scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP NOTARIS YANG TERINDIKASI TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUATAN AKTA OTENTIK

2016 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heriyanti ,
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Authority ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
The Public ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Government Authority

Abstract This article will describe how the legal protection of the notary who indicated a criminal offense in connection with the authentic deed made. To implement articles of the Criminal Code by Prosecutors and judges in order to drag notary into criminal case because Indonesia’s Law Number 2 of 2014 does not contain the who was appointed and dismissed by the public authority (government) and was given the authority and the obligation to serve the public, and therefore he participate to implement a government authority. the research conclusion describe that the legal protection of the Notaries in performing his respective which include right of refusal, liabilities broken and exclusive rights when summoned for questioning by investigators, prosecutors or judges, which is subject to approval of the Honorary Council of Regional Notary Keywords: legal protection, notary public, criminal act, authentic deed Abstrak Artikel ini akan mendeskripsikan bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap notaris yang terindikasi tindak pidana sehubungan dengan akta otentik yang dibuatnya. Penuntut umum dan hakim pada umumnya menerapkan pasal-pasal tertentu dalam Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) untuk menyeret notaris ke dalam perkara pidana karena Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) sama sekali tidak memuat konsep dan sistem pertanggungjawaban pidana notaris.Jabatan notaris adalah jabatan publik karena notaris diangkat dan diberhentikan oleh pemerintah. Notaris menjalankan tugas negara dan akta yang dibuatnya, yaitu minuta (asli akta), merupakan dokumen negara. Di Indonesia, notaris disebut sebagai Pejabat Umum karena diangkat dan diberhentikan oleh kekuasaan umum (pemerintah) dan diberi wewenang serta kewajiban untuk melayani publik dalam hal-hal tertentu, dan oleh karena itu ia ikut melaksanakan kewibawaan pemerintah. kesimpulan bahwa perlindungan hukum terhadap Notaris dalam menjalankan tugas jabatannya selaku Pejabat Umum dapat dilihat dalam beberapa instrumen yang mencerminkan hak-hak istimewa notaris, antara lain berupa hak ingkar, kewajiban ingkar dan hak ekslusif ketika dipanggil untuk dimintai keterangan oleh penyidik, penuntut umum atau hakim, yakni harus dengan persetujuan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Daerah. Kata kunci: perlindungan hukum, notaris, tindak pidana, akta otentik

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP NOTARIS YANG TERINDIKASI TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUATAN AKTA OTENTIK

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heriyanti
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Authority ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
The Public ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Government Authority

<p align="center"><em>A</em><em>b</em><em>s</em><em>tr</em><em>ac</em><em>t</em></p><p><em>T</em><em>h</em><em>i</em><em>s article will describe how the legal protection of the notary who indicated a criminal offense in connection with the authentic deed made. To implement articles of the Criminal Code by Prosecutors and judges in order to drag notary into criminal case because Indonesia’s Law Number 2 of 2014 does not contain the w</em><em>h</em><em>o was appointed and dismissed by the public authority (government) and was given the authority and the obligation to serve the public, and therefore he participate to implement a government authority. the research conclusion describe that the legal protection of the Notaries in performing his respective w</em><em>h</em><em>i</em><em>c</em><em>h include right of refusal, liabilities broken and exclusive rights when summoned for questioning by investigators, prosecutors or judges, which is subject to approval of the Honorary Council of Regional Notary</em></p><p><em>K</em><em>ey</em><em>w</em><em>o</em><em>r</em><em>d</em><em>s</em>: <em>l</em><em>e</em><em>g</em><em>a</em><em>l protection, notary public, criminal act, authentic deed</em></p><p align="center">Abstrak</p><p>Artikel ini akan mendeskripsikan bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap notaris yang terindikasi tindak pidana sehubungan dengan akta otentik yang dibuatnya. Penuntut umum dan hakim pada umumnya menerapkan pasal-pasal tertentu dalam Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) untuk menyeret notaris ke dalam perkara pidana karena Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) sama sekali tidak memuat konsep dan sistem pertanggungjawaban pidana notaris.Jabatan notaris adalah jabatan publik karena notaris diangkat dan diberhentikan oleh pemerintah. Notaris menjalankan tugas negara dan akta yang dibuatnya, yaitu minuta (asli akta), merupakan dokumen negara. Di Indonesia, notaris disebut sebagai Pejabat Umum karena diangkat dan diberhentikan oleh kekuasaan umum (pemerintah) dan diberi wewenang serta kewajiban untuk melayani publik dalam hal-hal tertentu, dan oleh karena itu ia ikut melaksanakan kewibawaan pemerintah. kesimpulan bahwa perlindungan hukum terhadap Notaris dalam menjalankan tugas jabatannya selaku Pejabat Umum dapat dilihat dalam beberapa instrumen yang mencerminkan hak-hak istimewa notaris, antara lain berupa hak ingkar, kewajiban ingkar dan hak ekslusif ketika dipanggil untuk dimintai keterangan oleh penyidik, penuntut umum atau hakim, yakni harus dengan persetujuan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Daerah.</p><p>Kata kunci: perlindungan hukum, notaris, tindak pidana, akta otentik</p>

INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION OF THE SPHERE OF BLOCKCHAIN FUNCTIONING AGAINST CRIMINAL OFFENCES: LANDSCAPE, DYNAMICS AND PERSPECTIVES

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 133-138
Author(s):  
SONA MKRTCHIAN ◽  
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Information Technologies ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
International Protection ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Telecommunications Network ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The purpose of the research is to identify the most successful ideas and legal techniques used in international law regarding regulations of defense against criminal offences in the sphere of cybersecurity, as well as blockchain functioning and cryptocurrency turnover. Results. On the basis of the positive international experience in regulating the criminal legal protection of relations in the last-mentioned sphere, the following directions for improving Russian criminal legislation were formulated: 1) fixation of the fair limits of the criminal administrative liability for defendant in reliance on the level of public danger of his personality and his offences; 2) creation of the formally defined crimes against computer information; 3) criminalization of some actions that precede cybercrimes; 4) expansion in the number of the mentioning of the sign "by interfering in the functioning of the resources of the storing, processing or transmitting computer information or data telecommunications network" as an essential or aggravating elements of crimes, typically committed with the use of information technologies (for example, in the articles number 133, 134, 135, 137, 138, 139, 146, 147, 163, 165, 240, 240.1, 241 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, etc.); 5) expansion in the number of the elements of crimes combined in the chapter 28 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, in reliance on the modern criminal schemes and typical criminal situations in the world of information technology; 6) expansion of the effect of the article number 274.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on any criminal offense to the critical information infrastructure of the Russian Federation and inclusion of the additional aggravating elements in the text of this article.

ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENGGELAPAN YANG TIMBUL DARI HUBUNGAN SEWA MENYEWA MOBIL DIKAITKAN DENGAN PASAL 372 KUHP

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-216
Author(s):  
Hurip Agustina ◽  
Dadang Suprijatna ◽  
Aal Lukmanul Hakim
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Bottom Layer ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Car Rental

Crime embezzlement car rentals are lately often devastating car rental owner. This is an issue where the meaning of a rule of law if the crime committed community can not be followed by the rule of law, such as crimes by way of evasion is one of the types of crimes against human wealth which is stated in Article 372 of the Criminal Code, which is a crime that does not exist inexhaustible, both from the bottom layer to the top layer of society can also be committing a criminal act embezzlement is a crime that originated from the existence of a trust in others, and that trust is lost because of the lack of an honesty. It is stated that the crime of embezzlement have a problem that is closely linked to attitudes, moral, mental, honesty and trust humans as individuals. The purpose of this study are as follows: 1) To determine and analyze the occurrence of the crime of embezzlement car rental. 2) To know and analyze the application of Article 372 of the Criminal Code the crime of embezzlement in the rental car. 3) To know and analyze the efforts of the police in preventing crime of embezzlement car lease. This study uses normative juridical approach that is used to make the description clear, systematic, transparent and precise about the facts / specific nature of the area and population which is then analyzed to obtain the desired facts. Criminal offense embezzlement rental car can be imprisoned if they meet the overall elements of the offenses charged by the public prosecutor and the offender accountable for his actions. If the offender does not meet one of the elements of which the accused, then it can not be convicted. The elements of criminal responsibility are: 1) committing illegal or criminal acts; 2) for the criminal should be able to be responsible; 3) to have a fault; 4) absence of an excuse. The conclusion from this study is the adoption of Article 372 of the Criminal Code in criminal offenses of embezzlement car rental where the incidence of criminal acts committed tenants for the rented goods belonging to the owner of the rental rights because of misuse or abuse of trust in which the crime of embezzlement are set in the provisions of Article 372 of the Criminal Code.

