scholarly journals Kebijakan Pencabutan Hak Politik sebagai Pidana Tambahan dalam Perkara Korupsi di Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Enha Sorandri Tahir
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
Research Type ◽  
Made In

Additional criminal to revoking political rights imposed on convicted corruption cases are referred to as extraordinary policy and efforts made in the context of eradicating the criminal act of corruption, in which corruption is categorized as an extra ordinary crime. The basis for additional criminal law deprivation of political rights is contained in the Criminal Code (KUHP) and Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 (UU PTPK). This study aims to examine the additional criminal policy of deprivation of political rights against convicted corruption cases seen from the perspective of the purpose of punishment and the suitability of the legal basis used to apply additional crimes of deprivation of political rights against convicts of corruption. The type of research used in this study is the juridical normative research type. The methods used are the statutory approach method, conceptual approach, and case approach. Meanwhile, for data collection techniques, this study uses legal materials consisting of: a.) Primary legal materials, namely statutory regulations and court decisions; b.) secondary legal materials include legal books, legal journals and other scientific works in the field of law. The results of this study first reveal that the additional punishment for depriving political rights is not against the purpose of punishment. It reveals that the additional criminal legal basis for deprivation of political rights for convicted corruption cases should be more specific in determining the length of time for deprivation of political rights in the PTPK Law. KEYWORDS: Policy, Additional Punishment, Political Rights, Corruption

scholarly journals Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perjudian Togel (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bangli Nomor 23/PID.B/2020/PNBLI)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-194
Author(s):  
I Dewa Ayu Mira Pradewi ◽  
I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha ◽  
I Ketut Widia
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Factors ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Research Type ◽  
Formulation Problem

Gambling is a bet with risk values that are intentionally aware of the risks. The formulation problem is  Why  togel  gambling  crimes  are  still  prevalent  in  the community? And What is the consideration of the Judge in dropping the verdict against the perpetrators of the togel gambling crimes?. The type of research used is the normative legal research type. The approach method used a statutory approach. While technique collecting legal materials used by analyzing court decisions. In conclusion, the rising gambling in Indonesian society is due to one of the impositions of criminal sanctions against perpetrators who are too light. While the case The Verdict Number 23/PID.B/2020/PNBLI caused by economic and environmental factors involving Defendant Nyoman Pageh and is subject to a prison sentence of 5 months on charges of violating the provisions Article 303 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code jo Article 2 of Law No. 7 of 1974. The judge's consideration verdict is based on the consideration of a juridical judge. As for the incriminating circumstances, his actions do not support the government's program in the eradication of gambling, while the circumstances that relieve is, the defendant regrets and promises not to repeat his actions again, the defendant behaved politely at the trial.

scholarly journals Law Enforcement on Carok Actor’s Criminal Act

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 346
Author(s):  
Heru Suyanto
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Enforcement Effort ◽  
Approach Method

Carok is a tradition in Madurese people in the form of fight for a certain, extreme reason concerning individual’s self-esteem, followed with group fight with the use of weapons, and carok implementation may cause death. In the context of formal law, carok is the manifestation of the actors’ bravery in violating the rules designated in the Criminal Code, thus they must undergo years of criminal imprisonment as actors of serious criminal act. On this basis, this research explored factors causing carok actor’s criminal act and the constraints the police faced in the law enforcement effort on carok actor’s criminal act. The normative law or literature research approach method employed in this research emphasized on criminal law literatures, prevailing laws and regulations, court decisions, legal theories, scholars’ opinions and interviews. This research took descriptive analysis form based on the approach of carok case that caused death in Decision Number 182/Pid.B/2013/PN.Bkl. From the perspective of criminal law, Carok indicates a crime that may be qualified as criminal acts of physical abuse and murder since it contains a certain period or tempo from the start to the implementation of problem, in which the actors have calmly considered any possibilities and consequences of their actions. In general, the reasons of carok actor’s criminal acts are individual or group’s self-esteem abuse, vengeance, inheritance distribution conflict, etc. The author expected that appropriate law enforcement will minimize Carok occurrences, such as through making of special regulation for carok actors and imposition of serious criminal sanction (imprisonment) on carok actors and improved education, especially primary education.

