Pengukuran Pihak Ketiga Pasca Asas Contradictoire Delimitatie di Kabupaten Sidoarjo dan Pasuruan

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-75
Author(s):  
Dedy Setyo Irawan ◽  
Harvini Wulansari
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Problem Analysis ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Descriptive Approach ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Of Land

Abstract: Complete Systematic Land Registration is a program which taken by the government in providing legal certainty in the field of land in Indonesia. PTSL activities at Sidoarjo Regency and Pasuruan Regency Land Office are carried out with third parties. Before starting the measurement, it is necessary to carry out the contradictoire delimitatie principle to ensure legal certainty of ownership of land rights. The research used a qualitative method with a descriptive approach. The data analysis carried out by compiling logically proportional statements to answer research questions. Problem analysis is carried out by making a description based on premier data and secondary data obtained through interviews and observations of implementation. The results of the research showed that the implementation of the contradictoire delimitatie principle is broadly following PP. No. 24 of 1997 and PMNA KaBPN No. 3 of 1997. The results of the study also showed that there were obstacles in the implementation of the contradictoire delimitatie principle, such as the third parties were not following technical guidelines No. 01 / JUKNIS-300/1/2018 annex 10 in the making of measurement drawings. Quality control is needed to improve the quality of work and results of third party products and minimize land problems in the future.Keywords: principle of contradictoire delimitation, third party. Intisari : Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap (PTSL) merupakan langkah pemerintah dalam memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dalam bidang pertanahan di Indonesia. Kegiatan PTSL di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sidoarjo dan Kabupaten Pasuruan dilaksanakan bekerjasama dengan Pihak Ketiga yang sebelumnya melalui tahapan asas contradictoire delimitatie untuk menjamin kepastian hukum kepemilikan hak atas tanah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif. Teknik analisa yang dilakukan yaitu dengan menyusun pernyataan-pernyataan proposional secara logis untuk menjawab pertanyaan penelitian. Analisa permasalahan dilakukan dengan membuat uraian berdasarkan data premier dan data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui wawancara serta observasi langsung terhadap pelaksanaan kegiatan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan asas contradictoire delimitatie secara garis besar telah sesuai dengan PP. No. 24 Tahun 1997 dan PMNA KaBPN No. 3 Tahun 1997. Dalam pelaksanaanya terdapat hambatan yakni  pembuatan Gambar Ukur oleh Pihak Ketiga tidak sesuai dengan pedoman JUKNIS No. 01/JUKNIS-300/1/2018 lampiran 10. Sehingga diperlukan pengawasan kendali mutu terkait pekerjaan dan hasil produk dari Pihak Ketiga agar kedepannya hasil pekerjaan yang dihasilkan lebih baik dan tidak menjadi permasalahan pertanahan dikemudian hari.Kata Kunci : asas contradictoire delimitatie, pihak ketiga.

scholarly journals PENDAFTARAN TANAH DENGAN ALAS HAK JUAL BELI DI BAWAH TANGAN PADA PROGRAM PENDAFTARAN TANAH SISTEMATIS LENGKAP (PTSL) (Studi Pada Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Lima Puluh Kota)

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-54
Author(s):  
Donald Andrean
Keyword(s):  
Task Force ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
City District ◽  
The Government

