scholarly journals Can virtual reality improve traditional anatomy education programmes? A mixed-methods study on the use of a 3D skull model

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi Chen ◽  
Jiawei Zhu ◽  
Cheng Cheng ◽  
Zhouxian Pan ◽  
Lingshan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
User Satisfaction ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Traditional Teaching ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Anatomical Structures ◽  
Skull Model ◽  
Teaching Anatomy ◽  
Theory Test

Abstract Background: Realistic, portable, and scalable lectures, cadaveric models, 2D atlases and computer simulations are being combined more frequently for teaching anatomy, resulting in major increases in user satisfaction. However, while digital simulations may be more portable, interesting, or motivating than traditional teaching tools, whether they are superior in terms of student learning remain unclear. This paper presents a study in which the educational effectiveness of a virtual reality (VR) skull model is compared with that of cadaveric skulls and atlases. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of teaching with VR to those of teaching with traditional teaching methods by administering objective questionnaires and perception surveys. Methods: A mixed-methods study with 73 medical students was carried out with three different groups: the VR skull (N=25), cadaveric skull (N=25) and atlas (N=23) groups. Anatomical structures were taught through an introductory lecture and model-based learning. All students completed the pre- and post-intervention tests, which were composed of a theory test and an identification test. Results: The participants in all three groups had significantly higher total scores on the post-intervention test than on the pre-intervention test; the post-interview test score in the VR group was not statistically significantly higher than those of the other groups (VR: 30 [22-33.5], cadaver: 26 [20-31.5], atlas: 28[20-33]; p=0.571). The participants in the VR and cadaver groups provided more positive feedback on their learning models than the atlas group (VR: 26 [19-30], cadaver: 25 [19.5-29.5], atlas: 12 [9-20]; p<0.0001).Conclusions: The skull VLR was equally efficient with cadaver skull and atlas in teaching anatomy structures. Such a model can aid individuals in understanding complex anatomical structures with a higher level of motivation and tolerable adverse effects.

scholarly journals Can virtual reality improve traditional anatomy educational programmes?A mixed-methods study on the use of a 3D skull model

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi Chen ◽  
Jiawei Zhu ◽  
Cheng Cheng ◽  
Zhouxian Pan ◽  
Lingshan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Test Score ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Traditional Teaching ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Anatomical Structures ◽  
Skull Model ◽  
Teaching Anatomy ◽  
Identification Test ◽  
Theory Test

Abstract Background: Realistic, portable, and scalable lectures, cadaveric models, 2D atlases and computer simulations are being combined more frequently for teaching anatomy, which result in major increases in user satisfaction. However, although digital simulations may be more portable, interesting, or motivating than traditional teaching tools, whether they are superior in terms of student learning remain unclear. This paper presents a study in which the educational effectiveness of a virtual reality (VR) skull model is compared with that of cadaveric skulls and atlases. The aim of this study was to compare the results of teaching with VR to results of teaching with traditional teaching methods by administering objective questionnaires and perception surveys. Methods: A mixed-methods study with 73 medical students was conducted with three different groups, namely, the VR group (N=25), cadaver group (N=25) and atlas group (N=23). Anatomical structures were taught through an introductory lecture and model-based learning. All students completed the pre- and post-intervention tests, which comprised a theory test and an identification test. The theory test consisted of 18 multiple-choice questions, and the identification test consisted of 25 fill-in-the-blank questions. Results: The participants in all three groups had significantly higher total scores on the post-intervention test than on the pre-intervention test; the post-intervention test score in the VR group was not statistically significantly higher than the post-intervention test score of the other groups (VR: 30 [IQR: 22-33.5], cadaver: 26 [IQR: 20-31.5], atlas: 28[IQR: 20-33]; p>0.05). The participants in the VR and cadaver groups provided more positive feedback on their learning models than the atlas group (VR: 26 [IQR: 19-30], cadaver: 25 [IQR: 19.5-29.5], atlas: 12 [IQR: 9-20]; p<0.001). Conclusions: The skull virtual learning resource (VLR) was equally efficient as the cadaver skull and atlas in teaching anatomy structures. Such a model can aid individuals in understanding complex anatomical structures with a higher level of motivation and tolerable adverse effects.

