Does predawn water potential discern between irrigation treatments in Galician white grapevine cultivars?

OENO One ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 123 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Manuel Mirás-Avalos ◽  
Emiliano Trigo-Córdoba ◽  
Yolanda Bouzas-Cid
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Water Status ◽  
Irrigation Management ◽  
Growing Season ◽  
Climatic Conditions ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Diurnal Changes ◽  
Stem Water Potential ◽  
Stem Water

<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Aims</strong>: To evaluate the usefulness of predawn water potential (<strong>Ψ</strong><sub>pd</sub>) to assess the water status of Galician grapevine cultivars for irrigation purposes.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Methods and results</strong>: Three Galician white grapevine cultivars (Albariño, Godello and Treixadura) were subjected to rain-fed and irrigation conditions during the 2013 growing season. Diurnal changes in leaf water potential (<strong>Ψ</strong><sub>l</sub>) were measured using a pressure chamber on days with high evapotranspiration demand. Stem water potential (<strong>Ψ</strong><sub>s</sub>) was measured at midday. <strong>Ψ</strong><sub>pd</sub> was not able to discriminate between treatments, whereas <strong>Ψ</strong><sub>l</sub> and <strong>Ψ</strong><sub>s</sub> at midday were able to detect significant differences in water status among plants.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Conclusion</strong>: <strong>Ψ</strong><sub>pd</sub> was not useful to evaluate vine water status under the Galician climatic conditions. In contrast, both <strong>Ψ</strong><sub>l</sub> and <strong>Ψ</strong><sub>s</sub> were effective for detecting differences between treatments and can thus be used for irrigation management purposes.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Significance and impact of the study</strong>: This is the first study evaluating water status of Galician grapevine cultivars. It also provides useful information about the strategy for its control through measurements of midday <strong>Ψ</strong>l or <strong>Ψ</strong>s.</p>

scholarly journals Correlations among Predawn Leaf, Midday Leaf, and Midday Stem Water Potential and their Correlations with other Measures of Soil and Plant Water Status in Vitis vinifera

2002 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 448-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.E. Williams ◽  
F.J. Araujo
Keyword(s):  
Vitis Vinifera ◽  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Gas Exchange ◽  
Water Status ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Stem Water Potential ◽  
Stem Water ◽  
Water Potential Measurements

A study was conducted to compare three measurements of determining water status of grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) in the field. Predawn leaf water potential (ΨPD), midday leaf water potential (Ψl), and midday stem water potential (Ψstem) were measured on `Chardonnay' and `Cabernet Sauvignon' grapevines grown in Napa Valley, California late in the 1999 growing season. Both cultivars had been irrigated weekly at various fractions (0, 0.5, and 1.0 for `Chardonnay' and 0, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.5 for `Cabernet') of estimated vineyard evapotranspiration (ETc) from approximately anthesis up to the dates of measurements. Predawn water potential measurements were taken beginning at 0330 hr and completed before sunrise. Midday Ψl and Ψstem measurements were taken only between 1230 and 1330 hr. In addition, net CO2 assimilation rates (A) and stomatal conductance to water vapor (gs) were also measured at midday. Soil water content (SWC) was measured in the `Chardonnay' vineyard using a neutron probe. Values obtained for ΨPD, Ψl, and Ψstem in this study ranged from about -0.05 to -0.8, -0.7 to -1.8, and -0.5 to -1.6 MPa, respectively. All three measurements of vine water status were highly correlated with one another. Linear regression analysis of Ψl and Ψstem versus ΨPD resulted in r2 values of 0.88 and 0.85, respectively. A similar analysis of Ψl as a function of Ψstem resulted in an r2 of 0.92. In the `Chardonnay' vineyard, all three methods of estimating vine water status were significantly (P < 0.01) correlated with SWC and applied amounts of water. Lastly, ΨPD, Ψl, and Ψstem were all linearly correlated with measurements of A and gs at midday. Under the conditions of this study, ΨPD, Ψl, and Ψstem represent equally viable methods of assessing the water status of these grapevines. They were all correlated similarly with the amount of water in the soil profile and leaf gas exchange as well as with one another.

scholarly journals Vine water deficit : among the 3 applications of pressure chamber, stem water potential is the most sensitive indicator

OENO One ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 169
Author(s):  
Xavier Choné ◽  
Olivier Trégoat ◽  
Cornelis Van Leeuwen ◽  
Denis Dubourdieu
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Water Deficit ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Water Status ◽  
Pressure Chamber ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Sensitive Indicator ◽  
Stem Water Potential ◽  
Water Deficits ◽  
Stem Water

