Commentary: 2-year follow up of pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial cancer (“KEYNOTE 045”)

51 Background: In 2021, 14,480 patients are estimated to be diagnosed with cervical cancer in the US; 16% of patients are expected to have metastatic disease for whom the 5-year survival rate is 17.6% per SEER estimates. Patients with metastatic cervical cancer (mCC) are treated mainly with systemic therapy. This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics, demographics, treatment patterns, and economic burden of patients with mCC receiving systemic therapy. Methods: Eligible women had been diagnosed with cervical cancer, as evidenced by >2 outpatient or >1 inpatient claim in the Optum Research Database from January 2014 through January 2020. Patients were included if they had metastasis within 6 months before or after cervical cancer diagnosis, with evidence of systemic treatment on or after the latter of a claim date for cervical cancer disease or metastatic disease. The index date was the first-line treatment initiation date. Patients were required to have ≥6 months of pre-index continuous enrollment. The top 3 treatment regimens and median treatment duration by line of therapy were described. All-cause per-patient-per-month (PPPM) costs (2019 US dollars), including plan and patient paid amounts, were reported for full follow-up period from first-line and second-line therapy initiation. Results: The study sample consisted of 778 patients (mean age, 59 years; commercial, 58%; Medicare Advantage, 42%). The mean (median) follow-up period was 14 (9) months. Top baseline comorbidities were diseases of the urinary system (71%) and diseases of the female genital organs (70%), and the median Charlson comorbidity index was 7. In the first line, 80% of patients received platinum-based therapy and 23% received bevacizumab (bev). Of 778 patients, only 294 (38%) received second-line therapy, with 34% receiving bev. Top first-line treatment regimens were carboplatin + paclitaxel (27%), cisplatin (21%), and bev + carboplatin + paclitaxel (10%); the median (95% CI) duration of treatment was 3.4 (3.1-3.7) months. Top second-line treatment regimens were bev + carboplatin + paclitaxel (13%), carboplatin + paclitaxel (11%), and pembrolizumab (6%); the median duration of treatment was 3.8 (3.1-4.2) months. Mean all-cause total PPPM costs were $19,519 from first-line and $22,660 second-line therapy initiation (table). Conclusions: This study indicates that real-world mCC patients have short treatment durations and significant economic burden with first-line and second-line therapy. Novel therapies associated with greater clinical benefits in patients with mCC may provide economic benefit.[Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Cyclosporine Treatment in Patients with MDS.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v110.11.4608.4608 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 110 (11) ◽

pp. 4608-4608

Author(s):

Alina Kokhno ◽

Elena Parovitchnikova ◽

Elena Mikhailova ◽

Yulia Olshanskaya ◽

Irina Kaplanskaya ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Stable Disease ◽

