scholarly journals COVID-19 and RAAS inhibitors: is there a final conclusion?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahshid Talebi-Taher ◽  
Mohammad Hosein Najafi ◽  
Shima Behzad
Keyword(s):  
Antihypertensive Drugs ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Final Conclusion ◽  
Viral Pathogen ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Receptor Blockers ◽  
Infection Disease ◽  
Raas Inhibitors ◽  
Patient Prognosis ◽  
First Time

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the first pandemic caused by a human infecting coronavirus, has drawn global attention from the first time it appeared in Wuhan city of China in late December 2019. Detection of the responsible viral pathogen, named as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by WHO, and its possible pathogenesis lead to the forming of many hypotheses about the factors that may affect the patients’ outcome. One of the SARS-CoV-2 infection concerns was the potential role of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) in COVID-19 patients’ morbidity and mortality. Studies demonstrated that because SARS-CoV-2 uses human ACE2 cell receptors as an entry receptor to invade the cells, there might be an association between antihypertensive drugs such as RAAS inhibitors (specifically ACEIs and ARBs) and the COVID-19 disease. Data are scarce and conflicting regarding ACEI or ARB consumption and how it influences disease outcomes, and a single conclusion has not been reached yet. According to the literature review in our article, the most evidentially supported theory about the use of RAAS inhibitors in COVID-19 is that these medications, including ACEI/ARB, are not associated with the increased risk of infection, disease severity, and patient prognosis. However, further studies are needed to support the hypothesis.

scholarly journals Antihypertensive Drugs and the Risk of Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 771
Author(s):  
In-Jeong Cho ◽  
Jeong-Hun Shin ◽  
Mi-Hyang Jung ◽  
Chae Young Kang ◽  
Jinseub Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antihypertensive Drugs ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Channel Blockers ◽  
Antihypertensive Medications ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Incident Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

We sought to assess the association between common antihypertensive drugs and the risk of incident cancer in treated hypertensive patients. Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, the risk of cancer incidence was analyzed in patients with hypertension who were initially free of cancer and used the following antihypertensive drug classes: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs); angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs); beta blockers (BBs); calcium channel blockers (CCBs); and diuretics. During a median follow-up of 8.6 years, there were 4513 (6.4%) overall cancer incidences from an initial 70,549 individuals taking antihypertensive drugs. ARB use was associated with a decreased risk for overall cancer in a crude model (hazard ratio (HR): 0.744, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.696–0.794) and a fully adjusted model (HR: 0.833, 95% CI: 0.775–0.896) compared with individuals not taking ARBs. Other antihypertensive drugs, including ACEIs, CCBs, BBs, and diuretics, did not show significant associations with incident cancer overall. The long-term use of ARBs was significantly associated with a reduced risk of incident cancer over time. The users of common antihypertensive medications were not associated with an increased risk of cancer overall compared to users of other classes of antihypertensive drugs. ARB use was independently associated with a decreased risk of cancer overall compared to other antihypertensive drugs.

scholarly journals Blood Pressure Control: Stroke and Stroke Prevention

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. S8-S11
Author(s):  
Hans-Christoph Diener
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Antihypertensive Drugs ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Antihypertensive Agents ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Pressure Lowering ◽  
Receptor Blockers

Hypertension is the most important modifiable risk factor for primary and secondary stroke prevention. All antihypertensive drugs are effective in primary prevention: the risk reduction for stroke is 30—42%. However, not all classes of drugs have the same effects: there is some indication that angiotensin receptor blockers may be superior to other classes of antihypertensive drugs in stroke prevention. Seventy-five percent of patients who present to hospital with acute stroke have elevated blood pressure within the first 24—48 hours. Extremes of systolic blood pressure (SBP) increase the risk of death or dependency. The aim of treatment should be to achieve and maintain the SBP in the range 140—160 mmHg. However, fast and drastic blood pressure lowering can have adverse consequences. The PROGRESS trial of secondary prevention with perindopril + indapamide versus placebo + placebo showed a decrease in numbers of stroke recurrences in patients given both active antihypertensive agents, more impressive for cerebral haemorrhage.There were also indications that active treatment might decrease the development of post-stroke dementia.

Intraoperative Hyperkalemia

2018 ◽  
pp. 269-274
Author(s):  
M. Angele Theard ◽  
Alexandra Bastien
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Renin Inhibitors ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Receptor Blockers

Patients with hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease are at risk for chronic kidney disease and therefore require close monitoring of potassium (K+) levels in order to avoid some of the more concerning consequences of hyperkalemia. Medical therapy in these patients, which often includes angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, renin inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, while helpful in managing some of the aforementioned comorbidities and ameliorating chronic kidney disease in these patients, places them at increased risk for unwanted K+ elevations. Symptoms of hyperkalemia maybe nonspecific (fatigue, weakness, and gastrointestinal upset), requiring attention therefore to preoperative laboratory analysis to avert the potentially lethal intraoperative consequences of hyperkalemia like asystole and ventricular fibrillation. Emergency surgery in these patients after trauma complicated by crush injury is particularly challenging requiring that the anesthesiologist be well-versed in recognizing the signs of and managing intraoperative hyperkalemia.

scholarly journals Azilsartan: Current Evidence and Perspectives in Management of Hypertension

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Akshyaya Pradhan ◽  
Ashish Tiwari ◽  
Rishi Sethi
Keyword(s):  
Antihypertensive Drugs ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Hypertension Management ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor ◽  
Global Pandemic ◽  
Receptor Blockers

