scholarly journals For horses undergoing general anaesthesia, are rope recoveries or free recoveries better?

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ffion Lloyd ◽  
Pamela Murison
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
Clinical Expertise ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Weak Evidence

PICO question In horses undergoing general anaesthesia, does assistance with ropes result in better recoveries when compared to no assistance (‘free’ recovery)?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed One randomised, non-blinded controlled trial and two retrospective cohort studies Strength of evidence Weak Outcomes reported The three studies reviewed arrive at different conclusions regarding the utility of rope assistance in recovery from general anaesthesia in horses, but examine very different populations. The randomised controlled trial provides weak evidence that rope assistance can shorten recovery and improve recovery quality in healthy (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I–II) horses. One retrospective cohort study provides weak evidence that rope assistance confers a reduction in fatality in both healthy and sick horses. The other retrospective cohort study provides weak evidence that rope assistance confers no benefit to horses undergoing emergency colic surgery. Both assisted and unassisted groups in each study had fatalities and all studies reported complications related to the rope recovery system Conclusion Insufficient evidence is available to permit a full recommendation regarding rope assistance during recovery from general anaesthesia in horses. Rope assistance may improve recovery time and quality in some horses. The decision to perform a rope-assisted recovery must be made considering individual patient, team and clinic factors. Rope assistance cannot prevent fatalities in recovery   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.  

scholarly journals Use of the feline interdigital semiochemical (FIS) to redirect unwanted scratching behaviour in cats

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt Goins
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
Clinical Expertise ◽  
Single Group ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
The Third ◽  
Weak Evidence ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Study Designs

PICO question Can the use of a synthetic feline interdigital semiochemical (FIS), with the provision of a scratching post, redirect unwanted scratching behaviour in cats better than provision of a scratching post alone?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed Three studies were evaluated. One was a randomised blinded trial on a single group of subjects following a crossover repetition design (Cozzi et al., 2013), the second was an open, uncontrolled study (Beck et al., 2018), and the third was a randomised unblinded trial on a single group of subjects using a placebo (Zhang et al., 2019). Strength of evidence Weak Outcomes reported In two of the three studies where the FIS pheromone was applied to the scratching posts resulted in a statistically significant increase in the cats’ scratching behaviour compared to the control. The third study showed a result approaching statistical significance (p = 0.06). Conclusion Based on the assessed studies there is weak evidence that FIS used in conjunction with the provision of a scratching post is more successful in redirecting unwanted scratching behaviour than provision of a scratching post alone. However, further studies using larger and more representative cohorts are needed in order to confirm the accuracy of these results.   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.  

scholarly journals Comparison of epidural morphine and buprenorphine for hindlimb orthopaedic surgery in dogs

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Towers
Keyword(s):  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Epidural Injection ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
Clinical Expertise ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Randomised Controlled

PICO question In dogs undergoing hindlimb orthopaedic surgery does epidural with local anaesthetic and buprenorphine provide equivalent intra- and postoperative analgesia as epidural with local anaesthetic and morphine?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed One double-blinded randomised controlled trial Strength of evidence Weak Outcomes reported Epidural analgesia with buprenorphine and bupivacaine may provide equivalent analgesia to more traditional morphine and bupivacaine epidural injection Conclusion There is weak evidence that buprenorphine may provide equivalent analgesia to morphine when combined with bupivacaine epidurally. The reduced regulatory requirements imposed on buprenorphine may sway some clinicians to utilise buprenorphine but further, higher powered, controlled trials are necessary to confirm equivalency   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.  

scholarly journals In mares with placentitis does the duration of antibiotic treatment affect foal outcome?

