scholarly journals A Scientometric Analysis of Neuroblastoma Research

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Illya Martynov ◽  
Jessica Klima-Frysch ◽  
Joachim Schoenberger
Keyword(s):  
Network Architecture ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Research Performance ◽  
R Package ◽  
Scientific Output ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
Valuable Insight ◽  
Mathematical Methods ◽  
Scholarly Data ◽  
Scientometric Study

Abstract Background: There are thousands of research articles in the field of neuroblastoma that have been published over the past few decades. However, the heterogeneity and variable quality of scholarly data may challenge scientists or clinicians to survey all published articles. However, holistic measuring and analyzing of neuroblastoma related literature by sophisticated mathematical methods can provide a unique opportunity to gain deep insights into the global research performance and collaborative architectonical structure within the neuroblastoma scientific community. In this scientometric study, we aim to determine the extent of the scientific output related to neuroblastoma research, focusing on the time period between 1980 and 2018. Methods: We apply novel scientometric tools, including Bibliometrix R package, biblioshiny, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace IV for comprehensive science mapping analysis of extensive bibliographic metadata which was retrieved from the Web of ScienceTM Core Collection database. Results: We demonstrate the enormous proliferation of neuroblastoma research during last the 38 years, including 12,435 documents published in 1,828 academic journals by 36,908 authors from 86 different countries. We determine the proportion of highly cited and never cited papers, “occasional” and “core” authors and journals. We identify the six most important clusters of authors and their interactions. Further, we show 10 (11.6%) of 86 countries were responsible for the three quarters of NB-related research output. Conclusions: These findings are crucial for researchers, clinicians, journal editors, and consortiums working in neuroblastoma area to understand the strengths and potential gaps in neuroblastoma research and to plan future investments in data collection and science policy. This first scientometric study of global neuroblastoma research performance provides valuable insight into the scientific landscape, co-authorship network architecture, international collaboration, and interaction within the neuroblastoma community.

scholarly journals A Scientometric Analysis of Neuroblastoma Research

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Illya Martynov ◽  
Jessica Klima-Frysch ◽  
Joachim Schoenberger
Keyword(s):  
Network Architecture ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Research Performance ◽  
R Package ◽  
Scientific Output ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
Valuable Insight ◽  
Scholarly Data ◽  
Prolific Authors ◽  
Scientometric Study

Abstract Background: Thousands of research articles on neuroblastoma have been published over the past few decades; however, the heterogeneity and variable quality of scholarly data may challenge scientists or clinicians to survey all of the available information. Hence, holistic measurement and analyzation of neuroblastoma-related literature with the help of sophisticated mathematical tools could provide deep insights into global research performance and the collaborative architectonical structure within the neuroblastoma scientific community. In this scientometric study, we aim to determine the extent of the scientific output related to neuroblastoma research between 1980 and 2018. Methods: We applied novel scientometric tools, including Bibliometrix R package, biblioshiny, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace IV for comprehensive science mapping analysis of extensive bibliographic metadata, which was retrieved from the Web of ScienceTM Core Collection database. Results: We demonstrate the enormous proliferation of neuroblastoma research during last the 38 years, including 12,435 documents published in 1,828 academic journals by 36,908 authors from 86 different countries. These documents received a total of 316,017 citations with an average citation per document of 28.35 ± 7.7. We determine the proportion of highly cited and never cited papers, “occasional” and prolific authors and journals. Further, we show 12 (13.9%) of 86 countries were responsible for 80.4% of neuroblastoma-related research output. Conclusions: These findings are crucial for researchers, clinicians, journal editors, and others working in neuroblastoma research to understand the strengths and potential gaps in the current literature and to plan future investments in data collection and science policy. This first scientometric study of global neuroblastoma research performance provides valuable insight into the scientific landscape, co-authorship network architecture, international collaboration, and interaction within the neuroblastoma community.

scholarly journals Environmental Literacy Research: Global Scientometric Mapping of Five Decades

