scholarly journals Legal Liability For Losses Of Third Parties In The Agreement To Transfer Property Rights With An Absolute Power Of Attorney

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Finni Rahmawati
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Transfer Property ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Absolute Power ◽  
Notary Public

Abstract: An agreement to transfer title to land based on absolute power is prohibited by law. The prohibition of absolute power is regulated in Instruction of the Minister of Home Affairs number 14 of 1982 concerning the Prohibition of Using Absolute Power for Transfer of Rights to Land, and Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 Article 39 paragraph (1) letter d concerning land registration. However, the reality is that there is still a land sale and purchase agreement using an absolute power of attorney, causing losses to other parties. The problem is how is the legal responsibility of the seller and the notary against the loss of a third party due to the use of absolute power of attorney in the agreement to transfer title to land. This study aims to determine the legal liability of the seller and the notary against the losses of third parties due to the use of absolute power of attorney in the agreement to transfer ownership of land rights. The method used in this study is a normative juridical method using a statuate approach and case approach. The Study found that the seller's responsibility was based on Article 1365 of the Civil Code, namely by providing compensation for the value of the sale value of the land minus the owner's debt without involving a third party with good faith. And the accountability of the notary is contained in Law Number 30 of 2014 Article 84 concerning the Position of Notary Public and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 Article 62 concerning Land Registration which explains the sanctions for notaries. In this case it relates to the loss of a third party in good faith.Keywords: Absolute Power, CompensationAbstrak: Perjanjian pengalihan hak milik atas tanah yang didasarkan pada kuasa mutlak merupakan sesuatu yang dilarang oleh hukum. Pelarangan kuasa mutlak diatur dalam Instruksi Menteri Dalam Negeri nomor 14 Tahun 1982 tentang Larangan Penggunaan Kuasa Mutlak Sebagai Pemindahan Hak Atas Tanah, dan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 24 Tahun 1997 Pasal 39 ayat (1) huruf d tentang pendaftaran tanah. Namun realitas yang terjadi masih terdapatnya suatu perjanjian jual beli tanah menggunakan surat kuasa mutlak sehingga menyebabkan kerugian bagi pihak lain. Permasalahannya adalah bagaimanakah pertanggungjawaban hukum pihak penjual dan notaris terhadap kerugian pihak ketiga akibat penggunaan surat kuasa mutlak dalam perjanjian pengalihan hak milik atas tanah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pertanggungjawaban hukum pihak penjual dan notaris terhadap kerugian pihak ketiga akibat penggunaan surat kuasa mutlak dalam perjanjian pengalihan hak milik atas tanah. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu metode yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa pertanggungjawaban pihak penjual yakni berdasarkan Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata yaitu  dengan memberikan ganti kerugian seharga nilai penjualan tanah dikurangi hutang pemilik tanpa melibatkan pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik. dan pertanggungjawaban pihak notaris yaitu terdapat dalam UU Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Pasal 84 tentang Jabatan Notaris dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Pasal 62 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah yang menjelaskan sanksi bagi notaris. Dalam hal ini berhubungan dengan kerugian pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik.Kata Kunci: Kuasa Mutlak, Ganti Kerugian

scholarly journals KEABSAHAN PENGGUNAAN KUASA MUTLAK DALAM PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI (PPJB) TANAH YANG DIBUAT OLEH NOTARIS

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 301
Author(s):  
Clara Vania ◽  
Gunawan Djajaputra
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Absolute Power ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Absolute power of attorney is a power of attorney containing an irrevocable element by the authorizing party. Since the Instructions of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 14 Year 1982 concerning the Prohibition of Absolute Power of Attorney as the Transfer of Land Rights took effect on 6 March 1982 and Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997 concerning Land Registration took effect on 8 July 1997, the use of absolute power of attorney has been banned. But in the practice, the use of absolute power of attorney in the Binding Sale and Purchase Agreement of Land is still found. This is what often causes conflict because the use of absolute power of attorney is considered contrary to the laws and regulations in Indonesia. The formulation of the problem in this thesis is how the validity of the use of absolute power of attorney in the Binding Sale and Purchase Agreement of Land made by a public notary and how the legal consequences of the Binding Sale and Purchase Agreement of Land that use absolute power of attorney. The results of the study showed that regarding the use of absolute power of attorney in the Binding Sale and Purchase Agreement of Land is legal and does not violate the laws and regulations. In addition, the legal consequences arising from the use of this absolute power of attorney in the Binding Sale and Purchase Agreement of Land are still recognized and remain valid and binding for the parties who have made them.

