scholarly journals Knowledge of medical students on clinical trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 1484
Author(s):  
Ravi Shankar Kanna ◽  
Jagadeesh Alla ◽  
Krishnakanth K.
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Basic Research ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
School Students ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Institutional Ethics

Background: Basic research can help medical school students improve critical thinking skills required by medical practice. In this era of evidence-based medicine, the combination of medical education with clinical research is the key to ensure scientific discoveries are translated into clinical practice. This study’s objective was to know the awareness about clinical trials among undergraduate medical students.Methods: After obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee of NRI Academy of Medical Sciences, Guntur, India, this cross sectional study was conducted in second year medical students after taking their consent. A sample of 90was considered for statistical analysis. A structured questionnaire was used to measure the objective of this study, which had general, regulatory and ethical questions related to clinical trials. Qualitative data variables were expressed by using frequency and Percentage (%).Results: Out of 90 students, it was observed that in the general questions category, 70% of students were aware of the purpose of conducting clinical trials, 50% were aware of the pre-requisites for a participant before participating in a clinical trial and 50% were aware of the parameters evaluated in a clinical trial. 95% of students did not know the response for regulatory questions. The students’ awareness regarding ethics related to clinical trials was better than the other two categories.Conclusions: The overall awareness of clinical trials was low among students though they demonstrated good awareness regarding few aspects of clinical trials.

scholarly journals Results availability and timeliness of registered COVID-19 clinical trials: interim cross-sectional results from the DIRECCT study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e053096
Author(s):  
Maia Salholz-Hillel ◽  
Peter Grabitz ◽  
Molly Pugh-Jones ◽  
Daniel Strech ◽  
Nicholas J DeVito
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Journal Article ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Registration Data ◽  
Clinical Trial Registries ◽  
Treatment And Prevention

ObjectiveTo examine how and when the results of COVID-19 clinical trials are disseminated.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingThe COVID-19 clinical trial landscape.Participants285 registered interventional clinical trials for the treatment and prevention of COVID-19 completed by 30 June 2020.Main outcome measuresOverall reporting and reporting by dissemination route (ie, by journal article, preprint or results on a registry); time to reporting by dissemination route.ResultsFollowing automated and manual searches of the COVID-19 literature, we located 41 trials (14%) with results spread across 47 individual results publications published by 15 August 2020. The most common dissemination route was preprints (n=25) followed by journal articles (n=18), and results on a registry (n=2). Of these, four trials were available as both a preprint and journal publication. The cumulative incidence of any reporting surpassed 20% at 119 days from completion. Sensitivity analyses using alternate dates and definitions of results did not appreciably change the reporting percentage. Expanding minimum follow-up time to 3 months increased the overall reporting percentage to 19%.ConclusionCOVID-19 trials completed during the first 6 months of the pandemic did not consistently yield rapid results in the literature or on clinical trial registries. Our findings suggest that the COVID-19 response may be seeing quicker results disclosure compared with non-emergency conditions. Issues with the reliability and timeliness of trial registration data may impact our estimates. Ensuring registry data are accurate should be a priority for the research community during a pandemic. Data collection is underway for the next phase of the DIssemination of REgistered COVID-19 Clinical Trials study expanding both our trial population and follow-up time.

scholarly journals Career Aspiration and Life Satisfaction of Final Year Medical School Students

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-491
Author(s):  
Uzma Zahid
Keyword(s):  
Life Satisfaction ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Medical School ◽  
Satisfaction With Life ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Satisfaction With Life Scale ◽  
Career Aspiration ◽  
School Students ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical School Students