Hypertension continues to be global pandemic with huge mortality, morbidity, and financial burden on the health system. Unfortunately, most patients with hypertension would eventually require two or more drugs in combination to achieve their target blood pressure (BP). To this end, emergence of more potent antihypertensive drugs is a welcome sign. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are cornerstones of hypertension management in daily practice. Among all ARBs, azilsartan is proven to be more potent in most of the head-to-head trials till date. Azilsartan is the latest ARB approved for hypertension with greater potency and minimal side effects. This review highlights the role of azilsartan in management of hypertension in the current era.

scholarly journals Latest Evidence on Non-Communicable Disease Management (NCD) during COVID-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Communicable Disease ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Sglt2 Inhibitors ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Recommended Care ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Raas Inhibitors ◽  
The Uk

The year 2020 has been dominated by a communicable disease which most did not see coming and are ill- prepared to handle. While daily headlines the world over are dominated by new cases and death from COVID-19, other major health issues must not take a back seat. As of 30thNovember this year, 357 people have died of COVID-19 in Malaysia,while close to 15,000 Malaysians died of Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) alone. With IHD and cerebrovascular accident (CVA) being the number 1 and number 3 causes of death (15% and 8% of all death, respectively) our focus on COVID-19 must not distract us from the ‘elephant in the room’. Evidence from UK showed that while hospitalization due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has significantly decreased by 50%, out of hospital cardiac arrest has significantly increased by 56%; and in hospital mortality from AMI has increased by at least 35% during the pandemic. Patients are shying away from coming for scheduled follow ups, and there has been a reduction in guideline recommended care for NCD. This is confounded by early scare which suggested that treatment of risk factors for NCDs, especially for hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes, may increase susceptibility to and worsen prognosis for patients with COVID-19. Since COVID-19 is a new entity, latest evidence generated are mainly from observational studies with few clinical trials with the exception of vaccine trials. What do we know about management of NCD in the COVID-era?Since the discovery that SARS-COV-2 virus attached itself to the ACE2 receptors before entering cells, alarm bells were sounded that patients treated with RAAS inhibitors may be susceptible to and have worse prognosis. Withup to 60% of hypertensiveworldwide taking this class of drugs, the concern is understandable. Reassuringly, 6 observational studies from 4 countries and 1 RCT from a 5th country showed this not to be true. Studies from China and Italy showed that those on RAAS inhibitors have better prognosis and this has triggered an RCT which hypothesized that pre-treatment with angiotensin receptor blockers may be beneficial in preventing pulmonary damage in these patients. Another RCT is looking at recombinant human ACE2 as treatment for patients with COVID-19. In diabetic patients, an observational study from New York showed those on statin has reduced mortality compared to non-user and in a large UK based primary care setting there was no increased risk of COVID-19 among patients prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors. The SGLT2 inhibitors have been proven to improve clinical outcome including mortality in diabetics and could be safely used to treat patients during the pandemic. Based on a nationwide retrospective cohort in the UK, overall mortality was higher for diabetics admitted to ICU or HDU and with greatest mortality impact in younger patients.The next few months will see more prospective intervention studies publishedaddressing the various unanswered questions. It is worth remembering that substandard care is responsible for upto 84% of CV death. Hence, we shouldnot let our guards down with NCDs even when the world’s attention is focused on COVID-19.International Journal of Human and Health Sciences Supplementary Issue: 2021 Page: S10

Abstract 15213: Association of Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Use and Covid-19 Infection Among Patients With Hypertension

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaejin An ◽  
Rong Wei ◽  
hui zhou ◽  
Tiffany Luong ◽  
Ran Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antihypertensive Medication ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Medication Use ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Receptor Blockers

Introduction: Given the limited evidence, we investigated the association between use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and risk of Covid-19 infection within a large diverse hypertension population. Methods: We identified patients with hypertension as of March 1, 2020 (index date) from Kaiser Permanente Southern California, a large US integrated healthcare system. Patient demographics, antihypertensive medication use, neighborhood income and education, and comorbidities were identified from electronic health records within 1-year pre-index date. The study outcome was a positive RT-PCR test for Covid-19 between March 1 - May 6, 2020. We used multivariable logistic regression models to examine the association between ACEI/ARB use and Covid-19 infection. Results: Among 824,650 patients with hypertension, 16,898 (2.0%) were tested for Covid-19. Of those tested, 1,794 (10.6%) had a positive result and 547 (30.5% of positive cases) were hospitalized within 14-days of testing positive. Of those tested, 4,878 (28.9%) were on ACEIs, 3,473 (20.6%) were on ARBs, and 4,177 (24.7%) were on other antihypertensive medication classes. Risk of covid-19 infection associated with ACEI use decreased with increasing age (P-interaction = 0.01). In age-stratified analyses, ACEI use was not statistically associated with increased risk of Covid-19 infection among the age groups of 18-39, 40-64, and 65-84 years but was associated with lower risk of Covid-19 among those aged ≥85 years ( Table ). Across all age groups, ARB use was not associated with increased risk of Covid-19, but non-white race, lower neighborhood income and education, and no antihypertensive medication use were associated with increased risk of Covid-19. Conclusions: ACEI nor ARB use was not associated with increased risk of Covid-19 infection. The decreased risk of Covid-19 infection among older adults using ACEIs warrants further investigation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document