In civil law, land is included in registered objects. Therefore ownership of land rights must be registered, for legal certainty. Land registration is regulated in PP No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. However, there are still many lands that have not been registered, to overcome this the government has issued a comprehensive systematic land registration program (PTSL) based on Minister of Agrarian Regulation No. 6 of 2018. The aim of this program is to provide legal certainty and legal protection for land rights owned by the community. The Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL) provides an opportunity for people who have not registered their land that is located throughout Indonesia in one village or village area. As in the Lima Puluh Kota Regency, there are still many lands that have not been registered, the people obtained them from buying and selling under their hands.The formulation of the problem in this thesis is firstly how is the land registration procedure with the basis of under-selling rights of purchase under the complete systematic land registration program (PTSL) at the fifty-city district land office ?; second, what are the obstacles in the implementation of land registration on the basis of the right to buy and sell under the complete systematic land registration program (PTSL) at the fifty-city district land office? The specification of this research is analytical descriptive, with a normative juridical approach, which is supported by an empirical juridical approach. The data used are secondary data as primary data and primary data as support, which are collected through literature studies and field studies with interview techniques. The data is then analyzed qualitatively and presented in a qualitative descriptive form. The results of the research and discussion of this thesis can be concluded that the procedure of land registration with the basis of the rights under the hand in the PTSL program in fifty cities is carried out with the stages of planning, location determination, preparation, formation and establishment of the PTSL adjudication committee and task force, counseling, physical data collection and collecting juridical data, researching juridical data for proving rights, announcing physical and juridical data and ratifying it, affirming conversion, recognizing rights and granting rights, accounting for rights, issuing certificates of land rights, documenting and submitting the results of activities and reporting.

scholarly journals Legal Protection for Village Communities Against Land Rights in the Construction of a National Strategy Project Through a Complete Systematic Land Registration System (Study of Pasuruan District Land Registration)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Ratna Biraeng Kumalasari
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Community Needs ◽  
Village Communities ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

In this study using normative legal research. Policies related to land are required to guarantee legal certainty and certainty of land ownership rights by every person (individual) or by legal entities. So the community needs to register land in order to obtain a certificate of land rights which serves as a strong means of proof of ownership of land rights by someone. Meanwhile, Article 19 paragraph (1) of the Basic Agrarian Law states that to ensure legal certainty by the Government, land registration is held throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia. This is done so that land owners can obtain legal certainty for the land they have owned, and it’s intended that rights holders obtain valid evidence in the form of certificates as a strong means of proof as holders of rights to the land they own. Starting from the description above, the researcher can provide several aspects of the study, including: First, the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) target is so large that it’s not an easy job for the Pasuruan Regency land office, which has 29 State Civil Servants, assisted by 63 non-government employees, due to the limited number of existing staff, the implementation of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) land office in Pasuruan Regency involves; 1. The private sector as a third party helping 20,200 fields for measurement and mapping activities, 2. Community participation in assissting Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) in village locations for 10,100 respectively, and 29,700 fields carried out and carried out by the Pasuruan Regency Land Office ASN.

scholarly journals The Strategy to Increase the Regional Revenue (PAD) of the Government of Central Kalimantan through the Governor Regulation No. 16/2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 245
Author(s):  
Suprayitno Suprayitno ◽  
Riamona Sadelman Tulis ◽  
Ira Zuraida
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Provincial Government ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Central Kalimantan ◽  
Local Revenue ◽  
The Government ◽  
Positive Results

This article aimed to analyze and identify the strategies of Central Kalimantan Provincial Government as an effort to increase Regional revenue (Pendapatan Asli Daerah - PAD) through third-party grants or donations. One of the efforts made by the Central Kalimantan Provincial Government in increasing regional revenue (PAD) is through the issuance of Governor Regulation No. 16/2018 on Guidelines for the Acceptance and Management of Grants or Donations from Third Parties to the Central Kalimantan Provincial Government. The data showed that the governor’s regulation had shown positive results relating to the efforts to increase the Regional revenue in Central Kalimantan Province. Local Revenue Offices of Central Kalimantan as the leading sector to implement the regulation has made several strategic efforts including sharing/spreading the information to 3 P i.e., investors, monitoring and controlling. The purposes of the governor’s regulation No. 16/2018 to provide legal protection to guarantee the participation of third parties in Central Kalimantan development, provide legal certainty in the management and acceptance of third-party grants or donations, and create an orderly administration, transparency and accountability in acceptance the grants or third-party donations to the government of Central Kalimantan Province. The collaboration cooperation between Central Kalimantan Provincial Government and the private sector to increase Regional revenue (PAD) needs to have support from all parties.

scholarly journals Instruments to Challenge the Grant of a Patent as a Third Party: Suggestions for the Review of New Zealand's Patent System

