scholarly journals Various modalities of induction of labour and its feto-maternal outcomes: An observational study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 334-338
Author(s):  
Prachi Sharda ◽  
Nisha Rani Agrawal
Keyword(s):  
Perinatal Mortality ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Uterine Contraction ◽  
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Minimal Risk ◽  
Obstetric Ultrasound ◽  
Foetal Monitoring ◽  
Foley’S Catheter

: In order for induction to be successful, it should result in labour with adequate uterine contraction and progressive dilatation of cervix with the outcome of a vaginal delivery with minimal risk to both mother and foetus. Primary outcome of the current study was to compare various modalities of Induction of Labour, alone or in combination & to evaluate the different outcomes of mother and baby.: History, general, obstetrical, vaginal examination to record Modified Bishop score, basic investigations and recent obstetric ultrasound was noted of 200 pregnant mothers and the results were analyzed. Foetal monitoring was done in all except those with confirmed IUFD cases. Methods used were Dinoprostone, Misoprostol, Oxytocin, Amniotomy and Mechanical Dilatation with Foley’s catheter; single or in combination with each other.: Among the 200 mothers, 118(59%) delivered vaginally and 82 (41%) mothers underwent LSCS. Dinoprostone gel was the dominant method used followed by misoprostol and oxytocin respectively. NICU admissions were required in 21.7%, 25,8% & 33.3% of the mothers who were induced with Dinoprostone, Misoprostol and Oxytocin respectively. 14 babies were diagnosed with IUFD, all delivered vaginally, out of which 10 were induced with misoprostol and 4 were induced with mechanical dilatation. Majority of the patients who underwent induction with dinoprostone alone delivered by LSCS (63.4%) but Dinoprostone with ARM & oxytocin for induction had a better outcome. Induction with Dinoprostone followed by misoprostol lead to more LSCS than SVD and there were 1%(2 babies) of perinatal mortality due to Meconium Aspiration Syndrome.: Misoprostol and Mechanical induction were the most preferred method in cases of IUFD. Induction with a combination of Dinoprostone with ARM or Oxytocin lead to more vaginal delivery than Dinoprostone alone, so this should be preferred. Induction with Dinoprostone followed by misoprostol lead to more LSCS and perinatal mortality so a combination of them should be given cautiously.

scholarly journals Induction of labour after 37 weeks of pregnancy using foley’s catheter: traction versus non-traction method

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 275
Author(s):  
Jaydeep J. Bhatu ◽  
Disha Patel
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Unfavourable Cervix ◽  
Foley’S Catheter ◽  
Traction Group

Background: Cervical Foley’s catheter used now a days for induction of labour alone as well as a combined with cerviprim gel. The objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness of 750 cc traction on Foley catheter with no traction for labour induction in >37 weeks pregnancy.Methods: A randomized controlled trial performed on pregnant women at >37 weeks who were admitted for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix. They were randomly assigned into two groups, Foley’s with 750 cc traction and without traction. The primary outcomes were improvement in Bishop Score, number of favourable cervix following induction and the mode of delivery. The secondary outcomes were neonatal outcome, and maternal infection.Results: A total of 80 pregnant women were randomized into traction group (n=46) and non-traction group (n=34). Traction group had significantly (p=0.0462) higher number of vaginal delivery compared to non-traction group. Participants were comfortable using both methods. There was no difference in neonatal outcomes and risk of maternal infections in both groups.Conclusions: Application of traction did result in more vaginal delivery.

scholarly journals A study of outcome of induction of labour with foley’s balloon in previous LSCS cases

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 2067
Author(s):  
Srinivas Krishna Jois ◽  
Sunanda K. M.
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Professional Organizations ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Patient Profile ◽  
Successful Induction ◽  
Foley’S Catheter ◽  
Scarred Uterus

