scholarly journals Hyponatremia in Cancer Patients Hospitalized in a Palliative Care Department: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
José Ferraz Gonçalves ◽  
Mariana Brandão ◽  
Ana Arede ◽  
Bárbara Prucha ◽  
Inês Grilo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Serum Sodium ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Care Department ◽  
Median Serum ◽  
Metastatic Sites

Introduction: Hyponatremia is frequent in cancer patients, as many studies carried out in these patients have shown. However, there are only a few studies carried out at the end of life and in palliative care. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of hyponatremia in cancer patients in the palliative care department of an oncology center and its association with survival.Material and Methods: The study included the first 300 patients hospitalized in the palliative care department in 2017. Survival was measured from the day of hospitalization until death.Results: Serum sodium was measured in 170 (59%) patients. The median serum concentration was 135 mmol/L (109 to 145). Among 91 (54%) patients, serum sodium was within the normal range, 59 (35%) had mild hyponatremia, 13 (8%) had moderate and seven (4%) had profound hyponatremia. The median survival was 13 days (1 to 1020). Serum sodium was not significantly associated with survival (p = 0.463). Regarding other variables, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was significantly associated with survival, while gender, age, primary cancer and number of metastatic sites were not.Discussion: Hyponatremia, mainly mild and moderate, was found in almost half of the patients included in this study. However, unlike other studies, hyponatremia was not associated with a poorer prognosis.Conclusion: Hyponatremia is common in cancer patients receiving palliative care but did not seem to influence survival.

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Adds Information to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status in Elderly Cancer Patients: An Italian Group for Geriatric Oncology Study

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 494-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lazzaro Repetto ◽  
Lucia Fratino ◽  
Riccardo A. Audisio ◽  
Antonella Venturino ◽  
Walter Gianni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Geriatric Oncology ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Elderly Cancer Patients

PURPOSE: To appraise the performance of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in elderly cancer patients (≥ 65 years) and to evaluate whether it could add further information with respect to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 363 elderly cancer patients (195 males, 168 females; median age, 72 years) with solid (n = 271) or hematologic (n = 92) tumors. In addition to PS, their physical function was assessed by means of the activity of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scales. Comorbidities were categorized according to Satariano’s index. The association between PS, comorbidity, and the items of the CGA was assessed by means of logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: These 363 elderly cancer patients had a good functional and mental status: 74% had a good PS (ie, lower than 2), 86% were ADL-independent, and 52% were IADL-independent. Forty-one percent of patients had one or more comorbid conditions. Of the patients with a good PS, 13.0% had two or more comorbidities; 9.3% and 37.7% had ADL or IADL limitations, respectively. By multivariate analysis, elderly cancer patients who were ADL-dependent or IADL-dependent had a nearly two-fold higher probability of having an elevated Satariano’s index than independent patients. A strong association emerged between PS and CGA, with a nearly five-fold increased probability of having a poor PS (ie, ≥ 2) recorded in patients dependent for ADL or IADL. CONCLUSION: The CGA adds substantial information on the functional assessment of elderly cancer patients, including patients with a good PS. The role of PS as unique marker of functional status needs to be reappraised among elderly cancer patients.

scholarly journals Population Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib in Patients with BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Melanoma

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 931 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Balakirouchenane ◽  
Sarah Guégan ◽  
Chantal Csajka ◽  
Anne Jouinot ◽  
Valentine Heidelberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Plasma Ratio ◽  
Metastatic Sites