scholarly journals Can virtual reality improve traditional anatomy education programmes? A mixed-methods study on the use of a 3D skull model

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi Chen ◽  
Jiawei Zhu ◽  
Cheng Cheng ◽  
Zhouxian Pan ◽  
Lingshan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Test Score ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Traditional Teaching ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Anatomical Structures ◽  
Skull Model ◽  
Teaching Anatomy ◽  
Identification Test ◽  
Theory Test

Abstract Background Realistic, portable, and scalable lectures, cadaveric models, 2D atlases and computer simulations are being combined more frequently for teaching anatomy, which result in major increases in user satisfaction. However, although digital simulations may be more portable, interesting, or motivating than traditional teaching tools, whether they are superior in terms of student learning remain unclear. This paper presents a study in which the educational effectiveness of a virtual reality (VR) skull model is compared with that of cadaveric skulls and atlases. The aim of this study was to compare the results of teaching with VR to results of teaching with traditional teaching methods by administering objective questionnaires and perception surveys. Methods A mixed-methods study with 73 medical students was conducted with three different groups, namely, the VR group (N = 25), cadaver group (N = 25) and atlas group (N = 23). Anatomical structures were taught through an introductory lecture and model-based learning. All students completed the pre- and post-intervention tests, which comprised a theory test and an identification test. The theory test consisted of 18 multiple-choice questions, and the identification test consisted of 25 fill-in-the-blank questions. Results The participants in all three groups had significantly higher total scores on the post-intervention test than on the pre-intervention test; the post-intervention test score in the VR group was not statistically significantly higher than the post-intervention test score of the other groups (VR: 30 [IQR: 22–33.5], cadaver: 26 [IQR: 20–31.5], atlas: 28[IQR: 20–33]; p > 0.05). The participants in the VR and cadaver groups provided more positive feedback on their learning models than the atlas group (VR: 26 [IQR: 19–30], cadaver: 25 [IQR: 19.5–29.5], atlas: 12 [IQR: 9–20]; p < 0.001). Conclusions The skull virtual learning resource (VLR) was equally efficient as the cadaver skull and atlas in teaching anatomy structures. Such a model can aid individuals in understanding complex anatomical structures with a higher level of motivation and tolerable adverse effects.

scholarly journals Can virtual reality improve traditional anatomy educational programmes?A mixed-methods study on the use of a 3D skull model

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi Chen ◽  
Jiawei Zhu ◽  
Cheng Cheng ◽  
Zhouxian Pan ◽  
Lingshan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Test Score ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Traditional Teaching ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Anatomical Structures ◽  
Skull Model ◽  
Teaching Anatomy ◽  
Identification Test ◽  
Theory Test

Abstract Background: Realistic, portable, and scalable lectures, cadaveric models, 2D atlases and computer simulations are being combined more frequently for teaching anatomy, which result in major increases in user satisfaction. However, although digital simulations may be more portable, interesting, or motivating than traditional teaching tools, whether they are superior in terms of student learning remain unclear. This paper presents a study in which the educational effectiveness of a virtual reality (VR) skull model is compared with that of cadaveric skulls and atlases. The aim of this study was to compare the results of teaching with VR to results of teaching with traditional teaching methods by administering objective questionnaires and perception surveys. Methods: A mixed-methods study with 73 medical students was conducted with three different groups, namely, the VR group (N=25), cadaver group (N=25) and atlas group (N=23). Anatomical structures were taught through an introductory lecture and model-based learning. All students completed the pre- and post-intervention tests, which comprised a theory test and an identification test. The theory test consisted of 18 multiple-choice questions, and the identification test consisted of 25 fill-in-the-blank questions.Results: The participants in all three groups had significantly higher total scores on the post-intervention test than on the pre-intervention test; the post-intervention test score in the VR group was not statistically significantly higher than the post-intervention test score of the other groups (VR: 30 [IQR: 22-33.5], cadaver: 26 [IQR: 20-31.5], atlas: 28[IQR: 20-33]; p>0.05). The participants in the VR and cadaver groups provided more positive feedback on their learning models than the atlas group (VR: 26 [IQR: 19-30], cadaver: 25 [IQR: 19.5-29.5], atlas: 12 [IQR: 9-20]; p<0.001).Conclusions: The skull virtual learning resource (VLR) was equally efficient as the cadaver skull and atlas in teaching anatomy structures. Such a model can aid individuals in understanding complex anatomical structures with a higher level of motivation and tolerable adverse effects.

