Contraceptives by Insurance Status and Race/Ethnicity

2022 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-66
Author(s):  
Tsai-Ling Liu ◽  
Yhenneko J. Taylor ◽  
Johanna Claire Schuch ◽  
Lisa Tucker ◽  
Kathryn M. Zager ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Insurance Status ◽  
Race Ethnicity

The Impact of Race/Ethnicity on the Outcomes of Burn Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmine Peters ◽  
Mariel S Bello ◽  
Leigh Spera ◽  
T Justin Gillenwater ◽  
Haig A Yenikomshian
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Native American ◽  
The United States ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Burn Care ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Racial and ethnic disparities are endemic to the United States and are only beginning to attract the attention of researchers. With an increasingly diverse population, focused and tailored medicine to provide more equitable care is needed. For surgical trauma populations, this topic is a small but expanding field and still rarely mentioned in burn medicine. Disparities in prevention, treatment, and recovery outcomes between different racial and ethnic minorities who are burned are rarely discussed. The purpose of this study is to determine the current status of identified disparities of care in the burn population literature and areas of future research. A systematic review was conducted of literature utilizing PubMed for articles published between 2000-2020. Searches were used to identify articles that crossed the burn term (burn patient OR burn recovery OR burn survivor OR burn care) and a race/ethnicity and insurance status-related term (race/ethnicity OR African-American OR Black OR Asian OR Hispanic OR Latino OR Native American OR Indigenous OR Mixed race OR 2 or more races OR socioeconomic status OR insurance status). Inclusion criteria were English studies in the US that discussed disparities in burn injury outcomes or risk factors associated with race/ethnicity. 1,169 papers were populated, 55 were reviewed, and 36 articles met inclusion criteria. Most studies showed minorities had poorer inpatient and outpatient outcomes. While this is a concerning trend, there is a paucity of literature in this field and more research is needed to create culturally-tailored medical care and address the needs of disadvantaged burn survivors.

scholarly journals Impact of health disparities on treatment for single-suture craniosynostosis in an era of multimodal care

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. E13
Author(s):  
Caitlin Hoffman ◽  
Alyssa B. Valenti ◽  
Eseosa Odigie ◽  
Kwanza Warren ◽  
Ishani D. Premaratne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Surgery ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Type Of Surgery ◽  
Surgical Group

Craniosynostosis is the premature fusion of the skull. There are two forms of treatment: open surgery and minimally invasive endoscope-assisted suturectomy. Candidates for endoscopic treatment are less than 6 months of age. The techniques are equally effective; however, endoscopic surgery is associated with less blood loss, minimal tissue disruption, shorter operative time, and shorter hospitalization. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the impact of race/ethnicity and insurance status on age of presentation/surgery in children with craniosynostosis to highlight potential disparities in healthcare access. Charts were reviewed for children with craniosynostosis at two tertiary care hospitals in New York City from January 1, 2014, to August 31, 2020. Clinical and demographic data were collected, including variables pertaining to family socioeconomic status, home address/zip code, insurance status (no insurance, Medicaid, or private), race/ethnicity, age and date of presentation for initial consultation, type of surgery performed, and details of hospitalization. Children with unknown race/ethnicity and those with syndromic craniosynostosis were excluded. The data were analyzed via t-tests and chi-square tests for statistical significance (p < 0.05). A total of 121 children were identified; 62 surgeries were performed open and 59 endoscopically. The mean age at initial presentation of the cohort was 6.68 months, and on the day of surgery it was 8.45 months. Age at presentation for the open surgery cohort compared with the endoscopic cohort achieved statistical significance at 11.33 months (SD 12.41) for the open cohort and 1.86 months (SD 1.1473) for the endoscopic cohort (p < 0.0001). Age on the day of surgery for the open cohort versus the endoscopic cohort demonstrated statistical significance at 14.19 months (SD 15.05) and 2.58 months (SD 1.030), respectively. A statistically significant difference between the two groups was noted with regard to insurance status (p = 0.0044); the open surgical group comprised more patients without insurance and with Medicaid compared with the endoscopic group. The racial composition of the two groups reached statistical significance when comparing proportions of White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, and other (p = 0.000815), with significantly more Black and Hispanic patients treated in the open surgical group. The results demonstrate a relationship between race and lack of insurance or Medicaid status, and type of surgery received; Black and Hispanic children and children with Medicaid were more likely to present later and undergo open surgery.

Acute Surgical Decision-Making in Abdominal Trauma Is Not Altered by Race or Socioeconomic Status

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (12) ◽  
pp. 1869-1875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krista Haines ◽  
Clayton Rust ◽  
Benjamin Pham Nguyen ◽  
Suresh Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Colonic Injury ◽  
Surgical Decision ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
Surgical Decision Making

Two main procedures are performed on patients suffering from colonic perforation, diverting colostomy and primary tissue repair. We investigated patient race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES) that predicted surgical outcomes after blunt or penetrating trauma. A retrospective analysis was performed using data from the National Trauma Data Bank for three years (2013–2015). We identified patients who presented with primary colonic injury and subsequent colon operation (n = 5431). Operations were grouped into three classes: colostomy, ileostomy, and nonostomy. Multiple linear and logistic regressions were performed to assess how race and insurance status are associated with the primary outcome of interest (ostomy formation) and secondary outcomes such as length of stay, time spent in ICU, and surgical site infection. Neither race/ethnicity nor insurance status proved to be reliable predictors for the formation of an ostomy. Patients who received either a colostomy or ileostomy were likely to have longer stays (OR [odds ratio]: 5.28; 95% CI [confidence interval]: 3.88–6.69) (OR: 11.24; 95% CI: 8.53–13.95), more time spent in ICU (2.73; 1.70–3.76) (7.98; 6.10–9.87), and increased risk for surgical site infection (1.32; 1.03–1.68) (2.54; 1.71–3.78). Race/ethnicity and SES were not reliable predictors for surgical decision-making on the formation of an ostomy after blunt and penetrating colonic injury. However, the severity of the injury as calculated by Injury Severity Score and the number of abdominal injuries were both associated with higher rates of colostomy and ileostomy. These data suggest that surgical decision-making is dependent on perioperative patient presentation and, not on race, ethnicity, or SES.