Patients treated with dabrafenib/trametinib (DAB/TRA) exhibit a large interindividual variability in clinical outcomes. The aims of this study were to characterize the pharmacokinetics of DAB, hydroxy-dabrafenib (OHD), and TRA in BRAF-mutated patients and to investigate the exposure–response relationship for toxicity and efficacy in metastatic melanoma (MM) patients. Univariate Fisher and Wilcoxon models including drug systemic exposure (area under the plasma concentration curve, AUC) were used to identify prognostic factors for the onset of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and Cox models for overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Seventy-three BRAF-mutated patients were included in pharmacokinetic (n = 424, NONMEM) and 52 in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses. Age and sex were identified as determinants of DAB and OHD clearances (p < 0.01). MM patients experiencing DLT were overexposed to DAB compared to patients without DLT (AUC: 9624 vs. 7485 ng∙h/mL, respectively, p < 0.01). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≥ 2 and plasma ratio AUCOHD/AUCDAB ≥ 1 were independently associated with shorter OS (HR: 6.58 (1.29–33.56); p = 0.023 and 10.61 (2.34–48.15), p = 0.022, respectively). A number of metastatic sites ≥3 and cerebral metastases were associated with shorter PFS (HR = 3.25 (1.11–9.50); p = 0.032 and HR = 1.23 (1.35–10.39), p = 0.011; respectively). TRA plasma exposure was neither associated with toxicity nor efficacy. Our results suggest that early drug monitoring could be helpful to prevent the onset of DLT in MM patients, especially in fragile patients such as the elderly. Regarding efficacy, the clinical benefit to monitor plasma ratio AUCOHD/AUCDAB deserves more investigation in a larger cohort of MM patients.

scholarly journals Screening Patients With Cancer Admitted to Hanoi Medical University Hospital for Palliative Care Needs

2020 ◽  
pp. 1321-1327
Author(s):  
Quang V. Le ◽  
Huy L. Trinh ◽  
Kim Ngan T. Mai ◽  
Manh D. Pham ◽  
Paul A. Glare
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical University

PURPOSE To evaluate a screening tool for identifying which patients admitted to the oncology ward of a Vietnamese hospital should be referred to specialist palliative care (PC). METHODS We performed a cross-sectional survey of consecutive patients hospitalized in the Department of Oncology and Palliative Care at Hanoi Medical University Hospital between June 2019 and September 2019. We translated a validated 11-item screening tool into Vietnamese and used a total score of ≥ 5 as a positive screen. RESULTS One hundred participants were recruited. Forty-four patients (44%) screened positive. Of these, 37 (84%) had locally advanced or metastatic disease, 31 (70%) had uncontrolled symptoms, and 43 (98%) requested a PC consultation. A score ≥ 5 was significantly more common in patients with stage IV disease versus earlier stage, performance status of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2 versus ECOG 0, and when life-limiting complications of cancer were present. Screening identified four patients overlooked by oncologists as needing referral, and 34% of patients requesting a referral had scores < 5. CONCLUSION This screening tool provided oncologists with easy-to-use criteria for referring patients for PC. At the same time, it relieved the work load for under-resourced PC physicians by screening out requests with low-level need. This tool should be part of routine assessment on admission in all oncology units in Vietnam.

Discrepancies between genitourinary cancer patients' and clinicians' characterization of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status

Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiane Decat Bergerot ◽  
Errol J. Philip ◽  
Paulo Gustavo Bergerot ◽  
JoAnn Hsu ◽  
Nazli Dizman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Genitourinary Cancer

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Delirium in the Palliative Care Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duan Guo ◽  
Taiping Lin ◽  
Chuanyao Deng ◽  
Yuxia Zheng ◽  
Langli Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Case Control Studies

Objective: Delirium is common and highly distressing for the palliative care population. Until now, no study has systematically reviewed the risk factors of delirium in the palliative care population. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate delirium risk factors among individuals receiving palliative care.Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane database to identify relevant observational studies from database inception to June 2021. The methodological quality of the eligible studies was assessed by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. We estimated the pooled adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for individual risk factors using the inverse variance method.Results: Nine studies were included in the review (five prospective cohort studies, three retrospective case-control studies and one retrospective cross-section study). In pooled analyses, older age (aOR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.04, I2 = 37%), male sex (aOR:1.80, 95% CI: 1.37–2.36, I2 = 7%), hypoxia (aOR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.77–0.99, I2 = 0%), dehydration (aOR: 3.22, 95%CI: 1.75–5.94, I2 = 18%), cachexia (aOR:3.40, 95% CI: 1.69–6.85, I2 = 0%), opioid use (aOR: 2.49, 95%CI: 1.39–4.44, I2 = 0%), anticholinergic burden (aOR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.07–1.30, I2 = 9%) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (aOR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.56–4.14, I2 = 21%) were statistically significantly associated with delirium.Conclusion: The risk factors identified in our review can help to highlight the palliative care population at high risk of delirium. Appropriate strategies should be implemented to prevent delirium and improve the quality of palliative care services.

