scholarly journals Evaluation of efficacy of BIORAD D10TM testing system in detection of beta thalassaemia carrier

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 782
Author(s):  
Debajyoti Singha Roy ◽  
Riju Bhattacharyya ◽  
Kaushik Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Debasis Bandopadhyay
Keyword(s):  
Disease Burden ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Exchange Chromatography ◽  
Carrier Detection ◽  
Testing System ◽  
Altman Analysis ◽  
Variant Hemoglobin ◽  
Beta Thalassaemia ◽  
Larger Sample ◽  
Successful Reduction

Background: Hemoglobinopathies especially thalassaemia and its interaction with HbE and HbS are significant cause of morbidity and mortality in our country. With no feasible treatment, prevention of cases by carrier detection is the only option for successful reduction of the disease burden. VARIANT hemoglobin testing system BIORAD using principle of cation exchange chromatography has been in use and considered as gold standard for carrier detection. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of a different, cheaper instrument; D10 by the same manufacturer BIORAD for carrier detection in beta thalassaemia.Methods: Patients diagnosed as beta thalassaemia carrier by VARIANT hemoglobin testing system (HbA2 value between 4.0-9.0) were retested using D10 instrument and checked for agreement.Results: There was good correlation between VARIANT and D-10 methods with Intraclass correlation coefficient 0.832 (95% Confidence Interval 0.756-0.884). Bland-Altman analysis showed mean bias of +0.3526 (95% CI -0.3958 to +1.101).Conclusions: Although further study is needed with larger sample size for assessment of sensitivity and specificity of D10 instrument, it is evident from this study that this instrument can be an effective and cheaper alternative of VARIANT hemoglobin testing system.

scholarly journals An investigation into the avoidability of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Ibn-Mas’ud Danjuma ◽  
Lina Mohammad Ahmad Naseralallah ◽  
Bodoor AbouJabal ◽  
Mouhand Faisal Mohamed ◽  
Ibrahim Y. Abubeker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Reaction ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Dress Syndrome ◽  
Study Population ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Systemic Symptoms ◽  
Larger Sample

AbstractDrug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a rising morbidity amongst hospitalized patients. Whilst clinical protocols for the management of individual DRESS cases have been well established, determination of potential prevention of these cases by utilizing novel “avoidability” tools has remained unexplored. This retrospective study reviewed records of patients who presented to the emergency department of Weill Cornell Medicine-affiliated Hamad General Hospital, Doha Qatar with suspected DRESS syndrome. These cases were independently adjudicated (utilizing the RegiSCAR, and JSCAR tools) as DRESS-drug pairs by a team of two clinical pharmacists and two General Physicians. They were then rated for potential avoidability with the Liverpool adverse drug reactions avoidability tool (LAAT) by the same team of raters. A total of 16 patients satisfied RegiSCAR criteria for DRESS syndrome. The mean age of the study population was 41.5 years (SD ± 13.3). The study population was predominantly male (n = 12; [75%]). The median latent period from drug ingestion to clinical presentation was 14 days (interquartile range [IQR] 6.5, 29). The median RegiSCAR and J-SCAR scores were 6 (IQR 5, 6.8), 5 (IQR 4, 5.8) respectively. Utilizing the LAAT, about 60% of the DRESS syndrome-drug pairs were rated as “avoidable” (“probable” or “definite”). The overall Krippendorf’s alpha with the LAAT was 0.81 (SE 0.10, CI 0.59–1.00); with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.90 (CI 0.77, 0.96.). In a randomly selected cohort of DRESS syndrome-drug pairs, a significant proportion was potentially avoidable (“possibly” and “definitely”) utilizing the LAAT. This will need validation by larger sample-sized prospective studies utilizing the updated LAAT proposed by this study.

scholarly journals Validity and reliability of assessing diaphragmatic mobility by area on X-rays of healthy subjects

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline Pedrini ◽  
Márcia Aparecida Gonçalves ◽  
Bruna Estima Leal ◽  
Michelle Gonçalves de Souza Tavares ◽  
Wellington Pereira Yamaguti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Altman Analysis ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Anthropometric Parameters ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Bland Altman Analysis ◽  
Left Hemidiaphragm ◽  
The Right

