scholarly journals A prospective study on the prescription pattern of anti-cancer drugs and adverse drug reaction in a tertiary care hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 200
Author(s):  
Harshendra Guduru ◽  
Santosh Kumar R. Jeevanagi ◽  
Shantiling Nigudgi ◽  
Smita V. Bhandare
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reaction ◽  
Drug Reaction ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Hair Loss ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Prescribing Pattern ◽  
Anti Cancer

Background: Cancers is a group of disease involving abnormal cell multiplication with the ability to spread to other parts of the body. Common side effects seen with chemotherapy are fatigue, hair loss, easy bruising and bleeding, infection, anemia, nausea and vomiting, appetite changes, constipation etc. The need of this study is to evaluate the prescribing pattern and the adverse drug reaction associated with chemotherapeutic drugs. The study is aimed to analyze the prescribing pattern of anticancer drugs in medical oncology department of a tertiary care hospital, Karnataka.Methods: An observational study was conducted on 30 patients of either sex admitted for chemotherapy for a period of 6 months in at HCG Cancer Institute, Gulbarga and Basaveshwar Teaching and General Hospital (BTGH), Gulbarga. The data collected is analysed statistically using descriptive statistics and presented as counts and percentages. Results are depicted in the form of tables.Results: A total of 30 prescriptions were collected with 10 (33.3%) male and 20 (66.6%) female. the maximum number of cases were noted in the age group of 46years to 55 years (10) and least in age group of 15-25 years having a single patient. In our study we found that more number of patients are breast cancer (12 patients) followed by cervical cancer and ovarian cancer (3 patients) and least are Ewing’s sarcoma and Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (1 patient). Most commonly prescribed anti-cancer drug is carboplatin and paclitaxel i.e. for 12 patients out of 30 patients, followed by cyclophosphamide for 10 patients and less commonly prescribed drug being dactinomycin and pemitrexate. Adverse drug reactions seen in maximum patients is hair loss among 20 pts followed by peripheral neuropathy (17) and taste change (16) and the less commonly noted side effects being chest pain and ototoxicity.Conclusions: The study concluded that the drugs which were used in the treatment of various neoplastic conditions are in adherence and in accordance with the standard treatment guidelines and most of them were prescribed with generic name which leads to reduce in cost of treatment.

A Study on prescribing pattern of drugs in orthopaedic in-patient department at a tertiary care hospital in Guntur region

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-70
Author(s):  
Anjani Teja Ch ◽  
Ramesh babu K ◽  
Leela subramanyam S ◽  
Janani Y ◽  
Eswar Sai Kiran K ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Essential Medicine ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Common Condition ◽  
Prescribing Pattern ◽  
Prescribing Indicators ◽  
Bed Days

The descriptive observational study was conducted over six months among inpatients of the orthopaedics department. The aim is to observe the prescribing pattern of drugs, to find out the percentage of analgesics given and most commonly prescribed analgesic, to compare the prescribed drugs whether they are in NLEM, WHO list and calculate DDD/100 Bed-days and to analyze the drugs for WHO prescribing drugs. A total of 250 patients were included in the study. Out of this, 168 were male, and 82 were female. Most of the patients were in the age group of 31-40[45 in number with 18%]. The most common condition was found to fracture [113 in number with 95.2%]. Commonly prescribed drugs were analgesics 447 with 26.76%. Among all the NSAID's, PCM was most commonly prescribed analgesic with 34.4%. The highest no, of drugs was found to be 4drugs/prescription with 24%. Monthly one analgesic was prescribed per prescription with 38.8%. Utilization of analgesics in term of DDD/100 Bed-days was 55.26; Drugs will be evaluated per prescription as per prescribing indicators of WHO was done, the average no. of drugs per prescription was found to be 0.45, percentage of drugs prescribed by generic name was found to be 13.3%, percentage of encounters with antibiotics prescribed were found to be 94.4%, In ratio percentage of drugs prescribed from the national list of essential medicine was found to be 92.6%. This study would help to facilitate better health care delivery.

scholarly journals ANTIMICROBIAL-RELATED ADVERSE DRUG REACTION IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 229
Author(s):  
Jindal M ◽  
Sharma Rk
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reaction ◽  
Drug Reaction ◽  
Spontaneous Reporting ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Past History ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Beta Lactam ◽  
Active Monitoring ◽  
Beta Lactam Antibiotics

  Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the adverse drug reaction (ADR) related to commonly used antimicrobials in a tertiary care hospital.Methods: A prospective spontaneous reporting study involving, active methods (pharmacist actively looking for suspected ADRs) and passive methods (stimulating prescribers to report suspected ADRs) was carried out in all departments of a tertiary care hospital, for 1 year. Patients of all age groups were included in the study. The data for the study were taken from case sheets, investigation reports of patients who had experienced an ADR, personal interviews with reporting persons or clinicians, personal interviews with patient or patient’s attendant, past history of medication use, which were generally obtained from, prescriptions from the past, reports of medical and surgical interventions, referral letters, ADR reporting forms. Collected data were then analyze for causality assessment by Naranjo’s scale and severity assessment by Hartwig and Siegel’s scale.Result: During 1 year of study period, 75 ADRs related to antimicrobial were reported among 1354 patients who were given antibiotic for the treatment. The incidence rate of antibiotic was found to be 5.53%. The department that reported ADR was medicine (10.16%), ENT (4.6%), pediatric (8.12%), orthopedics (06.9%), surgery (06.9%), chest and tuberculosis (04.6%), obstetrics and gynecology (06.9%), dentistry (02.3%), and skin (10.16%). The most common ADRs were related to gastrointestinal tract; dermatological reactions were second in the list of antimicrobial drugs causing ADR. In this study, among antimicrobials, fluoroquinolones, and beta-lactam antibiotics were the most common drugs causing gastrointestinal and dermatological ADRs. There was no unknown ADR reported that may need to be further investigated through active monitoring. All patients recovered from ADRs without any complications. The causality was assessed by Naranjo’s scale and it revealed that out of 75 antibiotics related ADR 48 (64%) were possible, 27 (36%) were probable, 3 (4.00%) were definate, and 0% were unlikely. According to the Hartwig and Siegel’s scale, most of ADR were mild 45 (60%) and moderate 30 (40%) in nature.Conclusion: ADRs related to antimicrobials occurs frequently. Among antimicrobials, fluoroquinolones, and beta-lactam antibiotics were the most common drugs causing gastrointestinal and dermatological ADRs. The health-care system can promote the spontaneous reporting of antimicrobial ADR to pharmacovigilance center for ensuring safe drug use and patient care.

scholarly journals IMPACT OF CERTAIN EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTIONS ON ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING BY NURSING HEALTH PROFESSIONALS AT A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

2020 ◽  
pp. 175-180
Author(s):  
SUPRIYA SONOWAL ◽  
CHETNA K DESAI ◽  
JIGAR R PANCHAL
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reaction ◽  
Drug Reaction ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Adr Reporting ◽  
Nursing Health

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the impact of certain educational interventions on adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting by nursing health professionals at a tertiary care hospital. Methods: Knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of the nurses regarding ADR reporting were evaluated before and after interventions using a KAP questionnaire. Educational interventions carried out among the nurses were workshops, booklets, SMSes, personal briefings, and posters. Number and quality of ADR reported by nurses in pre-intervention (3 months), intervention (10 months), and post-intervention (3 months) phase were compared. Results: There was a significant increase in response rate to questionnaires in the post-intervention phase (post-IP) (97.74%) as compared to pre-intervention (91.28%) phase (pre-IP). The knowledge score of the nurses increased significantly in post-IP (11.65 ± 2.14) as compared to the pre-intervention (6.98 ± 2.46) phase. No ADR was reported by nurses in pre-IP. Thirty nurses reported 30 ADRs in the intervention phase and six nurses reported six ADRs in the post-IP. The mean score of completeness of ADR notification forms decreased significantly in post-IP. Maximum ADRs (10) were reported after the workshops. Conclusion: Educational interventions improved the KAP of ADR reporting by nurses, albeit temporary. This suggests the need of continuous educational interventions.

scholarly journals Adverse Drug Reaction Policy in a Tertiary Care Hospital

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47
Author(s):  
V Aggarwal ◽  
Shakti Kumar Gupta ◽  
DK Sharma ◽  
S Arya ◽  
S Singh
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reaction ◽  
Drug Reaction ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Personnel Paramédical

