CAN NORWAY LEARN FROM CHINA?

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arild Tjeldvoll

Two particular experiences of my life as an international education researcher are behind this travelogue. During my seventy years’ participation in and observations of Norwegian education, I have seen a sad decline of school quality. It started when Norway switched to a US American curriculum tradition after WWII. The positive experience is my familiarizing with the education culture of East Asia over the last twenty-five years. In this culture, there is an enormous respect for learning, knowledge and the teacher. Willingness to learn and respect for knowledge is now the super soft power of economically successful East Asian countries. My two opposite experiences resulted in the following question: What can Norway learn from China in terms of school quality? Internationally, we see parents and grandparents who sacrifice everything to ensure their loved ones this best possible life insurance in a challenging global world - solid basic education making it easier to continue to learn new knowledge and skills when the environment is changing. I start the book by explaining the Chinese setting. Following, I present the meaning of ‘school quality’. In the China section, I first present Hong Kong’s education as a successful synthesis of English, American and Chinese/Confucian ideas about effective learning. The rest of this section is a historical sketch of education development in China, as well a series of individual pictures illustrating Chinese education culture in practice. In the second section – on Norway – I give a historical sketch of educational decline from its golden age, right after WW II, until present. In the last (third) section, I sum up what Norway (and many other countries) can learn not only from China, but also from Finland and England. In the final chapter, I envisage a rather radical market-oriented model for how Norway could regain a learning culture needed to provide quality education for all its citizens.

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arild Tjeldvoll

Two particular experiences of my life as an international education researcher are behind this travelogue. During my seventy years’ participation in and observations of Norwegian education, I have seen a sad decline of school quality. It started when Norway switched to a US American curriculum tradition after WWII. The positive experience is my familiarizing with the education culture of East Asia over the last twenty-five years. In this culture, there is an enormous respect for learning, knowledge and the teacher. Willingness to learn and respect for knowledge is now the super soft power of economically successful East Asian countries. My two opposite experiences resulted in the following question: What can Norway learn from China in terms of school quality? Internationally, we see parents and grandparents who sacrifice everything to ensure their loved ones this best possible life insurance in a challenging global world - solid basic education making it easier to continue to learn new knowledge and skills when the environment is changing. I start the book by explaining the Chinese setting. Following, I present the meaning of ‘school quality’. In the China section, I first present Hong Kong’s education as a successful synthesis of English, American and Chinese/Confucian ideas about effective learning. The rest of this section is a historical sketch of education development in China, as well a series of individual pictures illustrating Chinese education culture in practice. In the second section – on Norway – I give a historical sketch of educational decline from its golden age, right after WW II, until present. In the last (third) section, I sum up what Norway (and many other countries) can learn not only from China, but also from Finland and England. In the final chapter, I envisage a rather radical market-oriented model for how Norway could regain a learning culture needed to provide quality education for all its citizens.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-232
Author(s):  
Hamdah Abdullah Alfaraidy

The Saudi Ministry of Education has recently begun to allow all Saudi families to enroll their children in international schools. The international curriculum offered by such schools represents a notably different choice compared with Saudi traditional public and private schools, both of which teach the same state-mandated curriculum. As a result of the change, there has been a surge in demand for international education; the number of schools has increased rapidly, and there has been a steady “student leak” towards them and away from traditional schools. Little is known about why Saudi parents choose to enroll their children in international schools. We explored this question by surveying 431 Saudi parents of children attending such schools to identify the main factors contributing to their choice. Although all factors examined were important to parents, curriculum and overall school quality emerged as the most important; socioeconomic status was not influential in their decisions.


Societies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Priya Gauttam ◽  
Bawa Singh ◽  
Vijay Kumar Chattu

In this globalized world, education has become an important medium to enhance people-to-people contact. The Delores report of the International Commission on Education for the 21st century highlights the enormous potential of higher education to use globalization as a resource for bridging the knowledge gap and enriching cross-cultural dialogue. As a major contributor to soft power and an important field of public diplomacy, international education can have a wealth of advantages, including the ability to generate commercial value, promote a country’s foreign policy goals and interests, and contribute to economic growth and investment. The People’s Republic of China, well-known for being the world’s most populous nation and the global economic powerhouse, prioritizes the internationalization of the country’s higher education system. China is looking to expand its higher education program and carry out its diplomatic project in South Asia. In this sense, the South Asian zone, especially Nepal, is significant for China, where its educational diplomacy is playing as a “bridge between Sino- Nepal relations.” In this review, we describe the place and priority of “Education” in China’s foreign policy; explore China’s mediums of investment in Nepal’s education sector; and highlight the importance of educational aid in Sino-Nepal relations. Chinese educational aid to Nepal takes many forms, where Nepali students and officials engage with Chinese investment to enhance their career prospects and the education system in Nepal.