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Juliane Buchinski
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Current System ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Patent System ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Regulatory Regime ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Government

<p>In recent decades, intellectual property law (in particular patent law) has had to face new challenges due to the accelerating development of technology. Patents can have a negative effect on a country's economy if too many invalid or overly broad patents are granted. Such patents have the potential to impose high costs on society without providing substantial benefits. If a patent regime cannot avoid the grant of such patents, or does not provide instruments to remove them from the register, the negative effect may stifle innovation instead of encouraging it. In 2008, in consideration of these problems, the government of New Zealand introduced a Patents Bill. This Bill is the culmination of the government's review process, which started in the late 1980s. The aim of the Bill is to update New Zealand's patent law in order to bring it in line with international practise and to reduce the costs to society arising from invalid and overly broad patents. The provisions of the Bill cover all principal aspects of the patent regime: standards of examination and procedures, challenges on the grant of a patent, and provisions for updating the regulatory regime for patent attorneys. This dissertation focuses on analysing how the quality of New Zealand's patents could be enhanced using the knowledge and experience of third parties. Because the current examination standards may allow the grant of overly broad patents, this dissertation analyses specifically which changes in the examination procedure could help prevent the grant of "bad" patents without overburdening the resources of the IPONZ. In the next step, the dissertation analyses third-party instruments under the current patent system and under the Patents Bill 2008, proving that neither approach by itself would be sufficient to bring about an effective patent reviewing system for New Zealand. The approach under the current system is too expensive and has the potential to delay the granting procedure, whereas the approach proposed by the Patents Bill 2008 limits the influence of third parties before the grant of a patent to such an extent that most patents may remain in the register. The overall aim of this dissertation is to suggest a new approach that includes aspects of both of the others in order to find a balanced solution and an optimal fit for the specific needs of New Zealand.</p>

scholarly journals Implementasi PTSL Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Konflik Pertanahan Di Kecamatan Ingin Jaya Kabupaten Aceh Besar

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 217
Author(s):  
M. Syuib ◽  
Sarah Diana Aulia
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Large Area ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Of Land

In order to guarantee legal certainty for land rights holders, the Government is conducting land registration program throughout Indonesia territory. The program has put an obligation to the land rights holder to register their land. The purpose of land registration is, to provide evidence for the ownership of land. The implementation mechanism of the program in regulated in the Permen ATR/BPN Number 6 of 2018 concerning Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL). The presence of the Permen is, in order to prevent land disputes in the community by accelerating land registration. Sub-district of Ingin Jaya, which is located in the Aceh Besar district, is one of the areas where PTSL activities are carried out. Currently, there is a large area of land in the Aceh Besar district has not been certified yet, it may cause legal uncertainty for land owner and such condition can potentially lead to land dispute. One of the indicators to claim this, are by taking land dispute cases as put on trial in the Jantho Court which has reached 32 cases from 2014 until 2019. This study aims to find out how the implementation of PTSL and its barrier in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya, Aceh Besar. The research method is an empirical juridical research; it works by conducting observations, interviews, and documentation. The result found that the implementation of PTSL in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya, Aceh Besar, is in accordance with Permen ATR/BPN No. 6 of 2018. However, in the ground, it is found that there are a number of obstacles which affect the successful of the PTSL program both internally and externally. Therefore, synergy and cooperation with all parties are needed so that the PTSL program in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya can be implemented successfully in order to provide legal certainty for land rights holders, so that the land dispute can be prevented as early as possible.

scholarly journals Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap di Desa Menanga, Kecamatan Rendang, Kabupaten Karangasem

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 651-657
Author(s):  
Nyoman Handytya Wiarsa Putra ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
The Village

