scholarly journals Impact of T Helper Cell Subtype on CAR-T Cell Therapy Efficacy

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim M. Khan, BS BA ◽  
Andrew S. Nelson, PhD ◽  
Mark H. Kaplan, PhD
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Culture Conditions ◽  
Cell Killing ◽  
T Helper ◽  
Th Cells ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Th9 Cells ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Car T

Background and Hypothesis: Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) are recombinant receptors with high affinity for the target antigen. Used for tumor therapy, CARs are transduced into patient T cells. CAR-T cells specific for CD19 are used to treat B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Cancerous B cells are destroyed by CAR-T cells in an antigen-specific manner. Currently being used in conjunction with radiation and other cancer therapies to prohibit relapse, Dr. Marco Davila of the Moffitt Cancer Center, has shown that CAR-T therapy induces long term remission and B cell aplasia. Experimental Design: In this experiment the CAR vector obtained from Dr. Davila was transduced into T helper cells cultured under varying conditions (Th0, Th9, and ThGranzyme A). B cell killing and longevity of transduced CAR-Th cells were monitored as part of the criteria for determining the most effective Th subtype for the CAR-T therapy. The target cell killing-mechanism was analyzed at the RNA level using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to analyze gene expression of cytotoxic molecules including granzymes A/B, perforins, Fas-FasL, and TNF-α. Th9 cells were expected to be among the most effective of the indicated subtypes due to their longevity and coordination of the immune response. Results: T cells in all conditions were effectively transduced for CAR expression, although Th9 cells demonstrated a greater proportion of cultured cells that were transduced with the CAR. QPCR results suggest that there is specification of cytotoxic programs among the culture conditions. In Th9 cells, qPCR results suggest their use of perforin and TNF-α. Ongoing studies will compare cytotoxic activity. Potential Impact: Further steps after determining the most effective culture conditions include injecting transduced Th cells of the optimized subtype into mice afflicted with BALL to assess cancer killing in vivo as well as the potential harm of the therapy to the patient.

scholarly journals Adoptive Immunotherapy beyond CAR T-Cells

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 743
Author(s):  
Aleksei Titov ◽  
Ekaterina Zmievskaya ◽  
Irina Ganeeva ◽  
Aygul Valiullina ◽  
Alexey Petukhov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Adoptive Immunotherapy ◽  
Γδ T Cells ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Cell Immunotherapy ◽  
Car T

Adoptive cell immunotherapy (ACT) is a vibrant field of cancer treatment that began progressive development in the 1980s. One of the most prominent and promising examples is chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy for the treatment of B-cell hematologic malignancies. Despite success in the treatment of B-cell lymphomas and leukemia, CAR T-cell therapy remains mostly ineffective for solid tumors. This is due to several reasons, such as the heterogeneity of the cellular composition in solid tumors, the need for directed migration and penetration of CAR T-cells against the pressure gradient in the tumor stroma, and the immunosuppressive microenvironment. To substantially improve the clinical efficacy of ACT against solid tumors, researchers might need to look closer into recent developments in the other branches of adoptive immunotherapy, both traditional and innovative. In this review, we describe the variety of adoptive cell therapies beyond CAR T-cell technology, i.e., exploitation of alternative cell sources with a high therapeutic potential against solid tumors (e.g., CAR M-cells) or aiming to be universal allogeneic (e.g., CAR NK-cells, γδ T-cells), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and transgenic T-cell receptor (TCR) T-cell immunotherapies. In addition, we discuss the strategies for selection and validation of neoantigens to achieve efficiency and safety. We provide an overview of non-conventional TCRs and CARs, and address the problem of mispairing between the cognate and transgenic TCRs. Finally, we summarize existing and emerging approaches for manufacturing of the therapeutic cell products in traditional, semi-automated and fully automated Point-of-Care (PoC) systems.

