scholarly journals Review of caesarean sections at full dilatation

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 2491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijaya Monish Babre ◽  
Kirti Rajesh Bendre ◽  
Geeta Niyogi
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Maternal Morbidity ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Febrile Illness ◽  
Neonatal Morbidity ◽  
Bladder Injury ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Uterine Incision ◽  
Tertiary Teaching

Background: To study indications of second stage caesarean section. To study intraoperative and postoperative complications. To review maternal and perinatal outcome.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary teaching Institute. All second stage caesarean sections performed between a period 2008 to 2012 were analysed in terms of duration of 2nd stage of labour, instrumentation attempted prior to caesarean section, indication of caesarean-section, Intraoperative complications, maternal and perinatal outcome.Results: During the study period 2760, caesarean sections were performed out of them 61 were 2nd stage caesarean section. Out of 61 Caeserean 14 were given prior instrumental trial, followed by 2nd stage caesarean section. Intraoperative complications were higher in terms of blood loss, primary PPH, extension of uterine incision, in one case bladder injury was noticed. Patwardhan method was used in 23% cases for delivery deeply engaged head. Atonic PPH was seen in 11.5% of patiants.3.3% of patients had extension of uterine incision. 54% baby’s required NICU care. Increased incidence of post-operative febrile illness and wound infection were noted.Conclusions: Caeseraen section in the 2nd stage of labour is associated with significantly increased maternal morbidity. Neonatal morbidity and mortality also increases. A proper judgement is required by a skilled obstetrician to take a decision for instrumental delivery or ceaseraen section at full cervical dilatation.

scholarly journals Study of fetomaternal outcome in second stage caesarean section

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 2169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamal D. Goswami ◽  
Manisha M. Parmar ◽  
Avnika N. Kunjadiya
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Febrile Illness ◽  
Neonatal Morbidity ◽  
Cervical Dilatation ◽  
Bladder Injury ◽  
Fetal Head ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Uterine Incision ◽  
Tertiary Teaching

Background: The incidence of second stage caesarean section is more in developing countries. Caesarean sections done at full cervical dilatation with impacted fetal head are difficult and associated with an increased incidence of maternal and fetal complications.Methods: This was prospective observational study conducted at a tertiary teaching institute. All second stage caesarean sections performed between September 2017 to August 2018 were analysed in terms of incidence, indications of caesarean-section, intra-operative  and postoperative complications, maternal and fetal outcome.Results: During the study period there were total 7270 deliveries. Out of this 1884 deliveries were done by caesarean section. Out of them 50 were 2nd stage caesarean sections contributing to 2.65% of total sections. Patwardhan method was used in 50% cases for deliveryof deeply engaged head. Intra-operative complications were higher in terms of atonic pph (8%), extension of uterine incision (16%), in 3 cases bladder injury was noticed. Obstetric hysterectomy was required  in 4% cases. 14% cases had postoperative febrile illness and 8% cases had wound infection. 44% babies required NICU admissions and neonatal death was 18%.Conclusions: Caesarean section in the 2nd stage of labour is associated with significantly increased maternal morbidity. Neonatal morbidity and mortality also increases. A proper judgement is required by a skilled obstetrician to take a decision for caesarean section at full cervical dilatation.

scholarly journals Fetomaternal outcome in caesarean section at full dilatation

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 3098
Author(s):  
Kavita Gupta ◽  
Apurva Garg
Keyword(s):  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Birth Asphyxia ◽  
Febrile Illness ◽  
Neonatal Morbidity ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Bladder Injury ◽  
Cesarean Sections ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Uterine Incision

Background: To study indications, intraoperative and postoperative complications and fetomaternal outcome in cesarean sections done at full dilatation.Methods: This is a prospective cross-sectional study which was conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynecology, RNT medical college, Udaipur from November 2018 to April 2019. 100 cases of caesarean sections at full dilatation which were performed during this period were analyzed for indications and maternal and fetal morbidity.Results: Among these 100 cesarean sections, majority of cases were in the age group of 21-30 years (46%), booked and  Primigravida(81%).Most common indications were cephalo-pelvic disproportion (27%) and fetal distress (21%). Most commonly baby was delivered either by vertex (44%) or by Patwardhan (31%). Intraoperative complications were higher in terms of hematuria in 41%, Atonic PPH in 35%, uterine incision extension in 28% of cases. In one case bladder injury was noticed. Increased incidence of post-operative febrile illness and wound infection were noted. 44% baby’s required nursery admission, most commonly due to birth asphyxia (16%) and RDS (11%).Conclusions: Cesarean section in the 2nd stage of labor is associated with significantly increased maternal morbidity, Neonatal morbidity and mortality. So proper monitoring during labor and involvement of skilled obstetrician in decision making and delivery is crucial to minimize fetomaternal complications.