Author(s):  
Marilene Santos

The following article, whose nature is descriptive and bibliographic, aims, based on Goal eight of the National Education Plan 2014-2024 (PNE), to identify some indicators for the Countryside Education. For such purpose, we consider the educational reality of the countryside based on: the low schooling of the population; in the negative evolution of the enrollments number in the last few years; and in the circumstances through which the quality benchmark, provided by the Basic Education Development Index (Ideb), has been unproductive to the define public policies aimed for the Countryside Education. Despite the operational difficulties of the educational system to obtain the necessary information for its composition, the results of the last two Ideb, however, already show progress. Based on these indicators, we conclude that some actions aimed at increasing the schooling of the countryside population were undertaken, however, the unequal educational condition among young people living in the countryside and those who live in the urban areas still persists. There is a possibility of fulfilling the goal eight of PNE by 2024, however, this may not mean progress in guaranteeing the countryside population’s rights to an education of quality, but, on the contrary, its reduction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Everton Ellis ◽  
Edward Thomas

The literature on basic education emphasizes the need to improve enrollment and access to girls’ education in poorer countries. In Jamaica, the problem is not merely access to basic education but rather the quality of education outcomes, particularly for boys. Setting my research findings within the context of globalization and basic education, this paper explores the underachievement of boys within the contexts of international education policies at the domestic/national scale in Jamaica. Using a combination of participants’ responses drawn from semi-structured interviews conducted with teachers across two rural high schools in Jamaica, an analysis of secondary sources and (to a lesser extent) participant observations, we put forward a few claims regarding the process of ‘localizing’ ‘international’ education. It appears that global discourses in education (education for all) place demands on the local context – privilege girls, and the problem of lack of access to education and the overall the quality of experience. And therefore, the Jamaican state can ‘evade’ or palliatively address the ongoing problem of boys’ underachievement. The paper also highlights the effects of neoliberal restructuring in education as well as the inconsistencies between domestic/national and international education policies.


2014 ◽  
Vol 915-916 ◽  
pp. 1361-1366
Author(s):  
Xian Fen Xie ◽  
Bin Hui Wang

Education development is the product of endogenous socio-economic; studying on regional differences of education level plays an important role in social and economic development. This paper constructs regional education development index system based on two aspects of basic educational facilities and educational scale, applies robust principal component analysis method to explore education development level differences of China's 31 provinces, and with the traditional principal component analysis for comparison. Research shows that, results obtained by robust principal component analysis is more in line with China's actual situation; the overall level of education is not high and the difference between regions is large; China's basic education is positively correlated with regional economy, while inversely correlated with regional population.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (31) ◽  
pp. 1-32
Author(s):  
Joysi Moraes ◽  
Bruno Francisco Batista Dias ◽  
Sandra R. H. Mariano

The analysis of educational systems involves four central dimensions: economic, pedagogical, political and cultural. This paper focuses on the economic perspective, which has gained strength with the creation of the Basic Education Development Index (Ideb), and facilitates comparative analyzes of the performance of Brazilian educational systems. This research uses a linear least squares regression in which the dependent variables were the Ideb scores of Brazilian states and the independent variables were the corresponding investments in the maintenance and development of education (MDE), in the period 2005-2015. The results allow a comparative picture to be drawn of the effectiveness of the use of state resources invested by the states. It is verified that the investments in basic education in the states only partially explain the improved learning rates measured by the Ideb. Three distinct situations were observed. In 23 states there was an increase in investment in education accompanied by improvement in the Ideb. In 18 states, the increase in investments accompanied the improvement in the Ideb over a certain period, although this effect was not sustained throughout the historical series. In only 05 states, the relationship between investment and improvement in the Ideb remained positive throughout the analyzed period.


Author(s):  
N. Musienko ◽  
L. Ostapchenko ◽  
N. Taran ◽  
L. Batsmanova

The historical sketch of agrarian science and education development at the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv for the period 1834– 2019 is given.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document