The ABCs of Immunotherapy for Adult Patients With B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Troy Z. Horvat ◽  
Amanda N. Seddon ◽  
Adebayo Ogunniyi ◽  
Amber C. King ◽  
Larry W. Buie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T ◽  
American Society

Objective: To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of Food and Drug Administration approved and promising immunotherapy agents used in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Data Sources: A literature search was performed of PubMed and MEDLINE databases (1950 to July 2017) and of abstracts from the American Society of Hematology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Searches were performed utilizing the following key terms: rituximab, blinatumomab, inotuzumab, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, Blincyto, Rituxan, Gazyva, Arzerra, CAR T-cell, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR). Study Selection/Data Extraction: Studies of pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety of rituximab, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, inotuzumab, blinatumomab, and CAR T-cells in the treatment of adult patients with ALL were identified. Data Synthesis: Conventional chemotherapy has been the mainstay in the treatment of ALL, producing cure rates of approximately 90% in pediatrics, but it remains suboptimal in adult patients. As such, more effective consolidative modalities and novel therapies for relapsed/refractory disease are needed for adult patients with ALL. In recent years, anti-CD20 antibodies, blinatumomab, inotuzumab, and CD19-targeted CAR T-cells have drastically changed the treatment landscape of B-cell ALL. Conclusion: Outcomes of patients with relapsed disease are improving thanks to new therapies such as blinatumomab, inotuzumab, and CAR T-cells. Although the efficacy of these therapies is impressive, they are not without toxicity, both physical and financial. The optimal sequencing of these therapies still remains a question.

scholarly journals Switchable control over in vivo CAR T expansion, B cell depletion, and induction of memory

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (46) ◽  
pp. E10898-E10906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Viaud ◽  
Jennifer S. Y. Ma ◽  
Ian R. Hardy ◽  
Eric N. Hampton ◽  
Brent Benish ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Rest Period ◽  
Cell System ◽  
Cellular Activity ◽  
Dosing Regimen ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells with a long-lived memory phenotype are correlated with durable, complete remissions in patients with leukemia. However, not all CAR T cell products form robust memory populations, and those that do can induce chronic B cell aplasia in patients. To address these challenges, we previously developed a switchable CAR (sCAR) T cell system that allows fully tunable, on/off control over engineered cellular activity. To further evaluate the platform, we generated and assessed different murine sCAR constructs to determine the factors that afford efficacy, persistence, and expansion of sCAR T cells in a competent immune system. We find that sCAR T cells undergo significant in vivo expansion, which is correlated with potent antitumor efficacy. Most importantly, we show that the switch dosing regimen not only allows control over B cell populations through iterative depletion and repopulation, but that the “rest” period between dosing cycles is the key for induction of memory and expansion of sCAR T cells. These findings introduce rest as a paradigm in enhancing memory and improving the efficacy and persistence of engineered T cell products.

scholarly journals 221 CRISPR screen identifies loss of IFNγR signaling and downstream adhesion as a resistance mechanism to CAR T-cell cytotoxicity in solid but not liquid tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A234-A234
Author(s):  
Rebecca Larson ◽  
Michael Kann ◽  
Stefanie Bailey ◽  
Nicholas Haradhvala ◽  
Kai Stewart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

BackgroundChimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) therapy has had a transformative impact on the treatment of hematologic malignancies1–6 but success in solid tumors remains elusive. We hypothesized solid tumors have cell-intrinsic resistance mechanisms to CAR T-cell cytotoxicity.MethodsTo systematically identify resistance pathways, we conducted a genome-wide CRISPR knockout screen in glioblastoma cells, a disease where CAR T-cells have had limited efficacy.7 8 We utilized the glioblastoma cell line U87 and targeted endogenously expressed EGFR with CAR T-cells generated from 6 normal donors for the screen. We validated findings in vitro and in vivo across a variety of human tumors and CAR T-cell antigens.ResultsLoss of genes in the interferon gamma receptor (IFNγR) signaling pathway (IFNγR1, JAK1, JAK2) rendered U87 cells resistant to CAR T-cell killing in vitro. IFNγR1 knockout tumors also showed resistance to CAR T cell treatment in vivo in a second glioblastoma line U251 in an orthotopic model. This phenomenon was irrespective of CAR target as we also observed resistance with IL13Ralpha2 CAR T-cells. In addition, resistance to CAR T-cell cytotoxicity through loss of IFNγR1 applied more broadly to solid tumors as pancreatic cell lines targeted with either Mesothelin or EGFR CAR T-cells also showed resistance. However, loss of IFNγR signaling did not impact sensitivity of liquid tumor lines (leukemia, lymphoma or multiple myeloma) to CAR T-cells in vitro or in an orthotopic model of leukemia treated with CD19 CAR. We isolated the effects of decreased cytotoxicity of IFNγR1 knockout glioblastoma tumors to be cancer-cell intrinsic because CAR T-cells had no observable differences in proliferation, activation (CD69 and LFA-1), or degranulation (CD107a) when exposed to wildtype versus knockout tumors. Using transcriptional profiling, we determined that glioblastoma cells lacking IFNγR1 had lower upregulation of cell adhesion pathways compared to wildtype glioblastoma cells after exposure to CAR T-cells. We found that loss of IFNγR1 reduced CAR T-cell binding avidity to glioblastoma.ConclusionsThe critical role of IFNγR signaling for susceptibility of solid tumors to CAR T-cells is surprising given that CAR T-cells do not require traditional antigen-presentation pathways. Instead, in glioblastoma tumors, IFNγR signaling was required for sufficient adhesion of CAR T-cells to mediate productive cytotoxicity. Our work demonstrates that liquid and solid tumors differ in their interactions with CAR T-cells and suggests that enhancing T-cell/tumor interactions may yield improved responses in solid tumors.AcknowledgementsRCL was supported by T32 GM007306, T32 AI007529, and the Richard N. Cross Fund. ML was supported by T32 2T32CA071345-21A1. SRB was supported by T32CA009216-38. NJH was supported by the Landry Cancer Biology Fellowship. JJ is supported by a NIH F31 fellowship (1F31-MH117886). GG was partially funded by the Paul C. Zamecnik Chair in Oncology at the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and NIH R01CA 252940. MVM and this work is supported by the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation, Stand Up to Cancer, NIH R01CA 252940, R01CA238268, and R01CA249062.ReferencesMaude SL, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2018;378:439–448.Neelapu SS, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2017;377:2531–2544.Locke FL, et al. Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1–2 trial. The Lancet Oncology 2019;20:31–42.Schuster SJ, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells in refractory B-cell lymphomas. N Engl J Med 2017;377:2545–2554.Wang M, et al. KTE-X19 CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1331–1342.Cohen AD, et al. B cell maturation antigen-specific CAR T cells are clinically active in multiple myeloma. J Clin Invest 2019;129:2210–2221.Bagley SJ, et al. CAR T-cell therapy for glioblastoma: recent clinical advances and future challenges. Neuro-oncology 2018;20:1429–1438.Choi BD, et al. Engineering chimeric antigen receptor T cells to treat glioblastoma. J Target Ther Cancer 2017;6:22–25.Ethics ApprovalAll human samples were obtained with informed consent and following institutional guidelines under protocols approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) at the Massachusetts General Hospital (2016P001219). Animal work was performed according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) (2015N000218 and 2020N000114).

scholarly journals Multiple site place-of-care manufactured anti-CD19 CAR-T cells induce high remission rates in B-cell malignancy patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Maschan ◽  
Paolo F. Caimi ◽  
Jane Reese-Koc ◽  
Gabriela Pacheco Sanchez ◽  
Ashish A. Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Malignancies ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
One Year

AbstractChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting the CD19 antigen are effective in treating adults and children with B-cell malignancies. Place-of-care manufacturing may improve performance and accessibility by obviating the need to cryopreserve and transport cells to centralized facilities. Here we develop an anti-CD19 CAR (CAR19) comprised of the 4-1BB co-stimulatory and TNFRSF19 transmembrane domains, showing anti-tumor efficacy in an in vivo xenograft lymphoma model. CAR19 T cells are manufactured under current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) at two disparate clinical sites, Moscow (Russia) and Cleveland (USA). The CAR19 T-cells is used to treat patients with relapsed/refractory pediatric B-cell Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL; n = 31) or adult B-cell Lymphoma (NHL; n = 23) in two independently conducted phase I clinical trials with safety as the primary outcome (NCT03467256 and NCT03434769, respectively). Probability of measurable residual disease-negative remission was also a primary outcome in the ALL study. Secondary outcomes include complete remission (CR) rates, overall survival and median duration of response. CR rates are 89% (ALL) and 73% (NHL). After a median follow-up of 17 months, one-year survival rate of ALL complete responders is 79.2% (95%CI 64.5‒97.2%) and median duration of response is 10.2 months. For NHL complete responders one-year survival is 92.9%, and median duration of response has not been reached. Place-of-care manufacturing produces consistent CAR-T cell products at multiple sites that are effective for the treatment of patients with B-cell malignancies.

