scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of hysterosalpingo contrast sonography with laparoscopy for determination of tubal patency in infertility

Author(s):  
Geetha Krishnamoorthy ◽  
Amutha Perumal ◽  
Chithra Boovaragasamy ◽  
Gnanamani Gnanasabai

Background: Tubal factor is responsible for infertility and is found in one of three infertile women. The current research was undertaken to compare the efficacy of hysterosalpingo contrast sonography (HyCoSy) with laparoscopy and chromopertubation in infertile women.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from August 2016 to March 2017 among the patients attending outpatient department with complaints of primary or secondary infertility after obtaining written and informed consent. Detailed history of the patient was taken; clinical examination and necessary investigations were done. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS version 22.Results: All the HyCoSy findings showed excellent specificity (84-100%) and the sensitivity ranged from 40-87%.Conclusions: Study conclude that HyCoSy is a good screening method for evaluating uterine cavity lesions and tubal block in infertile women being safe, sensitive, cost effective, non-invasive procedure giving additional information regarding ovarian, adnexal and peritoneal pathology.

Author(s):  
Anjana Choudhary ◽  
Shreya Tiwari

Background: Infertility is a critical component of reproductive health, and has often been neglected in these efforts. The inability to have children affects men and women across the globe. Infertility can lead to distress and depression, as well as discrimination and ostracism. Hysterosalpingography (HSG) of infertile women is useful for the assessment of structure of uterine cavity, tubes and their patency. However, although a more invasive procedure such as laparoscopy (L/S) which is regarded as the most reliable method in detection of tubal pathologies in infertility.Methods: This was a Prospective cross sectional study of 50 patients with history of primary or secondary infertility selected from IPD of Jawaharlal Nehru medical College and Acharya Vinobha Bhave Rural Hospital, Tertiary Health Care Centre Located in Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra (India).  The age group of the patients was between 18 yrs. - 45 yrs. The study population was selected depending upon the total number of patients (fitting the criteria) visiting the IPD of AVBRH Department of Obstetrics and gynecology for a period of 1 years (September 2015 to September 2016). The collected data was compiled and proper statistical formulas were applied to analyze the data collected.Results: The present study include 50 cases of both primary and secondary infertility of which 29 cases (58%) were primary infertility and 21 cases (42%) were secondary  infertility. In this study the 3(6%) cases were found in the age group of <20 years followed by 16 (32%) cases in the age group of 21-25 years, 19(38%) cases were in the age group of 26-30 years while 7(14%) cases were in the age group of 31-35years the age group of 36-40 years 2(14%) and in age group > 40 years is 3(6%). In the present study, based on Kuppuswamy index most (30%) of the women had class IV socio economic status in both primary and secondary infertility. In the present study, there were 6 (28.57%) cases with History of LSCS, 7 cases (33.33%) had FTND, 6(28.57%) cases had history of abortion, and 2(9.52%) had previous ectopic pregnancy. Moderate degree of agreement was found between findings of both tests.Conclusions: The results suggest that hysterosalpingography is useful as a primary screening procedure, but laparoscopy provides a more accurate assessment of tubal patency in the investigation of infertility.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hema Dhumale ◽  
BR Desai ◽  
Yeshita Pujar ◽  
Bhavana Sherigar ◽  
Shobana Patted

ABSTRACT Objective To compare the diagnostic efficacy of saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) with hysterolaparoscopy in evaluation of uterine cavity and tubal patency. Methods This prospective one year cross-sectional study was conducted at the assisted reproduction center (ARC), KLES Dr Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Belgaum. A total of 60 patients underwent SIS for evaluation of uterine cavity and tubal patency. Subsequently all patients underwent hysterolaparoscopy with chromopertubation (CPT). Results of SIS and hysterolaparoscopy with chromopertubation were compared. Results For evaluation of uterine cavity, when compared with hysteroscopy, SIS had a sensitivity of 97.8%, specificity of 88.8%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 97.8% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 88.8%. For evaluation of tubal patency when SIS was compared to laparoscopy with CPT, SIS had a sensitivity of 83.3%, specificity of 82.9%, PPV of 42.9% and NPV of 97.5%. Conclusion Saline infusion sonohysterography is a noninvasive, simple, easy and cost-effective procedure. SIS is more sensitive and specific for evaluation of uterine cavity as compared to evaluation of tubal patency.