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Barter
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Clinical Expertise ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Length Of Treatment ◽  
Diseased State ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Short Courses

PICO question In mares with placentitis does treatment with long-term antibiotics result in improved foal viability when compared to repeated short courses of 7 to 10 days?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed The literature search identified six publications that included length of antibiotic treatment and foetal outcome. The publications consisted of four non-randomised non-blinded controlled trials and two randomised non-blinded controlled trials Strength of evidence Collectively there was weak evidence to support either an intermittent or continuous antibiotic protocol in the treatment of placentitis in mares Outcomes reported The literature involved experimental induction of ascending placentitis with foal survival or viability as the outcome Conclusion Further research is required into the diagnosis of placentitis, length of treatment and choice of antibiotic/s to penetrate the uterus in a diseased state   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision-making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.  

scholarly journals Is inhaled immunotherapy more effective than environmental management when treating equine asthma?

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Leather ◽  
Sarah Smith
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
Clinical Expertise ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Equine Asthma

PICO question In horses with severe equine asthma syndrome, is inhaled immunotherapy compared to environmental reduction of allergen exposure more effective in disease modification?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed 12 papers were critically reviewed. Nine clinical trials; one crossover study; one split-plot design study; and one cross-sectional study Strength of evidence Low Outcomes reported Four studies found inhaled immunotherapy to improve the clinical signs associated with equine asthma and the lung function of horses with asthma. Three papers found environmental modification by improved lung function and the clinical signs associated with equine asthma but two studies provide moderate evidence that environmental management alone is insufficient to permanently cure asthma Conclusion There is a low level of evidence to support the use of inhaled immunotherapy as a treatment for equine asthma   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.  

scholarly journals In Greyhounds with paw pad corns, is surgical excision more effective at resolving lameness than extirpation?

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Kenny
Keyword(s):  
Research Question ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Surgical Excision ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
Repeated Treatment ◽  
Clinical Expertise ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Level Of Evidence

PICO question In Greyhounds (and Sighthounds) with recurring pedal corns, is surgical excision in comparison to corn extirpation more effective at resolving lameness?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed Three case series were included, all three were retrospective, one included a prospective component. There was one opinion-based narrative review and one opinion-based article. Strength of evidence Weak Outcomes reported Extirpation allows only a short palliation of lameness and repeated treatment is required at variable intervals. Surgical excision may provide good rates of short-term resolution however, in the long-term recurrence rates are still moderate. It should also be born in mind that further corns may develop in different digits. Conclusion In Greyhounds (and Sighthounds) with recurring pedal corns, surgical excision of the corn is more likely to provide long-term resolution of lameness in comparison to extirpation. However, the current level of evidence on this topic is weak.   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision-making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.  

scholarly journals Is a cross-match necessary before a cat’s first blood transfusion?

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Safrany ◽  
Sophie Adamantos
Keyword(s):  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
Randomised Control Trial ◽  
Clinical Expertise ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Transfusion Reactions

PICO question In transfusion-naïve cats receiving a type specific blood transfusion is cross-matched blood (major and minor) associated with an increased haematocrit development and reduction in acute transfusion reactions when compared with those receiving non-crossmatched blood?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed Ten papers were critically reviewed. There were four retrospective case series, three prospective cross-sectional surveys, a retrospective cohort study, a prospective case series and a prospective randomised control trial. Strength of evidence Weak Outcomes reported It would appear that in the United Kingdom the incidence of non-AB transfusion reactions is low.  A single study suggests that cross-matching may result in a greater improvement in haematocrit, but this is unlikely to be clinically significant. There is evidence to support the hypothesis that non-AB antigens (for example the Mik antigen) differ with geographic distribution. Conclusion Based on the information available it is it is challenging to establish a meaningful clinical conclusion on which to base a recommendation.   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.  

scholarly journals The incidence of uterine pathology in ovariectomised bitches

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Norell Candetoft
Keyword(s):  
Research Question ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
Clinical Expertise ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Gynaecological Examination ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Study Designs