Response Rate ◽

Bone Marrow Failure ◽

Normal Karyotype ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy

Abstract Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) represents a heterogenous group of myeloid neoplasms characterized by abnormal differentiation and maturation of myeloid cells, bone marrow failure and genetic instability. The recent clinical and laboratory investigations suggest that MDS is closely related to diseases in which the bone marrow failure is mediated at least in part by the immune system. The are few studies concerning the of efficacy of treatment of MDS pts with cyclosporine A (CSA) but they are limited to the group of pts with bone marrow hypoplasia. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of CSA treatment in MDS pts as first line or second line therapy. 48 pts with different forms of MDS were included in study. The group of first line CSA treatment included 30 pts, male-18/female-12, RA-3, RARS-1, RCMD-18, RAEB-7, RAEBt-1, 20-normal karyotype, 10-different abberations including: 5q−, 16q+, −7, 12q+, −Y, [11p+,7q−] and complex abb. Hypoplastic bone marrow was revealed in 15 pts, hyperplastic-8 pts, hypo/hyper-7 pts. Second line therapy group included 18 pts, male-9/female-9, RCMD-11, RARS-1, RAEB-5, RAEBt-1, normal karyotype-3, cytogenetic anomalies-13 (+8, 5q−,−7, +8 and complex abb.). Hypoplastic bone marrow was revealed in 12 pts, hyperplastic-4 pts, hypo/hyper-4 pts. The first line therapy consited of splenectomy in 8 pts, low doses of Ara-C-3, interferon-α-3, chemotherapy-2 and ATG-2 pts. CSA was applied at 5–10 mg/kg/day initially and then adjusted according to blood levels and toxicity. The maintenance dose was 1–3 mg/kg/day. Minimum time to response evaluation was one month. Complete response (CR) was defined as normal PB counts, BM aspirate; partial response-improvement of PB counts to 50% of normal and freedom from transfusions; stabilization-decrease of transfusion requirements and stabilization of PB counts for more then 1 month. Total response rate in first group was 60% (18 pts) with median follow up of 10 months (2–134). CR was estimated in 20% (6pts), median follow-up 72 months (44–134). 2 pts with CR are in clonal remission. 2 pts from response group developed acute leukemia (AL). 40% of pts showed no response.58% of pts without response developed RAEB or AL. 42% of pts were in stable disease and were treated with another modalities. The response rate in second group was 61% (11 pts) with median follow-up of 7 months (1–78). 22% (4 pts) achieved CR, median follow-up 60 months (43–78). 39% of pts showed no response. 71% from these pts (5) transformed to RAEB or AL. 2 pts remained in stable disease. In both groups response was registrated from 1 to 4 months from treatment initiation (median 3 months). CR was achieved in the majority of pts after 1 year of treatment. Response was achieved in 77% of pts with hypo/hyper and hypoplastic bone marrow and in 12% of pts with hyperplastic bone marrow. Overall survival was decreased in pts with more the 5% blasts in bone marrow (p=0,02 for 1st line group, p=0,075 for 2nd line group), and increased for pts with hypo and hypo/hyper bone marrow cellularity (p=0,002 for 1st line group). There was no impact of cytogenetics. We may conclude, that CSA demonstrates good efficacy in therapy of MDS pts, especially for pts with RA, RARS and RCMD with hypo and hypo/hypercellular bone marrow and reactive lymphoid nodules in bone marrow. It can be initiated as 1st or 2nd line therapy and should be continued at least for 3 months before evaluating of response.

Download Full-text

Splenectomy Is Still a Valid Option For Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.5129.5129 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 5129-5129

Author(s):

Alessandro Pulsoni ◽

Pasqualina D'Urso ◽

Gianna Maria D'Elia ◽

Giorgia Annechini ◽

Caterina Stefanizzi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Marginal Zone ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Marginal Zone Lymphoma ◽

Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma ◽

Spleen Size ◽

Second Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy

Abstract Introduction Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is an indolent B-cell lymphoma characterized by splenomegaly, frequent moderate lymphocytosis with or without villous morphology and possible involvement of various organs, especially the bone marrow (BM). Diagnosis is classically based on the spleen histology, but it can be made on the BM biopsy, based on the typical intrasinusoidal cell infiltration pattern and immunohistochemistry. Different therapeutic options are available, but to date there are no conclusive comparative data. Patients and methods We retrospectively analyzed 83 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of SMZL observed at our Institution between 1999 and 2013. The diagnosis was based on the BM biopsy in 79 patients; the BM was negative in 4 patients. Diagnosis was histologically confirmed on the spleen in 27 patients who underwent splenectomy. Patients presented a median age of 72.5 years (range 38-84); 43 were males. The median spleen size at diagnosis was 145 mm, ranging from 100 to 300 mm. The majority of patients were stage IV at diagnosis for BM infiltration (95%); B symptoms were present in 4 of them (4.8%). Forty-two patients (50.6%) had a lymphocytosis at diagnosis and 13 (15.6%) presented an IPI score higher than 3. Thirty-five of them (42%) had a MZL BM infiltration superior to 30% of the total bone cellularity. Forty-two patients (50.6%) underwent a watch and wait policy (WW), while 41 (49.4%) were treated within 6 months from diagnosis, mainly because of symptomatic splenomegaly; in these patients, treatment consisted of splenectomy, chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus immunotherapy with Rituximab. The features of patients submitted to WW with respect to patients treated at diagnosis were comparable for the various parameters mentioned above, except for spleen size (higher in patients treated at presentation) and lymphocyte count (higher in patients who were observed). After a median follow-up of 64 months, the overall median survival was 96%. Among the 42 WW patients, 18 (42.8%) are still untreated after a median follow-up of 57.5 months, while 24 (57.2%) have required therapy; the median treatment-free interval in these patients was 25.5 months. Concerning the 41 patients who underwent treatment at diagnosis, after a median follow-up of 50 months, 13 (31.7%) have required a subsequent second-line treatment. The interval between first-line approach and re-treatment in patients treated at diagnosis was 30 months. Overall, 27 patients were treated with splenectomy only (either at diagnosis or after a WW period): only 6 of them (22%) had a subsequent progression after a median latency of 42 months; 26 were treated with chemotherapy alone (alkylating agents in the majority of them, combination therapy in a minority): 15 of them (60%) had a subsequent relapse or progression after a median of 9 months; 12 patients received a Rituximab-containing regimen: of these, only 2 (16%) have so far required a second-line therapy after 10 and 26 months respectively. Conclusions The WW policy is a valid option for asymptomatic patients: in these patients, after 4.5 years from diagnosis more than 40% is still untreated. In patients requiring treatment, splenectomy alone is followed in the majority of patients by a long period of good disease control: only 22% required a second-line therapy after 3.5 years. The addiction of Rituximab to chemotherapy seems to reduce the probability of relapse and to prolong the response duration. However, these preliminary data need to be confirmed by larger studies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