2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (03) ◽  
pp. 432-437
Author(s):  
MASOMEH ASGHARNIA ◽  
Zahra Mohammad Tabar ◽  
MARZIEH MEHRAFZA ◽  
Mary am Shakiba ◽  
MONA OUDI ◽  
...  

B a c k g r o u n d : Hysteroscopy is a valuable diagnostic and therapeutic modality in the management of infertility. A i m : To evaluatethe consistency of hysteroscopy based on a histopathological report from endometrial specimens for intrauterine disorders. Materials andMethods: This is a cross-sectional study. The study included 115 infertile patients. All were admitted for investigation of infertile women beforeassisted reproduction in Mehr infertility institute between 2006 and 2007 hysteroscopy, and histological evaluation of endometrial biopsyperformed.We compared the efficacy of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of benign intrauterine pathology in infertile women in whom the diagnosiswas confirmed by histologic studies. The women had a complete evaluation with preoperative hysteroscopy, and histological analysis of uterinecavity specimens. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive and negative predictive values were calculated for hysteroscopy considering the histologicalstudy as 100%. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of sonography in diagnosing the polyp were stated 81 % and 64% respectively. Sensitivityand specificity of hysteroscopy showed of polyps revealed 85% and 84% respectively. The results indicated that Sensitivity and specificity ofsonography in diagnosing the myoma were 25% and 98% respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of hysteroscopy in diagnosing the myomawere expressed 50% and 93% respectively. C o n c l u s i o n : Hysteroscopy is a safe and rapid direct visualisation of the uterine cavity. We believeit should be replaced by the diagnostic hysteroscopy as a first line infertility investigation.


Author(s):  
Maliheh Amirian ◽  
Anis Darvish Mohammadabad ◽  
Negar Morovatdar ◽  
Leili Hafizi

Objectives: Endometrial pathologies inside the cavity can occur simultaneously with gestational unpleasant consequences but are not always capable of being diagnosed by the hysterosalpingography (HSG). This study aimed to examine the value of performing diagnostic hysteroscopy beside diagnostic laparoscopy among infertile women with normal uterine cavities in HSG. Materials and Methods: A total of 103 infertile women with normal uterine cavities in the HSG and within the age range of 18-40 who referred to Imam Reza hospital for laparoscopy during 2016-2017 were included in this cross-sectional study. Hysteroscopy was performed simultaneously with diagnostic laparoscopy. Then, the existence of uterine pathologies like endometrial polyps, submucous myoma, and uterine endometrial adhesions and their relationship with the patient’s age, infertility type and duration, and cycle time were evaluated. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Overall, 64 patients (63.1 %) had a normal uterine cavity in the hysteroscopy while 39 of them had an abnormal uterine cavity, the HSG false negative cases of whom were reported 37.9%. The pathologies found in the hysteroscopy were endometrial polyp (16 cases), submucous myoma (1 case), uterine septum (6 cases), asherman syndrome (7 cases), bicornuate uterus (4 cases), polyp + asherman (3 cases), polyp + submucous myoma (1 case), and septum + submucous myoma (1 case). Patients’ age, type of infertility, and menstruation time during performing hysteroscopy made no particular difference in diagnosing pathologies of the uterine cavity in the hysteroscopy. Conclusions: Based on the findings, conducting hysteroscopy in infertile women who are candidates of laparoscopy and have normal uterine cavities in HSG can result in recognizing some cases of uterine pathologies which influence the outcomes of future pregnancies is not dependent upon the patient’s age, menstruation time, type and duration of infertility, and result of laparoscopy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 158 (9) ◽  
pp. 324-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judit Lőrincz ◽  
Attila Jakab ◽  
Péter Török

