scholarly journals Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Covid-19 Illness Severity Accounting for Concomitant Comorbidities: A Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongwei Ji ◽  
Natalie Achamallah ◽  
Nancy Sun ◽  
Patrick Botting ◽  
Peter Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Multiple reports have highlighted important racial and ethnic differences in the degree to which Americans may be vulnerable to severe forms of Covid-19 illness. Whether or not racial or ethnic disparities are related to variations in the underlying burden of comorbidities or other predisposing factors remains unclear.Methods We identified patients diagnosed with Covid-19, based on a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2, from the electronic health record of a large multi-hospital system located in Southern California. We developed an illness severity score, based on the level of care each patient required (not admitted to the hospital; required hospital admission but never required intensive care; required intensive level care but never intubation; and, required intubation during hospitalization) and assessed for associations with clinical and demographic factors for each patient using ordinal logistic regression.Results A total of 571 patients with Covid-19 were identified a majority of whom were male (56%), with a mean age of 55±21 years. There were 81 (14%) patient who identified as African American, and 101 (18%) as Hispanic. A total of 202 (36%) patients required hospitalization without need for intensive care, 43 (8%) required intensive care without intubation, and 64 (11%) required intubation while also receiving intensive care. Of the total sample, African American race (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.44-3.78, P=0.001) and Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.14-3.12, P=0.004) were associated with greater illness severity.Conclusions Racial and ethnic disparities in the severity of Covid-19 illness persist, even when controlling for baseline comorbidities. It remains unclear if these differences are related to variations in physiologic response to SARS-CoV-2, differential timing of presentation or disparities in care.

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kay S. Varela ◽  
Anthony A. Peguero ◽  
John M. Eason ◽  
Miner P. “Trey” Marchbanks ◽  
Jamilia Blake

There are racial and ethnic disparities associated with school discipline practices and pushout rates. In addition, research suggests that urban schools have stricter school discipline practices and higher pushout rates. What remains unknown, however, is the relationship between racial and ethnic inequality, school discipline practices, and pushout rates across urban, rural, and suburban schools. Therefore, this study draws from the Texas Education Agency’s (TEA) Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) to address two questions about the relationship between racial and ethnic inequality, school punishment practices, and academic progress that remain unanswered by the previous literature. First, is the relationship between stringent or lenient discipline practices and pushout rates similar in urban, rural, and suburban school contexts? Second, is the relationship between stringent or lenient discipline practices in urban, rural, and suburban contexts associated with racial and ethnic differences in pushout rates? This study seeks to contribute to racial and ethnic educational inequality research by investigating if there is a relationship between school discipline practices and pushout rates and establishing if there are racial and ethnic differences in urban, rural, and suburban contexts. Findings indicate that there are significant racial and ethnic disparities in pushout rates across all school contexts, particularly for Black/African American and Latina/o American students. Findings indicate that both stringent and lenient school punishment practices have effects on pushout rates; however, there are important and distinctive nuances that are presented and examined.


Author(s):  
Joseph E. Ebinger ◽  
Natalie Achamallah ◽  
Hongwei Ji ◽  
Brian L. Claggett ◽  
Nancy Sun ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundCertain individuals, when infected by SARS-CoV-2, tend to develop the more severe forms of Covid-19 illness for reasons that remain unclear.MethodsWe studied N=442 patients who presented with laboratory confirmed Covid-19 illness to our U.S. metropolitan healthcare system. We curated data from the electronic health record, and used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association of pre-existing traits with a Covid-19 illness severity defined by level of required care: need for hospital admission, need for intensive care, and need for intubation.ResultsOf all patients studied, 48% required hospitalization, 17% required intensive care, and 12% required intubation. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, patients requiring a higher levels of care were more likely to be older (OR 1.5 per 10 years, P<0.001), male (OR 2.0, P=0.001), African American (OR 2.1, P=0.011), obese (OR 2.0, P=0.021), with diabetes mellitus (OR 1.8, P=0.037), and with a higher comorbidity index (OR 1.8 per SD, P<0.001). Several clinical associations were more pronounced in younger compared to older patients (Pinteraction<0.05). Of all hospitalized patients, males required higher levels of care (OR 2.5, P=0.003) irrespective of age, race, or morbidity profile.ConclusionsIn our healthcare system, greater Covid-19 illness severity is seen in patients who are older, male, African American, obese, with diabetes, and with greater overall comorbidity burden. Certain comorbidities paradoxically augment risk to a greater extent in younger patients. In hospitalized patients, male sex is the main determinant of needing more intensive care. Further investigation is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying these findings.