Long-term benefit (LTB) of sunitinib (SU) treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Retrospective analysis for clinical biomarkers identification.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 465-465
Author(s):  
Oren Smaletz ◽  
Matias Chacon ◽  
Ludmila de Oliveira Koch ◽  
Daniela Regina de Carvalho Rocha ◽  
Fernanda Camila Cardoso
Keyword(s):  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Predictive Marker ◽  
Common Finding ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Clinical Biomarkers ◽  
Metastatic Sites

465 Background: Prospective studies with sunitinib in mRCC have shown median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 11 months (first line) and 8.3 months (second line). In order to identify patients with LTB with SU, we describe the clinical characteristics of patients with mRCC treated with SU with an mPFS of 15 months or more. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of patients with mRCC treated with SU in two hospitals, Alexander Fleming Institute Buenos Aires in Argentina and Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Inclusion criteria included patients treated with SU who had a PFS of at least 15 months. Results: Between September 1995 and August 2009, 29 cases were identified. Patient demographics were: median age of 56 years, 65% male, 96% with previous nephrectomy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of either 0 (52%) or 1 (48%), 93% had clear cell histology, 69% received prior systemic therapy, and 78% had ≤ 2 metastatic sites (mostly in the lungs, liver and bone). Patients were started on SU 50 mg 4 weeks on treatment/2 weeks off treatment (4/2) (n=26) or 37.5 mg 6 weeks continuous dosing (n=3). For those patients starting on 4/2, dose reduction was necessary in 59% of the patients to maintain SU therapy. Median duration of therapy was 23.7 months. During treatment, 24 patients (83%) developed hypertension. Response rates were as follows: complete response 7% (n=2), partial response 38% (n=11), stable disease 52% (n=15); data missing for one patient. Conclusions: LTB is seen in patients who are young, have good performance status, and either 1 or 2 metastatic sites. Dose reductions are common in order to maintain treatment while benefiting from SU. Treatment with SU as either first- or second-line therapy did not appear to influence outcome. Hypertension is a common finding and serves as a predictive marker during treatment, but study limitations preclude the identification of pre-treatment predictive factors.

Symptom burden among metastatic cancer patients receiving palliative chemotherapy.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20696-e20696
Author(s):  
Herdee Gloriane Cristal Luna ◽  
Jose Enrique Montoya ◽  
Amherstia Morelos ◽  
Jose Roberto Amparo ◽  
Leo Marbella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Palliative Chemotherapy ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Cancer Site ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Severity Scores