scholarly journals Analysis of the Implementation of Criminal and Administrative Offenses in the Perspective of Immigration Law Number 6 of 2011 (Case Study Djoko Soegiarto Tjandra)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-23
Author(s):  
Bima Yosua A Tarigan ◽  
Faridh Al Wajidi ◽  
K Karina
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Immigration Law ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Action ◽  
Administrative Sanction

Criminal action is an act that violates the rules and punishable by crime, while the immigration administrative action is an administrative sanction given to foreigners outside the judicial process. One of the cases that have been in the public spotlight is the criminal case of Cessie Bank Balicorruption and bribery related to the deletion of the wanted list (DPO) by Djoko Tjandra. This study uses a qualitative empirical normative legal approach with data collection in the form of library materials which include statutory regulations, books, papers, and other sources. The formulation of the problem discussed in this study is how the application of criminal acts and Immigration Administrative Measures (TAK) in Law Number 6 Of 2011 concerning Immigration which is charged against Djoko Tjandra. The purpose of this research is to find out the criminal acts and administrative immigration actions given to Djoko Tjandra who was an Indonesian fugitive for many years. Based on the data analysis carried out, it was concluded that criminal and administrative actions ensnared Djoko Tjandra and the elements who helped him in accordance with the applicable rules, namely as the provisions written in the Criminal Code, Law Number 20 Of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crime, and Law Number 6 Of 2011 concerning Immigration.

scholarly journals NOTARIS DALAM STATUS TERPIDANA YANG MASIH MENJALANKAN JABATANNYA

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Franky Roberto Gomies
Keyword(s):  
Drug Abuse ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

The purpose of this study is to determine the authority of a Notary Public in the period of parole in carrying out his position as a public official making an authentic deed and knowing the legal position of an authentic deed made by a Notary during the parole who performs the duties of a Notary Public. This type of research is normative juridical by using the statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach. From the results of the study note: First, the position of notary public, besides being a public official as well as a public official, so a notary must always maintain his honor and dignity and have a good personality. When a notary public commits a criminal offense, the Notary Position Act will also impose administrative sanctions. Of the cases examined in this study, a notary was sentenced to a criminal sentence for drug abuse, returning to his position as a notary public to serve the public while undergoing a period of parole. This is due to the negligence of the notary Supervisory Council that has been formed in stages starting from the Regional Supervisory Council, Regional Supervisory Council and Central Supervisory Council, which does not carry out its duties, functions and obligations properly. The two acts of notary that have legally lost their authority but re-practiced and served the community are acts that are carried out without authority so that the deed they make does not have power as an authentic deed.

scholarly journals Separate Filing (Splitsing) In Criminal Case Management

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 461
Author(s):  
Hidayat Abdulah
Keyword(s):  
Case Management ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Case File ◽  
The Public ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Court Process

