scholarly journals Using DEA to evaluate efficiency of higher education

2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 79-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Réka Tóth

The aim of the higher education reform process both in Hungary and in the European countries is establishing a competitive, qualitative higher education with efficiently operating institutions. The question of efficiency needs increased attention not only because of the decline of the state support but also the rapid raise of the student mass. In the educationsystemit’snot easy to measurethe output of the services.The situation is more complicated if an organisation or a sector has multiple inputs and outputs. In this case a possible method of determining efficiency is Data Envelopment Analysis. In my paper I’d like to introduce this method and use it to compare the efficiency of higher education systems. urthermore I am examining whether their efficiency is influenced by the extent of the contribution of the state and the private sector or socio-economic factors like GDP per capita and education level of parents.  

2009 ◽  
pp. 207-214
Author(s):  
Réka Tóth

The aim of the higher education reform process both in Hungary and in the European countries is establishing a competitive, qualitative higher education. The Education Minister of our country regularly emphasizes in his statements that the quantitative changes of he past 15 years are completed, from now the emphasis must be on quality :„a degree in itself is not sufficient, the actual knowledge behind is necessary”. To achievethis aim, the government carried out several changes in the field of higher education in the past years, one of them was implementing a budget support system in accordance with the performance of the institutions. The objective of the three year long support agreement between the state and the higher education institutions is considering quality parameters and outputs beside and instead of normative (input-based) support. The other occurent and debated issue is the introduction of tuition fees. Although this plan was rejected by the national referendum on 9th March, 2008, some weeks ago an amendment bill was passed, which would mean bringing tuition fees back in the system.In my paper I am examining whether the efficiency of higher education systems are influenced by the extent of the contribution of the state and the private sector to their expenses. Furthermore I’d like to find the answer to the following question: Does it matter what principles and mechanisms play role by the distribution of the state support between the institutions of higher education. 


Author(s):  
Zhazira Abdykhalykova ◽  
Indira Saktaganova Saktaganova ◽  
Sholpan Abikenova ◽  
Assem Baidildinova

Higher education is a major factor of modernization of economy and society. Quality and competitiveness of higher education determines the competitiveness of the state in the international space. Internationalization of higher education, which is implemented in accordance with Kazakhstan’s 2011-2020 State Program for Education Development, is one of the priorities of the integration of national education. A major step towards the internationalization of higher education in Kazakhstan is the decision to implement higher education reform along the general lines of the Bologna process. In line with the national plan, the former types and levels of academic programs were transformed into to the three levels established under the Bologna framework: Bachelor, Master and PhD. Along with this, major changes are taking place in the teaching and learning process, the way curricula and programs are organised and delivered. This article discusses the major initiatives in the field of internationalization of higher education in Kazakhstan, such as the state international scholarship "Bolashak", project of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan aimed at inviting visiting professors, academic mobility students and faculty from the leading universities all over the world.    Keywords: higher education; internalization of higher education; academic mobility;


2014 ◽  
pp. 97-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Tambovtsev ◽  
I. Rozhdestvenskaya

The paper is aimed to analyze the current higher education reform in Russia in the context of international experience of higher education systems’ performance and economics’ statements. It is shown that changes put into practice are in discrepancy with Russian higher education system institutional environment. As a consequence the achievement of formal resemblance of Russian higher education system with other effective higher education systems will not result in real improvement of its efficiency and quality. Alternative directions for the Russian higher education system transformation are proposed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Tabulawa ◽  
Mino Polelo ◽  
Onalenna Silas

2012 ◽  
pp. 133-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Klyachko ◽  
S. Sinelnikov-Murylev

The article deals with higher education reform in Russia. Special attentionis paid to the innovations after the Federal law No 83 was adopted (2010). The authors analyze whether the reforms lead to financial self-dependence of universities, whether they do create a more competitive environment (which promotesa better education), and how the normative per capita financing affects the higher education system. Аnalysis of the first reform steps shows: the results are contradictory, many applied methods do not lead to the desired effect. The main obstacles are other institutions: first of all the system of higher educationinstitutions accreditation and licensing. For further efficiency growth of higher education political (administrative) methods are needed. Only after application of administrative methods the economic methods will work properly. During the reforms it is also necessary to account for the social situation in the country.


Author(s):  
Elena Koval ◽  
Ksenia Ilyina ◽  
Anatasia Fefelova

The aim of the article is to research the state and prospects of expanding investments in the marketing of higher education and adapting to the fluctuations in the educational services market. The research methodology is based on the methods of scientific abstraction in determining the components of the market, comparative analysis of the world experience and domestic sources of the higher education institutions financing, analysis of the expenditures structure on education in the state budget of the country, monographic method of the studing the state and improving of the competitiveness in domestic institutions of higher education, statistics information. The scientific novelty of the conducted research is that the state of financing of higher education institutions is scientifically substantiated, alternative instruments of financing of investments in marketing of educational services are analyzed, directions of increase in competitiveness of market participants are outlined. Conclusions.Among other important areas of the European Union’s investment model are research, innovation and digitization in research marketing projects, as well as the financing of projects in the fields of skills, education, training and social innovation. Higher education reform in Ukraine aims to integrate into the European higher education area and the research area on the basis of a competitive national higher education system. Expanding the international activity of domestic higher education institutions is aimed at introducing modern global trends ofthe investment in higher education marketing.


2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith Braun ◽  
Bernhard Leidner

This article contributes to the conceptual and empirical distinction between (the assessment of) appraisals of teaching behavior and (the assessment of) self-reported competence acquirement within academic course evaluation. The Bologna Process, the current higher-education reform in Europe, emphasizes education aimed toward vocationally oriented competences and demands the certification of acquired competences. Currently available evaluation questionnaires measure the students’ satisfaction with a lecturer’s behavior, whereas the “Evaluation in Higher Education: Self-Assessed Competences” (HEsaCom) measures the students’ personal benefit in terms of competences. In a sample of 1403 German students, we administered a scale of satisfaction with teaching behavior and the German version of the HEsaCom at the same time. Using confirmatory factor analysis, the estimated correlations between the various scales of self-rated competences and teaching behavior appraisals were moderate to strong, yet the constructs were shown to be empirically distinct. We conclude that the self-rated gains in competences are distinct from satisfaction with course and instructor. In line with the higher education reform, self-reported gains in competences are an important aspect of academic course evaluation, which should be taken into account in the future and might be able to restructure the view of “quality of higher education.” The English version of the HEsaCom is presented in the Appendix .


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document