A phase II study of single agent abraxane as second-line therapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e16058 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e16058-e16058

Author(s):

S. S. Sridhar ◽

C. M. Canil ◽

A. Eisen ◽

I. F. Tannock ◽

J. J. Knox ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase Ii ◽

Joint Pain ◽

Urothelial Cancer ◽

Single Agent ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽

Cancer Setting

e16058 Background: Metastatic urothelial cancer progressing on or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy is incurable and has a very poor prognosis. There is no standard second-line therapy, but the taxanes including paclitaxel, have previously shown activity. Abraxane (ABI-007) is a novel well tolerated albumin-bound nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel. The goal of this study was to determine the efficacy and tolerability of single agent Abraxane in the second-line metastatic urothelial cancer setting. Methods: Patients with measureable metastatic urothelial cancer, who progressed on or after first-line cisplatin based chemotherapy were enrolled onto this phase II, two-stage multicenter trial. Patients received Abraxane 260 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. Clinical evaluation, CBC and blood chemistries were performed every cycle and restaging CT scans every 2 cycles. Results: Fourteen patients have been enrolled to date. Patient demographics: M: F 12:2; mean age 64 (range 45–80); ECOG 0:1:2 4:5:5. A total of 57 cycles, avg 4 cycles/ patient (range 1–9) have been administered. There were three dose delays due to neuropathy, pain, and low neutrophil count respectively. There were two dose reductions due to fatigue and neuropathy. Most frequent adverse events (AE) were fatigue, alopecia, anorexia, cough and joint pain; the most frequent grade 3+ AE were fatigue, joint pain, hypertension, joint stiffness and back pain. Fourteen patients are currently evaluable for best response using RECIST criteria. There have been 5 partial responses (PR), 5 stable disease (SD) and 4 progressive disease (PD). Conclusions: Single agent Abraxane was well tolerated in the 2nd line, cisplatin refractory/resistant metastatic urothelial cancer setting. Preliminary efficacy results are encouraging with a clinical benefit rate of 71% (10 out of 14 evaluable pts having either SD or PR). Stage 1 response criteria have been met and accrual is ongoing to a total of 48 patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Combination therapy of low-dose gemcitabine and paclitaxel in every 4 weeks for patients with platinum-resistant urothelial cancer whose performance status is 2 or 3.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.462 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽

pp. 462-462

Author(s):

Tomohiro Matsuo ◽

Yasuyoshi Miyata ◽

Yuji Sagara ◽

Kojiro Ohba ◽

Hideki Sakai

Keyword(s):