Complete systematic land registration is a program organized by the government, specifically the "Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning or Head of the National Land Agency". with the aim of increasing the number of land registrations issuing certificates in Indonesia. This is very important, so it is hoped that the participation of the whole community in the importance of certificates and it is hoped that the National Land Agency will provide socialization about the importance of ownership of land rights. Its application is contained in the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning or the Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 2018 concerning Complete Systematic Land Registration. This study aimed to examine the process of implementing a complete systematic land registration and its obstacles and to examine the efforts to implement a complete systematic land registration in the village of Menanga, Rendang District, Karangasem Regency. The method used was empirical legal research. Sources of data used were primary and secondary legal data, then analyzed through interpretation and qualitative techniques. The results showed that the Implementation of Complete Systematic Land Registration in Menanga Village, Rendang District, Karangasem Regency was carried out to achieve legal certainty of land rights ownership. The implementation of this program has not been effective and has not been implemented optimally due to the low participation in the management of land certificates.

scholarly journals Sengketa Pendaftaran Hak Milik Atas Tanah

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-155
Author(s):  
Dewi Arnita Sari
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Active Role ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Of Land

This journal aims to find about Ownership disputes land rights Related to land registration in Makassar city. The purpose of this study is : 1. to analyze the factors affecting the dispute over ownership of land that has been registered in Makassar. 2. to analyze how far the solutions are provided by the government in resolving ownership of land that has been registered.This research is descriptive research with empirical juridical approach method. Research method used is method by using primary and secondary data with data collecting technique that are interview and questionnaire. The population of this study are the employee office of the state land agency Makassar and public figure. Sample in this research is 30 respondents by using technique purposive sampling.The results of this study shownthat : (1). the factors affecting the dispute over ownership of land are Legal factors, law enforcement factors, facilities and infrastructure factors. (2). There are two solutions are provided by the government in resolving ownership of land, that was The national land agency facilitates to do mediation and Solutions through the judiciary, negotiations, and others Depending on the perpetrators leading in the direction of a good solution to them. Recommendation of this research is Government is expectedPlay an active role So that people did not have problems in dispute signs in the future, that is Increased administration to be more thorough in making land certificates In order to minimize the dispute. Developing the training in order to increase human resource of law enforcer, socialization to public can be held in great quantities and all of reinforced facility supplying so that all of factor whom can influence presence of proprietary right dispute for estate can be minimalized.Keyword : Ownership disputes land rights, land registration

scholarly journals Instruments to Challenge the Grant of a Patent as a Third Party: Suggestions for the Review of New Zealand's Patent System

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Juliane Buchinski
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Current System ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Patent System ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Regulatory Regime ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Government

<p>In recent decades, intellectual property law (in particular patent law) has had to face new challenges due to the accelerating development of technology. Patents can have a negative effect on a country's economy if too many invalid or overly broad patents are granted. Such patents have the potential to impose high costs on society without providing substantial benefits. If a patent regime cannot avoid the grant of such patents, or does not provide instruments to remove them from the register, the negative effect may stifle innovation instead of encouraging it. In 2008, in consideration of these problems, the government of New Zealand introduced a Patents Bill. This Bill is the culmination of the government's review process, which started in the late 1980s. The aim of the Bill is to update New Zealand's patent law in order to bring it in line with international practise and to reduce the costs to society arising from invalid and overly broad patents. The provisions of the Bill cover all principal aspects of the patent regime: standards of examination and procedures, challenges on the grant of a patent, and provisions for updating the regulatory regime for patent attorneys. This dissertation focuses on analysing how the quality of New Zealand's patents could be enhanced using the knowledge and experience of third parties. Because the current examination standards may allow the grant of overly broad patents, this dissertation analyses specifically which changes in the examination procedure could help prevent the grant of "bad" patents without overburdening the resources of the IPONZ. In the next step, the dissertation analyses third-party instruments under the current patent system and under the Patents Bill 2008, proving that neither approach by itself would be sufficient to bring about an effective patent reviewing system for New Zealand. The approach under the current system is too expensive and has the potential to delay the granting procedure, whereas the approach proposed by the Patents Bill 2008 limits the influence of third parties before the grant of a patent to such an extent that most patents may remain in the register. The overall aim of this dissertation is to suggest a new approach that includes aspects of both of the others in order to find a balanced solution and an optimal fit for the specific needs of New Zealand.</p>