scholarly journals A study of intra-operative maternal morbidity after repeating caesarean section

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 291
Author(s):  
Sonali S. Somani ◽  
Sunita Sudhir ◽  
Shashikant G. Somani ◽  
. Bushra
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Maternal Morbidity ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Bladder Injury ◽  
Cesarean Sections ◽  
Intraoperative Complication ◽  
Uterine Incision ◽  
Operative Findings ◽  
Caesarean Hysterectomy ◽  
Previous Cesarean

Background: Caesarean section (CS) is one of the most common obstetric procedures worldwide and an increased rate of caesarean section has been observed in recent studies. Maternal morbidities and mortality associated with repeat caesarean section is an important health problem. The present study aims at knowing the various intraoperative complications encountered during repeat caesarean sections. Objective was to study the incidence and type of surgical difficulties encountered in repeat cesarean sectionsMethods: It was a prospective observational study of 118 cases of repeat cesarean sections. Intra-operative findings of all cases were analyzed to know the difficulties encountered because of previous cesarean section.Results: In present study, out of total 118 cases of previous cesarean sections, 71 (60.17%) cases were of previous one caesarean section and 47(39.83%) were of previous two cesarean sections. Following intraoperative morbidities were encountered – adhesions (1 caesarean section vs 2 caesarean section – 40.85 vs 65.96% respectively) , thin lower uterine segment (1 caesarean section vs 2 caesarean section – 21.13 vs 36.17% respectively), advanced bladder(1 caesarean section vs 2 caesarean section – 15.49 vs 36.17 % respectively) , extension of uterine incision(1 caesarean section vs 2 caesarean section – 9.86 vs 19.15% respectively) , scar dehiscence(1 caesarean section vs 2 caesarean section –7.04 vs 31.91% respectively), excess blood loss (1 caesarean section vs 2 caesarean section –7.04 vs 19.15% respectively), 1 case of placenta accrete was found in previous 2 caesarean section 2.13%) which needed caesarean hysterectomy. uterine rupture and bladder injury seen in one patients of previous 2caesarean section. Time taken for surgery was more in repeat CS group Delivery.Conclusions: An increasing number of CS is accompanied by increased maternal morbidity. Intraoperative complication which increase the risk of morbidity are adhesion, placenta accreta. It is prudent to involve a senior experienced obstetrician in repeat cesarean section. The best way to reduce this is by reducing primary caesarean section rates. Patients with previous caesarean section should be considered as high risk and should be counseled for regular antenatal check-up and they should be given option of vaginal birth after CS whenever possible.

scholarly journals First versus second stage caesarean section: a comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 3477
Author(s):  
Sushma Sinha ◽  
Surya Malik ◽  
Mala Dixit
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Caesarean Delivery ◽  
Neonatal Morbidity ◽  
Neonatal Outcomes ◽  
P Value ◽  
Neonatal Complications ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
One Year

Background: A retrospective study was done to compare the maternal and neonatal complications of caesarean delivery performed in the second stage compared with the first stage of labor.Methods: This is a one year retrospective study done in a 100-bedded hospital, govt of NCT OF Delhi, New Delhi from 1st November 2015 to 31st October 2016.  Total number of deliveries in this one year duration were 1785, including both normal and caesarean deliveries. Total number of patients who underwent caesarean delivery in the first stage of labor were 159, and in 2nd stage of labor were 15 during this time period. These were designated into two groups, group 1 and group 2. These two groups were then compared in terms of maternal demographics, labor characteristics, maternal outcomes and neonatal outcomes. Numerical variables were compared between groups by calculating P-value for each variable. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: Caesarean deliveries performed in the second stage were associated with increased maternal morbidity in terms of blood loss, unintended extensions, blood transfusions, prolonged hospital stay, febrile morbidity. Similarly, Neonatal morbidity was much higher in the patient who underwent LSCS in 2nd stage of labor compared to 1st stage. There was increase in neonatal complications, for e. g. –5 minute Apgar <7, NICU admissions >24 hrs, neonatal septicaemia, (P-value <0.05).Conclusions: In conclusion, present study suggests that women undergoing caesarean section in the second stage of labor have increased maternal and fetal morbidity. Therefore, selection of birthing method should be made very carefully and meticulously to decrease maternal and neonatal morbidity.

scholarly journals A prospective observational study of fetomaternal outcome in second stage caesarean section

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 4798
Author(s):  
Isha . ◽  
Prabha Lal ◽  
Vikram Dutta ◽  
Aayushi Kaushal
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Birth Asphyxia ◽  
Neonatal Morbidity ◽  
Bladder Injury ◽  
Intraoperative Complication ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Second Stage Of Labour