In the implementation of the criminal case handling a lot of things that can be done to perfect evidence is the failure by one of them is doing a separate filing (splitsing). In Article 142 Criminal Procedure Code stipulates that the public prosecutor has the authority to separate docket (splitsing) against each defendant if found lacking evidence and testimony, as well as other matters that are not included in the provisions of Article 141 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Separation of the case must be based on solely the purpose of examination. That's what makes the public prosecutor has the authority to determine the case file should be separated (splitsing) or not. The purpose for doing the separation of the case file (splitsing) is to facilitate the enforcement of the prosecutor when the court process, to strengthen the evidence for lack of evidence when the process of verification, then a criminal offense committed by the offender more than one and the same time one of these actors into the search list (DPO) which allow splitsing.Keywords: Separate Filing; The Criminal Case.

scholarly journals Gugurnya Hak Menuntut Terhadap Korporasi Akibat Pailit

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Audaraziq Ismail ◽  
Eva Achjani Zulfa ◽  
Yutcesyam Yutcesyam ◽  
Fatiatulo Lazira
Keyword(s):  
Limited Liability ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Ne Bis In Idem ◽  
Bankruptcy Code

Prosecution is basically an action by the public prosecutor to delegate a criminal case to the competent District Court so that it is examined and decided by a judge in a court session. With regard to prosecution, Article 109 of the Criminal Procedure Code states that there are 3 reasons for stopping prosecution, namely that an event is not a criminal act, there is not enough evidence collected by investigators to prove the fulfillment of the elements in a criminal act and for the sake of law. The Criminal Code, First, with regard to the application of the principle of ne bis in idem. Second, if the Defendant dies, Third, Expires, Fourth, Settlement outside the court, Article 82 of the Criminal Code has described if an offense is threatened with a fine only, then prosecution can be avoided by paying the maximum fine directly. Against corporations, prosecution is limited by a number of provisions, in this case also including when the corporation is bankrupt. That as a result, if the entire corporate assets are included in the bankruptcy code, there will be a transfer of corporate licenses and an impact on the liquidation process. Thus, based on the provisions of Article 142 paragraph (1) of Law no. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, the corporation is dissolved. Thus, the prosecution of the bankrupt corporation can be dropped.

scholarly journals Ajaran Turut Serta Tindak Pidana Korupsi

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-52
Author(s):  
Harry Arfhan ◽  
Mohd. Din ◽  
Sulaiman Sulaiman
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Banda Aceh

Penyertaan pada dasarnya diatur dalam pasal 55 dan 56 KUHP yang berarti bahwa ada dua orang atau lebih yang melakukan suatu tindak pidana atau dengan perkataan ada dua orangatau lebih mengambil bahagian untuk mewujudkan suatu tindak pidana. Penyertaan di dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo Undang-Undang Nomor 20 tahun 2001 disebut sebagai pembantuan.Dalam putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor : 1769 K/PID.SUS/2015 menyatakan bahwa Terdakwa I Indra Gunawan Bin Alm. Saleh tersebut tidak terbukti secara sah dan menyakinkan bersalah melakukan perbuatan sebagaimana yang didakwakan dalam semua dakwaan Penuntut Umum dan Menyatakan Terdakwa II Irfan Bin Husen telah terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan bersalah melakukan tindak pidana “Turut Serta Melakukan Korupsi”. Majelis Hakim Judex Factie Pengadilan Tinggi/Tipikor Banda Aceh dalam memeriksa dan mengadili perkara Aquo telah salah dalam menerapkan hukum atau suatu peraturan hukum tidak diterapkan atau diterapkan tidak sebagaimana mestinya, yaitu mengenai penerapan hukum pembuktian sehingga harus dibatalkan oleh Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.The participation is basically regulated in articles 55 and 56 of the Criminal Code, which means that there are two or more people who commit a crime or say that there are two or more people taking part to realize a crime. The participation in the Law on the Eradication of Corruption Crime namely Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 is referred to as assistance. In the decision of the Supreme Court Cassation Number: 1769 K / PID.SUS / 2015 stated that Defendant I Indra Gunawan Bin Alm. Saleh is not proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing an act as charged in all charges of the Public Prosecutor and Stating Defendant II Irfan Bin Husen has been proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing a criminal offense "Also Participating in Corruption". Judex Factie Judge of the High Court / Corruption Court in Banda Aceh in examining and adjudicating the case of Aquo has been wrong in applying the law or a legal regulation was not applied or applied improperly, namely regarding the application of verification law so that it must be canceled by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia.