ABSTRACT Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality and contribute to the incidence of adverse events, resulting in increased healthcare costs. Healthcare providers need to understand their role and responsibility in the detection, management, documentation, and reporting of ADRs. The purpose of this study is to provide guidelines regarding the procedure of reporting ADRs to hospital authority. It was a descriptive cross-sectional study carried out between April and August 2013. The study population included doctors, nursing personnel, paramedical staff and quality managers of tertiary care hospital from one public and two private hospitals. Interaction was done with study population against the back drop of the checklist and ADR policy was formulated. How to cite this article Singh S, Gupta SK, Arya S, Sharma DK, Aggarwal V. Adverse Drug Reaction Policy in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Int J Res Foundation Hosp Healthc Adm 2015; 3(1):41-47.

scholarly journals A Retrospective Descriptive Study of Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring in Tertiary Care Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 54-58
Author(s):  
Ajay K Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reaction ◽  
Drug Reaction ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
System Organ Class ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Reaction Monitoring ◽  
Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring

ABSTRACT Introduction An adverse drug reaction (ADR) is any undesirable effect of a drug to the patient beyond its anticipated therapeutic effects while used clinically. Aims and objective To analyze the incidence of ADRs in a tertiary care hospital reported from April 2015 till December 2017. Materials and methods Two hundred ADR forms were included in the study and analyzed. These were codified into various drug classes according to anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) classification based on WHO–ATC Index 2019 besides categorized into preventable or not modified Schumock and Thornton scale. Severity was assessed based on a scale by Hartwig et al. Also, the ADRs were classified based on MedDRA 13.01 to system organ class (SOC) and preferred terms (PT) falling under respective SOC. Results Maximum ADRs were reported by dermatology. Most commonly, it involved gastrointestinal system (GIT) followed by skin. Antibiotics and anti-cancer drugs caused maximum ADRs. About two-thirds were classifiable as moderate to severe, whereas about one-third were preventable. About 10% of cases were such that left deep impact of sequelae or were not recovered and one case was fatal. Conclusion Extreme vigilance by clinicians is of utmost crucial virtue in detecting, diagnosing, and reporting such ADR for continued drug safety monitoring. How to cite this article Gupta AK. A Retrospective Descriptive Study of Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring in Tertiary Care Hospital. J Med Acad 2020;3(2):54–58.

scholarly journals Antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a retrospective study of drug utilization pattern in outpatient department of psychiatry at a tertiary care hospital

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Usharani H. Patted ◽  
Hema N. G. ◽  
Anil Kumar Mysore Nagaraj
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Drug Utilization ◽  
Somatoform Disorders ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Burden Of Illness ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Outpatient Department ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Prescribing Pattern ◽  
Cross Sectional

Background: Psychiatric disorders are one of the major causes of morbidity and the burden of illness is enormous and remains grossly under represented. Psychotropic drugs have had a remarkable impact in psychiatric practice. Currently a large number of atypical antipsychotics available in the market are endorsed as better options for treating schizophrenia than the typical antipsychotics. The main objective of the study was to find the commonly prescribed antipsychotics in schizophrenia patients in a tertiary care center.Methods: After Institutional Ethics Committee approval, a retrospective cross-sectional drug utilization study of 400 prescriptions was under taken from 1st July 2015 to 30th July 2016 in the outpatient department of psychiatry of a tertiary care hospital. The prescribing pattern of antipsychotics in schizophrenia patients (N=107) was measured.Results: Out of 400 cases in the outpatient department, schizophrenia cases were predominant (N=107 i.e. 27%) out of which 42.1% were females and 57.9% were males. This was followed by mood disorders and neurotic & somatoform disorders. The most common antipsychotic used was olanzapine followed by risperidone. Least commonly used antipsychotic was haloperidol. Most of the patients who received risperidone also received an anticholinergic trihexyphenidyl (91.8%).Conclusions: Olanzapine and risperidone are the most commonly used antipsychotics. Anticholinergics should be used only in selected patients on antipsychotics as tolerance develops to extrapyramidal side effects. Anticholinergics are unnecessary after 3-6 months in all except 10% of patients. Moreover, it has its own side effects and adversely interacts with antipsychotics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document