scholarly journals PENGGUNAAN KUASA MENJUAL DIDALAM PERALIHAN HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH MELALUI JUAL-BELI

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adnyana .
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Growth Dynamics ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Equal Rights ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Absolute Power

The authorization pursuant to Article 1792 of the Civil Code is "an agreement by which a given authority to another person, who received it, for conducting an affair on his behalf". It seems clear on the one hand there is the so-called to give and some are called to receive power, each party both receiver and giver have equal rights and obligations in running the power. In a very rapid growth dynamics can be found in the deed of transfer of power that the land ownership through purchase, clauses can not be withdrawn or disregard of Article 1813 of the Civil Code which is referred to as "Power of Absolute", it means no longer balanced and adverse the power giver if concerned about the rights and obligations of the giver and the receiver of power. In connection with the absolute power of the transformation of property rights to land through purchase, there are some legislation that expressly prohibits: 1. Instruction of the Minister of Home Affairs No. 14 of 1982 on the Prohibition of Use of Absolute Powerful As the transfer of Land Rights.2. Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registration, in  Article 39 paragraph (1) letter d.3. Supreme Court Decision No. 2584 / K / Pdt / 1986 explicitly states that "absolute power of attorney regarding the sale and purchase of land can not be justified because in practice often misused for smuggling and selling land".4. Decision of the Supreme Court Reg. No. 2817 / K / Pdt / 1994 explicitly states that "buying and selling is done on the basis of absolute power is invalid and void". As a result of the ban, the use of absolute power in the transfer of property rights through the purchase can not be done because it is illegal and null and void.

Pengukuran Pihak Ketiga Pasca Asas Contradictoire Delimitatie di Kabupaten Sidoarjo dan Pasuruan

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-75
Author(s):  
Dedy Setyo Irawan ◽  
Harvini Wulansari
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Problem Analysis ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Descriptive Approach ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Of Land

Abstract: Complete Systematic Land Registration is a program which taken by the government in providing legal certainty in the field of land in Indonesia. PTSL activities at Sidoarjo Regency and Pasuruan Regency Land Office are carried out with third parties. Before starting the measurement, it is necessary to carry out the contradictoire delimitatie principle to ensure legal certainty of ownership of land rights. The research used a qualitative method with a descriptive approach. The data analysis carried out by compiling logically proportional statements to answer research questions. Problem analysis is carried out by making a description based on premier data and secondary data obtained through interviews and observations of implementation. The results of the research showed that the implementation of the contradictoire delimitatie principle is broadly following PP. No. 24 of 1997 and PMNA KaBPN No. 3 of 1997. The results of the study also showed that there were obstacles in the implementation of the contradictoire delimitatie principle, such as the third parties were not following technical guidelines No. 01 / JUKNIS-300/1/2018 annex 10 in the making of measurement drawings. Quality control is needed to improve the quality of work and results of third party products and minimize land problems in the future.Keywords: principle of contradictoire delimitation, third party. Intisari : Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap (PTSL) merupakan langkah pemerintah dalam memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dalam bidang pertanahan di Indonesia. Kegiatan PTSL di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sidoarjo dan Kabupaten Pasuruan dilaksanakan bekerjasama dengan Pihak Ketiga yang sebelumnya melalui tahapan asas contradictoire delimitatie untuk menjamin kepastian hukum kepemilikan hak atas tanah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif. Teknik analisa yang dilakukan yaitu dengan menyusun pernyataan-pernyataan proposional secara logis untuk menjawab pertanyaan penelitian. Analisa permasalahan dilakukan dengan membuat uraian berdasarkan data premier dan data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui wawancara serta observasi langsung terhadap pelaksanaan kegiatan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan asas contradictoire delimitatie secara garis besar telah sesuai dengan PP. No. 24 Tahun 1997 dan PMNA KaBPN No. 3 Tahun 1997. Dalam pelaksanaanya terdapat hambatan yakni  pembuatan Gambar Ukur oleh Pihak Ketiga tidak sesuai dengan pedoman JUKNIS No. 01/JUKNIS-300/1/2018 lampiran 10. Sehingga diperlukan pengawasan kendali mutu terkait pekerjaan dan hasil produk dari Pihak Ketiga agar kedepannya hasil pekerjaan yang dihasilkan lebih baik dan tidak menjadi permasalahan pertanahan dikemudian hari.Kata Kunci : asas contradictoire delimitatie, pihak ketiga.

