scholarly journals Comparison of conventional IVF versus ICSI in non-male factor, normoresponder patients

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Eftekhar ◽  
Farnaz Mohammadian ◽  
Fariba Yousefnejad ◽  
Behnaz Molaei ◽  
Abbas Aflatoonian
Keyword(s):  
Male Infertility ◽  
Effective Treatment ◽  
Male Factor Infertility ◽  
Fertilization Failure ◽  
Male Factor

Conventional IVF and ICSI are two common techniques to achieve fertilization. IVF has long been used for treatment of infertility, although it is not an effective treatment in severe male infertility. The use of ICSI has been expanded in severe male factor and fertilization failure after IVF cycle. In spite of the widespread use of ICSI in patients with non-male factor infertility, there is still little evidence to confirm its effectiveness in this population

Infertility and the Military Male

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (01) ◽  
pp. 005-011
Author(s):  
Amanda B. Reed-Maldonado ◽  
Kristin C. Madden
Keyword(s):  
Male Infertility ◽  
Military Service ◽  
Clinical Investigation ◽  
Male Factor Infertility ◽  
Military Population ◽  
Male Factor ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Military Service Members ◽  
Infertile Couples ◽  
The Military

AbstractMale infertility is a condition that affects approximately 50% of infertile couples and about 30% of those couples have only male factor infertility identified. There has been speculation that male military service members may have an even greater lifetime prevalence of infertility as compared to the general population, but very few scientific publications focus on male factor infertility in the military population specifically. This review will discuss many of the unique considerations regarding male infertility in the military and highlight future opportunities for research. The military/federal health system has the potential to serve as a leader in both the delivery of health care for male factor infertility and in the clinical investigation into the etiologies of and treatments for male factor infertility.

Gender, Family Norms, and Male-Factor Infertility in Japan: An Analysis of Internet Blogs

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (14) ◽  
pp. 3713-3731
Author(s):  
Kimiko Tanaka ◽  
Nan E. Johnson ◽  
Deborah Lowry
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Studies ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Male Infertility ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Male Factor Infertility ◽  
Male Factor ◽  
Japanese Male ◽  
Family Norms ◽  
Cross Cultural Studies

This study analyzes blogs about male-factor infertility posted on a Japanese blogsite on a certain day in April 2014. It focuses on an understudied topic and is the first study of Japanese male infertility based on blogs. The blog format afforded anonymity to the bloggers, and our sample of 97 adults yields the largest number of individual respondents of all cross-cultural studies cited in our literature review. We extract three major themes from the analysis of the blogs, offer suggestions for a redirection of family and infertility policy in Japan, and suggest lines for further research.

A modern view of male infertility

1994 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 93 ◽  
Author(s):  
SJ Silber
Keyword(s):  
Male Infertility ◽  
Y Chromosome ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Male Factor Infertility ◽  
Male Factor ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Modern Approach ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Defective Spermatogenesis

It is archaic to view male factor infertility today separately from in vitro fertilization (IVF) and treatment of the female partner. Oligoasthenozoospermia may be an inherited condition (most likely on the Y chromosome), and is refractory to any treatment of the male including hormones and varicocelectomy. IVF technology is the only justifiable approach for achieving a pregnancy in these couples. The reasons for this view and the suggested modern approach to couples with oligoasthenozoospermia are outlined in this review. However, obstructive azoospermia is different as it can be successfully corrected with microsurgery in over 90% of men. When it cannot be corrected, as in congenital absence of vas, microsurgical sperm retrieval combined with IVF can still be highly effective in producing pregnancy with sperm from the husband. The most important arena for research into male infertility in the next decade will be to map out the deletions on the Y chromosome that might result in defective spermatogenesis, and which probably cause most cases of non-obstructive male factor infertility.

scholarly journals The pioneering of intracytoplasmic sperm injection: historical perspectives

Reproduction ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. F71-F77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zev Rosenwaks ◽  
Nigel Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection ◽  
Scientific Work ◽  
Semen Parameters ◽  
Male Factor Infertility ◽  
Fertilization Failure ◽  
Male Factor ◽  
Live Births ◽  
Historical Perspectives ◽  
Mammalian Fertilization

