scholarly journals Global Challenges of Digital Transformation of Markets: Collaboration and Digital Assets

Author(s):  
Vladimir Yadikin ◽  
Sergey Barykin ◽  
Vladimir Badenko ◽  
Nikolai Bolshakov ◽  
Elena de la Poza ◽  
...  

Abstract The objective of this study is an ontological analysis of the digital object (DO), of a relatively recent phenomenon that has emerged in relation to the performance of production enterprises. We analyzed the additional benefits that economic actors can gain from using the DO. This object is fairly well-understood from a technical point of view; although there are many options for its definition, its basic composition and functionality are defined clearly, but currently in the economic science DO has not yet been enough considered. The DO, which first appeared as a digital twin has not been properly explored by economic science. The ontological analysis of the DO within the existing conceptual framework of economic science are presented. The DO is comprehensively examined to determine whether all the properties and characteristics of the DO are described by modern economic language or whether there is a need to introduce new concepts and categories to describe such objects. We propose to analyze the DO in terms of such economic categories as goods, innovation process, the system of division of labor, the role of market participants in the creation and use of the DO, intellectual property, etc.

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 10619
Author(s):  
Vladimir Yadykin ◽  
Sergey Barykin ◽  
Vladimir Badenko ◽  
Nikolai Bolshakov ◽  
Elena de la Poza ◽  
...  

Cyber-physical system (CPS) and digital twin (DT) technologies are the key enablers of smart manufacturing. The main idea of CPS is to build bi-directional interaction channels between the physical and cyber worlds. The research gap is ontological consideration of the concept of the digital object (DO) as a representation of a physical object (PO) in the digital space/world. The objective of this study is an ontological analysis of the digital object (DO). This object is fairly well-understood from a technical point of view; although there are many options for its definition, its basic composition and functionality are defined clearly, but currently in the economic science DO has not yet been enough considered. The DO, which first appeared as a digital twin has not been properly explored by economic science. Authors attempt to determine whether all the properties and characteristics of the DO are described by modern economic language or whether there is a need to introduce new concepts and categories to describe such objects. The ontological analysis of the DO within the existing conceptual framework of economic science is presented. The result of the research is comprehensive study of DO which allows the consideration of the additional benefits that economic actors can gain from using the DO. We propose to analyze the DO in terms of such economic categories as goods; innovation process; the system of division of labor; the role of market participants in the creation and use of the DO; intellectual property; etc.


Resources ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Yury Nurulin ◽  
Inga Skvortsova ◽  
Iosif Tukkel ◽  
Marko Torkkeli

Knowledge has always been, and still is, a crucial source of economy. However, during the past few years we have seen a growing interest in treating knowledge as a significant organizational resource for innovation. This trend coincides with the rapid development of ICT, indicating the strong influence that ICTs have on the processes of creating, disseminating, and using knowledge. At present, issues of innovation management and knowledge management are studied independently, which creates a certain gap in the systemic understanding of the innovation development processes. The paper proposes an integrated approach to the issues mentioned. The hierarchy and taxonomy of knowledge are considered from the point of view of their influence on decision-making at different stages of the innovation lifecycle. Our proposition complements and contributes to several recent models of decision-making developed in the frame of the innovation process.


2020 ◽  
pp. 144-153
Author(s):  
G. B. Kleiner

The monograph “Mesoeconomics: Elements of a new paradigm”, prepared by the collective of Russian and foreign scientists, reveals the stages and genesis’s internal logic of one of the most promising areas of modern economic science — mesoeconomics. This article identifies the empirical, managerial, theoretical, and system-wide foundations for the need for mesoeconomics to arise as an independent discipline. The importance of the economy’s mesolevel for the transition to the trajectory of the sustainable evolutionary growth of Russia is emphasized. It is proposed to institutionalize the belonging of economic objects to the economy’s mesolevel, introducing the status of a “mesoeconomic organization” for them. It is a prerequisite for separating mesoeconomic formations from microeconomic objects and macroeconomic systems. This status allows introducing special tax regimes, facilitating access to state orders, while strengthening the social responsibility of the mesoeconomic organization to the state, business, economy, and society. The role of the Center for Evolutionary Economics of the Institute of Economics, RAS as the “assembly point” of modern research in the field of mesoeconomics is emphasized.


Author(s):  
Dmitrij Egorov

Over the past 100 years, economics has stood out from other scientific disciplines because of the presence of two fundamentally different approaches to understanding its subject: from a systemic point of view, and from the point of view of individual choice. All the main directions of modern economic theory turn out to be reducible to two paradigms, conceptually related to two main interpretations of the economic science subject. The understanding of the economy as an equilibrium or non-equilibrium system is associated with two said paradigms. The author believes that the development of economic theory after Keynes can be interpreted as a series of attempts to integrate the identified paradigms. In another form, this is the question of the synthesis of micro- and macro-approaches in economic theory. 