Background: Induction of labour in a scarred uterus is a controversial topic in Obstetric practice, but in carefully selected and monitored cases never the less the outcome is gratifying. When the baby is non-salvageable, or in cases of IUFD, it is always desirable to achieve a vaginal delivery. Many of the professional organizations recommend induction of labour in previous LSCS. Thus, this study was done to evaluate the success rate, determinants of failure and complications of induction of labour with foley’s catheter in patients with previous 1 LSCS.Methods: 62 patients were recruited over a period of 1 year and studied at Vani Vilas Hospital, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, all with previous 1 LSCS. 34% of them were with past h/o 1 or more vaginal delivery. 8% were term pregnancies, 64% were between 28-32 weeks. Induction was done for IUFD in 56% and, HDP warranting termination in 44%. Induction done with Foley’s catheter, expulsion of catheter with filled bulb and uterine contraction initiation was taken as successful induction. The patient profile in cases of failure was noted.Results: 83% was the success rate for induction out of which 30% cases required additional PGE2 gel. Oxytocin and ARM alone or together were used for augmentation in 90% cases. Induction to foley’s expulsion average duration was 14 hours. Post expulsion delivery happened at an average time interval of 5 hours. One patient had rupture uterus during the course of augmentation.Conclusions: Induction can be done safely in carefully selected cases of previous LSCS with Foley’s Balloon.

scholarly journals Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women with eclampsia by mode of delivery at Riley mother baby hospital: a longitudinal case-series study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Koech Irene ◽  
Poli Philippe Amubuomombe ◽  
Richard Mogeni ◽  
Cheruiyot Andrew ◽  
Ann Mwangi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Perinatal Mortality ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Case Series Study ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Series Study

Abstract Background Eclampsia, considered as serious complication of preeclampsia, remains a life-threatening condition among pregnant women. It accounts for 12% of maternal deaths and 16–31% of perinatal deaths worldwide. Most deaths from eclampsia occurred in resource-limited settings of sub-Saharan Africa. This study was performed to determine the optimum mode of delivery, as well as factors associated with the mode of delivery, in women admitted with eclampsia at Riley Mother and Baby Hospital. Methods This was a hospital-based longitudinal case-series study conducted at the largest and busiest obstetric unit of the tertiary hospital of western Kenya. Maternal and perinatal variables, such as age, parity, medications, initiation of labour, mode of delivery, admission to the intensive care unit, admission to the newborn care unit, organ injuries, and mortality, were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 20.0. Quantitative data were described using frequencies and percentages. The significance of the obtained results was judged at the 5% level. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables, and Fisher’s exact test or the Monte Carlo correction was used for correction of the chi-square test when more than 20% of the cells had an expected count of less than 5. Results During the study period, 53 patients diagnosed with eclampsia were treated and followed up to 6 weeks postpartum. There was zero maternal mortality; however, perinatal mortality was reported in 9.4%. Parity was statistically associated with an increased odds of adverse perinatal outcomes (p = 0.004, OR = 9.1, 95% CI = 2.0–40.8) and caesarean delivery (p = 0.020, OR = 4.7, 95% CI = 1.3–17.1). In addition, the induction of labour decreased the risk of adverse outcomes (p = 0.232, OR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.1–2.0). Conclusion There is no benefit of emergency caesarean section for women with eclampsia. This study showed that induction of labour and vaginal delivery can be successfully achieved in pregnant women with eclampsia. Maternal and perinatal mortality from eclampsia can be prevented through prompt and effective care.

Induction of labour, birthweight and perinatal mortality by day of the week

1987 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 413-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. M. DOWDING ◽  
N. M. DUIGNAN ◽  
G. R. HENRY ◽  
D. W. MACDONALD
Keyword(s):  
Perinatal Mortality ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Day Of The Week

scholarly journals Transvaginal Ultrasound Assessment of Cervical Length in Threatened Preterm Labor

2020 ◽  
pp. 81-84
Author(s):  
Prasila Ekaputri
Keyword(s):  
Preterm Labor ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Uterine Contraction ◽  
Transvaginal Ultrasound ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cervical Length ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Active Labor ◽  
Ultrasound Assessment ◽  
Threatened Preterm Labor