Lung Cancer in Nonelderly Patients: Facility and Patient Characteristics Associated With Not Receiving Treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 931-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Nardi ◽  
Can-Lan Sun ◽  
Francisco Robert ◽  
Julie A. Wolfson
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Los Angeles ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Cancer Surveillance ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Treatment Facility ◽  
Race Ethnicity

Background: In elderly patients with lung cancer, race/ethnicity is associated with not receiving treatment; however, little attention has been given to nonelderly patients (aged ≤65 years) with a range of disease stages and histologies. Nonelderly patients with lung cancer have superior survival at NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs), although the reasons remain unknown. Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 9,877 patients newly diagnosed with small cell or non–small cell lung cancer (all stages) between ages 22 and 65 years and reported to the Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program registry between 1998 and 2008. Multivariable logistic regression examined factors associated with nontreatment. Results: In multivariable analysis, race/ethnicity was associated with not receiving cancer treatment (black: odds ratio [OR], 1.22; P=.004; Hispanic: OR, 1.17; P=.04), adjusting for patient age, sex, disease stage, histology, diagnosis year, distance to treatment facility, type of facility (CCC vs non-CCC), and insurance status. With inclusion of socioeconomic status (SES) in the model, the effect of race/ethnicity was no longer significant (black: OR, 1.02; P=.80; Hispanic: OR, 1.00; P=1.00). Factors independently associated with nontreatment included low SES (OR range, 1.37–2.15; P<.001), lack of private insurance (public: OR, 1.71; P<.001; uninsured: OR, 1.30; P<.001), and treatment facility (non-CCC: OR, 3.22; P<.001). Conclusions: In nonelderly patients with lung cancer, SES was associated with nontreatment, mitigating the effect of race/ethnicity. Patients were also at higher odds of nontreatment if they did not have private insurance or received cancer care at a non-CCC facility. These findings highlight the importance of understanding how both patient-level factors (eg, SES, insurance status) and facility-level factors (eg, treatment facility) serve as barriers to treatment of nonelderly patients with lung cancer.

Evaluation of the effect of care at NCI comprehensive cancer centers (NCICCCs) on disparities in outcome within adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9512-9512
Author(s):  
Julie Anna Wolfson ◽  
Can-Lan Sun ◽  
Heeyoung Kim ◽  
Tongjun Kang ◽  
Smita Bhatia
Keyword(s):  
African Americans ◽  
Older Age ◽  
Age At Diagnosis ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
The Impact

9512 Background: AYAs (15-39y at diagnosis) with cancer have not seen the survival improvement evidenced by younger and older age groups with similar diagnoses, leaving an AYA Gap. While treatment on pediatric protocols is associated with superior survival in 15-21 year-olds, the impact of site of care on survival for vulnerable AYA subpopulations (age at diagnosis or race/ ethnicity) between 22-and 39y at diagnosis remains unstudied. Methods: We constructed a cohort of 10,727 patients newly diagnosed between the ages of 22- and 39y with lymphoma, leukemia, brain tumors, melanoma, thyroid and GU cancers, and reported to the LA County cancer registry between 1998 and 2008. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was conducted, and included race/ethnicity, age at diagnosis, SES, insurance status, primary cancer diagnosis and diagnosis year in the model; the analysis was stratified by site of care (NCICCC vs. non-NCICCC). Results: A total of 928 (9%) patients received treatment at the 3 NCICCCs (City of Hope, Jonsson Cancer Center and Norris Cancer Center) in LA County, and 9,799 received care elsewhere. Five-year overall survival (5y OS) was significantly worse for patients treated at non-NCICCC (87%) when compared with those treated at NCICCC (84%, p=0.02). In addition, 5y OS was worse for African Americans (71%) vs. non-Hispanic whites (89%, p<0.0001) and for older patients (31-39yo: 84%, vs. 22-30yo: 86%, p=0.0004). Multivariable analysis adjusting for SES, insurance status, diagnosis and diagnosis year revealed that African Americans (HR=1.4, p=0.0002) and older AYAs (31-39y: HR=1.24, p<0.0001) were at an increased risk of death. Among patients treated at NCICCC, the difference in risk of death due to race (African Americans: HR=0.8, p=0.7) and age (31-39yo: HR=1.1, p=0.6) was abrogated. On the other hand, among patients treated at non-NCICCC, these differences in outcome persisted (African Americans: HR=1.45, p =0.0002; 31-39yo: HR=1.25, p<.0001). Conclusions: Population-based data reveal that receipt of care at an NCICCC abrogates the effects of race and older age on mortality in AYAs with cancer. Barriers to accessing care at NCICCCs are being explored.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document