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the concurrent validity, as well as the intra- and inter-rater reliability, of assessing diaphragmatic mobility by area (DMarea) on chest X-rays of healthy adults. Methods: We evaluated anthropometric parameters, pulmonary function, and diaphragmatic mobility in 43 participants. Two observers (rater A and rater B) determined diaphragmatic mobility at two time points. We used Pearson’s correlation coefficient to evaluate the correlation between DMarea and the assessment of diaphragmatic mobility by distance (DMdist). To evaluate intra- and inter-rater reliability, we used the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC [2,1]), 95% CI, and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: A significant correlation was found between the DMarea and DMdist methods (r = 0.743; p < 0.0001). For DMarea, the intra-rater reliability was found to be quite high for the right hemidiaphragm (RHD)-ICC (2,1) = 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.95) for rater A and ICC (2,1) = 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84-0.94) for rater B-and the left hemidiaphragm (LHD)-ICC (2,1) = 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97) for rater A and ICC (2,1) = 0.91 (95% CI: 0.81-0.95) for rater B-(p < 0.0001 for all). Also for DMarea, the inter-rater reliability was found to be quite high for the first and second evaluations of the RHD-ICC (2,1) = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99) and ICC (2,1) = 0.95 (95% CI: 0.86-0.97), respectively-and the LHD-ICC (2,1) = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99) and ICC (2,1) = 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87-0.97)-(p < 0.0001 for both). The Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement between the mobility of the RHD and that of the LHD. Conclusions: The DMarea method proved to be a valid, reliable measure of diaphragmatic mobility.

The Accuracy and Reproducibility of Linear Measurements Made on CBCT-derived Digital Models

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 294-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Y Hajeer ◽  
Ahmad L Maroua ◽  
Mowaffak Ajaj
Keyword(s):  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Intraobserver Reliability ◽  
Altman Analysis ◽  
Digital Models ◽  
Linear Measurements ◽  
Bland Altman Analysis ◽  
Accuracy Of Measurements ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Plaster Models

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of linear measurements made on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-derived digital models. Materials and methods A total of 25 patients (44% female, 18.7 ± 4 years) who had CBCT images for diagnostic purposes were included. Plaster models were obtained and digital models were extracted from CBCT scans. Seven linear measurements from predetermined landmarks were measured and analyzed on plaster models and the corresponding digital models. The measurements included arch length and width at different sites. Paired t test and Bland–Altman analysis were used to evaluate the accuracy of measurements on digital models compared to the plaster models. Also, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate the reproducibility of the measurements in order to assess the intraobserver reliability. Results The statistical analysis showed significant differences on 5 out of 14 variables, and the mean differences ranged from −0.48 to 0.51 mm. The Bland–Altman analysis revealed that the mean difference between variables was (0.14 ± 0.56) and (0.05 ± 0.96) mm and limits of agreement between the two methods ranged from −1.2 to 0.96 and from −1.8 to 1.9 mm in the maxilla and the mandible, respectively. The intraobserver reliability values were determined for all 14 variables of two types of models separately. The mean ICC value for the plaster models was 0.984 (0.924–0.999), while it was 0.946 for the CBCT models (range from 0.850 to 0.985). Conclusion Linear measurements obtained from the CBCTderived models appeared to have a high level of accuracy and reproducibility. How to cite this article Maroua AL, Ajaj M, Hajeer MY. The Accuracy and Reproducibility of Linear Measurements Made on CBCT-derived Digital Models. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(4):294-299.

scholarly journals Comparing School-Aged Refraction Measurements Using the 2WIN-S Portable Refractor in Relation to Cycloplegic Retinoscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Ziming Liu ◽  
Emmanuel Eric Pazo ◽  
Hong Ye ◽  
Cui Yu ◽  
Ling Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gold Standard ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Spherical Equivalent ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Altman Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Bland Altman Analysis ◽  
The Mean

Purpose. To assess the repeatability and agreement of refractive measurements using 2WIN-S photoscreening with the gold-standard cycloplegic retinoscope refraction. Design. Single centre, cross-sectional study. Methods. Spherical, cylindrical, axis, and spherical equivalent of 194 bilateral eyes of 97 children were assessed using a retinoscope and 2WIN-S. One week later, another operator repeated the 2WIN-S measurements. The primary outcome measures were to assess the repeatability and agreement between spherical equivalent, J0, and J45 readings of 2WIN-S. The repeatability of measurements was assessed by the within-subject standard deviation (2.77 Sw) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The agreement between devices was assessed using 95% limits of agreement. The extent of the agreement between cycloplegic retinoscopy and noncycloplegic 2WIN-S measurements was assessed using Bland–Altman analysis. Results. The mean age ± SD was 10.3 ± 2.46 year (range, 4–14 years). The sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent measurements were found to be consistent with both apparatus (r value >0.86). ICC for SE, J0, and J45 was 0.900, 0.666, and 0.639, respectively; Sw for SE, J0, and J45 was 0.61D, 0.30D, and 0.31D, respectively; Bland–Altman analysis of retinoscopy with cycloplegia and 2WIN-S for SE was 184/194 (95%) in 95% confidence interval, and the mean value was 0.46. J0 was 184/194 (95%), and the mean value is −0.04. J45 was 181/194 (93%), and the mean value is −0.15. Conclusion. The objective refractive measurement of 2WIN-S had good reliability and high agreement with the gold-standard retinoscopy refraction in children and adolescents. While consistency was observed, it is essential to take into consideration that it is a screening tool.