scholarly journals Legal Protection for Child Kidnapping Victims: Case Study in Gianyar District Court

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 333
Author(s):  
Komang Suartana ◽  
I Made Wirya Darma
Keyword(s):  
Child Protection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Specific Context ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Special Protection

This article aims to analyze how the crime of child kidnapping is covered in the Indonesian Criminal Code and the type of sanctions that can be imposed on the perpetrator of the crime of child kidnapping. It is a legal research that uses statutory, conceptual, and case approaches in discussing the legal protection of child kidnapping victims. In order to illustrate how the law that protects the victim of child kidnapping is applied by the court, it presents a case study at the Gianyar District Court that investigated a criminal offense of child kidnapping in 2018. The results reveal that the Indonesian Criminal Code classifies child kidnapping as a crime that is punishable as stipulated in Article 330 of the Code. In a more specific context, Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 22 of 2003 concerning Child Protection includes child kidnapping as a case that needs to be given special protection  A case study regarding the imposing of sanctions on the perpetrator of child kidnapping can be seen in a criminal case before the District Court of Gianyar in 2018. In the judgment, the panel of judges imposing a sentence against the defendant in the form of imprisonment of 8 (eight) years in prison and a fine of Rp. 60,000,000 (sixty million rupiah) subsidiary 6 (six) months in prison;

scholarly journals Public danger of crime: the concept and criteria of verification

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 124-140
Author(s):  
Natalia A. Lopashenko ◽  
Arina V. Golikova ◽  
Elena V. Kobzeva ◽  
Darya A. Kovlagina ◽  
Mikhail M. Lapunin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Objective Assessment ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of

The subject. The article reveals theoretical, lexical and logical approaches to determining the essence of the public danger of crime. The purpose of the article is to confirm or dispute hypothesis that the public danger of crime as a legal or theoretical construction represents the possibility of negative changes in society; public danger is an exclusive social feature of criminal acts. The authors also aim to develop a system of verifiable criteria for public danger. The methodology of the research is an objective assessment of the public danger as legal category. It is performed selecting a system of verified factors of public danger on the basis of analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, interpretation of legal literature. The main results, scope of application. The meaning of the legal definition of a crime contains the purpose of preventing possible harm to society stipulated in the criminal law. This fact is due to the preventive task (part 1 of article 2 of the Russian Criminal Code). The public danger of crime as a phenomenon of objective reality is meaningless, since the crime is the negative changes and harm that has occurred. The social danger of crime creates a shock to the foundations of society, undermines the conditions of its existence. Other ("non-criminal") offenses that contradict the established law and order in the state do not threaten the basic system of social values. Intersectoral differentiation of legal responsibility should have transitivity, which includes a rule: the degree of repression of coercive measures within various branches of law meets the rules of hierarchy. Mandatory signs of public danger of a crime are that the act: 1) affects significant social relations that need criminal legal protection from causing harm to them by socially dangerous behavior; 2) has a harmful potential that is fraught with causing significant harm or creating a threat of causing such harm to the object of criminal legal protection; 3) results in socially dangerous consequences; 4) is characterized by the guilty attitude of the subject to the deed, expressed in the form of intent or carelessness. Optional criteria of public danger of act are: the characteristics of the crime and characteristics of victim; method of committing a crime; the time, place, atmosphere, instruments and means of committing the crime; the motive; the object of the crime; special characteristics of the perpetrator. The quantitative indicators (size, severity, or other value) of the subject of the offense and its socially dangerous consequences, as well as the repetition of the act and the presence of a special recidivism of crimes should not be used as criteria for public danger of behavior. Conclusions. Public danger is a social feature exclusively of criminal acts (crimes and potential criminal misdemeanors); all other types of offenses are harmful to the interests of society, but they do not pose a danger to it. To exclude competition between criminal and administrative responsibility, it is necessary to take into account the public danger of the crime on the basis of verifiable factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document