scholarly journals Criminal Law Protection of Reproductive Health: Current Challenges

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-153
Author(s):  
E. L. Sidorenko
Keyword(s):  
Reproductive Health ◽  
Human Genome ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Policy Development ◽  
Practical Importance ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The subject of the research is the specifics of the criminal law protection of reproductive health in the Russian legislation. The topic was chosen due to the increasing dynamics of crimes related to limitation on the reproductive rights of women and men and unauthorized manipulation of the human genome. Despite the growing need for providing a regulatory framework for this kind of relationships, the system of their criminal law protection is only beginning to take shape, therefore, a necessity arises to revise traditional approaches to the protection of the individual. Therefore, the purpose of the paper was to understand the system of criminal law protection of reproductive health in terms of its compliance with trends of medical practices and dynamics of socially significant diseases based on both traditional principles of scientific analysis and the results of applying sociological methods of data processing, which made it possible to identify the most significant directions of the Russian criminal policy development. Moreover, the critical analysis method was used in the research that showed the inconsistency of the system of criminal law prevention of criminal abortions, contamination with socially significant diseases and illegal use of the human genome. Based on the research findings, an author’s model of criminal prevention of attacks on reproductive health has been built and its systemic assessment is given. It is concluded that the legislator is inconsistent in assessing the attributes of an unlawful abortion; the accounting of contamination with certain socially significant diseases is inadequate; the laws prohibiting the use of the human genome need to be included into the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The conclusions formulated in the paper have practical importance and can be taken into account by the legislator in the reform of the current criminal legislation.

The essence of deprivation of the right to engage in certain activities as a punishment for an offense under Art. 264 of the Criminal Code

2019 ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
Ольга Александровна Беларева
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
The Road ◽  
Paradoxical Situation ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Principle Of Justice ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Right

В статье рассматривается сущность лишения права заниматься определенной деятельностью как обязательного дополнительного наказания за преступление, предусмотренное ст. 264 УК РФ. В большинстве приговоров по ст. 264 УК РФ дополнительное наказание сформулировано как лишение права заниматься деятельностью, связанной с управлением транспортным средством. Однако использование в приговорах единой формулировки не снимает вопросов, связанных с толкованием объема назначенных судом ограничений. Автором выделены два подхода к определению содержания понятия «транспортные средства»: широкий, включающий все виды транспортных средств, и узкий, включающий только механические транспортные средства. Анализ судебных решений позволяет сделать вывод об отсутствии единообразного подхода к определению содержания наказания в виде лишения права заниматься деятельностью, связанной с управлением транспортными средствами. Показано, что в практике применения наказания за преступления, предусмотренные ст. 264 УК РФ, сложилась парадоксальная ситуация: лицо, нарушившее правила дорожного движения, лишается права управления всеми видами транспортных средств. По мнению автора, такая ситуация нарушает принцип справедливости: характер наказания не соответствует характеру совершенного преступления. В целях единообразного применения уголовного закона Пленуму Верховного суда РФ следует разъяснить, что суды должны конкретизировать вид транспортных средств, права управления которыми лишается осужденный, исходя из характера совершенного преступления. The article deals with the essence of deprivation of the right to engage in certain activities as a mandatory additional punishment for a crime under Art. 264 of the Criminal Code. In most of the sentences under Art. 264 of the criminal code additional punishment is formulated as deprivation of the right to engage in activities related to driving. However, the use of a single wording in sentences does not remove questions of interpretation of the scope of the court's limitations. The author identifies two approaches to the definition of the concept of “vehicles”: wide, including all types of vehicles, and narrow, including only mechanical vehicles. Analysis of court decisions leads to the conclusion that there is no uniform approach to determining the content of the penalty in the form of deprivation of the right to engage in activities related to the management of vehicles. The article shows that in the practice of punishment for the crimes provided for in the Art. 264 the criminal code, there is a paradoxical situation: a person who violates the rules of the road, is deprived of the right to control all types of vehicles. According to the author, this situation violates the principle of justice: the nature of the punishment does not correspond to the nature of the crime committed. For the purpose of uniform application of the criminal law to the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation it is necessary to explain that courts have to specify a type of vehicles which right of management is deprived condemned, proceeding from character of the committed crime.