Objectives: To determine the cut off point of cervical length usingtransvaginal ultrasonography to predict the actual occurrence ofpreterm labor in women with threatened preterm labor. Methods: A cross sectional study with consecutive random samplingmethod. We examined 80 women with singleton pregnancycomplaining of regular, painful uterine contraction and rupturedmembrane at 24-36 weeks of gestation. Women in active labor, definedby the presence of cervical dilatation less than or equal 3 cm, and having complicationwere excluded. When the patient was admitted, a transvaginalscan was performed to measure the cervical length. Parenteralmagnesium sulfate was given as the subsequent management.The primary outcome was delivery within 24 hours of presentation.Results: We found that the optimal cut off values for cervical lengthwas 2.65 cm with sensitivity 94.4 Percent, specificity 65.4Percent, positive predictivevalue 75.4 Percent and negative predictive value 81.8 Percent. In 69cases, the cervical length was more than or 2.65 cm, with 52 patients successfullycontinued their pregnancy until more than 24 hours. In the 11cases with cervical length less than or equal 2.65 cm, delivery within 24 hours occurredin 9 cases (81,8 Percent). Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that in women withthreatened preterm labor, cervical length more than or equal 2.65 cm may help predictthe actual occurrence of preterm labor. Keywords: cervical length, threatened preterm labor, transvaginalultrasonography

Effect of Sustained Uterine Compression versus Uterine Massage on Blood Loss after Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Labib M. Ghulmiyyah ◽  
Alaa El-Husheimi ◽  
Ihab M. Usta ◽  
Cristina Colon-Aponte ◽  
Ghina Ghazeeri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Postpartum Hemorrhage ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Dropout Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Uterine Massage ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Objective This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of sustained uterine compression versus uterine massage in reducing blood loos after a vaginal delivery. Study Design This was a prospective randomized trial conducted at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC) between October 2015 and October 2017. Inclusion criteria were women with a singleton pregnancy at ≥36 weeks of gestation, with less than three previous deliveries, who were candidates for vaginal delivery. Participants were randomized into two groups, a sustained uterine compression group (group 1) and a uterine massage group (group 2). Incidence of postpartum hemorrhage (blood loss of ≥500 mL) was the primary outcome. We assumed that the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage at our institution is similar to previously published studies. A total of 545 women were required in each arm to detect a reduction from 9.6 to 4.8% in the primary outcome (50% reduction) with a one-sided α of 0.05 and a power of 80%. Factoring in a 10% dropout rate. Secondary outcomes were admission to intensive care unit (ICU), postpartum complications, drop in hemoglobin, duration of hospital stay, maternal pain, use of uterotonics, or of surgical procedure for postpartum hemorrhage. Results A total of 550 pregnant women were recruited, 273 in group 1 and 277 in group 2. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Type of anesthesia, rate of episiotomy, lacerations, and mean birth weight were also equal between the groups. Incidence of the primary outcome was not different between the two groups (group 1: 15.5%, group 2: 15.4%; p = 0.98). There was no statistically significant difference in any of the secondary outcomes between the two groups, including drop in hemoglobin (p = 0.79). Conclusion There was no difference in blood loss between sustained uterine compression and uterine massage after vaginal delivery. Key Points

scholarly journals A comparative study of intra-cervical foley’s catheter and PGE2 gel for induction of labour at term

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 3689
Author(s):  
Anjali R. Kanada ◽  
Mahima Jain
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Mechanical Methods ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Foley’S Catheter