scholarly journals The Expectation Gap In The Legal System: Perception Differences Between Auditors And Judges

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Lowe
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Business Owners ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Bank Loan ◽  
Small Business Owners ◽  
Expectation Gap ◽  
Role Responsibilities ◽  
Loan Officers

<span>The expectation gap, and its related effects on auditor legal liability, has been presumed to be caused by diverging perceptions by the auditing profession and third party litigants regarding the professions role, responsibilities, and related performance. Prior research regarding the expectation gap has focused on diverging perceptions of different groups (i.e. financial analysts, bank loan officers, small business owners, and auditors). While this research has identified an expectation gap between auditors and certain third-parties, it has neglected examining the perceptions of judicial litigants. This absence is somewhat ironic given the current auditor legal liability situation. This study fills this void by comparing judges and auditors attitudes toward the auditing profession. Results revealed a large divergence in perceptions of auditors and judges regarding their expectations of the auditing profession.</span>

scholarly journals Behoort die saaklike ooreenkoms aan vormvereistes onderwerp te word?

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
PJW Schutte
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
South African ◽  
Circumstantial Evidence ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Transfer Property ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Real ◽  
Legal Position

No formalities are required in South African law in respect of the real agreement relating to the transfer of ownership in immovable property. The agreement is, for example, derived from surrounding circumstances, such as the fact that the parties concluded an obligatory agreement which is aimed at the transfer of property, or the fact that the transferor has signed a power of attorney, or the fact that the transferee has paid transfer duty. However, this circumstantial evidence is not conclusive proof that an agreement to transfer property has in fact been concluded. The transferor might have signed the power of attorney, for example, while he was erroneously under the impression that he was signing an option, or the transferee might refuse to take delivery because the property does not correspond to the thing agreed upon. In each situation neither of the parties has the intention to transfer property, and ownership could therefore not be transferred. Yet registration is possible even in the absence of a valid real agreement. This may result in an incorrect register because the person who is indicated as the owner is in fact not. It therefore appears that there is a deficiency in South African law with regard to land registration and a need for greater certainty regarding the question as to whether or not a real agreement has in fact been concluded. In this paper two solutions are explored: (1) the defect can be rectified by requiring the parties to appear (either in person or by a representative) before a conveyancer and to declare that they respectively intend to transfer and obtain property, as is the case in the Netherlands and Germany. The conveyancer should reduce the agreement to writing and the document by which the parties are bound should then be lodged with the registrar as proof of the real agreement; (2) the real agreement may be incorporated into the deed of transfer. Any one of these proposals will remove any doubt regarding the existence of the real agreement and will ensure that the register reflects the true legal position. 

scholarly journals WEAKNESSES OF THE NEGATIVE PUBLICATION SYSTEM WITH POSITIVE ELEMENTS IN AGRARIAN LAW IN INDONESIA

1970 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-248
Author(s):  
Suharyono Suharyono
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Real ◽  
Positive Elements ◽  
Agrarian Law ◽  
Implementation Level

In the negative publication system with positive elements in agrarian law in Indonesia at the implementation level, there are still a number of weaknesses, both weaknesses from the aspect of the norms for the purpose of land registration, aspects of legal responsibility and the system of imposing sanctions. There will be 3 (three) weaknesses in the Negative Publication System (positive elements) which are used as the basis for Land Registration by Government Regulation/PP Number 24 of 1997, namely: first; the norming system because it is imperative (norm imperative) and open (openbaar norm) which provides an opportunity for other parties to prove that they are the real owners of the land, thus resulting in legal disputes that must be resolved through the courts; second; the norm of legal responsibility for BPN/Kakan Land Officials who make mistakes in the implementation of land registration is not regulated in a negative publication system with positive elements, so that BPN/Land Office officials are not legally responsible when a certificate of land rights is canceled or declared invalid by a court decision; and third; norms and system for imposing sanctions for Land Registration Officers (BPN officials) who make mistakes in the implementation of land registration in Government Regulation/PP Number 24 of 1997 is not regulated. Keywords: Negative Publications, Positive Elements, and Agrarian Law.