PICO question What is the incidence of postoperative uterine pathology in ovariectomised bitches compared to ovariohysterectomised bitches?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Incidence The number and type of study designs reviewed Three retrospective case series Strength of evidence Weak Outcomes reported None of the reviewed case series found any uterine pathology for ovariectomised bitches in the long-term follow-up of several years, although none of the studies performed a proper gynaecological examination to confirm a lack of pathology Conclusion With the limited evidence available, it appears that leaving the uterus when gonadectomising bitches does not seem to have a high risk for developing pathology as long as the ovaries are completely removed.   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision-making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.  

scholarly journals Interstitial lung disease in a veterans affairs regional network; a retrospective cohort study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0247316
Author(s):  
Armando Bedoya ◽  
Roy A. Pleasants ◽  
Joel C. Boggan ◽  
Danielle Seaman ◽  
Anne Reihman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Diagnostic Code ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Incidence Prevalence

Background The epidemiology of Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILD) in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is presently unknown. Research question Describe the incidence/prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of ILD patients within the Veteran’s Administration Mid-Atlantic Health Care Network (VISN6). Study design and methods A multi-center retrospective cohort study was performed of veterans receiving hospital or outpatient ILD care from January 1, 2008 to December 31st, 2015 in six VISN6 facilities. Patients were identified by at least one visit encounter with a 515, 516, or other ILD ICD-9 code. Demographic and clinical characteristics were summarized using median, 25th and 75th percentile for continuous variables and count/percentage for categorical variables. Characteristics and incidence/prevalence rates were summarized, and stratified by ILD ICD-9 code. Kaplan Meier curves were generated to define overall survival. Results 3293 subjects met the inclusion criteria. 879 subjects (26%) had no evidence of ILD following manual medical record review. Overall estimated prevalence in verified ILD subjects was 256 per 100,000 people with a mean incidence across the years of 70 per 100,000 person-years (0.07%). The prevalence and mean incidence when focusing on people with an ILD diagnostic code who had a HRCT scan or a bronchoscopic or surgical lung biopsy was 237 per 100,000 people (0.237%) and 63 per 100,000 person-years respectively (0.063%). The median survival was 76.9 months for 515 codes, 103.4 months for 516 codes, and 83.6 months for 516.31. Interpretation This retrospective cohort study defines high ILD incidence/prevalence within the VA. Therefore, ILD is an important VA health concern.

scholarly journals Can dog appeasing pheromone ameliorate stress behaviours associated with anxiety in mature domestic dogs?

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun Fung Wong ◽  
Merran Govendir
Keyword(s):  
Research Question ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Therapeutic Benefit ◽  
Domestic Dogs ◽  
Residual Effects ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Clinical Expertise ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Hospitalised Patients

PICO question Does use of dog-appeasing pheromone reduce the frequency and/or severity of non-specific stress behaviours associated with anxiety in domestic dogs, older than 6 months, when compared with no treatment?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed Eight controlled trials were appraised. Four were randomised and four were either non-randomised or did not clearly describe the method of allocating subjects into treatment groups. Strength of evidence Weak Outcomes reported There was no evidence that any dog appeasing pheromone (DAP) formulation (spray, diffuser, or collar) was superior. There was moderate evidence that DAP could reduce some behavioural manifestations of fear and/or anxiety stemming from thunderstorm noise and weak evidence that it could ameliorate some non-specific stress behaviours in hospitalised patients. In shelter dogs, there was mild evidence that DAP could reduce barking intensity and increase some behaviours associated with relaxation. When behavioural changes occurred, most were observed during exposure to DAP and there were minimal residual effects post-treatment. Conclusion The evidence for using DAP to manage stress behaviours associated with anxiety in dogs over six months of age remains weak. Until there is a stronger evidentiary basis, clinicians should be aware that a true clinical benefit is undetermined. Nevertheless, DAP is unlikely to cause harm and may still provide some therapeutic benefit. Therefore, DAP may still be employed in a multimodal management plan for some behaviour cases and may exert a placebo effect. However, if an owner’s financial resources are restrictive, clinicians should not prioritise pheromone therapy at the omission of other therapies that have established clinical effects   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document