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 963-973
Author(s):  
Vijay Kumar R ◽  
Thamizhiniyan K Thamizhiniyan K ◽  
Naseema S. Naseema S.
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Literacy ◽  
R Package ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
Science Mapping ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Bibliographic Data ◽  
Mapping Analysis ◽  
Scientometric Study ◽  
Conference Papers ◽  
Literacy Research

To date, there is no scientometric study conducted on Environmental Literacy (EL) literature. Hence, this paper aims to bridge this gap.We aimed fora holistic scientometric analysis of scientific literature available on EL, whichresulted in finding global research trends in EL research. We operatedthe following scientometric tools: VOSviewer and Bibliometrix R Package-Biblioshiny for complete science mapping analysis of the collected bibliographic data retrieved from Scopus database. We analysed the Scopus scientific research outcomes during the last 50 years. The outcome included438 total documents published and among them 354 were articles and 84 were conference papers published by1112 authors from 50 countries. The findings of this study arevital for policy makers, researchers and other working in environmental education and literacy development to understand the potential gaps and strength in the current EL research in Scopus literature.

scholarly journals Research Output and International Cooperation Among Countries During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scientometric Analysis

10.2196/24514 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. e24514
Author(s):  
Nadja Grammes ◽  
Dominic Millenaar ◽  
Tobias Fehlmann ◽  
Fabian Kern ◽  
Michael Böhm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Web Application ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Large Data ◽  
The United States ◽  
Scientific Output ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Collaborative Efforts

Background The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has instigated immediate and massive worldwide research efforts. Rapid publication of research data may be desirable but also carries the risk of quality loss. Objective This analysis aimed to correlate the severity of the COVID-19 outbreak with its related scientific output per country. Methods All articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic were retrieved from Web of Science and analyzed using the web application SciPE (science performance evaluation), allowing for large data scientometric analyses of the global geographical distribution of scientific output. Results A total of 7185 publications, including 2592 articles, 2091 editorial materials, 2528 early access papers, 1479 letters, 633 reviews, and other contributions were extracted. The top 3 countries involved in COVID-19 research were the United States, China, and Italy. The confirmed COVID-19 cases or deaths per region correlated with scientific research output. The United States was most active in terms of collaborative efforts, sharing a significant amount of manuscript authorships with the United Kingdom, China, and Italy. The United States was China’s most frequent collaborative partner, followed by the United Kingdom. Conclusions The COVID-19 research landscape is rapidly developing and is driven by countries with a generally strong prepandemic research output but is also significantly affected by countries with a high prevalence of COVID-19 cases. Our findings indicate that the United States is leading international collaborative efforts.

Scientometric Analysis of Pediatric Research Output in Global: A Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-25
Author(s):  
S. Abirami ◽  
R. Senthilkumar
Keyword(s):  
Medical Care ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Pediatric Research ◽  
Pediatric Care ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
Mathematical Methods ◽  
Thomson Reuters ◽  
Comprehensive Classification

Pediatric is a division of medicine dealing with the well-being and health check care of infants, children and adolescents. Pediatric is a newly developed medical branch, it was started developing only in the mid-19th century. “Abraham Jacobi” (1830–1919) is the father of pediatric. The American Academy of Pediatric [AAP] suggested that, the people should be under pediatric care up to the age of 21[1]. In human life attempting to examine the contribution of medical care and its advancement, the goal must be addressed to the medical care. In this analysis the pediatric research output in global from the year 2001-2016, the data were retrieved from web of science [WOS] by Thomson Reuters, presently maintained by Clarivate Analytics. The total records published during this study period [2001-2016] 20615 publications. The outcome of this analysis combined together and provided as a result by the use of Scientometric’s statistic and mathematical methods. When the researcher provides the comprehensive classification by using the research indicator, the major responsibility can hold by the quantitative studies. This quantitative or statistical and mathematical method is called as Scientometric analysis.

scholarly journals Scientometric Analysis of Research Output from Brazil in Response to the Zika Crisis Using e-Lattes

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Barros Sampaio ◽  
Antônio de Abreu Batista ◽  
Bruno Santos Ferreira ◽  
Mauricio L. Barreto ◽  
Jesús P. Mena-Chalco
Keyword(s):  
Research Output ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Scientific Output ◽  
Research Quality ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
Scientific Impact ◽  
The Public ◽  
Research Production ◽  
Brazilian Science ◽  
Practical Implications