<p style="text-align: justify;">Vine water status is an important factor in grape quality. High tannin and anthocyanin content in red grape berries are related to moderate vine water deficits. Hence, a simple and sensitive indicator is required to determine vine water status and especially water constraint. Pressure chamber allows a quick and easy to practice determination of water status in the vineyard. Three applications of pressure chamber are known: predawn leaf water potential (ΨB), leaf water potential (ΨF) and stem water potential (ΨT). Only ΨB and ΨF are widely used on vines. In this survey ΨB, ΨF, ΨT and transpiration flow were measured on mature leaves to determine non-irrigated vine water status in field grown vines during the growing season. In California as well as in France, stem Ψ was the most discriminating indicator for both moderate and severe water deficits. In every plot surveyed ΨT was much better correlated to leaf transpiration than ΨF. Moreover, ΨT revealed nascent water deficit earlier than ΨB did. Among the three application of pressure chamber, ΨT was the only one to indicate short term water deficit after a rainfall. Hence, ΨT appears to be a useful indicator for grapevine management in both non-irrigated and irrigated vineyards.</p>

scholarly journals Water relations of field-grown grapevines in the São Francisco Valley, Brazil, under different rootstocks and irrigation strategies

2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 436-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Rita de Souza ◽  
Luís Henrique Bassoi ◽  
José Moacir Pinheiro Lima Filho ◽  
Fabrício Francisco Santos da Silva ◽  
Leandro Hespanhol Viana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Root System ◽  
Water Relations ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Water Status ◽  
Irrigation Management ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Stem Water Potential ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Grape Quality

There is an increased demand for high quality winegrapes in the São Francisco Valley, a new wine producing area in Brazil. As the grape quality is closely linked to the soil water status, understanding the effects of rootstock and irrigation management on grapevine water relations is essential to optimize yield and quality. This study was carried out to investigate the effects of irrigation strategies and rootstocks on water relations and scion vigour of field-grown grapevines in Petrolina, Pernambuco state, Brazil. The cultivars used as scions are Moscato Canelli and Syrah, both grafted onto IAC 572 and 1103 Paulsen rootstocks. The following water treatments were used: deficit irrigation, with holding water after veraison; and partial root-zone drying, supplying (100% of crop evapotranspiration) of the water loss to only one side of the root system after fruit set, alternating the sides periodically (about 24 days). In general, all treatments had values of pre-dawn leaf water potential higher than -0.2 MPa, suggesting absence of water stress. The vine water status was more affected by rootstock type than irrigation strategies. Both cultivars grafted on IAC 572 had the highest values of midday leaf water potential and stem water potential, measured on non-transpiring leaves, which were bagged with both plastic sheet and aluminum foil at least 1 h before measurements. For both cultivars, the stomatal conductance (g s), transpiration (E) and leaf area index (LAI) were also more affected by roostsotck type than by irrigation strategies. The IAC 572 rootstock presented higher g s, E and LAI than the 1103 Paulsen. Differences in vegetative vigor of the scion grafted onto IAC 572 rootstocks were related to its higher leaf specific hydraulic conductance and deeper root system as compared to the 1103 Paulsen, which increased the water-extraction capability, resulting in a better vine water status.

scholarly journals Rapid Equilibration of Leaf and Stem Water Potential under Field Conditions in Almonds, Walnuts, and Prunes

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 609-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Fulton ◽  
Richard Buchner ◽  
Cyndi Gilles ◽  
Bill Olson ◽  
Nick Bertagna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sample Size ◽  
Water Potential ◽  
Water Status ◽  
Irrigation Management ◽  
Irrigation Scheduling ◽  
Field Conditions ◽  
Equilibration Time ◽  
Diurnal Changes ◽  
Stem Water Potential ◽  
Stem Water

Covering a plant leaf with a reflective, water impervious bag ensures that equilibrium is reached between the nontranspiring leaf and the stem, and appears to improve the accuracy of determining plant water status under field conditions. However, the inconvenience of covering the leaf for 1 to 2 hours before measuring stem water potential (SWP) has constrained on-farm adoption of this irrigation management technique. A second constraint has been that the requirement of midafternoon determinations limits the area that can be monitored by one person with a pressure chamber. This paper reports findings from field studies in almonds (Prunus dulcis),prunes (P. domestica), and walnuts (Juglans regia) demonstrating modified procedures to measure midday SWP, making it a more convenient and practical tool for irrigation management. For routine monitoring and irrigation scheduling, an equilibration period of 10 min or longer appears to be suitable to provide accurate SWP measurements. Based on the large sample sizes in this study, we estimate that measurement error related to equilibration time for SWP can be reduced to an acceptable level [0.05 MPa (0.5 bar)] with a sample size of about 10 leaves when using a 10-min equilibration period. Under orchard conditions where tree growth and health appears uniform, a sample of one leaf per tree and 10 trees per irrigation management unit should give an accurate mean indicator of orchard water status. Under more variable orchard conditions a larger sample size may be needed. Midmorning and midday SWP both exhibited similar seasonal patterns and responded alike to irrigation events. On some occasions, midday SWP was accurately predicted from midmorning SWP and the change in air vapor pressure deficit (VPD) from midmorning to midday, but both over- and underestimate errors [to 0.3 MPa (3.0 bar)] appeared to be associated with unusually low or high diurnal changes in VPD, respectively. Hence, direct measurement of SWP under midday conditions (about 1300 to 1500 hr) is still recommended.

