scholarly journals Removal of mechanical ventilation during veno-venous ECMO may improve outcome of patients with acute respiratory failure due to adult community-acquired pneumonia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu-Lu Li ◽  
Cong-Ying Song ◽  
Mei Shao ◽  
An-Dong Shang ◽  
Lin-Lin Meng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Significant Independent Predictor ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Ecmo Therapy

Abstract Background As a life-saving therapy for patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF)Mechanical ventilation has catalyzed the development of modern emergency medicine and intensive care units.Another way to support respiratory or cardiac functions is extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).Based on previous studies, the increased pre-ECMO time of mechanical ventilation is a significant independent predictor of the poorer outcome. Removal or maintaining of mechanical ventilation during ECMO is still debatable. Methods We analyzed the clinical data of 23 patients veno-venous ECMO therapy with acute respiratory failure due to adult community-acquired pneumonia.They were divided into two groups: group A (removed of mechanical ventilation, n = 10) and group B ( maintaining of mechanical ventilation,n = 13).Demographic data, including gender, age, smoking habits were collected. General characteristics and Clinical characteristics of patients were also recorded, in order to discuss whether the retention or removal of trachea cannula and continued mechanical ventilation during ECMO can affect patients’ prognosis. Results After analysis, patients in the Group B were older than the Group A (61.0 y [54.5–67.5] vs 39.0 y [24.0-61.8], P = 0.021). The median APACHE Ⅱ score of 23 patients before ECMO therapy was 25.0 (IQR, 21.0–28.0), and the Group A had a lower initial APACHE Ⅱ score than the Group B (21.5 [20.8–24.3] vs 28.0 [24.0–29.0], P = 0.005).The group A with a survival rate of 80%, and the group B presenting a survival rate of 23.1%.The difference in the survival rate between the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.012).No differences in other items were found between the two groups. Conclusions The final results showed that the removing of mechanical ventilation during ECMO can improve the survival rate and prognosis in patients with ARF.

scholarly journals Removal of Mechanical Ventilation During Veno-Venous ECMO May Improve Outcome of Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure Due to Adult Community-Acquired Pneumonia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu-Lu Li ◽  
Cong-Ying Song ◽  
Mei Shao ◽  
An-Dong Shang ◽  
Lin-Lin Meng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Significant Independent Predictor ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Ecmo Therapy

Abstract Background: As a life-saving therapy for patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF)Mechanical ventilation has catalyzed the development of modern emergency medicine and intensive care units.Another way to support respiratory or cardiac functions is extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).Based on previous studies, the increased pre-ECMO time of mechanical ventilation is a significant independent predictor of the poorer outcome . Removal or maintaining of mechanical ventilation during ECMO is still debatable. Methods: We analyzed the clinical data of 23 patients veno-venous ECMO therapy with acute respiratory failure due to adult community-acquired pneumonia.They were divided into two groups: group A (removed of mechanical ventilation, n=10) and group B ( maintaining of mechanical ventilation,n=13).Demographic data, including gender, age, smoking habits were collected. General characteristics and Clinical characteristics of patients were also recorded, in order to discuss whether the retention or removal of trachea cannula and continued mechanical ventilation during ECMO can affect patients’ prognosis. Results: After analysis, patients in the Group B were older than the Group A (61.0 y [54.5-67.5] vs 39.0 y [24.0-61.8], P=0.021). The median APACHE Ⅱ score of 23 patients before ECMO therapy was 25.0 (IQR, 21.0-28.0), and the Group A had a lower initial APACHE Ⅱ score than the Group B (21.5 [20.8-24.3] vs 28.0 [24.0-29.0], P=0.005)(Table 1).The group A with a survival rate of 80% , and the group B presenting a survival rate of 23.1%.The difference in the survival rate between the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.012).No differences in other items were found between the two groups.Conclusions: The final results showed that the removing of mechanical ventilation during ECMO can improve the survival rate and prognosis in patients with ARF.

scholarly journals The Way of Severe Nursing of Respiratory System Failure

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Qiongshan Liu ◽  
Weichao Li
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Ph Value ◽  
Respiratory Dysfunction ◽  
Airway Patency ◽  
Main Research ◽  
Artificial Airway ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Way