AbstractPurposeThis paper aims to test the use of e-Lattes to map the Brazilian scientific output in a recent research health subject: Zika Virus.Design/methodology/approachFrom a set of Lattes CVs of Zika researchers registered on the Lattes Platform, we used the e-Lattes to map the Brazilian scientific response to the Zika crisis.FindingsBrazilian science articulated quickly during the public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) due to the creation of mechanisms to streamline funding of scientific research.Research limitationsWe did not assess any dimension of research quality, including the scientific impact and societal value.Practical implicationse-Lattes can provide useful guidelines for different stakeholders in research groups from Lattes CVs of members.Originality/valueThe information included in Lattes CVs permits us to assess science from a broader perspective taking into account not only scientific research production but also the training of human resources and scientific collaboration.

scholarly journals Media Literacy A Scientometric Study Based on Web of Science during 1989 2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 302-307
Author(s):  
Vishal Dattatray Bapte
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Media Literacy ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
Author Keywords ◽  
Link Strength ◽  
Prolific Authors ◽  
Scientometric Study ◽  
Literacy Research

The study aims to do the scientometric analysis of global research output of media literacy during last 30 years. These 30 years produced 1038 documents on media literacy which have been cited 15.37 per cent citation per item. Most of the articles were published during the block 2017-2020. Multiple co-authorship has been the trend in media literacy research. Primack, B (18), Austin, E. W. (17) and Hobbs, K. (14) are identified as the most prolific authors. Communicar with 96 publications is the most productive journal. Korea, South Africa and Norway registered the highest multiple collaboration ratio (MCR). USA, United Kingdom and Australia are the leading countries in terms of citations received. The co-authorship network reflects 175 clusters about the authors who came together to contribute on media literacy. Further co-occurrence of keywords is given on the basis of author keywords in which media literacy had the total link strength (TLS) of 729 with 329 documents.

Evaluating research performance of Coronavirus and Covid-19 pandemic using scientometric indicators

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 1443-1461
Author(s):  
Sidhartha Sahoo ◽  
Shriram Pandey
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Research Performance ◽  
Citation Impact ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
Subject Domain ◽  
Scientometric Indicators ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Scopus Database

PurposeThis study is an attempt to evaluating the growth of scientific literature in the domain of coronavirus and Covid-19 pandemic research based on scientometric indicators: prolific countries and relative citation impact (RCI); influential institutions; author analysis and network, h-index and citation; DC (degree of collaboration), CC (collaboration coefficient), MCI (modified collaboration index) in the subject domain of coronavirus and Covid-19 research.Design/methodology/approachThe authors adopted approaches to obtain the literature data from Scopus database from 2000 to 2020 by conducting a systematic search using keywords related to the studied subject domain. In total, 15,297 numbers of records were considered for the literature analysis considering the real significant growth of this subject domain. This study presented the scientometric analysis of these publications. Furthermore, statistical correlations have been used to understand the collaboration pattern. Visualization tool VOSviewer is used to construct the co-author network.FindingsThe present study found that 53.57% (8,195) of the research documents published on the open-access platform. Journal of Virology was found to be most preferred journal by the researcher producing around 839(5.48%) articles. USA and China dominate in the research output, and the University of Hong Kong has produced the highest number of research paper 547(3.58%). A significant portion of the research documents are published in the subject domain of medicine (49.70%), followed by immunology and microbiology (35.72%), and biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology subject domains (22.32%). There has been an unparalleled proliferation of publications on COVID-19 since January 2020 and also a significant distribution of research funds across the globe.Research limitations/implicationsThe study exclusively examines 15,297 research outputs which have been indexed in the Scopus database from 2000 to 2020 (till 01 April 2020). Thus, documents published in any other different channels and sources which are not covered in Scopus are excluded from the purview of research.Practical implicationsIt will be beneficial for researchers and practitioners worldwide for understanding the growth of scientific literature in the coronavirus and COVID-19 and identifying potential collaborator.Originality/valueConsidering the global impact and social distress due to the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic, this study is significant in the present scenario for identifying the growth of scientific literature in this field and evolving of this domain of research around the globe. The research results are useful to identify valuable research patterns from publications and of developments in the field of coronavirus and COVID-19.