scholarly journals 593 A Lightweight, Hand-operated Pressure Chamber for Determining Plant Water Status

HortScience ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 499B-499
Author(s):  
Ken Shackel ◽  
David Paige
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Water Status ◽  
Irrigation Management ◽  
Nitrogen Pressure ◽  
Irrigation Scheduling ◽  
Pressure Chamber ◽  
Plant Water ◽  
Stem Water Potential ◽  
Stem Water ◽  
Time Required

In a number of tree crops, we have found that the water potential of lower canopy, nontranspiring leaves, measured with the pressure chamber at midday (midday stem water potential), is an excellent index of plant water stress and can be used for irrigation scheduling. Because stem water potential is typically much higher than transpiring leaf water potential, a lower pressure is required for the measurement, allowing us to design and build a lightweight device that could be easily operated by hand. The prototype was designed for pressures up to 2 MPa, which is sufficient for most irrigation conditions. A number of design features were incorporated into the sealing gland to eliminate the need for retightening during the pressurization process, reduce the amount of tissue external to the pressure chamber, and allow a greater visibility of the petiole. Identical values to those obtained with the standard, compressed nitrogen pressure chamber were obtained over the entire 2-MPa range, and the time required using either device under field conditions was the same (about 1 min per measurement). A number of alternative protocols were tested, and we found that even substantial recutting of the petiole had no influence on the measured water potential, contrary to popular belief. We also found that the same sample could be remeasured multiple times (five), with no net change in the water potential, allowing the measurement to be checked if necessary. This device should be of great utility in field irrigation management.

scholarly journals A few words on grapevine leaf water potential

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Deloire ◽  
Anne Pellegrino ◽  
Suzy Rogiers
Keyword(s):  
Water Supply ◽  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Water Status ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Mitigation Strategies ◽  
Drought Mitigation ◽  
Stem Water ◽  
Potential Methods ◽  
Precision Irrigation

The majority of vineyards are grown under limiting water supply, with consequences on grapevine physiology, berry growth and composition/quality versus wine styles. Assessing vine water status is crucial to understand vine function and to optimize drought mitigation strategies, such as irrigation. In this regard, the leaf water potential methods, notably predawn and stem water potentials, are relevant for quantifying vine water status and are generally used as references to calibrate others methods and/or for precision irrigation. 

scholarly journals Water relations of woody perennial plant species

OENO One ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth A. Shackel
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Conductance ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Stem Water Potential ◽  
Woody Perennial ◽  
Stem Water ◽  
Irrigation Treatments ◽  
Woody Crop

<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Aims</strong>: To describe the relation of various water status measures of woody perennial plants (predawn and midday stem and leaf water potential), to indices of physiological activity such as leaf conductance, vegetative growth and fruit growth and composition.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Methods and results</strong>: Almonds were exposed to three levels of irrigation over three years, and midday stem water potential (SWP) and leaf conductance, collected at approximately weekly intervals, is reported for the third year of the study. A strong linear increase in both leaf conductance and trunk growth occurred with increasing SWP, and this relation was consistent both within and between treatments. A similarly positive linear relation was found between SWP and fruit size in pear, with a negative relation between SWP and fruit soluble solids and fruit color. In grapevine, SWP was found to be uniform across all lower canopy positions tested (trunk, cordon and near the base of current year shoots) and positively correlated to early season shoot growth even before irrigation treatments were applied. Midday SWP was found to be more sensitive than midday leaf water potential (LWP) for detecting treatment differences over the course of the season, but both were well correlated to average seasonal leaf conductance within and between irrigation treatments. Predawn SWP and LWP were not as well correlated to average seasonal leaf conductance, but the most important factor determining midday leaf conductance was wind speed, indicating that grape leaf stomatal responses are quite sensitive to this environmental factor.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Conclusion</strong>: In a wide variety of woody crop species midday stem water potential (SWP) has been found to be a valuable tool for quantifying the degree of water stress experienced by the plant, and for understanding the physiological responses of the plant to water limited conditions. In grapevine, SWP detected irrigation differences over 1 month sooner than midday leaf water potential when the number of vines used and the number of samples taken were the same for both methods, and SWP had a higher correlation to leaf conductance than predawn leaf or stem water potential.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Significance and impact of study</strong>: SWP as a standard method for quantifying water stress in grapevine and other crops will aid research in the development of reliable management practices to improve crop productivity and quality.</p>

scholarly journals Leaf and stem water potential as vine water status indicators, in Tempranillo grapevine, under different water regimes in the Duero valley