scholarly journals Can virtual reality improve traditional anatomy educational programmes?A mixed-method study on the use of a 3D skull model

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi Chen ◽  
Jiawei Zhu ◽  
Cheng Cheng ◽  
Zhouxian Pan ◽  
Lingshan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Mixed Method ◽  
User Satisfaction ◽  
Mixed Method Study ◽  
Traditional Teaching ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Skull Model ◽  
Complex Anatomy ◽  
Level Of Motivation ◽  
Theory Test

Abstract Background: Realistic, portable, and scalable lectures, cadaveric models, 2D atlases and computer simulations are being combined more frequently for teaching anatomy, resulting in major increases in user satisfaction. However, while digital simulations may be more portable, interesting, or motivating than traditional teaching tools, it is unclear whether they are superior in terms of student learning. This paper presents a study in which the educational effectiveness of a virtual reality (VR) skull model is compared with that of cadaveric skulls and atlases. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of teaching with VR with those of traditional teaching methods by administering objective questionnaires and perception surveys. Methods: A mixed-method study with 73 medical students was carried out with three different groups: the VR skull (N=25), cadaveric skull (N=25) and atlas (N=23) groups. Anatomical structures were taught through an introductory lecture and model-based learning. All students completed the pre- and post-intervention tests, which were composed of a theory test and an identification test. Results: The participants in all three groups had significantly higher total scores on the post-intervention test than on the pre-intervention test; the post-interview test score in the VR group was not statistically significantly higher than those of the other groups (VR: 30 [22-33.5], cadaver: 26 [20-31.5], atlas: 28[20-33]; p=0.571). The participants in the VR and cadaver groups provided more positive feedback on their learning models than the atlas group (VR: 26 [19-30], cadaver: 25 [19.5-29.5], atlas: 12 [9-20]; p<0.0001).Conclusions: The VR skull model was equally efficient as the cadaver skull and atlas in terms of enabling students to learn anatomy. In addition, VR can aid participants in understanding complex anatomy structures with a higher level of motivation and mild adverse effects.

scholarly journals Can virtual reality improve traditional anatomical education?: A randomized controlled trial on use of 3D skull model

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi Chen ◽  
Jiawei Zhu ◽  
Cheng Cheng ◽  
Zhouxian Pan ◽  
Lingshan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Positive Feedbacks ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Skull Model ◽  
Complex Anatomy ◽  
Identification Test ◽  
Theory Test

Abstract Background Anatomy teaching is trending towards a mixture of lectures, cadaveric models, 2D atlas and computer simulations. This paper presents a study which compare the educational effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) skull model with that of cadaveric skulls and atlas. Methods A randomized controlled study with 73 medical students was carried out with three different groups: VR skull (N = 25), cadaveric skull (N = 25) and atlas (N = 23). Anatomical structures were taught through an introductory lecture and a model-based learning. All students completed the pre- and post-intervention test, which is composed of a theory test and an identification test. Results Participants in all three groups gained significantly higher total scores at post-intervention test than at pre-intervention test; the post-identification test score of VR group was non-statistically higher than the other group (VR 30 [22-33.5], cadaver 26 [20-31.5], atlas 28[20-33]). Participants in VR and cadaver group provided more positive feedbacks on their learning models (VR 26 [19-30] vs. 25 [19.5-29.5] vs. 12 [9-20], p<0.05). Conclusions VR skull model showed equivalent efficiency in teaching anatomy structure as cadaver skull and atlas. In addition, VR can assist participants in understanding complex anatomy structures with higher motivation and tolerable adverse effects.