The aim of this study was to assess career aspiration and its three subscales (leadership, achievement, educational) and their relationship with life-satisfaction in final year medical school students of both genders. This cross-sectional study was carried out in final year students of a medical college in Rawalpindi,Pakistan using 24 items revised English Version of Career Aspiration Scale (CAS) and 5 items Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). This study was conducted on total 88 final year medical school students, among them 44 were males and 44 were females. Findings show significant correlation of career aspiration with lifesatisfaction, as well as of its educational subscale and life satisfaction. There was a non-significant correlation of achievement and leadership subscales of career aspiration with life-satisfaction. Medical students who are more aspired towards their career seem to be more satisfied in their life. Moreover, medical students were more interested in getting more and more education but there is lack of aptitude towards achievement and leadership, signifying the need of mentoring amongst medical students. Practical steps should be taken to develop achievement and leadership aspects of medical students, which can ultimately enhance their career aspirations.

scholarly journals Can reading too much make me run mad? Exploring students’ assumptions and academic performance

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-112
Author(s):  
Kehinde Kazeem Kanmodi ◽  
Olanrewaju Isaac Owoeye ◽  
Almu Bello ◽  
Linda Ekele Iyadi
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Academic Performance ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Study Data ◽  
University Teaching ◽  
School Students ◽  
Cross Sectional

AbstractObjectivesTo determine the prevalence of the assumption that ‘reading too much’ could cause madness (i.e., severe mental illness) among medical, nursing, and community health students, and also explore the relationship between these students’ status on this assumption and their academic performance.MethodsThis study was a cross-sectional study conducted among a convenient sample of medical, nursing, and community health students (n = 122) studying within the Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital campus, Sokoto, Nigeria. Study tool was a paper questionnaire, which obtained information on the demographic profile, awareness of ‘madness’, assumption that ‘reading too much’ is a cause of madness, and self-rating of the participants’ academic performance in their current course of study. Data collected was analysed using the SPSS version 20 software. Test of associations between variables were done using Chi square test.ResultsThe mean age of the 122 respondents was 27.3 years, majority (61.5%) of them were males, and 53.3% were medical students. More than half of the surveyed nursing students (54.2%) and community health students (55.6%), unlike the surveyed medical students (24.6%), had the assumption that reading too much could make them run mad. There was no statistically significant relationship between the assumption that ‘reading too much’ is a cause of mental illness and academic performance of the respondents.ConclusionAssumption that reading too much could cause madness is a fairly common phenomenon among the surveyed tertiary school students, irrespective of their level of academic performance. There exists the need to disabuse the minds of tertiary school students from the assumption that reading too much could make one run mad.

Willingness of patients with pancreatic cancer to participate in clinical trials.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4055-4055
Author(s):  
Pelin Cinar ◽  
Anitra W. Talley ◽  
Jimmy Hwang ◽  
Daniel Paul Dohan ◽  
Margaret A. Tempero
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Trial Recruitment ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Recruitment Methods ◽  
Clinical Trial Recruitment

4055 Background: Recruitment of oncology patients into clinical trials continues to be a challenge as <5% of patients are accrued. Low accrual rates may be due to reduced awareness of trial availability and eligibility by physicians/patients. Our objective was to study the attitudes of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) regarding clinical trial participation and to identify possible barriers to recruitment. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we collaborated with Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN) and invited patients with PC or their caregivers to complete a survey. The survey that was developed consisted of 22 questions and inquired about patients’ previous clinical trial enrollment experiences and their views on participation. The surveys were collected over a 6-month period via the PanCAN website and regional meetings. Comparison analyses between groups were done by Chi-square and Fisher’s test using STATA software. Results: Of the390 surveys received, 149 were included in the final analyses. 30% of the patients were offered to participate in a trial by their physicians. When asked to participate, 62% of the patients agreed. Of the patients who were not enrolled in a clinical trial, 61% were offered to participate in a trial but did not agree. This suggests that these patients were eligible to participate but declined. Conclusions: Majority of the patients with pancreatic cancer were not offered to participate in clinical trials by their physicians but would have agreed if asked. While low clinical trial recruitment rates for PC may be multifactorial, further research may focus on the important role of physicians in clinical trial recruitment efforts. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Knowledge and attitude related to medical ethics among medical students

