scholarly journals Digital collaborative consumption and social issues: The clash of taxi and Uber driver in Surabaya and Taipei

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 333
Author(s):  
Kholifatus Saadah ◽  
Shafira Elnanda Yasmine ◽  
A. Safril Mubah

Since the occurrence of application-based taxi, phenomenon and resistance have emerged in metropolitan cities around the world. One of the main issues highlighted is digital collaborative consumption which emerges as the consequences of globalization. As an interpretive case study research, this paper aims to analyze the use of Uber as an alternative to public transportation in Taipei and Surabaya. Authors discuss the issue by comparing the reaction toward the occurrence of Uber and Taipei and Surabaya. Authors apply the theory from Hegre, Gissinger, & Gledtisch (2002) about globalization and social conflict to explain social issues as the consequences of digital collaborative consumption as the new consumption model. According to the theory, globalization creates a deprivation which makes the struggle to access source of capital become more intense. Poverty is the main generator of radical action and violence. Analyzing the phenomena of Uber usage and the resistance from traditional taxi businessmen in Taipei and Surabaya, the authors argue that globalization reflected on digital collaborative consumption could lead to social unrest for parties who cannot adapt to the changes in economic practice. As shown by many cases of app-based rejection taxi in public places such as airport, train station and bus station; the traditionalists show resistance towards globalization and the economic shift of public transportation business model.

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 1065-1072
Author(s):  
Zukiswa Nhase ◽  
Chinedu I.O. Okeke ◽  
Christian Sunday Ugwuanyi

This study explored Grade 3 teachers’ use of an inquiry-based approach to mediate the development of basic science concepts among learners within the socio-cultural theory. This study adopted interpretive case study research of the qualitative type, using a sample of four (4) female teachers who use the home language of learners as the language of instruction. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview guide and observational schedule which was properly validated. Analysis of data was achieved through thematic data analysis. The result of the study revealed that the foundation phase teachers are aware of the importance of the use of the inquiry-based approach in mediating the development of basic science concepts by the learners, but only one out of the four participants implemented it. Thus, it was recommended that there should be a provision of further professional development spaces that promote a community of practice in using an Inquiry-Based Approach in the Foundation Phase.   Keywords: Basic science concepts, Grade 3 teachers, Foundation Phase, Inquiry-Based approach


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nizar Mohammad Alsharari ◽  
Mohammed Al-Shboul

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to extend the knowledge claim of management accounting research using qualitative research methods, in particular, the interpretive case study, and its evaluation using “convincingness” criteria demonstrating the textual authenticity, plausibility and criticality of case study findings.Design/methodology/approachQualitative research in the management accounting field considers both context and function (Burchell et al., 1980). This study sets out the rationale for adopting qualitative methodologies such as interpretive case studies in which rich, contextual and detailed data were collected and analyzed (Miles and Huberman, 1994; Mason, 2002). Methodological issues related to research design, analysis and evaluation are discussed by drawing on frameworks of social science research design. The paper sets out the procedures of an interpretive case study essential to ensuring the procedural validity of research which can be evaluated more accurately using the criteria of “convincingness” rather than positivist measures of the reliability, validity of data and the generalization of results. Textual authenticity, plausibility and critical interpretation, and how these hallmarks of “convincingness” can reflect the procedural validity of accounting research are described.FindingsQualitative research strategies such as the interpretive case study, which consider the complex settings of accounting change and practice, are found to offer deep understandings and convincing explanations of accounting change. Affirming that accounting is firmly established as a social science, the paper finds that the authenticity, plausibility and criticality of research in this field.Research limitations/implicationsThe relevance of qualitative research to contemporary accounting research is considered as an effective method to explicate theory and inform practice, which suggests that new measures to evaluate related research are required to develop the potential of selected qualitative research methodologies in accounting domains.Originality/valueQualitative research in management accounting focuses on the interpretation of meanings found in people and organizations that are subject to the influence of contextual variables. Human attributes underpin accounting conventions and change resulting from continuous technological and regulatory advances. This paper’s comprehensive account of interpretive case study research emphasizes the significance of evaluative criteria that relate, beyond reliability, to the richness of the text. This, thus, encourages and supports new and emerging researchers to seek qualitatively coherent and critical interpretations in management accounting research.


Author(s):  
Tiko Iyamu

Data collection is a critical aspect of any research. To this point, it is very important that a researcher has a good understanding of why, where and how to collect data. Broadly speaking, there are two main research and data collection approaches; namely, quantitative and qualitative methodologies. These two approaches are used both in academia and professional domains. This study focuses on philosophical assumptions underpinning Information Systems (IS) research. The philosophical assumptions underlying interpretive, case study research tradition and approach implies a subjective epistemology and the ontological belief that reality is socially constructed. The study investigated the challenges of interpretive, case study research strategy and empirical techniques applied in the information systems discipline. This paper focuses on the realistic challenges that researchers face while conducting a qualitative, interpretive, case study, particularly during data collection.