scholarly journals Legal Assurance and Legal Protection in Land Registration in Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Suharyono Suharyono
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Site ◽  
Land Title ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Legal assurance to protect the owner of the land title has been the main objectives of the 1997 Government Regulation No. 24. However, in reality, the objectives above cannot be spelled due to the negative publication system of land title registration regulated by the regulation above. The loophole the system has, inter alia, concerns with the actual or the correctness of land site or the physical data of the land.  As a result, a conflict will not be prevented between or amongst the true land deed holder, land rights holder and the third party. If the case is brought before the court, the further consequence is that the verdict will declare the cancelation of or invalidity of the land deed. Then the legal status of the land deed will become uncertain and landowners will lose their rights without getting any protection from the State.  The problem raised in this article regarding the negative system of land registration in the 1997 government regulation no. 24 does not provide legal protection for the landowner who has already land certificate. The results of the study showed that there were two different values of legal certainty and legal protection manifested in the Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 and those of legal certainty and legal protection as mandated by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.  Therefore it is not superfluous to state that legal certainty and legal protection are intended and regulated by Government Regulation No.24 of 1997 which is in contradictory to the manifested value of legal certainty and legal protection guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution

Pelaksanaan Pencatatan Blokir Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah (Studi di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Bantul)

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-135
Author(s):  
Anisa Sekarsari ◽  
Haryo Budhiawan ◽  
Akur Nurasa
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Recording Process ◽  
Potential Loss ◽  
The Government

Abstract: In order to give the assurance of legal certainty, certainty of rights and legal protection to holders and owners of land rights, the land registration shall be carried out. However, there is still a land dispute which now become a homework for The Government. This is because the certificate which should be a strong evidentiary can not guaranteed the legal certainty for the owner, so the person who right the land can blocking the certificate of land rights at Land Office. The issuance of Regulation Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial / Head of National Land Office Number 13 Year of 2017 concerning the Procedures of Block and Sita which expected to create uniformity, standardization in recording process and abolition of registration blocked, it turns out not all the rules can be implemented at The Land Office of Sleman and Bantul Regency.The result of this research shows that blocking certificate process at Sleman Land Office and Bantul Land Office have a policy that the applicant is required to pay the blocking recording fee after the blocking received. Makes a potential loss to the (PNBP) which should be owned by Land Office for faced the problem of KKPweb application which have not been able to accomodate the time period of blocking. Keywords : blocking certificate, blocking, registration blocked Intisari: Dalam rangka memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dan kepastian hak serta perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang dan pemilik hak atas tanah, maka dilaksanakan pendaftaran tanah. Namun demikian, masih saja terjadi sengketa pertanahan yang saat ini menjadi pekerjaan rumah bagi Pemerintah. Hal ini disebabkan karena, sertipikat sebagai alat pembuktian yang kuat ternyata belum menjamin kepastian hukum pemiliknya sehingga pihak yang merasa berhak atas tanah tersebut dapat melakukan blokir sertipikat hak atas tanah di Kantor Pertanahan. Dikeluarkannya Permen ATR/Kepala Nomor 13 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Blokir dan Sita yang diharapkan bertujuan untuk mewujudkan keseragaman, standarisasi dalam pelaksanaan pencatatan dan penghapusan catatan blokir ternyata tidak semua peraturan tersebut dapat dilaksanakan di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Bantul. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pelaksanaan pencatatan blokir di kantor pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Kabupaten Bantul terdapat kebijakan yaitu pemohon diwajibkan membayar biaya pencatatan blokir setelah blokirnya diterima membuat potensial loss terhadap (PNBP) yang seharusnya didapat kantor pertanahan untuk kendala yang dihadapi yaitu Aplikasi KKPweb yang belum dapat mengakomodir jangka waktu blokir. Kata Kunci: blokir sertipikat, pemblokiran, pencatatan blokir

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document