Abstract: Most common organic cause of infertility is the blockage of the Fallopian tubes. Several methods were introduced to evaluate tubal patency. Hysterosalpingography is a conventional radiology procedure using contrast medium, which gives an accurate image of the uterine cavity and the Fallopian tubes, but radiation exposure is necessary. Hystero-contrast-sonography similarly examines the uterine cavity and tubal patency by ultrasonography, and it enables to detect pelvic pathology, too. Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy is a minimal invasive direct method using endoscope introduced into the abdominal cavity through the posterior vaginal fornix, both ovaries and tubal patency can be observed. Laparoscopy is the “gold standard” procedure in the tubal testing, however it is a more invasive procedure. A cost-effective testing method is the selective tubal pertubation performed via office hysteroscopy. Recent outpatient methods to detect tubal patency have high negative predictive values and recommended to be the first choice in infertility work-up. Orv. Hetil., 2017, 158(9), 324–330.


2021 ◽  
pp. 43-44
Author(s):  
S. Balameena ◽  
R Agavendra ◽  
Karthikeyan Karthikeyan ◽  
Sujatha Sujatha ◽  
Sabarish Sabarish ◽  
...  

Background:Burden of Osteoporosis and its related fractures are enormous and growing public health concern. Worldwide, an estimated 200 million adults suffer from osteoporosis. Vertebral and non-vertebral fractures are the most clinically relevant osteoporotic fracture because they are expensive to treat and have severe consequences for middle aged and elderly population.(1 ,2) The purpose of our study was to assess calcaneal ultrasound score as a screening test for osteoporosis. Material and Methods: Fifty patients above the age of 40 years who attended a health checkup camp conducted by our institute in a suburban population base of Chennai,Tamilnadu was subjected for noninvasive QUS of calcaneum bone as a screening test for osteoporosis. They were divided into different age groups ,co-morbid conditions noted and BMD scores from QUS was assessed. Statistical method were used with SPSS Version .It was a cross sectional descriptive study. Results: A total of 50 patients underwent QUS of calcaneum bone in our study , all of them above the age of 40 years. 33(66%) of them were females and 17(34%) were males. Eight patients( 16% ) had T score < -2.5 out of which 1 was male. 26 patients(52%) had T scores in the osteopenic range (-1>Tscore>-2.5).16 patients(32%) had T scores in the normal range. 40 % of patients had associated osteoarthritis and four patients had diabetes. 2 patients who underwent screening had past history of nontraumatic fractures. Conclusion: QUS of calcaneum is a good screening tool for assessing bone density in our country since its cost effective and can be used in various screening camps. The machine is portable and can be used with minimal training making it easier for the primary caregiver. It has reasonably good sensitivity and fair specicity when using Tscore of -2.5 as the cut off point. However DEXAis the gold standard for treatment and followup of patients with osteoporosis.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-66
Author(s):  
Pranav Kumar Santhalia ◽  
MK Gupta ◽  
D Uprety ◽  
K Ahmad ◽  
S Ansari ◽  
...  