scholarly journals Test–Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 1343
Author(s):  
Francisco Molina-Rueda ◽  
Pilar Fernández-González ◽  
Alicia Cuesta-Gómez ◽  
Aikaterini Koutsou ◽  
María Carratalá-Tejada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Initial Contact ◽  
Altman Analysis ◽  
Joint Angles ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Bland Altman Analysis ◽  
Motion System ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

The aim of this study was to evaluate the test–retest reliability of a conventional gait model (CGM), the Plug-in Gait model, to calculate the angles of the hip, knee, and ankle during initial contact (IC) and toe-off (TO). Gait analysis was performed using the Vicon Motion System® (Oxford Metrics, Oxford, UK). The study group consisted of 50 healthy subjects. To evaluate the test–retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the standard error of measurement (SEM), the minimal detectable change (MDC), and the Bland–Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement were calculated. The ICC for the joint angles of the hip, knee, and ankle was higher than 0.80. However, the ankle angle at IC had an ICC lower than 0.80. The SEM was <5° for all parameters. The MDC was large (>5°) for the hip angle at IC. The Bland–Altman analysis indicated that the magnitude of divergence was between ±5° and ±9° at IC and around ±7° at TO. In conclusion, the ICC for the plug-in gait model was good for the hip, knee, and ankle angles during IC and TO. The plots revealed a disagreement between measurements that should be considered in patients’ clinical assessments.

scholarly journals Comparison of reliability of measurements among fetal facial profile parameters by operators with different levels of experience at 15-23 weeks of gestation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chitkasaem Suwanrath ◽  
Rapphon Sawaddisan ◽  
Pitchaya Booncharoen
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Altman Analysis ◽  
Facial Profile ◽  
Bland Altman Analysis ◽  
Mandible Length ◽  
Different Levels ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract Background Mandible anomalies are associated with many syndromes. Various methods have been proposed to assess fetal mandibles with different reliability. This study aimed to compare the reliability of measurements among five fetal facial profile parameters by operators with different levels of experience, at 15–23 weeks of gestation in Thai fetuses. Methods An observational study was prospectively conducted. The inferior facial angle (IFA), anteroposterior mandibular diameter (APD), mandible width (MD), maxilla width (MX) and mandible length (ML) were measured in 123 normal fetuses, using 2D ultrasonography, by 3 operators with different levels of experience. Each participant was examined by 2 operators. Each operator performed three independent measurements for each parameter and was blinded to the results of the other. Reliability of measurement was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient for both intraobserver and interobserver variabilities. Bland-Altman analysis was used to evaluate the agreement between operators’ measurements. Results The success rate of ML measurement was highest (100%) among the five parameters for all operators. Failure of MX measurement was high in fetuses at a gestational age of less than 18 weeks. Intraobserver variabilities of APD, MD, MX and ML measurements were excellent for all operators (ICC 0.958–0.986), while those of IFA measurement was moderate to excellent (0.560–0.923), depending on the operators’ experience. Interobserver variabilities varied between pairs of operators; only 2 parameters, APD and ML, showed excellent interobserver variabilities for both pairs of operators (ICC > 0.9) with good agreement. Interobserver variabilities of MX measurements for both pairs of operators were good (ICC 0.606–0.709), while MD was excellent for operator 1 and 2 (ICC 0.867), but moderate for operator 1 and 3 (ICC 0.576) and IFA was good for operator 1 and 2 (ICC 0.602), but poor for operator 1 and 3 (ICC 0.128). Conclusions The reliability of ML measurement was the highest, followed by APD, while IFA was the lowest, among the 5 parameters. ML and APD measurements were feasible and reproducible, whereas MX measurement was limited in fetuses with a gestational age of less than 18 weeks. Additionally, reliability of IFA measurement depended on the operator’s experience.

scholarly journals Reliability and Validity of Trunk Assessment for People With Multiple Sclerosis