INKLUSI ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Deta Lustiyati ◽  
Merita Eka Rahmuniyati

Persons with disabilities often experience obstacles because there are no accessible facilities available to them in public places. The purpose of this study is to obtain an overview of the accessibility of public toilets in public transportation located in Yogyakarta. The research took the case of Giwangan bus station, Yogyakarta (Tugu) train station, Lempuyangan train station, Wates train station, Maguwoharjo train station, and Adisutjipto airport. This type of research is descriptive evaluative. Data collection is done by using purposive sampling technique and by the method of observation, documentation, and interviews. The results of this study indicate that the accessibility of sanitation services at Adisucipto airport and all train stations is good; while accessibility at the Giwangan terminal is still lacking.[Para difabel sering mengalami hambatan karena tidak terdapatnya fasilitas yang aksesibel bagi mereka di tempat-tempat umum. Tujuan penelitian ini adalan untuk memperoleh gambaran aksesibilitas toilet umum bagi difabel di tempat transportasi umum DIY. Penelitian mengambil kasus di terminal Giwangan, stasiun Yogyakarta (Tugu), stasiun Lempuyangan, stasiun Wates, stasiun Maguwoharjo, dan bandar udara Adisutjipto. Jenis penelitian ini adalah deskriptif evaluatif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling dan dengan metode observasi, dokumentasi, dan wawancara. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa aksesibilitas layanan sanitasi di bandara Adisucipto dan semua stasiun kereta api sudah baik; sementara aksesibilitas di terminal Giwangan masih kurang.]


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Jamilah Nur Halimah ◽  
Bahrudin M. Ag ◽  
Nase Saepudin

ABSTRACT The video entitled "Mendadak Halal" has moderated the YouTube social media community to share argumentative ideas with each other in their comments column. This study aims to develop knowledge about communication strategies in topic selection, orderly message, and the use of selected message delivery methods. The researcher used a case study research that examined more about the video production of Remotivi institution. This research is based on the assumption of a communication model, namely the S-M-C-R model of David K. Berlo, an expert of communication science from the United States. The results of the study point out: a. Choice of topics in Remotivi is done because Remotivi wants to select and filter out social issues that are being considered and it is suspected that there are irregularities in them b. The packaging of messages carried out by Remotivi was made by formulating the points elaborated beforehand with in-depth research. c. The method of delivering messages carried out by Remotivi is an approach strategy to communication. His approach uses messages that are not only informative but also persuasive. The steps to deliver the message made by Remotivi are, first, by moderating, the second with discussion. Keywords: Strategy; Remotivi; Halal; Model S-M-C-R. ABSTRAK Video yang berjudul “Mendadak Halal” telah memoderasi masyarakat media sosial youtube untuk saling menyampaikan gagasan yang argumentatif di kolom komentar milik mereka. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan pengetahuan mengenai strategi komunikasi dalam pemilihan topik, pengemasan pesan, dan penggunaan metode penyampaian pesan yang dipilih. Peneliti menggunakan metode penelitian studi kasus yang mengkaji lebih dalam soal lembaga dan produksi video milik Remotivi. Penelitian ini didasarkan pada asumsi sebuah model komunikasi, yaitu model S-M-C-R David K. Berlo pakar ilmu komunikasi dari Amerika Serikat. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa: a. Pemilihan topik di Remotivi dilakukan sebab pihak Remotivi ingin memilih dan menyaring isu sosial yang tengah menjadi perhatian dan diduga terdapat kejanggalan didalamnya b. Pengemasan pesan yang dilakukan oleh Remotivi dibuat dengan merumuskan poin-poin yang dielaborasi sebelumnya dengan riset yang mendalam. c. Metode penyampaian pesan yang dilakukan oleh Remotivi merupakan strategi pendekatan kepada komunikasi. Pendekatannya menggunakan pesan yang tidak hanya bersifat informatif tapi juga persuasif. Langkah-langkah penyampaian pesan yang dilakukan Remotivi adalah, yang pertama dengan memoderasi, yang kedua dengan diskusi. Kata Kunci: Strategi; Remotivi; Halal; Model S-M-C-R.


2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 953-974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Géraldine Zeimers ◽  
Christos Anagnostopoulos ◽  
Thierry Zintz ◽  
Annick Willem

Nonprofit organizations (NPOs) increasingly implement socially responsible programs to address their responsibilities toward society. Although collaborations are a valuable means to tackle complex social issues, NPOs also similarly collaborate with other NPOs for delivering socially responsible programs. However, the motivations driving NPOs to collaborate with likeminded organizations for socially responsible programs remain unclear. Using a single embedded in-depth case study research design, our purpose is to examine the formation of collaborations among sport federations and sport clubs for socially responsible programs. Reflecting the interplay between resource-based view and institutional perspectives, our findings intrinsically indicate that partners demonstrate similarity in their motivations to collaborate due to their organizational fit, but with some key differences in the complementary resources they seek. Organizational legitimacy and resource exchange needs for socially responsible programs are driving the collaboration rather than organizational survival needs. The potential to create social value makes this nonprofit collaboration form unique.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bendik Bygstad ◽  
Bjørn Erik Munkvold

Recent information systems research calls for interaction between the researcher and the informants in interpretive case study research. In line with Van de Ven's call for engaged scholarship, we Investigate how to involve the informants in case studies, not only for the collection of facts, but also in the co-construction and interpretation of the case narrative. The paper builds on a longitudinal case study, in which we explored an approach of extensive informant involvement. Using the ladder of analytical abstraction as our analytical tool, we discuss how an extended involvement of informants may enrich the Interpretive process In case study research, and increase the relevance of the findings. We discuss how and under what conditions this form of involvement may take place, and potential challenges of this approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document