Evaluating the interchangeability of infrared and digital devices with the traditional mercury thermometer in hospitalized pediatric patients: an observational study.
Abstract A gradual replacement of the mercury thermometers with alternative devices is ongoing around the world as effect of the global strategies to reduce mercury pollution. However, to reduce the risks of misdiagnosis, unnecessary treatments, and omission of care in the pediatric population, more evidence on the reliability and validity of alternative thermometers are needed. The aim of this comparative observational study was to detect any differences in temperature measurements between the gold-standard axillary mercury thermometer (AXLMER) and the alternative devices. Temperature values in Celsius (°C) were simultaneously measured in a group of Albanian children aged up to 14 years using both (AXLMER) and digital axillary thermometers (AXLDGT), as well as forehead and tympanic infra-red thermometers. The AXLDGT device, compared with the AXLMER, showed no clinically significant difference in the mean values (-0.04 ± 0.29 °C) and the narrowest 95% Level of Agreement (+0.53 °C to -0.62 °C) in the paired comparisons. For cut-off points of 37.0 °C and 37.5 °C, the AXLDGT showed the highest levels of sensitivity (67.4% and 72.5%) and specificity (95.3% and 99.1%) in detecting fever. This study indicates that the AXLDGT thermometer may prove the better option since it adequately balances accuracy, safety and children’s comfort.