scholarly journals Transforming training into practice with the conflict management framework: a mixed methods study

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e001088
Author(s):  
Oscar Lyons ◽  
Liz Forbat ◽  
Esse Menson ◽  
Julia C Chisholm ◽  
Kate Pryde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Conflict Management ◽  
Management Training ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Management Framework ◽  
Semistructured Interviews ◽  
Conflict Management Training ◽  
Effective Adjunct ◽  
And Training

ObjectiveTo implement and evaluate the use of the conflict management framework (CMF) in four tertiary UK paediatric services.DesignMixed methods multisite evaluation including prospective pre and post intervention collection of conflict data alongside semistructured interviews.SettingEight inpatient or day care wards across four tertiary UK paediatric services.InterventionsThe two-stage CMF was used in daily huddles to prompt the recognition and management of conflict.ResultsConflicts were recorded for a total of 67 weeks before and 141 weeks after implementation of the CMF across the four sites. 1000 episodes of conflict involving 324 patients/families across the four sites were recorded. After implementation of the CMF, time spent managing episodes of conflict around the care of a patient was decreased by 24% (p<0.001) (from 73 min to 55 min) and the estimated cost of this staff time decreased by 20% (p<0.02) (from £26 to £21 sterling per episode of conflict). This reduction occurred despite conflict episodes after implementation of the CMF having similar severity to those before implementation. Semistructured interviews highlighted the importance of broad multidisciplinary leadership and training to embed a culture of proactive and collaborative conflict management.ConclusionsThe CMF offers an effective adjunct to conflict management training, reducing time spent managing conflict and the associated staff costs.

scholarly journals Feasibility and acceptability of a Takeaway Masterclass aimed at encouraging healthier cooking practices and menu options in takeaway food outlets

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2268-2278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances Hillier-Brown ◽  
Scott Lloyd ◽  
Louise Muhammad ◽  
Carolyn Summerbell ◽  
Louis Goffe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Training Session ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Food Outlet ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Food Outlets ◽  
North East ◽  
Cooking Practices ◽  
Reported Data ◽  
Minimal Effort

AbstractObjective:To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the Takeaway Masterclass, a three-hour training session delivered to staff of independent takeaway food outlets that promoted healthy cooking practices and menu options.Design:A mixed-methods study design. All participating food outlets provided progress feedback at 6 weeks post-intervention. Baseline and 6-week post-intervention observational and self-reported data were collected in half of participating takeaway food outlets.Setting:North East England.Participants:Independent takeaway food outlet owners and managers.Results:Staff from eighteen (10 % of invited) takeaway food outlets attended the training; attendance did not appear to be associated with the level of deprivation of food outlet location. Changes made by staff that required minimal effort or cost to the business were the most likely to be implemented and sustained. Less popular changes included using products that are difficult (or expensive) to source from suppliers, or changes perceived to be unpopular with customers.Conclusion:The Takeaway Masterclass appears to be a feasible and acceptable intervention for improving cooking practices and menu options in takeaway food outlets for those who attended the training. Further work is required to increase participation and retention and explore effectiveness, paying particular attention to minimising adverse inequality effects.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Visual Self-Expression in Virtual Reality on Psychosocial Well-Being With the Inclusion of a Fragrance Stimulus: A Pilot Mixed-Methods Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Girija Kaimal ◽  
Katrina Carroll-Haskins ◽  
Arun Ramakrishnan ◽  
Susan Magsamen ◽  
Asli Arslanbek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Negative Affect ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Art Making ◽  
Creative Agency ◽  
The Impact