Author(s):  
Zanthia Wiley ◽  
Katie Ross-Driscoll ◽  
Zhensheng Wang ◽  
Laken Smothers ◽  
Aneesh K Mehta ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Since the introduction of remdesivir and dexamethasone for severe COVID-19 treatment, few large multi-hospital system US studies have described clinical characteristics and outcomes of minority COVID-19 patients who present to the emergency department (ED). Methods This cohort study from the Cerner Real World Database (87 US health systems) from December 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020 included PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients who self-identified as non-Hispanic Black (Black), Hispanic White (Hispanic), or non-Hispanic White (White). The main outcome was hospitalization among ED patients. Secondary outcomes included mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit care, and in-hospital mortality. Descriptive statistics and Poisson regression compared sociodemographics, comorbidities, receipt of remdesivir, receipt of dexamethasone, and outcomes by racial/ethnic groups and geographic region. Results 94,683 COVID-19 patients presented to the ED. Blacks comprised 26.7% and Hispanics 33.6%. Nearly half (45.1%) of ED patients presented to hospitals in the South. 31.4% (n=29,687) were hospitalized. Lower proportions of Blacks were prescribed dexamethasone (29.4%; n=7,426) compared to Hispanics (40.9%; n=13,021) and Whites (37.5%; n=14,088). Hospitalization risks, compared to Whites, were similar in Blacks (Risk Ratio (RR)=0.94; 95% CI:0.82, 1.08; p=0.4)) and Hispanics RR=0.99 (95% CI:0.81, 1.21; p=0.91), but risk of in-hospital mortality was higher in Blacks, RR=1.18 (95% CI:1.06, 1.31; p=0.002) and Hispanics, RR=1.28 (95% CI: 1.13, 1.44; p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions Minority patients were overrepresented among COVID-19 ED patients, and while they had similar risks of hospitalization as Whites, in-hospital mortality risk was higher. Interventions targeting upstream social determinants of health are needed to reduce racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19.


Author(s):  
Bradford H. Gray ◽  
Mark Schlesinger ◽  
Shannon Mitchell Siegfried ◽  
Emily Horowitz

Differences in the source of care could contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in health status. This study looks at a major metropolitan area and examines racial and ethnic differences in the use of high-volume hospitals for 17 services for which there is a documented positive volume-outcome relationship. Focusing on the hospitalizations of New York City area residents in the periods 1995-1996 and 2001–2002, we found, after controlling for socioeconomic characteristics, insurance coverage, proximity of residence to a high-volume hospital, and paths to hospitalization, that minority patients were significantly less likely than whites to be treated at high-volume hospitals for most volume-sensitive services. The largest disparities were between blacks and whites for cancer surgeries and cardiovascular procedures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-138
Author(s):  
Ilhom Akobirshoev ◽  
Monika Mitra ◽  
Susan L. Parish ◽  
Anne Valentine ◽  
Tiffany A. Moore Simas

Abstract Understanding the pregnancy experiences of racial and ethnic minority women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) is critical to ensuring that policies can effectively support these women. This research analyzed data from the 1998–2013 Massachusetts Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal (PELL) data system to examine the racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes and labor and delivery charges of U.S. women with IDD. There was significant preterm birth disparity among non-Hispanic Black women with IDD compared to their non-Hispanic White peers. There were also significant racial and ethnic differences in associated labor and delivery-related charges. Further research, examining potential mechanisms behind the observed racial and ethnic differences in labor and delivery-related charges in Massachusetts' women with IDD is needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document