OENO One ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Jesús Yuste ◽  
I. Gutiérrez ◽  
José Antonio Rubio ◽  
María del Valle Alburquerque
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Water Status ◽  
High Density ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Middle Zone ◽  
Stem Water Potential ◽  
Irrigation Rate ◽  
Solar Noon

<p style="text-align: justify;">Attempts have been made to determine the water status of vineyards using different methods, with variable results according to the different authors. Therefore, various methods have been used to estimate soil humidity (TDR, tensiometer, neutron probe, etc.) and the water status of the plant (dendrometer, porometer, leaf water potential, xylem water potential, etc.). The leaf water potential measured with leaf and «bagged» leaf, which are subjected to comparison in this report, are two useful and simple methods for finding out the water status of the vines, based on the use of a simple instrument that is acceptably available in economic terms, the pressure chamber.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The trial was performed at an experimental Tempranillo vineyard in which the main source of variation was the watering regime (no irrigation, 20 % ETo irrigation, 40 % ETo irrigation) and in which a change in planting density was also included (low, 2.7x1.4 m; high, 2.2x1.5 m). The resulting experimental treatments were: B00 (low density and no irrigation), B20 (low density and 20%ETo), H20 (high density and 20%ETo) and H40 (high density and 40 % ETo). The total amount of water applied to the treatments with the lesser irrigation rate (0.2 ETo mm) was equal to 61 mm and to the treatment with the higher irrigation rate (0.4 ETo mm) was equal to 122 mm, up to the week of August 29, 2002. The measurements of Yf were performed before dawn (aa) on June 14, at solar noon (12:00 p.m.) on July 19 and 26 and on August 29, 2002, on adult leaves located in the middle zone of the shoot, above the height of the clusters, on the eastern face of the trellised vines. Yx was measured at 6:00 a.m. on June 14 and at solar noon (12:00 p.m.) on July 19 and 26 and on August 29, 2002, also on adult leaves in the middle zone of the shoot, above the zone of the clusters, leaves located on the western face of the trellised vines and therefore shaded, and covered at least one hour prior to taking the measurement.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The relationship between the water potential of the leaf and that of the «bagged» leaf has proven to draw closer as the cycle has advanced and the vines have been more stressed, in such a way that the best relationship between the two indicators was obtained in the measurement performed at the end of the month of August. When the water differences are very notable, both indicators are able to show the water status of the vineyard expected in accordance with the rate of irrigation applied.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The measurement of water potential of the leaf has been easier to take, because it is not necessary to cover the leaves prior to taking the measurement (except in the measurement before dawn, in which case one must be in the vineyard at an unpleasant hour). However, using the potential of the xylem it has been possible to make better observations of the differences between treatments, when these differences are not very important.</p>

scholarly journals Towards Vine Water Status Monitoring on a Large Scale Using Sentinel-2 Images

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1837
Author(s):  
Eve Laroche-Pinel ◽  
Sylvie Duthoit ◽  
Mohanad Albughdadi ◽  
Anne D. Costard ◽  
Jacques Rousseau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Water Potential ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Water Status ◽  
Vegetation Indices ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Severe Drought ◽  
Stem Water Potential ◽  
Stem Water ◽  
Sentinel 2

Wine growing needs to adapt to confront climate change. In fact, the lack of water becomes more and more important in many regions. Whereas vineyards have been located in dry areas for decades, so they need special resilient varieties and/or a sufficient water supply at key development stages in case of severe drought. With climate change and the decrease of water availability, some vineyard regions face difficulties because of unsuitable variety, wrong vine management or due to the limited water access. Decision support tools are therefore required to optimize water use or to adapt agronomic practices. This study aimed at monitoring vine water status at a large scale with Sentinel-2 images. The goal was to provide a solution that would give spatialized and temporal information throughout the season on the water status of the vines. For this purpose, thirty six plots were monitored in total over three years (2018, 2019 and 2020). Vine water status was measured with stem water potential in field measurements from pea size to ripening stage. Simultaneously Sentinel-2 images were downloaded and processed to extract band reflectance values and compute vegetation indices. In our study, we tested five supervised regression machine learning algorithms to find possible relationships between stem water potential and data acquired from Sentinel-2 images (bands reflectance values and vegetation indices). Regression model using Red, NIR, Red-Edge and SWIR bands gave promising result to predict stem water potential (R2=0.40, RMSE=0.26).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document