Author(s):  
Yu. A. Sergeeva ◽  
A. Kh. Kade ◽  
S. B. Bogdanov ◽  
A. I. Trofimenko

Since of the invention lipofilling, there was a significant change in ideas of the role used autologous fat tissue (Auto Fat) from natural filler of defects to the product for stimulating regeneration. There was a considerable evolution in technology of liposuction and Auto Fat processing, material and methodical providing of the procedure was improved. Opening and studying role of the stromal-vascular fraction (SVF) of the adipose tissue, in particular mesenchymal stem cells of the adipose tissue (MSC FT), promoted considerable extension of indications while using this method in aesthetic medicine. During experience accumulation of lipofilling application new concepts of application of Auto Fat in combination with MSC FT, platelet-enriched plasma (PRP) and growth factors were developed for scar correction. Understanding of a key role recipient area in succesful engrafting Auto Fat on scars resulted in development of transcutaneous aponeurotomy in a combination with a lipofilling (riggotomy). The procedure of a nanolipofilling which can be considered an attempt of the isolated use of lipofilling for regeneration stimulation and remodeling of cicatricial tissue was developed. However, despite the achieved success, carrying out further researches which would allow to confirm this method efficacy from the point of view evidence-based medicine and develop clear clinical guidelines about its application for treatment of dermal scars would be necessary.


2008 ◽  
pp. 20-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Khudokormov

The author considers modern economic theory from the point of view of crisis phenomena inherent to it. He recapitulates various aspects and positions of different authors and concludes that there is obvious presence of crisis tendencies in different fields of economic research. Nevertheless it is not worth talking about the crisis as there is no real alternative to neoclassical mainstream economics. Basing upon the detailed analysis of the state of modern economic science the article classifies its major schools and currents putting emphasis on the philosophical, political and ideological orientation of their main representatives.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 27-37
Author(s):  
Nina Konnova

The article is dedicated to the analysis of axiological ideas lying in the foundation of the modern economic science in general and theory of finances in particular. The concept of homo economicus and its origins are considered. Concept of the "homo economicus" is used in the modern philosophic and methodologic literature on methodologic questions of economical science is used in two meanings. The first considers homo economicus only as a technical construct or model created in the form of certain hypotheses and suppositions set taken in their limit form as an idealization. The second takes it as a certain anthropologic type characterized with according values and behavior. It was demonstrated that the concept of homo economicus has a long before-history consisting in gradual break-up between economical theory and ethics. The homo economicus is a person who build his behavior through calculation of his profit. The latter is a form of his self-discipline that forms a new system of norms free from moral and other similar things. The new system of norms suppose no stable tenets and axioms as it takes place in ethics but remains rational and is based on probabilities calculations. The evolution of economical science is regarded as well as its division into political philosophy and proper economic theory in the end of the XIX century, the role of the growth principle, the growth in spite of anything that stood to the first place in the time of the Great Depression and goes on occupying this place till now. It is demonstrated that the essence of money consists in being a symbol and sign of debt obligations, that the capital is representation of their accumulated form and moving power that makes market economics to move. It is shown also that namely the ideas of capital as well as labour compound axiological foundation of modern economical ideas. The homo economicus or economical man, that means individualistic and egotistic psychotype oriented onto profit and satisfaction of his desires, becomes conceptual ideal.


Organizations take the lead of any innovation process and thus they pave the way for further social changes. Small companies and start-ups are in the avant-garde of innovations, proposing disruptive solutions on the market. In the present chapter the author will analyze the role of organizations in the framework of new digitalization shift. The first part of the chapter will discuss organizational development from institutional point of view. Then there will be outlined the main understanding of organizational change, organizational change management in the framework of the system theory. Further there will be assessed the mechanisms and methodologies for measuring maturity assessment models and its impact on organizational capacity to adopt new technologies. Finally, there will be analyzed some of the key findings of digitalization processes including business model innovations and organizational transformation. In the end, a general analysis will be made about digitalization shifts, company transformation, and the role of the institutions in this process.


2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-198
Author(s):  
Deborah K. Ford ◽  
Brett Guidry

This article provides helpful information to researchers, students, and authors who wish to find and cite in-press articles in the Journal of Management ( JOM). Any manuscript that has survived the review process innately possesses relevant information, and having access to these articles in their final form the moment they are ready for publication holds obvious benefits. Reading in-press articles helps researchers keep abreast of current findings and the latest advances in the field. Citing in-press articles encourages the advancement of research and demonstrates up-to-date knowledge of the subject matter. In addition, these most current documents are essential when evaluating the potential contribution of a given article. Although the review process helps to determine whether or not submitted articles provide meaningful contributions, evaluating new concepts in the context of research that has already been accepted for publication assures that each new submission significantly advances the field.


2021 ◽  
pp. 146-152
Author(s):  
Galina Panova

The article considers topical issues of how banks are developing in the new realities of the digital economy, and presents the results of research on theoretical and practical aspects of banks' business models evolution. The methodology uses such approaches as scientific abstraction, system and factor analysis, methods of grouping, detailing, and synthesis. The topic is relevant for banks first of all from the economic science point of view, since until now the conceptual apparatus of not only the types of bank business models but also the definition of bank business models and their ecosystems remain controversial. However, in practice the applying of new strategic solutions is needed to solve the triune task: to ensure profitability of banks' business while maintaining liquidity and minimizing risks. The obtained results allowed us to reveal the important role of the banks' business models innovative transformation, as well as to reveal the tendency of improving the intermediary function of banks on the modern stage of digital technologies' development. The article substantiates the need to develop new approaches to administering business processes, expanding banking activities using digital platforms, and reveals the problem that requires the speediest solutions in developing regulation standards for financial ecosystems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document