Administrative Prejudice in Criminal Law: Law Enforcement Problems

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 0-0 ◽  
Author(s):  
Элина Сидоренко ◽  
Elina Sidorenko
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Institutions ◽  
Methods Of Analysis ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

The author analyzes the problem of inclusion in the Russian criminal law of the institute of administrative prejudice. The paper comprises three blocks: assessment of the need to introduce rules on prejudice in the Criminal Code; the timing of bringing persons to administrative responsibility and consideration of private issues of classification of individual components. The aim of the study is to develop scientifically based and up-to-date recommendations for the application of criminal law to administrative prejudice. The author achieves the goal through solving specific problems associated with the beginning of the expiration of the period of limitation for bringing persons to administrative responsibility, revealing differences in understanding by administrative and criminal legal institutions of the concepts of duplicity and recurrence and others. The author proposes the solution of these problems through the use of privatescientific methods of analysis: comparative legal, formal-legal methods, content analysis, and others. The study of court decisions and doctrinal positions on the classification of acts containing administrative prejudice has allowed the author to formulate a number of conclusions regarding the inconsistency of legislative structures of some articles of the Criminal Code. In particular, the use of different approaches to determining the time for bringing a person to administrative responsibility, the absence in Art. 154 and Art. 180 of the Criminal Code of indication on the prejudicial character of the rules etc draw objections. The author pays particular attention to assessing the recurrence of administrative offences and transition of this concept to criminal law relations.

scholarly journals ILLEGAL TURNOVER OF OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS: CRIMINAL LEGAL ASPECT

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 892-898
Author(s):  
S.A. Styazhkina
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Aspect ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Official Document ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Subjective Side ◽  
Made In

The article discusses the issues of criminal liability for encroachments on the procedure of official document circulation. The concept and features of a document and an official document as subjects of criminal law protection are analyzed in detail. Criteria are proposed for distinguishing between a document and an official document, as well as the classification of documents. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of amendments to Article 327 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, made in the summer of 2019, which provide for responsibility for the falsification, production or circulation of fake documents, state awards, stamps, seals or letterheads. The article examines in detail the objective features of the elements of crimes encroaching on official documents, which include the acquisition, sale, stealing, destruction, damage, concealment, as well as forgery of official documents, the sale of fake official documents and their use. The issues of the subjective side of these crimes are considered. The article also focuses on the problems of delimiting the use of obviously fake official documents, the responsibility for which is provided for in paragraph 4 of Article 327 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation from crimes, where the use of fake documents acts as a means of committing a crime, such as fraud, illegal obtaining a loan, etc. Suggestions are made on the appropriateness amending a number of articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, providing for liability for encroachment on official documents.

scholarly journals CRIMINAL AND LEGAL STUDY OF CONNIVANCE IN CRIME AS A SIGN CHARACTERIZING CONFLUENCE OF SEVERAL PERSONS IN ONE CRIME

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (72) (2) ◽  
pp. 236-241
Author(s):  
A. A. Kashkarov ◽  
D. A. Poshtaruk
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Legal Study ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Objective Side ◽  
Made In

A criminal and legal analysis of the objective and subjective signs, characterizing the connivance to the crime is made in the publication. The study found that connivance in a crime may be characteristic of various criminal law institutions, such as implication in a crime and complicity in a crime. In addition, the presented arguments show that connivance as a criminally punishable act may be associated with non-interference with unlawful activities that do not constitute a crime. The analysis shows that connivance in a crime can have a selfish purpose. It is noted that connivance in a crime is significantly different from other forms of implication in a crime, namely concealment of a crime and failure to report a crime. The subject of connivance in a crime is a person endowed with special powers to prevent, document and register crimes or offences. The article discloses that there is no special penal provision in the current Act of Criminal Responsibility of the Russian Federation that criminalizes it. The exception is the disposition of Art. 290 of the Criminal Code of RF, which contains an indication of connivance as a sign characterizing the objective side of receiving a bribe.