scholarly journals Research Output and International Cooperation Among Countries During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scientometric Analysis (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadja Grammes ◽  
Dominic Millenaar ◽  
Tobias Fehlmann ◽  
Fabian Kern ◽  
Michael Böhm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Web Application ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Large Data ◽  
The United States ◽  
Scientific Output ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Collaborative Efforts

BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has instigated immediate and massive worldwide research efforts. Rapid publication of research data may be desirable but also carries the risk of quality loss. OBJECTIVE This analysis aimed to correlate the severity of the COVID-19 outbreak with its related scientific output per country. METHODS All articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic were retrieved from Web of Science and analyzed using the web application SciPE (science performance evaluation), allowing for large data scientometric analyses of the global geographical distribution of scientific output. RESULTS A total of 7185 publications, including 2592 articles, 2091 editorial materials, 2528 early access papers, 1479 letters, 633 reviews, and other contributions were extracted. The top 3 countries involved in COVID-19 research were the United States, China, and Italy. The confirmed COVID-19 cases or deaths per region correlated with scientific research output. The United States was most active in terms of collaborative efforts, sharing a significant amount of manuscript authorships with the United Kingdom, China, and Italy. The United States was China’s most frequent collaborative partner, followed by the United Kingdom. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 research landscape is rapidly developing and is driven by countries with a generally strong prepandemic research output but is also significantly affected by countries with a high prevalence of COVID-19 cases. Our findings indicate that the United States is leading international collaborative efforts. CLINICALTRIAL

Work Engagement and Research Output Among Female and Male Scientists

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lonneke Dubbelt ◽  
Sonja Rispens ◽  
Evangelia Demerouti
Keyword(s):  
Work Engagement ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Research Performance ◽  
Daily Work ◽  
Time Control ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
And Performance ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract. Women have a minority position within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics and, consequently, are likely to face more adversities at work. This diary study takes a look at a facilitating factor for women’s research performance within academia: daily work engagement. We examined the moderating effect of gender on the relationship between two behaviors (i.e., daily networking and time control) and daily work engagement, as well as its effect on the relationship between daily work engagement and performance measures (i.e., number of publications). Results suggest that daily networking and time control cultivate men’s work engagement, but daily work engagement is beneficial for the number of publications of women. The findings highlight the importance of work engagement in facilitating the performance of women in minority positions.

Questions to the Article of research output and international cooperation among countries during the COVID-19 pandemic (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Chun Kuo ◽  
Tsair-Wei Chien ◽  
Willy Chou
Keyword(s):  
Citation Analysis ◽  
International Cooperation ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Visual Representations ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
Medical Subject Headings ◽  
Pubmed Central ◽  
The Us ◽  
Circle Diagram

UNSTRUCTURED We read with great interest the study by Grammes et al. on research output and international cooperation among countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. The paper is a quantitative study using scientometric analysis instead of a qualitative research using citation analysis. A total of 7,185 publications were extracted from Web of Science Core Collection (WoS) with keywords of “covid19 OR covid-19 OR sarscov2 OR sars-cov-2” as of July 4, 2020. We replicated a citation analysis study to extract abstracts from Pubmed Central(PMC) with similar keywords mentioned above and obtained 35,421 articles relevant to COVID-10 matching their corresponding number of citation in PMC. one hundred top-cited atricles were selected and compared on diagrams. Social network analysis combined with citation numbers in articles was performed to analyze international cooperation among countries. The results were shown on a world map instead of the circle diagram in the previous study. A Sankey diagram was applied to highlight entities(e.g., countries, article types, medical subject headings, and journals) with the most citations. Authors from Chian dominated citations in these 100 top-cited articles rather than the US in publications addressed in the previous study. Both visual representations of the world map and Sankey diagram were provided to readers with a better understanding of the research output and international cooperation among countries during the COVID-19 pandemic

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document