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has often been heralded as a ground-breaking technique that has transformed the treatment of couples with infertility. By injecting a single spermatozoon into the cytoplasm of the oocyte, ICSI bypasses the zona pellucida and increases the chances of fertilization and subsequent embryo development, independent of semen parameters. Ever since the first live births using ICSI were reported in 1992, ICSI has become the mainstay of treating male factor infertility as well as overcoming fertilization failure associated with conventional in vitro insemination. Today, ICSI is utilized in nearly 66% of all assisted reproductive treatments worldwide and has resulted in the birth of millions of babies. The primary goal of this review is to provide historical perspectives about the pioneering of ICSI. We begin by highlighting the scientific work of early investigators who elucidated the mechanisms central to mammalian fertilization. Furthermore, we briefly discuss how these findings contributed to the development of IVF for the treatment of infertility. We then emphasize the shortcomings of IVF in treating severe forms of male factor infertility and enumerate the micromanipulation techniques that were developed to circumvent these shortcomings. Finally, we indicate how the inadequacies of these micromanipulation techniques lead to the inception, application and popularity of ICSI.

The CFTR gene: male infertility and assisted conception

1999 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kulshrestha ◽  
A Makrigiannakis ◽  
P Patrizio
Keyword(s):  
Male Infertility ◽  
Vas Deferens ◽  
Cftr Gene ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Male Factor Infertility ◽  
Assisted Conception ◽  
Male Factor ◽  
Fertility Treatments ◽  
Bilateral Absence ◽  
Testicular Failure

Approximately 30–40% of couples seeking fertility treatments have male factor infertility. Their dysfunctions include azoospermia, oligozoospermia, asthenozoospermia and teratozoospermia. Those with azoospermia represent about 25% of the total, and of these about 30% have an obstructive process while the remaining have either primary or secondary testicular failure. In the obstructive azoospermia group, 25% of males have congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD).

scholarly journals Development of ICSI

Reproduction ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 156 (1) ◽  
pp. F51-F58 ◽  
Author(s):  
C L O’Neill ◽  
S Chow ◽  
Z Rosenwaks ◽  
G D Palermo
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Human Body ◽  
Assisted Reproductive Techniques ◽  
Semen Parameters ◽  
Male Factor Infertility ◽  
Fertilization Failure ◽  
Male Factor ◽  
Reproductive Techniques

The first conception outside of the human body that led to the birth of Louise Brown was a tremendous accomplishment, which opened the door to the utilization of assisted reproductive techniques globally. This brought the understanding that accomplishing life in a dish required several steps, the most obvious being the timing and characteristics of fertilization. It soon became obvious in the 1980s that the most disappointing phenomenon was unexpected and complete fertilization failure. Among the approaches that were attempted to treat male factor infertility, ICSI surfaced as the technique that brought the ratio of the gametes to 1:1 and was also able to grant consistent fertilization and a higher pregnancy rate. ICSI has now been implemented for a quarter of a century, proving itself as the ultimate technique utilizing ejaculated spermatozoa independent of the semen parameters and is the sole insemination method to be used with surgically retrieved spermatozoa. There are currently various indications for ICSI that are widely adopted, rendering it the most popular insemination method worldwide. The reliability of ICSI ensures its employment in upcoming techniques involving in vitro spermatogenesis and neogametogenesis.

scholarly journals Prevalence and Patterns of Male Infertility Based on Semen Analysis in Patients Visiting Massawa Hospital; Eritrea: Cross-Sectional Study; 2020

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berhe Tesfai ◽  
Fitsum Kibreab ◽  
Hailemichael Gebremariam ◽  
Liwam Abraham
Keyword(s):  
Male Infertility ◽  
Sperm Motility ◽  
Sperm Count ◽  
Semen Analysis ◽  
Male Factor Infertility ◽  
Male Factor ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Semen Volume ◽  
Primary Type ◽  
Study Participants

Abstract Background Semen analysis is the first step to identify male factor infertility. World Health Organization estimates that male factor accounts for 50% of couple sub-fertility. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and patterns of male factor infertility based on semen analysis in patients visiting Massawa Hospital with infertility complaints. Methods It was a retrospective, descriptive cross sectional hospital based type of study with a census sampling method. Patient’s medical records and hospital laboratory register were used to retrieve semen analysis results of patients from June 2018 to June 2020. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ministry of Health Research and Ethical Review Committee. Confidentiality of patients records kept was secured and consent was obtained from study participants to use their data. Results were presented in frequency, tables and p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results A total of 112 patients data was analyzed in the study with 49.1% were aged between 20 to 30 years. The prevalence of male factor infertility in these patients was found to be 42% and 79.5% of them had primary type of infertility. Of the study participants; 63 (56.3%), 72 (64.3%) and 70 (62.5%) had sperm count < 15 million sperms/ml, sperm motility < 40 % and morphology of < 60% respectively. One tenth, 15 (13.4%) of the patients had a semen volume of < 1.5ml/ejaculate, out of which 13(86.7%) had primary type of infertility. Moreover; 72 (64.3%) patients had total sperm count/ejaculate of < 39 million and 59 (82%) of these had primary type of infertility. In addition; 50.8% and 50% of patients aged 20 to 30 years had a sperm count < 15 million/ml and sperm motility of < 40% respectively. Conclusion The prevalence of male factor infertility was slightly higher and was dominated with primary infertility. Most patients had lower sperm count, sperm motility but higher semen volume, and majority of the patients with abnormal sperm results were aged between 20 to 30 years. Further prospective researches to determine the risk factors for male infertility and introducing assisted type of fertility in Eritrea are highly recommended.