scholarly journals The goals of criminal punishment as a reflection of modern criminal policy

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 324-330
Author(s):  
V.V. Popov ◽  
◽  
S.M. Smolev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Criminal Punishment ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The presented study is devoted to the issues of disclosing the content of the goals of criminal punishment, analyzing the possibilities of their actual achievement in the practical implementation of criminal punishment, determining the political and legal significance of the goals of criminal punishment indicated in the criminal legislation. The purpose of punishment as a definition of criminal legislation was formed relatively recently, despite the fact that theories of criminal punishment and the purposes of its application began to form long before our era. These doctrinal teachings, in essence, boil down to defining two diametrically opposed goals of criminal punishment: retribution and prevention. The state, on the other hand, determines the priority of one or another goal of the punishment assigned for the commission of a crime. The criminal policy of Russia as a whole is focused on mitigating the criminal law impact on the offender. One of the manifestations of this direction is the officially declared humanization of the current criminal legislation of the Russian Federation. However, over the course of several years, the announced “humanization of criminal legislation” has followed the path of amending and supplementing the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: introducing additional opportunities for exemption from criminal liability and punishment, reducing the limits of punishments specified in the sanctions of articles of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and including in the system of criminal punishments of types of measures that do not imply isolation from society. At the same time the goals of criminal punishment are not legally revised, although the need for such a decision has already matured. Based on consideration of the opinions expressed in the scientific literature regarding the essence of those listed in Part 2 of Art. 43 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the goals of punishment are determined that each of them is subject to reasonable criticism in view of the abstract description or the impossibility of achieving in the process of law enforcement (criminal and penal) activities. This circumstance gives rise to the need to revise the content of the goals of criminal punishment and to determine one priority goal that meets the needs of modern Russian criminal policy. According to the results of the study the conclusion is substantiated that the only purpose of criminal punishment can be considered to ensure proportionality between the severity of the punishment imposed and the social danger (harmfulness) of the crime committed. This approach to determining the purpose of criminal punishment is fully consistent with the trends of modern criminal policy in Russia, since it does not allow the use of measures, the severity of which, in terms of the amount of deprivation and legal restrictions, clearly exceeds the social danger of the committed act. In addition, it is proportionality, not prevention, that underlies justice – one of the fundamental principles of criminal law.

scholarly journals Dehumanisasi Pada Penerapan Hukum Pidana Secara Berlebihan (Overspanning van het Straftrecht)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-29
Author(s):  
Ramdan Kasim
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Current Application ◽  
Detention Centers ◽  
Death Sentences ◽  
The Right