Background: Incidence of caesarean section is rapidly rising over last two decades and one fourth is contributed by caesarean section in second stage. The objective of this study was to study of fetomaternal outcome in second stage caesarean section.Methods: Prospective observational study was done in 80 women undergoing second stage caesarean section from December 2015 to March 2017 at Lady Hardinge Medical Collage Delhi. These women observed from labour to caesarean section in second stage of labour till post-operative period for any complication. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed in these women.Results: Caesarean section rate was 22% in which 3.9% were done in second stage of labour. Most common gestational age being 39-40 weeks (47%). Most common indication being deep transverse arrest (41.25%). Intraoperative complication as bladder injury (5%), extension of uterine incision (23%), PPH (33%) and need for blood transfusion (31%) and post-operative complication as wound sepsis in 58% and 20% requiring resuturing, post-operative fever, prolong hospital stay, prolonged catheterization etc. neonatal complications as severe birth asphyxia (2.5%), respiratory distress (55%), need for mechanical ventilation.Conclusions: Thus, caesarean section done in second stage of labour is associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity.

scholarly journals Retrospective study of maternal and neonatal outcome in second stage lower segment caesarean section in a tertiary hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 4924
Author(s):  
M. P. A. Sailakshmi ◽  
Vidhyadhare G. S.
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Neonatal Morbidity ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Clinical Exposure ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Lower Segment Caesarean Section ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Safe Performance

Background: Caesarean section at second stage are increasing and are associated with significant maternal morbidity. The overall caesarean section rates are also increasing from last two decades.Methods: A retrospective study conducted in Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Raja Rajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore from January 2018 to July 2019. Second stage LSCS were analysed in terms of indications, intraoperative and post-operative complications, neonatal morbidity.Results: In our hospital during study period there were 2639 deliveries and total number of LSCS 1146 (43.42%) and caesarean section rate was 35-45% and second stage LSCS 60 (5.23%).Conclusions: Second stage LSCS associated with more number of maternal and neonatal morbidity. Adequate clinical exposure and appropriate training are essential for safe performance in second stage LSCS. 

scholarly journals Comparison of maternal and fetal morbidity between Patwardhan method of second stage lower segment caesarean section and conventional "push and pull" method

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 4538
Author(s):  
Kishorkumar Hol ◽  
Sneha Trivedi ◽  
Shruti Jaiswal ◽  
Sameer Popat Darawade
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Neonatal Morbidity ◽  
Lower Segment ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Lower Segment Caesarean Section ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Uterine Incision ◽  
Second Stage Of Labour ◽  
Fetal Complications ◽  
Push And Pull

Background: To compare Maternal and fetal morbidity between Patwardhan method of second stage LSCS and conventional "push and pull" method.Methods: A retrospective study of all LSCS performed in second stage of labour consisted of all cases delivered by Patwardhan method compared with cases delivered by Push method during 3 years from January 2016 to December 2018 in Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College Pune, Maharashtra, India.Results: A total of 89 patients underwent second stage LSCS from January 2016 to December 2018. A total of 37 patients were delivered by Patwardhan’s method and 52 patients were delivered by Push method. Uterine incision extension was more in the push and pull method when compared to Patwardhan technique. Same was true for the traumatic PPH blood transfusion which was significantly high in push and pull method as compared. Neonatal morbidity was significantly less in Patwardhan’s method as compared to Push method.Conclusions: As the maternal and fetal complications are seen to be considerably less in Patwardhan’s method than the conventional Push method our study concludes that Patwardhan’s method for delivering baby in second stage LSCS confers greater advantage.

Study on Maternal and Neonatal Outcome of women undergoing Caesarean Section using Nice Classification in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Rural Area of Central India - An Observational Prospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuchi M. Jain ◽  
Ketki. Thool ◽  
Manish A. Jain ◽  
Poonam V. Shivkumar
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Central India ◽  
Neonatal Morbidity ◽  
Bladder Injury ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Chi Square