AimsIn this pilot mixed-methods study, we examined the participants experiences of engaging in virtual drawing tasks and the impact of an olfactory stimulus (calming fragrance blend) on outcomes of affect, stress, self-efficacy, anxiety, creative agency, and well-being (satisfaction with life).MethodsThis study used a parallel mixed-methods, simple block randomization design. The study participants included 24 healthy adults aged 18 to 54 years, including 18 women and six men. The participants completed two 1-h immersive virtual art making sessions and were randomly assigned to receive either a fragrance or a non-fragrance condition for the first session. Quantitative (standardized self-report measures) and qualitative (open-ended survey responses and virtual artwork) datasets were collected concurrently and integrated during data analysis.ResultsThe quantitative results indicated that the fragrance condition demonstrated a significant reduction in negative affect (e.g., feeling hostile, jittery, upset, distressed, etc.), namely, reduced feelings of negativity when compared to the non-fragrance condition. A trend toward improvement in self-efficacy was also seen in the fragrance condition. No significant changes were found for fragrance or non-fragrance conditions for positive affect, anxiety, and creative agency. The qualitative findings included five themes related to art making experiences in virtual reality in both conditions: fun and joy; novelty of virtual media, experimentation, and play; relaxation and calm; learning curve; and physical discomfort and disorientation. Four themes were identified for virtual art content and visual qualities: nature imagery, references to memories and personal symbols, fantasy and play within imagery, and depiction of everyday objects.ConclusionsOverall, the participants reported positive responses to the novel virtual art making experiences which were further heightened by the inclusion of the fragrance stimulus for negative affect. These preliminary findings need to be replicated with larger sample sizes to confirm the outcomes and the trends that were seen in this pilot study. Further research is recommended to examine the differences between experiences of virtual and traditional art media and to examine different olfactory stimuli promoting focus and concentration.

scholarly journals Mixed methods study evaluating the implementation of the WHO hand hygiene strategy focusing on alcohol based handrub and training among health care workers in Faranah, Guinea

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0256760
Author(s):  
Sophie Alice Müller ◽  
Alpha Oumar Karim Diallo ◽  
Carlos Rocha ◽  
Rebekah Wood ◽  
Lena Landsmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Local Production ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Improvement Strategy ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Local Staff ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Introduction The most frequent adverse health events in healthcare worldwide are healthcare-associated infection. Despite ongoing implementation of the WHO multimodal Hand Hygiene (HH) Improvement Strategy, healthcare-associated infection rate continues to be twofold higher in low- than in high-income countries. This study focused on continued evaluation of HH compliance and knowledge. The mixed method approach, with inclusion of patients and care-givers, provided insight into challenges and facilitators of the WHO HH Improvement Strategy, and highlighted improvement points. Methods An uncontrolled, before-and–after intervention, mixed methods study in Faranah Regional Hospital was conducted from December 2017 to August 2019. The intervention implemented the WHO HH Strategy including HH training for healthcare workers (HCWs), and the relaunch of the local production of alcohol-based handrub (ABHR). A baseline assessment of HH knowledge, perception and compliance of HCWs was done prior to the intervention and compared to two follow-up assessments. The second follow-up assessment was complemented by a qualitative component. Results Overall compliance six months post-intervention was 45.1% and significantly higher than baseline but significantly lower than in first follow-up. Knowledge showed similar patterns of improvement and waning. The perception survey demonstrated high appreciation of the intervention, such as local production of ABHR. HCW’s were concerned about overconsuming of ABHR, however simultaneous quantitative measurements showed that consumption in fact was 36% of the estimated amount needed for sufficient HH compliance. Potential fields for improvement identified by HCWs to enhance sustainability were permanent ABHR availability, having a dedicated person with ownership over continuous simulation HH trainings including simulations to improve technique. Conclusion The study shows that the WHO multimodal HH strategy has a positive effect on HCW compliance and knowledge. Improvement points identified by local staff like sensitization on appropriate ABHR amount per HH action should be considered for sustainable HH improvement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document