scholarly journals Recent advances in understanding and managing male infertility

F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Fainberg ◽  
James A. Kashanian
Keyword(s):  
Male Infertility ◽  
Paternal Age ◽  
World Health ◽  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Male Factor Infertility ◽  
Male Factor ◽  
Lifestyle Choices ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Shed Light

Infertility is a prevalent condition affecting an estimated 70 million people globally. The World Health Organization estimates that 9% of couples worldwide struggle with fertility issues and that male factor contributes to 50% of the issues. Male infertility has a variety of causes, ranging from genetic mutations to lifestyle choices to medical illnesses or medications. Recent studies examining DNA fragmentation, capacitation, and advanced paternal age have shed light on previously unknown topics. The role of conventional male reproductive surgeries aimed at improving or addressing male factor infertility, such as varicocelectomy and testicular sperm extraction, have recently been studied in an attempt to expand their narrow indications. Despite advances in the understanding of male infertility, idiopathic sperm abnormalities still account for about 30% of male infertility. With current and future efforts examining the molecular and genetic factors responsible for spermatogenesis and fertilization, we may be better able to understand etiologies of male factor infertility and thus improve outcomes for our patients.

scholarly journals Epigenetic reprogramming during spermatogenesis and male factor infertility

Reproduction ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 156 (2) ◽  
pp. R9-R21 ◽  
Author(s):  
H M McSwiggin ◽  
A M O’Doherty
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Male Infertility ◽  
Deep Sequencing ◽  
Male Factor Infertility ◽  
Male Factor ◽  
Chromatin Dynamics ◽  
Sequencing Technologies ◽  
Male Germline ◽  
Male Factors ◽  
Epigenetic Processes

Infertility is an often devastating diagnosis encountered by around one in six couples who are trying to conceive. Moving away from the long-held belief that infertility is primarily a female issue, it is now recognised that half, if not more, of these cases may be due to male factors. Recent evidence has suggested that epigenetic abnormalities in chromatin dynamics, DNA methylation or sperm-borne RNAs may contribute to male infertility. In light of advances in deep sequencing technologies, researchers have been able to increase the coverage and depth of sequencing results, which in turn has allowed more comprehensive analyses of spermatozoa chromatin dynamics and methylomes and enabled the discovery of new subsets of sperm RNAs. This review examines the most current literature related to epigenetic processes in the male germline and the associations of aberrant modifications with fertility and development.

scholarly journals The Impact of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Non-Male Factor Infertility—A Critical Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2616
Author(s):  
Tanya L. Glenn ◽  
Alex M. Kotlyar ◽  
David B. Seifer
Keyword(s):  
Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Fertilization Rate ◽  
Male Factor Infertility ◽  
Fertilization Failure ◽  
Male Factor ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Total Fertilization Failure ◽  
The Impact

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was originally designed to overcome barriers due to male factor infertility. However, a surveillance study found that ICSI use in non-male factor infertility increased from 15.4% to 66.9% between 1996 and 2012. Numerous studies have investigated fertilization rate, total fertilization failure, and live birth rate per cycle (LBR), comparing the use of ICSI versus conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) for non-male factor infertility. The overwhelming conclusion shows no increase in fertilization rate or LBR per cycle with the use of ICSI for non-male factor infertility. The overuse of ICSI is likely related to the desire to avoid a higher rate of total fertilization failure in IVF. However, data supporting the benefit of using ICSI for non-male factor infertility is lacking, and 33 couples would need to be treated with ICSI unnecessarily to avoid one case of total fertilization failure. Such practice increases the cost to the patient, increases the burden on embryologist’s time, and is a misapplication of resources. Additionally, there remains conflicting data regarding the safety of offspring conceived by ICSI and potential damage to the oocyte. Thus, the use of ICSI should be limited to those with male factor infertility or a history of total fertilization factor infertility due to uncertainties of potential adverse impact and lack of proven benefit in non-male factor infertility.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document