Combination Therapy ◽

Urothelial Cancer ◽

Low Dose ◽

Performance Status ◽

Control Group ◽

Second Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Experimental Group

462 Background: Platinum-based regimens are standard therapy for advanced urothelial cancer (UC). However, second-line chemotherapy is still not established. Therefore, best supportive care is often selected in patients with poor performance status (PS). In our hospital, combination therapy of low-dose gemcitabine and paclitaxel every 4 weeks is administered as second-line therapy for platinum-resistant patients with PS 2 or 3. We investigated the quality of life (QoL) and safety of our regimen in these patients. Methods: Forty-two advanced UC patients were treated with gemcitabine (700 mg/m2 on day 1) and paclitaxel (70 mg/m2 on day 1) every 4 weeks (experimental group). The QoL was evaluated using the short-form survey (SF)-36, and the data were collected on the day before the first cycle was started and 8 weeks after starting the therapy. In addition, survival analysis was performed between these patients and 30 patients who received no second-line therapy (control group). Results: In experimental group, one patient showed grade 3 anemia after the treatment. However, this patient also had severe hematuria before staring of the therapy. No patient had severe adverse events (grade 3 and higher) because of this therapy. The QoL score decreased after the therapy; however, the difference was not significant. With regard to efficacy, partial response was found in two patients, and the mean/SD survival period of the experimental group was 9.2/7.2 months. This period was significantly (P < 0.01) longer than that in the control group (5.8/2.4 months). In addition, 13 (31.0%) and 6 patients (14.3%) survived over 12 and 18 months, respectively. Conclusions: Combined therapy of low-dose gemcitabine and paclitaxel every 4 weeks was well tolerated, and the patient’s QoL was maintained after treatment. Some patients showed relatively long survival periods. We suggest that this treatment regimen is worthy of consideration as second-line therapy for patients with advanced UC with PS 2 or 3.

Download Full-text

Outcomes in patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) who discontinued (DC) first-line nivolumab + ipilimumab (N+I) or sunitinib (S) due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in CheckMate 214.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.7_suppl.581 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽

pp. 581-581 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Nizar M. Tannir ◽

Robert J. Motzer ◽

Elizabeth R. Plimack ◽

David F. McDermott ◽

Philippe Barthelemy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Groups ◽

High Dose ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Post Hoc ◽

Study Dose ◽

Clinical Trial Information

581 Background: The phase 3 CheckMate 214 trial demonstrated superior efficacy for N+I vs S in aRCC, although more patients discontinued N+I compared with S due to TRAEs. This is a post hoc analysis of outcomes in pts who DC N+I or S due to TRAEs. Methods: Untreated pts with clear cell aRCC were randomized 1:1 to N 3 mg/kg + I 1 mg/kg Q3Wx4 (induction) and then N 3 mg/kg Q3W (maintenance), or S 50 mg daily for 4 wk on, 2 wk off (6-wk cycles). This analysis includes all pts who DC due to TRAEs reported during extended follow-up (≤100 d after last study dose). Results: Of 550 N+I randomized pts, 135 (25%) DC due to TRAEs, most commonly increased ALT, diarrhea, and increased AST (all 3%); 64 (12%) of 535 S randomized pts DC due to TRAEs, most commonly increased ALT, diarrhea, and pancreatitis (all 1%). In N+I pts who DC due to TRAEs, 47% DC during N+I induction, 7% completed induction but no N maintenance, and 46% completed induction and received N maintenance (median [range] 8 [1–47] doses). At 30-mo minimum follow-up, ORR per investigator, CR rate, and 24-mo OS rate were higher in pts who DC N+I vs S due to TRAEs. Outcomes in pts who DC S due to TRAEs were similar to those in all S ITT pts and worse than in N+I pts who DC due to TRAEs (Table). At 24 mo, 42% of pts who DC N+I due to TRAEs were alive and free from second-line therapy. Consistent outcomes were seen in pts who DC N+I due to TRAEs across IMDC risk groups (data to be presented). Pts who DC N+I due to TRAEs experienced more immune-related select TRAEs and received more high-dose steroids (≥40 mg prednisone daily or equiv.), but times to onset and resolution and resolution rates of select TRAEs were similar vs all treated N+I pts. Conclusions: Discontinuation of first-line N+I due to TRAEs did not result in impaired outcomes, and a high proportion of pts remain alive and free from second-line therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02231749. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib in the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Policythemia Vera Resistant/Intolerant to Hydroxyurea