scholarly journals The Liability of Internet Intermediaries

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaani Riordan
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Detailed Analysis ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
Secondary Liability ◽  
Social Importance ◽  
Online Regulation

Internet intermediaries play a central role in modern commerce and society. Although their economic and social importance is well-recognised, their legal liability remains poorly understood, and, until now, no work has specifically addressed their legal responsibility for wrongdoing carried out by third parties using their facilities or platforms. This work fills that gap by providing comprehensive coverage of the legal duties owed by intermediaries and the increasingly complex schemes that regulate their activities. The first part of the work introduces the concept of an internet intermediary, general doctrines of primary and secondary liability, and the European enforcement regime. The second part examines the liability of intermediaries in specific areas of law, with a detailed analysis of the applicable liability rules, and the major English case law, and decisions of the Court of Justice that interpret and apply them. The final part of the work provides guidance on remedies and limitations. Written by an expert author from the intellectual property chambers at 8 New Square, Lincoln's Inn, this is an essential guide for lawyers advising on liability, privacy, and online regulation.

scholarly journals Fiduciary Dispute Settlement of Murabaha Contract in PT. Al-Ijarah Indonesia Finance

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-192
Author(s):  
Riska Wijayanti ◽  
Kartika Marella Vanni
Keyword(s):  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Black Color

This study examines the authority of dispute settlement body of a bad financing in murabaha contracts with a collateral of Daihatsu VVTI car 13 XI DLX Year 2011 midnight black color. According to DSN Fatwa Number 04/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 concerning Murabaha the placement of fiduciary on murabaha contract objects is indeed permissible, but it becomes ambiguous when murabaha objects which are used as collateral in the financing process that have not been repaid are lost, causing late installment payments. The customer argued that the late payment was due to the embezzlement of murabaha objects by third parties beyond the expectations or control of the customer. This study also examines the legal liability for late settlement of murabaha sale and purchase by customers due to the loss of murabaha objects which at the same time become collateral in murabaha financing contracts. This research is normative legal research with a legal approach and a case approach. This study concludes that Religious Courts have the authority to decide disputes that occur between customers (mushtari) and sharia financial institutions (ṣahib al-māl) for late repayment of murabaha financing. Based on the principle of accountability based on the element of error, the customer (mushtari) has legal responsibility for his actions. Errors made by customers (mushtari) are in the form of negligence.

Procuração/power of attorney

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-166
Author(s):  
Tereza Passos e Sousa Marques Afonso ◽  
Maria do Céu Henriques de Bastos
Keyword(s):  
Northern Ireland ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Legal Instrument ◽  
Notary Public

Abstract This paper presents a contrastive legal and corpus-based linguistic and terminological analysis to translate a common legal instrument on a global scale, the power of attorney in English or procuração in Portuguese. This usually takes the shape of a written document, granted before a notary public as required by law, allowing one person to appoint another person to act on his/her behalf. Civil law and common law systems differ considerably with respect to requirements, formalities and range of powers permitted. In cross-border transactions, a translation is required to certify the authority given to third parties who do not speak the language. Bearing this in mind, a comparable corpus of authentic Portuguese and British texts (from England and Wales, and Northern Ireland) pertaining to this legal genre (12 procurações and 24 PoA) is analysed to identify its characteristics at functional, situational, thematic, lexical and grammatical levels.

SURAT KUASA MEMBEBANKAN HAK TANGGUNGAN ATAS TANAH NEGARA (STUDI KASUS PT X DI KOTA Y)

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 192
Author(s):  
Ayang Fristia Maulana
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Right

State land is land directly controlled by the state as stated in Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registration. State land is not an object of Mortgage Rights, the object of mortgage is the right to land with the status of “Right of Ownership”,” Right to Exploit”, Right to Build” and “Rights to Use” as described in Article 51 of BAL in Article 4 UUHT. Because state land is not the object of mortgage rights, it is not justified if the state land is guaranteed as the repayment of debtor's debt which is tied up with Power of Attorney Charging the Deposit Rights. In this case, the debtor is a legal entity of a Limited Liability Company engaged in real estate which has located permission for land acquisition. The land to be acquired has the right of ownership status which is then released by the owner with the provision of compensation. After the release of the land rights, the released land will become state land as set forth in Article 19 of the BAL. This is the land which is released as collateral by the debtor to the creditors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document