Background: In cervical ripening, before induction of labour, is needed to increase the success of labour induction, to reduce complications and to diminish the rate of caesarean section and duration of labour. Pharmacological preparations are in widespread use for cervical ripening but are not free from side-effects and complications. Mechanical methods, i.e. the use of Foley’s catheter balloon, though effective have not gained much popularity because of the fear of infection. Therefore, the study has been conducted to prove the efficacy and safety of extra amniotic Foley catheter balloon and to compare it with intra-cervical prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) gel. The objective of the study was to the success of induction of labor depends on the cervical status at the time of induction. For effective cervical ripening both Foley's catheter and PGE2 gel are used. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intra cervical Foley's catheter and intra cervical PGE2 gel in cervical ripening for the successful induction of labor.Methods: A randomized, comparative study was conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynaecology, Civil hospital, B.J. Medical College Ahmedabad, during a period of 8 month from September 2018 to April 2019. 100 patients at term with a Bishop's score ≤5 with various indications for induction were randomly allocated to group F (intra-cervical Foley’s catheter) and group P (PGE2 gel) with 50 women included in each group.Results: The groups were comparable with respect to maternal age, gestation age, indication of induction and initial Bishop's score. Both the groups showed significant change in the Bishop's score, 5.10±1.55 and 5.14±1.60 for Foley's catheter and PGE2 gel, respectively, p <0.001. However there was no significant difference between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the side effects and caesarean section rate in both groups. The induction to delivery interval was 16.01±5.50 hours in group F and 16.85 ± 3.81 hours in group P (p=0.073). Apgar scores, birth weights and NICU admissions showed no significant difference between the two groups.Conclusions: The study shows that both Foley's catheter and PGE2 gel are equally effective in pre induction cervical ripening.

scholarly journals Induction of labour and its feto-maternal outcome

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 2748
Author(s):  
Mridu Sinha ◽  
Shashi Bala Arya ◽  
Shashi Saxena ◽  
Nitant Sood
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Post Partum ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Relative Effect ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
One Year

Background: Induction of labour is an iatrogenic deliberate attempt to terminate the pregnancy in order to achieve vaginal delivery in cases of valid indication. It should be carefully supervised as it is a challenge to the clinician, mother and the fetus. Aim of this study was to find out common indications for IOL in a tertiary care teaching centre and its feto-maternal outcome.Methods: An institutional based retrospective observational study was conducted to describe the prevalence of labour induction and factors associated with its outcome, during the time-period of one year from January 2018 to December 2018, at SRMS IMS, Bareilly. Logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the relative effect of determinants and statistical tests were used to see the associations.Results: Most of the patients were primigravidas of younger age-group. Idiopathic oligohydramnios and postdatism were the commonest indications for induction of labour and Misoprost was the commonest drug used for it. Though majority had vaginal delivery, as the method was changed to combined method it was significantly associated with increased likelihood of LSCS. Similarly there was increased association with maternal cervico-vaginal tear / lacerations as the method was changed to combined type. However there were no association between post-partum hemorrhage, meconium stained liquor or fetal distress.Conclusions: Common indications for induction of labour were oligohydramnios and postdatism. Misoprost can be safely used for induction of labour without any increased risk for LSCS or any fetal / neonatal risks.

scholarly journals Sequential Foley Catheter and Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor in Postdated Pregnancy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-112
Author(s):  
Baburam Dixit Thapa ◽  
Tara Manandhar ◽  
Sarita Sitaula ◽  
Tulasa Basnet
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Induction Of Labor ◽  
Normal Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Pharmacological Agents ◽  
Sequential Group ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Foley’S Catheter ◽  
Time To Delivery

Introduction: Induction of labor is done with the aim of normal vaginal delivery. There are different methods; mechanical like intra-cervical Foley’s or pharmacological agents like misoprostol ordinoprostone. Objectives: To compare sequential use of Foley’s catheter and vaginal misoprostol in comparison with vaginal misoprostol only. Methods: Patients with period of gestation more than or equal to 41 weeks without any complications were assigned randomly according to computer generated randomization into sequential use ofintracervical Foley followed by vaginal misoprostol after 24 hours (sequential group) or vaginalmisoprostol only. Primary outcome was rate of normal vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes were induction to delivery interval, maternal and fetal morbidity. Results: Rate of normal vaginal delivery in sequential group (n= 353) and misoprostol alone group(n= 356) was 71.6% and 53.3% (p < 0.001) but the time to delivery from induction is statistically more in sequential group (30.3 vs. 11.2 hours, p< 0.001). Maternal outcomes like postpartum hemorrhage, hyper-stimulation syndrome, chorioamnitis and neonatal outcomes like low Apgar score, meconium stained baby and stillbirth are similar in both the groups. Conclusions: The priming of cervix using intracervical Foley catheter before giving vaginalmisoprostol was beneficial in increasing the rate of normal vaginal delivery but it increased the induction to delivery interval.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document