Respiratory failure is the most common clinical symptom, seriously endangering people’s health, which is mainly caused by a series of reasons, leading to serious respiratory dysfunction and severe pulmonary respiratory disorders, damaging the pulmonary airway function, and causing disability to maintain normal human gas exchange activities. At present, the main treatment of respiratory failure is to use the ventilator to help patients exchange gas and keep their breathing unobstructed. The nursing method is also around the artificial airway mechanical ventilation. The nursing of patients with respiratory failure is mainly respiratory nursing and psychological nursing. In this paper, the main research is to explore the way of severe nursing of respiratory failure. Before the nursing of respiratory failure, we should carry out nursing detection of the ventilator and test its performance, tightness, pipeline safety, and airway patency. Then carrying on the respiratory failure mechanical ventilation nursing and clarifying its mechanical ventilation nursing process is the main work of intensive care, at the same time, giving consideration to the psychological nursing of respiratory failure and implementing comprehensive nursing. In this paper, 50 patients were selected and divided into group A and group B; group A was given comprehensive nursing, and group B was given general nursing. The experimental results show that a series of situations in group A are more optimistic than those in group B. There was no doubt that the PH value of the two groups changed significantly 6 months after discharge. The pO2 value of group A was higher than that before discharge, while the pCO2 value of group B was unstable and increased. The pO2 value of group A was 55.52 before discharge and 62.36 six months after discharge. The pCO2 value of group A was 54.31 before discharge and 50.61 six months after discharge. The pCO2 value of group B was 55.23 before discharge and 57.34 six months after discharge.

scholarly journals A Clinical Study of Role of Noninvasive Ventilation in Community Acquired Pneumonia Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure – A Prospective Observational Study from Telangana, India

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 1686-1691
Author(s):  
Pampana Eshwaramma ◽  
Gaddam Ramulu Yadav ◽  
Vankayala Veena Reddy ◽  
Tarigopula Pramod Kumar ◽  
Mandapakala Gopala Krishna Murthy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation

BACKGROUND Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) is defined as “an acute infection of the pulmonary parenchyma. The most important complication of CAP is Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF) and some of them may require Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV) to manage hypoxia and hypoventilation along with appropriate antibiotic therapy. A number of studies, however, indicate that IMV is associated with high rates of serious complications and mortality in patients with ARF. For this reason Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) has been used for ARF of diverse aetiologies.The most important rationale for using NIV in early stages of respiratory failure is to decrease the workload on respiratory muscles and improve ventilation by applying positive airway pressure. This may help to overcome an episode of severe ARF without the need for MV. In this study we evaluated the efficacy of NIV in patients with ARF and compare the outcome of using NIV in CAP with ARF patients with and without comorbidities. METHODS This prospective observational study was done on 150 CAP patients in acute respiratory failure who received NIV. It was conducted in the Department of Respiratory Medicine in Gandhi Hospital, Secunderabad, for a period of one year and six months. A comparative analysis of the outcome of using NIV in CAP with ARF patients with and without co-morbidities was carried out. RESULTS In the current study 150 CAP patients with ARF who needed NIV, were treated initially with NIV, antibiotic therapy and other supportive measures as per the American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines 32. 95 (63.3 %) of 150 patients were continuously treated with NIV. Apart from these, 55 (36.7 %) patients required MV. In patients with continued NIV, 93 (98 %) recovered, remaining 2 died with sudden cardiac arrest. In patients who were gone for MV, 12 (22 %) survived. CONCLUSIONS Early intervention by NIV in CAP patients suffering from acute respiratory failure secondary to community acquired pneumonia was found to be successful in avoiding mechanical ventilation and its attendant morbidity and mortality31. Early intervention with NIV, identifying risk factors for NIV failure, addressing associated co-morbid conditions will go in a long way in effectively managing these patients by significantly minimizing the ICU and hospital stay. Patients with co-morbidities have more chances of NIV failures. Patients with co morbidities on NIV stayed significantly more number of days in the hospital than patients without co-morbidities. The current study suggests that co morbid patients require more monitoring as compared to patients without co morbidities on NIV. KEY WORDS Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP), Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV), Mechanical Ventilation (MV), Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF), Arterial Blood Gas Analysis (ABG), Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Intubation

Comparison of the effects of Dexamethasone and Ondansetron on the Reduction of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting following Cesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arash karimi ◽  
Jahanbakhsh Nejadi ◽  
Mahnaz Shamseh ◽  
Nooshin Ronasi ◽  
Mehdi Birjandi
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication associated with the use of anesthesia. Several antiemetics are used to reduce the incidence and severity of PONV. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of dexamethasone and ondansetron to treat PONV in patients undergoing cesarean section (c-section) under spinal anesthesia. Methods: This double-blind clinical trial study was performed on patients who were referred to the operating room of Haji Karim Asali Hospital of Khorramabad for elective cesarean section in 2016-17. Upon meeting the inclusion criteria, patients were allotted into two groups (n=60). Group A received 8mg of dexamethasone and group B received 4mg of ondansetron after spinal anesthesia. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questionnaire and Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale (DASS) questionnaire was used for the analysis. Patients with mild to moderate stress, anxiety, and depression were included in the study. Data were analyzed using SPSS 16 software. Results: There was no difference in the demographic data of the two groups. The mean severity of nausea in group A was significantly higher than in group B. The frequency of vomiting in group A was 20 times higher than group B, which was found to be statistically significant, p = 0.018. Concerning the type of delivery with the frequency of nausea, the results showed that the frequency of nausea in group A was 3.24 times higher than group B, however, this difference was not statistically significant, p = 0.106. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, ondansetron had a significant effect on the alleviation of postoperative nausea and vomiting, as compared to dexamethasone in c-section surgical candidates.