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-149612 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2581-2581

Author(s):

Roberto Latagliata ◽

Daniela Bartoletti ◽

Alessandro Andriani ◽

Massimo Breccia ◽

Elena Rossi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Real World ◽

Age Groups ◽

Second Line ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Dose Reductions

Abstract Introduction: Ruxolitinib (Rux) has been recently approved as second-line therapy in patients (pts) with Polycythemia Vera (PV) resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea (HU). Median age of PV pts enrolled in the pivotal Response trials was around 60 yrs; at present, no data is reported on the use of Rux in elderly pts. Aims: In a real-world cohort of PV pts treated with Rux, we investigated whether the efficacy and safety of Rux were comparable in pts who initiated therapy when aged ≥75 years compared with younger pts. Methods: After IRB approval, clinical/laboratory data of 934 WHO2016-defined PV pts followed in 29 Hematology Centers were retrospectively collected. Of them, 168 (17.9%) were considered resistant/intolerant to HU at any time during follow-up by responsible physician and shifted to Rux as second-line therapy. Results: Among the 168 pts treated with Rux, 42 (25%, median age 78.2 years) were aged ≥75 yrs at Rux start, 74 (44%, median age 67.7) were aged 60-74 and 52 (31%, median age 53) were <60 at Rux start. No significant differences were observed between the 3 groups, apart from a lower need for phlebotomies in pts aged ≥75 yrs and lower presence of palpable spleen in older pts (age ≥60), that more frequently switched to Rux due to HU intolerance (Table 1). Median duration of HU treatment was 41.0 months (IQR 14.6 - 85.8), with a trend for a longer median treatment duration in pts aged ≥75 [61.0 months (IQR 21.5 - 89.6) vs 35.9 months (IQR 13.4 - 79.6), p=0.04]. Rux starting dose was similar across age groups; however, more elderly pts underwent Rux dose reductions during follow-up (45.2% in pts aged ≥75 vs 28.6% in younger pts, p=0.04). Responses during Rux therapy are reported in Table 2, with no significant differences between the 3 groups at any time. In the overall cohort, response on PV-related symptoms at 6 and 12 months was significantly higher in pts who switched to Rux because of HU intolerance; however, this difference was not observed in pts aged ≥75 yrs. As to the most common hematologic Rux-related toxicities, grade 3-4 anemia and thrombocytopenia were observed in only 2 (1.2%) and 5 (3%) pts, with no difference across age groups (p=0.45 and p=0.18). However, any grade anemia and thrombocytopenia during Rux were more frequently observed in pts aged ≥75 (68.3% vs 51.7% of anemia, p=0.06 and 12.2% vs 3.5% of thrombocytopenia in younger pts, p=0.04). Nineteen and 4 pts experienced infectious and thrombotic complications during Rux with incidence rates of 0.59 and 0.12 per 100 patient-months, respectively, comparably in younger and older (≥75) pts (p=0.75 and p=0.29, respectively). Notably, 6 infections were herpes simplex/zoster virus, comparably distributed between the 3 groups (p=0.60). Permanent Rux discontinuation was needed in 14 pts (8.3%) after a median Rux exposure of 7.8 months (IQR 4.6 - 17.6) (incidence: 0.41 per 100 pts/months). Discontinuation was comparable between age groups, with Rux stop in 4 pts aged ≥75 yrs and 10 younger pts (2.4% vs 5.2% at 8 months, log-rank p=0.75). At last follow-up, 2 pts had died (1 from 2 nd neoplasia after 19.1 months from Rux start and 1 from acute leukemia after 3.3 years), both pts aged 60-74 yrs. Conclusions. In this real-world analysis, use of Rux in HU resistant/intolerant elderly PV pts was effective and safe despite the more frequent need for dose reductions. Older age should not discourage Rux therapy, but stricter hematological monitoring may be suggested. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Latagliata: BMS Cellgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Breccia: Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Bonifacio: Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Cavo: Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Accommodations, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squib: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Palandri: AOP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sierra Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text