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 2222
Author(s):  
Iswarya S. ◽  
Bhuvaneshwari S.
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Medical Ethics ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Willingness To Participate ◽  
Ethical Practice ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Institutional Ethics ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Knowledge And Attitude

Background: There has been growing public awareness regarding the ethical conduct of medical practitioners, and complaints against physicians appear to be escalating. After completing their studies, healthcare professionals are expected to know ethical principles and apply them in their clinical practice. Hence, this study was conducted to assess the knowledge and attitude of medical ethics among final year medical students.Methods: Cross sectional study was conducted among final year Medical students in a private medical college. After obtaining permission from Institutional ethics committee, the purpose of the study and nature of information which has to be furnished from the students was explained to them. Willingness to participate in the study was obtained from participants using written consent form. Data was collected among 135 medical students using pre tested self-administered questionnaire. The respondents were asked to grade their responses on a 3 point Likert scale.Results: Study results showed majority 87% of students felt patient wishes must always be adhered to. In contrast 65% of students felt doctors must do what is best irrespective of patient’s opinion. About 64.7% of them disagreed consent is required only in case of operations and not for tests and medications. Nearly half (47%) of the students were of opinion privacy of the patient must not be ignored for benefit of larger group.Conclusions: The fact that many respondents had neutral opinion to some questions may indicate their lack of awareness or knowledge in that area and their inability to decide. Hence there should be sufficient training classes, workshops, conferences to stress the importance of ethical practice. 

scholarly journals Insight of medical students on online teaching during COVID-19 pandemic-A survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-199
Author(s):  
Vaseemunnisa Begum ◽  
Neeraj Sadiq ◽  
Ghulam Subhani ◽  
Asma Gulnaaz ◽  
Mohammed Mohsin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Online Teaching ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Online Classes ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Institutional Ethics ◽  
Study Results

: The Global disease (COVID-19 pandemic) has impacted our lives in various ways. Online teaching is the strange routine for studying platforms to continue with the process of educating students, Online classes have become a key component in the continuity of education.: 1. This study aims to rank the usefulness of online teaching compared to classroom conventional teaching 2. Socioeconomic parameters related to online teaching in a medical college: The study is a cross-sectional study done on medical students. A questionnaire was prepared listing the various ways in which they discern online teaching trying to cope up during the pandemic.: After the institutional Ethics committee clearance, online cross-sectional study was done on the medical students where from the 2 and 3 year. This online survey was done between 10May 2021- 10 June 2021, A total number of 211 students participated out of 250, after completion of 18 months of online classes. A Set of 15 self -designed questionnaire based on 5 point Likert scale was given to the students to rank the effectiveness through online class usefulness levels and satisfaction levels on various parameters. Students were also asked about the demographic factors. The data was analyzed using software SPSS software The study results shows that online classes is less helpful in five parameters and equally helpful in five parameters but was not at all superior to conventional methods, we can come to the interpretation that students think that classroom teaching cannot be replaced by online teaching. We can conclude that online studies can only be a supplement and cannot be an alternate for the established order of learning

Differences in critical thinking skills between nursing students on a fast-track versus traditional 4-year programme

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 434-439
Author(s):  
Khaldoun Aldiabat ◽  
Enam Alsrayheen ◽  
Catherine Aquino-Russell ◽  
Mohammad Al-Qadire ◽  
Omar Al Rawajfah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
University Degree ◽  
Self Administered Questionnaire ◽  
Canada Data

Background: The authors were unable to find studies comparing the critical thinking skills of nursing students on advanced standing programmes (ASP) and on traditional 4-year BN programmes in Canada. The ASP is a condensed Bachelor of Nursing (BN) programme, designed for students who already have a university degree or similar qualification. Aim: To measure and compare the critical thinking skills of ASP students and traditional 4-year BN students. Method: A cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire used to collect data from 100 nursing students at a university in Canada. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. All research ethics were taken into consideration. Findings: All participants scored highly in their critical thinking skills. However, ASP students scored significantly higher than their counterparts on the 4-year programme (M=21.6 vs M=18.9, F=4.75, P=0.035). Conclusion: Higher critical thinking skills among ASP nursing students is a promising sign to expand and support this type of programme as a fast and effective method to cover the shortage in nurses.