 ABSTRAKJika melihat kecenderungan proses penerapan pemidanaan di Indonesia, maka dapat kita lihat bahwasanya banyak proses pemidanaan yang diterapkan secara berlebihan. Tentunya hal ini menyebapkan adanya over ciminalization pada penerapan pemidanaan yang tentu saja hal ini menyebapkan adanya ketidak harmonisan dalam penerapan hukum pidana yang mana meniadakan rasa kemanusiaan yang berujung pada banyak gejala dehumanisasi yang terjadi. Pada penelitian ini mengunakan jenis jenis penelitian hukum normative dengan mengunakan pendekatan Pendekatan Perundang-Undangan (Statue Approach), Pendekatan konseptual (Conseptual Approach), dan pendekatan kasus (case Approach). Penelitian ini bertjuan untuk mengetahui Bagaimana  penerapan hukum pidana yang ada di Indonesia saat ini dan Bagaimana Prospektif hukum pidana dan pemidanaan yang ada di Indonesia?.  Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan Bahwa penerapan hukum pemidanaan di Indonesia saat ini, masih meninggalkan beberapa catatan penting antara lain; banyak Terjadinya Over Criminalization dan banyaknya terjadi Dekonstruksi Pidana dan Pemidanaan di Indonesia dimana dekonstruksi itu antara lain; Pertama, Terjadinya Over Kapasitas Lapas dan Rutan, kedua, Pengaturan Hukuman Mati yang Sangat Massif; ketiga, Kebijakan Hukum Yang Over Pada Penghinaan Di Media Sosial; keempat, Dalam Penyidikan Kriminal Penyidik Mencari Bukti Dengan Kejahatan (penyiksaaan); kelima, Inkonsistensi Hak  Atas Perkara Cuma-Cuma (prodeo). Bahwa Prospektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana dan Pemidanaan Yang Ada di Indonesia harus didasarkan pada beberapa hal, antara lain: Pedekatan Restorative Justice dalam Penerapan Pemidanaan; Pendekatan Ultimum remedium dalam penerapan pemidanaan; Reformasi Kelembagaan Lembaga Penegak Hukum; dan Revisi Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP). Kata Kunci: Dehumanisasi, Over Criminalization, Restorative Justice, Ultimum remediumABSTRACTIf we look at the trend of the process of implementing criminal punishment in Indonesia, we can see that many criminal proceedings are over-applied. Of course this implies over ciminalization in the application of punishment, which of course imposes a disharmony in the application of criminal law which negates the sense of humanity which leads to many symptoms of dehumanization that occur. In this study using the type of normative legal research using the approach of legislation approach (Statue Approach), conceptual approach (Conseptual Approach), and case approach (case approach). This research aims to find out how the application of criminal law in Indonesia today and How is the prospect of criminal law and punishment in Indonesia ?. The results of this study indicate that the current application of the criminal law in Indonesia still leaves some important notes, among others; there is a lot of Over Criminalization and many cases of Criminal Deconstruction and Criminalization in Indonesia where deconstruction is among others; First, the occurrence of over-capacity of prisons and detention centers, second, the regulation of extremely mass death sentences; third, the Legal Policy Over Over Insulting on Social Media; fourth, In Criminal Investigations Investigators Seek Evidence With Crime (torture); fifth, the Inconsistency of the Right to Free Cases (prodeo). That the Prospective Criminal Law and Penalty Existing in Indonesia must be based on several things, including: Restorative Justice Approach in the Application of Penalty; Ultimum remedium approach in the application of punishment; Institutional Reform of Law Enforcement Agencies; and Revision of the Criminal Code (KUHP) and the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). Keywords: Dehumanization, Over Criminalization, Restorative Justice, Ultimum remedium

scholarly journals Studi Komparatif Tindak Pidana Aborsi dalam Perspektif Hukum Article Positif dan Hukum Pidana Islam (Imam Madzhab)

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-213
Author(s):  
Moh. Faqih
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Medical Reason ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Approach Method

The rise of promiscuity and free sex is the reason for a large number of abortion perpetrators in Indonesia. In the enactment of the law stipulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) regarding abortion, it is very clear that abortion is prohibited as well as from the perspective of Islamic law it is forbidden to abort the fetus unless there is a medical reason that an abortion must be performed. However, in the opinion of Madzhab, there is still a classification of permissibility before the blowing of the spirit and the scholars agree that it is haram to abort the fetus after blowing the spirit. The research approach used in this study is the Normative Juridical Research Method, namely the approach method used in this study is the normative juridical approach or doctrinal legal research, which is legal research that uses secondary data sources. The results of the research conducted by the author are to provide insight to readers so that they better understand the meaning of abortion and also the punishment of the perpetrators of the crime of abortion both in terms of positive law and Islamic criminal law. In finding the comparison of the punishment between positive law and Islamic criminal law lies in the age limit of the fetus that is in the content of the sanction based on Islamic criminal law, the punishment is to pay ghurrah or diyat Kamilah Dari before the blowing of the spirit or after the blowing of the spirit.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document