e20696 Background: Cancer-related symptoms are less investigated but frequently reported patient-experienced symptom clusters. In palliative oncology, focus is on recognizing and addressing these symptoms, and giving quality of life. The purpose of this study is to determine the severity of cancer related symptoms among metastatic cancer patients on palliative chemotherapy using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (Filipino) [MDASI-F]. Methods: A cross-sectional study among metastatic cancer patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute, Philippines, was performed using MDASI-F. Results: A total of 114 patients were included with a mean age of 55.5 years. 61% were female, and 39% were male. 81.6% were married, while 14% were single and 4.4% were widowed. Highest educational level attained were college (78.1%), high school (19.3%) and primary school (2.6%). Average Body Mass Index fall on 23 kg/m2. Majority of the patients have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 1 (54.4%), followed by ECOG 2 (19.3%), ECOG 0 (18.4%), and ECOG 3 (7.9%). The most common cancer site is breast (30.7%), followed by colon (21.9%), and lungs (16.7%), while the remaining 30.7% belong to other cancer sites. Majority of the patients have one metastatic site (68.4%), 22.8% have two, while 8.8% have 3 metastatic sites. Mean duration of illness from the time of diagnosis was 13.67 months. The most severe cancer related symptoms were sleep disturbance (mean 3.48), fatigue (mean 3.36) and pain (mean 3.14). Interestingly, all Filipino metastatic cancer related severity symptoms and interference items belong to the mild severity score (scores of 0-3) using the MDSAI-F. Conclusions: Among Filipino metastatic cancer patients on palliative chemotherapy, cancer-related symptom severity items and interference items were shown to have mild severity scores based on the MDASI-F.

Effects of baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), interferon gamma (IFN-g) expression, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) on treatment response to first-line atezolizumab (A) + vemurafenib (V) and cobimetinib (C) in BRAFV600 mutation–positive advanced melanoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9523-9523
Author(s):  
Caroline Robert ◽  
Karl D. Lewis ◽  
Paolo Antonio Ascierto ◽  
Rodrigo Ramella Munhoz ◽  
Gabriella Liszkay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Recursive Partitioning ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
L1 Data ◽  
Metastatic Sites

9523 Background: The phase 3 IMspire150 study showed that first-line A+V+C improved investigator-assessed PFS vs placebo (P)+V+C in BRAFV600E/K mutation–positive advanced melanoma (hazard ratio 0.78; P=.0249). Prior biomarker analyses showed that IFN-g or TMB > 10 mut/Mb were associated with greater PFS benefits with A+V+C (Lewis et al. J ImmunoTher Cancer 2020;8:A188-A189). We further evaluated the association of these biomarkers with outcomes. Methods: Exploratory recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to model associations between PFS and age ( < 65 vs ≥65 y), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs 1), liver metastases (yes vs no), metastatic sites (≤3 vs > 3), sum of longest tumor diameters ( < 44 mm vs ≥44 mm), baseline LDH (normal [n] vs elevated [e]), TMB ( < 10 vs ≥10 mut/Mb), PD-L1 (negative vs positive), and IFN-g (high [h; > Quartile 3; Q3] vs intermediate [ > Q1 and ≤Q3] vs low [≤Q1]). Time-to-event analyses were summarized using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: The RPA analysis included 208/256 (81.3%) patients (pts) from the A+V+C arm of IMspire150 for whom LDH, TMB, IFN-g, and PD-L1 data were available. RPA showed that LDH was associated with PFS. In pts treated with A+V+C and n-LDH, h-IFN-g signature was associated with longer PFS and higher rates of objective response (OR) and complete response (CR) vs low/intermediate (l/i) IFN-g (2-y PFS: 59% vs 38%; ORR: 77% vs 69%; CR: 38% vs 15%, respectively); TMB ≥10 mut/Mb was associated with more favorable outcomes in pts with e-LDH (Table). In contrast, neither IFN-g nor TMB discriminated PFS outcomes in n-LDH or e-LDH pt subgroups receiving P+V+C. Pts with e-LDH and TMB < 10 mut/Mb had poor PFS outcomes, with 2-y PFS rates of 9% and 3% and lower rates of OR (51% and 62%) and CR (5% and 9%) in the A+V+C and P+V+C arms, respectively. Similar trends were observed for duration of response (DOR), and for the subset of pts with BRAFV600E mutation–positive melanoma. A+V+C improved PFS vs P+V+C across all subgroups with the exception of e-LDH and TMB < 10. Conclusions: IFN-g and TMB discriminated PFS benefit in pts receiving A+V+C but not for those receiving P+V+C. Durable responses were observed for pts treated with A+V+C in the n-LDH + h-IFNg subgroups.[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document