2006 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geert Verheyden ◽  
Godelieve Nuyens ◽  
Alice Nieuwboer ◽  
Pol Van Asch ◽  
Piet Ketelaer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Weighted Kappa ◽  
Altman Analysis ◽  
Bland Altman Analysis ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background and Purpose. Standardized scales are a prerequisite for rehabilitation and research. This study was designed to determine the reliability and validity of scores on items of the trunk assessment of the Melsbroek Disability Scoring Test (MDST) and Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Subjects. Thirty people with MS participated in the study. Methods. Interrater and test-retest reliability and construct validity were assessed. Results. Kappa and weighted kappa values for the items of the trunk assessment of the MDST ranged from .74 to .95, and the kappa and weighted kappa values for the TIS items ranged from .46 to 1.00. Intraclass correlation coefficients for interrater and test-retest agreement were .93 and .92, respectively, for the trunk assessment of the MDST and .97 and .95, respectively, for the TIS. Bland-Altman analysis showed consistency of scores without observer bias. Construct validity was established. Discussion and Conclusion. The MDST and TIS provide reliable assessments of the trunk and are valid scales for measuring trunk performance in people with MS. [Verheyden G, Nuyens G, Nieuwboer A, et al. Reliability and validity of trunk assessment for people with multiple sclerosis.

Evaluation of Point-of-care Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Testing by Comparison to Laboratory-based Assay for Control of Intravenous Heparin

Angiology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 358-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander D. Douglas ◽  
Jo Jefferis ◽  
Rishi Sharma ◽  
Rachel Parker ◽  
Ashok Handa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Thromboplastin Time ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time ◽  
Testing System ◽  
Altman Analysis ◽  
Point Of Care Testing ◽  
Response System ◽  
Intravenous Heparin ◽  
Surgical Ward ◽  
Laboratory Assay

Introduction Patients on intravenous heparin require regular activated partial thromboplastin time monitoring. Laboratory-based activated partial thromboplastin time assays necessitate a delay between blood sampling and dose adjustment. Point-of-care testing could permit immediate dose adjustments, potentially enabling tighter control of anticoagulation. Aim To assess equivalence of activated partial thromboplastin time measured by conventional laboratory assay and by a novel proprietary point-of-care testing system (Hemochron Response, ITC, Thoratec Corporation, Edison, NJ) among surgical ward patients on intravenous heparin. Methods A total of 39 blood samples from patients on intravenous heparin were tested with both laboratory and point-of-care assays. Assay equivalence was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. Results. Point-of-care measurements exceeded laboratory activated partial thromboplastin time by a mean of 15 seconds (standard deviation 19). In 19 cases (49%), the point-of-care measurement would have resulted in different heparin dosing from the laboratory activated partial thromboplastin time. Conclusions The Hemochron Response system is not sufficiently accurate for routine ward use compared with laboratory activated partial thromboplastin time assays.

scholarly journals Accuracy and reliability of measurements obtained with a noncontact tono-pachymeter for clinical use in mass screening

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinho Lee ◽  
Hyuk Jin Choi
Keyword(s):  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Corneal Thickness ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Strongly Correlated ◽  
Altman Analysis ◽  
Applanation Tonometer ◽  
Cautious Interpretation ◽  
Healthy Participants

AbstractWe evaluated the reliability and accuracy of the noncontact CT-1P tonopachymeter (Topcon, Japan) in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT). One hundred sixty-three healthy participants and 33 patients with open angle glaucoma were enrolled. IOPs were measured by CT-1P (T-IOP) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (G-IOP), and CCTs were measured by the CT-1P (T-CCT) and an ultrasound pachymeter (US-CCT). Both CCT instrument-adjusted (T-IOP-C) and unadjusted T-IOPs (T-IOP-NC) were included. Pearson correlation coefficients and biases assessed with Bland–Altman analysis with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for reliability evaluation. Intrasession repeatability was excellent for both T-IOP (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.91) and T-CCT (ICC 0.98). Intersession reproducibility was also excellent for T-CCT (ICC 0.94). T-IOP-NC and T-IOP-C both showed significant correlations with G-IOP (r = 0.801, P  <  0.001 and r = 0.658, P  < 0.001, respectively). T-CCT was also strongly correlated with US-CCT (r = 0.958; P  < 0.001). T-IOP-NC and T-IOP-C both showed a positive bias (1.37 mmHg, 95% CI [1.14, 1.61] and 2.77 mmHg, 95% CI [2.49, 3.05], respectively). T-CCT showed a negative bias of − 17.3 µm (95% CI [−18.8, − 15.8]). With cautious interpretation, the CT-1P may offer good feasibility for IOP and CCT measurement in screening centers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document