Background : Caesarean section is often perceived to be safer than vaginal delivery for mothers and neonates, and thus has become increasingly common around the globe. However, it may actually be detrimental to maternal and neonatal health while consuming valuable resources. Objective : The objective of this study was to categorize the caesarean sections performed in our rural institute into various categories using NICE classification and to study the maternal and neonatal outcome in them. Method : This was a prospective study of all women who underwent caesarean section over a period of 18 months. Data was retrieved from the files of women for morbiditiy and mortality in mothers and babies. Data was entered in MS excel sheet and analyzed with percentages and chi square test using SPSS ver.17. Results: Caesarean section rate (CSR) was 36.88%. All CS were classified into four categories based on urgency as per NICE guidelines. There were 22.62% women in Category I, 38.61% in category II, 28.37% in category III and 10.40% in Category IV. Adhesions, extension of angle, lacerations in lower segment, scar dehiscence, atonic PPH and bladder injury were noted in (12.83%), 11.81%, 6.83%, 4.08% , 1.53% and 0.08% CS respectively. Caesarean hysterectomy was done in 0.24% cases. Postoperative morbidity was febrile morbidity (11.93%), postdural puncture headache (13.85%), paralytic ileus (11.49%), wound infection (8.83%), ARDS (0.70%), sepsis (0.78%), pulmonary edema (0.47%) and pulmonary embolism (0.03%). Maternal mortality was 0.03%. Neonates born were 2577 (29 were twin deliveries). 82.46% neonates were healthy, 16.80% had morbidities and 0.74% were still born. Apgar score of less than 7 was in 10%. 16.80% neonates were admitted in NICU during their hospital stay. Neonatal mortality was 1.47%. Conclusion : Intraoperative and post-operative complication were more in caesarean sections of category I and II as compared to category III and category IV. Neonatal morbidity, mortality and admissions to NICU were more in caesarean sections of category I and II as compared to category III and category IV. Thus though caesarean section is an emergency lifesaving procedure for mother and baby it may prove detrimental to their health.

scholarly journals Maternal outcomes following second stage caesarean section in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia: A 6-year retrospective review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurul Nafizah Mohd Rashid ◽  
Nik Mohamed Zaki Nik Mahmood ◽  
Mohd Pazudin Ismail ◽  
Adibah Ibrahim ◽  
W Fadhlina W Adnan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Post Partum ◽  
Neonatal Morbidity ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Maternal Outcomes ◽  
Total Blood ◽  
Second Stage

Introduction: The trend for second stage caesarean section (SSCS) has been rising, and it carries a high rate of maternal and neonatal morbidity. Aim: To determine the prevalence of caesarean section (CS) performed during the second stage of labour and identify maternal outcomes and associated risk factors in these women. Material and methods: This retrospective study was performed in the Hospital University Sains Malaysia (HUSM). Medical records of 207 women with singleton cephalic pregnancies at term who underwent a SSCS between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2015 were reviewed, and demographic and outcome data were collected. Results and discussion: During the study period, 8,197 (19.3%) out of 42,546 babies were delivered by CS, including 257 (4.1%) SSCSs. Nearly half (49.3%) the women were nulliparous, 182 (87.9%) experienced spontaneous labour and 123 (59.4%) received oxytocin augmentation. Furthermore, 26 (12.6%) of women had post-partum haemorrhage (≥1000 mL), of whom 22 (10.6%) required blood transfusion. Only 1 (0.5%) woman was admitted to the intensive care unit postoperatively, but 163 (78.7%) had an overall hospital stay length of 3 days. Furthermore, 38 (18.4%) and 33 (15.9%) of women experienced extended uterine tear and uterine atony, respectively. Parity (P < 0.001), attempted instrumentation (P < 0.001) and baby’s weight (P < 0.004) were statistically significantly associated with total blood loss. Parity (P < 0.012) and attempted instrumentation (P < 0.001) were risk factors for extended uterine tear. Conclusions: The overall outcomes from SSCS were better compared with studies performed in other centres. Current practices must be maintained or improved to provide the best patient caree.

scholarly journals Exploring caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour at a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 3929
Author(s):  
Pravinkumar A. Jadav ◽  
Palak M. Dabhi ◽  
Dhruti A. Rathod
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Neonatal Morbidity ◽  
Transfusion Rate ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Intraoperative Complication ◽  
Second Stage Of Labor ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Second Stage Of Labour

Background: Caesarean section (CS) performed in the second stage of labour has many implications for maternal and neonatal morbidity as well as for subsequent pregnancies. The objectives of this study were to determine the rates of CS at full dilatation, their indications, associated maternal and neonatal complications.Methods: This retrospective study assessed all the women with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation at term (≥37 weeks) who underwent CS in the second stage of labor between 1 August 2019 and 31 March 2020 at a tertiary care hospital. Maternal demographics, labour and delivery details as well as neonatal outcomes were collected.Results: During the study period, 2124 (36%) babies were born by CS. Of these, 49 (2.3%) were performed in the second stage of labour at ≥37 weeks of gestation. The most common indication of CS was non-descent of head in 38 (77.55%) of cases. The majority of women 38 (77.55%) delivered by CS in the second stage of labor were primiparous. The 27 (55.10%) women were in the age group of 20-25 years. Most common intraoperative complication was blood-stained urine in 20 (40.81%) women. Overall transfusion rate was 18.36%. Maximum number of babies born 44 (89.79%) were having birth weight between 2.5-3.5 kg. Out of 65 babies born, 17 (34.69%) were admitted to neonatal intensive care unit.Conclusions: Formulation of an institutional protocol and training and supervision of trainees to improve the skill of operative vaginal delivery and second stage cesarean is needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document