scholarly journals Corticosteroids Do Not Influence the Efficacy and Kinetics of CAR-T Cells for B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 228-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuangyou Liu ◽  
Biping Deng ◽  
Jing PAN ◽  
Zhichao Yin ◽  
Yuehui Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Steroid Group ◽  
Car T ◽  
Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Kinetics Of

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is the most prominent and potentially life-threatening toxicity caused by chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, therefore, effectively controlling severe CRS is critical to ensure patient safety. Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, has been widely used to treat CRS, whereas it is not clear if corticosteroids could be as another optimal choice for managing CRS. We applied corticosteroids instead of tocilizumab as the first-line agent to control CRS in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia during CAR-T therapy. The impacts of steroids on treatment efficiency and kinetics of CAR-T cells were assessed by comparing two groups of patients who did (42 cases) or did not (26 cases) receive steroids. Patients followed up less than one month (went to other hospitals for transplantation or died within one month) were excluded. Treatment effects were evaluated on day 30 after T-cell infusion and then monthly in follow-up patients. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was detected by multiparameter flow cytometry (FCM) and quantitative PCR for fusion genes. The dynamic monitoring of CAR-T cells was performed through flow cytometric quantitation of FITC+CD3+ T cells. B-cell aplasia (BCA) was assayed by FCM. Dexamethasone or methylprednisolone or both (alternately) were administrated. Dexamethasone was used in most cases especially for patients with neurologic symptoms; methylprednisolone was preferred for patients with pulmonary or liver dysfunction, and patients accepting high dose steroids. Steroids started with low dose and could be increased if symptoms were not resolved, for severe CRS, steroids would be escalated up to dexamethasone 20mg/m2/d or more higher up to methylprednisolone 10mg/kg/d. Once CRS was improved, steroids were rapidly reduced and stopped. A total of 68 patients (28 adults and 40 children younger than 18 years) were included, 22 (32.4%) presented with extramedullary diseases (EMD), bone marrow blasts in patients without EMD varied between 5%-96.5%, 31 (45.6%) patients had an allogeneic transplantation, 54 (79.4%) cases received CD19-specific and 14 (20.6%) received CD22-specific CAR-T therapy. Forty-two (61.8%) cases, including all (10) of grade III CRS, 68.2% (30/44) of grade II CRS and 2 patients with no CRS but with GVHD (1 case) or neurotoxicity (1 case), were administered steroids, among them, 23/42 (54.8%) received high dose steroids (>10mg/m2/d dexamethasone or equivalent), the duration of steroid use was 1-16 days (78.6% <= 7 days); whereas 26 (38.2%) patients were not given any steroids but the supportive care. We found that there was no difference either in complete remission (CR) rate (95.2% vs 92.3%, p=.344) or in MRD negative CR rate (80.0% vs 79.2%, p=.249) between steroid and non-steroid group, verified that corticosteroids even high dose steroids did not influence the treatment response. Furthermore, we investigated the dynamics of CAR-T cells. Firstly, the expansion of CAR-T cells in peripheral blood (PB) was evaluated, the average CAR-T cell counts in steroid group were significantly higher than those in non-steroid group on D11 (p=.0302), D15 (p=.0053), D20 (p=.0045) and D30 (p=.0028), except for D7 when CAR-T cells began to expand (p=.9815), this demonstrated that steroids did not suppress the proliferation of CAR-T cells in PB. Secondly, the percentages of patients with detectable CAR-T cells in bone marrow (BM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were compared between steroid and non-steroid group, there were no differences both in BM (85.2% vs 78.6%, p=.923) and in CSF (68.6% vs 57.9%, p=.433), which implied steroids did not influence the trafficking of T-cells to BM and CSF. Thirdly, we monitored B-cell aplasia (BCA) in part of patients followed-up more than 2 months without further treatments, the percentages of patients with BCA in steroid group had no significant differences compared to non-steroid group at 2-month (p=.086) and 3-month (p=.146). Later, although limited cases left, in the steroid group, 100% of patients (4-month, 7/7; 5-month, 7/7; 6-month, 5/5) still maintained BCA and CR, indicating that corticosteroids did not impact the duration of functional CAR-T cells. In conclusion, corticosteroids do not compromise the treatment efficacy and kinetics of CAR-T cells, could be as a feasible and effective approach to manage CAR-T associated CRS. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document