scholarly journals Translation and Validation of the Greek Version of a Questionnaire Measuring Patient Views on Participation in Clinical Trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Karampatakis ◽  
Angeliki Kakavouti-Doudos ◽  
Panagiotis Oikonomidis ◽  
Polychronis Voultsos
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Willingness To Participate ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Greek Version ◽  
Factor Solution ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Risks And Benefits ◽  
Patient Views

Abstract BackgroundThe increasing number of clinical research opportunities requires increasing numbers of participants in clinical trials. However, it may become increasingly problematic, as protocols have become increasingly complex. Better understanding of patients’ attitudes towards their potential participation in clinical trials is essential for developing effective clinical trial recruitment strategies. In Greece, limited research has been conducted on this topic so far. This study aims to contribute to filling this gap. MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted. Purposive sampling was used to select participants. The Greek version of a recently developed questionnaire measuring patient views on participation in clinical trials, a 27‐item scale distributed into four factors, was tested. In addition, participants were asked to provide information regarding their socio-demographics. A demographic comparison was conducted.ResultsThe four-factor solution derived in our study consisted of the same 27 items and it was different from the six-factor solution that Arnetz et al. proposed. The factors risks and benefits, that consisted of 5 and 3 items respectively in the six-factor solution, were merged into one factor that consisted of 10 items in the four-factor solution. The four factors produced were Risks and benefits (ten items, α= 0,867), Patient’s expectations (six items, α= 0.864), Patient’s participation (five items, α= 0.827), and Cost and convenience (five items, α= 0,770). We found that demographic factors did not impact patients' opinions about clinical trials participation, except for gender. The participants reported as important for participating in clinical trial: receiving clear and adequate information (95,5%) and being given the opportunity to ask questions (97,8%), take part in discussions regarding their own treatment (94,6%), and voice their concerns and opinions (91,1%). As factors strongly associated with participants’ willingness to participate in a clinical trial were reported: concerns about the risks of being in a clinical trial (87,5%), the possible side effects of clinical trials (86,3%), the type of treatment given in a clinical trial (83,7%), and whether participation would improve their quality of life (QoL) (81,5%).ConclusionThe preliminary validation of the Greek version of the questionnaire measuring patient perceptions and expectations of participating in clinical trials demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability and could be further tested in larger samples. The findings that emerged from this study are in line with previous literature.

scholarly journals Empathy levels and its relationship with various independent factors: a web-based cross-sectional study amongst medical students

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 4125
Author(s):  
Ranu Rawat ◽  
Parmal Singh
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
School Students ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Government School ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Clinical Empathy ◽  
Poor Students ◽  
The Mean

Background: Empathy is a critical construct in the context of the doctor patient relationship. Very few studies in India have previously assessed clinical empathy explicitly in medical students. The present study aimed to estimate and compare the empathy scores of the medical students with various independent factors and to determine the correlation between empathy scores and age of participants.Methods: A web based cross-sectional study was undertaken using a partly self-designed and partly pre-designed Jefferson scale of physician empathy (JSPE) questionnaire for data collection.Results: The mean empathy score of the students was found to be 98.79±12.02. Gender, type of schooling and personal rating of the student were found to have a statistically significant association on comparison. A low degree of statistically insignificant negative correlation (r=-0.1) between age and empathy scores was found.Conclusions: The mean empathy scores recorded in our study are lower as compared to those obtained by Western studies. Aptitude assessment at the time of Bachelor of medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) entry could improve the selection of students to those who possess more attributes necessary in a doctor. Orientation in empathy is also required for MBBS students as it is documented that clinical empathy level is amenable to change by empathy education. Males, government school students and very good and average to poor students need special attention to improve their empathy levels. Longitudinal empathy training could minimize the negativity of age on empathy levels in student.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document