Background: Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is the radiographic technique for evaluation of uterine cavity and fallopian tubes. It still remains the best imaging procedure for fallopian tubes despite the advent of newer modalities and is used primarily for the evaluation of female infertility.1,2 The purpose of the study was to assess the uterine and tubal abnormalities detected on radiographic HSG as causative factors of infertility and to describe their imaging features. Methods: This prospective cross sectional study was conducted at the Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, BPKIHS, Dharan. Forty-four patients with infertility (both primary and secondary) referred for HSG were included. HSG was performed using non-ionic contrast medium under image intensifier fluoroscopic control during the follicular phase of menstrual cycle. Radiographic films were obtained and analyzed. Results: Out of the total 44 patient, 26 (59.0%) had primary infertility while 18 (41.0%) had secondary infertility. Tubal abnormalities were seen in 28 (63.6%) and uterine abnormalities in 2 (4.6%) patients. The most common tubal abnormality detected on HSG was tubal block (50.0%). Unilateral and bilateral tubal blocks were equally distributed (50.0% each). Proximal tubal block was observed in 8 (36.4%) and distal in 13 (59.1%) patients. Fifteen (34.1%) patients had hydrosalpinx. Conclusion: HSG is easy, safe, and cost-effective and plays vital role in the evaluation of female with infertility. The most common structural cause of female infertility found as per this study was tubal block. Nepalese Journal of Radiology / Vol.3 / No.1 / Issue 4 / Jan-June, 2013 / 59-66 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/njr.v3i1.8810


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesmine Banu ◽  
Farzana Deeba ◽  
Parveen Fatima ◽  
Parveen Sultana

<p><strong>Background:</strong> Hysteroscopy is the gold standard procedure for uterine cavity exploration. However, hysteroscopy is only recommended by the WHO when clinical or complementary exams (ultrasound, HSG) suggest intrauterine abnormality or after in vitro fertilization failure. Nevertheless, many specialists feel that hysteroscopy is a more accurate tool.</p><p><strong>Objec­tive:</strong> The aim of this prospective study is to find out the evaluation of uterine cavity by hysteroscopic examination as a primary workup of infertility. To asses the uterine pathology which is the causal factor for infertility.</p><p><strong>Method:</strong> This is a cross sectional study in which total 100 infertile patients were enrolled from infertility OPD in BSMMU with maintain­ing inclusion and exclusion criteria Hysteroscopy was performed with a standard sequence. The endocervical canal, uterine cavity, endometrium, and tubal ostia were inspected and findings were recorded. Results: Hysteroscopy was performed in 100 infertile women,among them 44% were presented with primary infertility and 56% presented with secondary infertility. The most common indication for diagnostic hysteroscopy was as a part of an infertility workup 80% cases. Other indication included abnormal hysterosalphingography, recurrent pregnancy loss and unexplained infertility. Hysteroscopy revealed a normal uterine cavity in 51 ( 51 % ) women (Table 2).among them majority of patients were primary infertility.and age less than 30 years. Hysteroscopic abnormalities are significantly high in secondary than primary infertility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> In this study abnormal hysteroscopic findings were found in 49% who underwent diagnostic hysteroscopy. Our data are an additional argument to suggest that diagnostic hysteroscopy as part of investiga­tion in infertile woman to evaluate uterine pathology. Routine diagnostic hysteroscopy should be part of an infertility workup in both primary and secondary infertility.At the same setting therapeutic approach also be possible which is beneficial for the patients.</p>


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-96
Author(s):  
Naseem Jahan ◽  
BH Nazma Yasmeen ◽  
Mosammat Bilkis Parvin ◽  
Shirin Akhter ◽  
Salma Yeasmin

Background : The polycystic ovary syndrome is a common cause of infertility. Clomiphene is the current first-line infertility treatment in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome.Objective : To observed effect of clomiphene therapy in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome.Methodology : In this cross-sectional study we enrolled 210 infertile women aged 25 – 35 years diagnosed as polycystic ovary syndrome. Participants who had normal urine cavity and sperm concentration of at least 20 million/ml of her husband were prescribed clomiphene for 6 months. Medication was discontinued when pregnancy was confirmed and participants were followed until delivery.Results : After 6 months treatment 85(40.5%) patient was conceived. Live birth was 44(20.9%) of 210 subjects. Among pregnancies multiple (twin) birth was 12(5.7%). First trimester pregnancy loss was 41(19.5%). After having 6 months of therapy there was no pregnancy in125 (59.5%) patients.Conclusions : Clomiphene is safe and cost effective medicine in achieving live birth in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome.Northern International Medical College Journal Vol.7(1) Jul 2015: 94-96


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document