Accuracy Computer-Guided Implant Placement using 3D Planning Software

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gagik Hakobyan
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
3D Modeling ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Surgical Time ◽  
Surgical Guide ◽  
Minimal Trauma ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of implant treatment using computer 3D modeling and surgical guided. Materials and Methods: The study included 148 patients who underwent prosthodontics rehabilitation using dental implants in 2015-2020. 3D computer-aided modeling and surgical guide were used to plan the operation. To conduct a comparative analysis of the treatment results, two groups were formed: In group A (included 75 patients, fully guided surgery), in group B (included 73 patients). Results: In patients Group A intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications were noted (errors in the position, inclination), anatomical risk structures were invaded, after 3 years producing a survival rate of 96.2% In patients Group B, intraoperative complications were recorded; membrane perforation 4, errors in the position of the implants 16, the inclination of the implants 18, fenestration 12, after 3 years producing a survival rate of 97.6%. Mean marginal bone loss (MBL) patients in Group A were significantly higher than patients in group B (p < 0.05). In patients Group A the average surgical time from time of anesthesia to the placement of the healing abutment was 10.6 ± 2.9 min per implant, in patients Group B, the average surgical time was 16.4 ± 1.5 min per implant. Conclusion: The 3D modeling method and the controlled positioning of the implant allows surgical access with minimal trauma, reducing treatment time and complications.

Perforator-Based Flap Reconstruction after Melanoma Resection: Evaluation of Oncological, Aesthetic, and Functional Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beniamino Brunetti ◽  
Rosa Salzillo ◽  
Stefania Tenna ◽  
Bruno Brunetti ◽  
Mario Alessandri Bonetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Locoregional Recurrence ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
One Year ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background Evidence in literature about the best reconstructive approach after melanoma resection is controversial, with some authors advocating that tissue rearrangement flap techniques might hinder the early detection of local relapses. The aim of the present study is to evaluate oncological, aesthetic, and functional outcomes following melanoma reconstruction using pedicled perforator-based flaps. Methods The authors reviewed all patients affected by melanoma treated during a 6-year period. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, and operative variables were evaluated. Locoregional recurrence was assessed with clinical and radiological follow-up. One-year postoperatively patients rated on a 5-point Likert scale the aesthetic and functional outcomes of the procedure. Three blind observers examined preoperative and 1-year postoperative photographs and rated the aesthetic outcome of the reconstructive procedure. Results One-hundred sixty-five patients were treated with wide excision and delayed reconstruction, including pedicled perforator-based flaps in 70 patients (group A) and primary closure in 95 patients (group B). Mean Breslow thickness was 2.972 and 2.189 mm in group A and B, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in locoregional recurrence (chi-squared test, p = 0.8333; Fisher's exact test, p > 0.9999) between the two groups. Group A reported a higher satisfaction with both the aesthetic (mean rating 4.390 in group A and 4.094 in group B) and functional (mean rating 4.732 in group A and 4.170 in group B) outcomes of the procedure, the latter being statistically significant (p = 0.0006). Conclusion This series suggests that pedicled perforator-based flaps provide optimal aesthetic and functional outcomes in melanoma reconstruction without impairing the locoregional control of the disease.

Comparative study between noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with respiratory failure

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed N Al Shafi'i ◽  
Doaa M. Kamal El-din ◽  
Mohammed A. Abdulnaiem Ismaiel ◽  
Hesham M Abotiba
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has been increasingly used in the management of respiratory failure in intensive care unit (ICU). Aim of the Work is to compare the efficacy and resource consumption of NIPPMV delivered through face mask against invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) delivered by endotracheal tube in the management of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Patients and Methods This prospective randomized controlled study included 78 adults with acute respiratory failure who were admitted to the intensive care unit. The enrolled patients were randomly allocated to receive either noninvasive ventilation or conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). Results Severity of illness, measured by the simplified acute physiologic score 3 (SAPS 3), were comparable between the two patient groups with no significant difference between them. Both study groups showed a comparable steady improvement in PaO2:FiO2 values, indicating that NIPPV is as effective as CMV in improving the oxygenation of patients with ARF. The PaCO2 and pH values gradually improved in both groups during the 48 hours of ventilation. 12 hours after ventilation, NIPPMV group showed significantly more improvement in PaCO2 and pH than the CMV group. The respiratory acidosis was corrected in the NIPPV group after 24 hours of ventilation compared with 36 hours in the CMV group. NIPPV in this study was associated with a lower frequency of complications than CMV, including ventilator acquired pneumonia (VAP), sepsis, renal failure, pulmonary embolism, and pancreatitis. However, only VAP showed a statistically significant difference. Patients who underwent NIPPV in this study had lower mortality, and lower ventilation time and length of ICU stay, compared with patients on CMV. Intubation was required for less than a third of patients who initially underwent NIV. Conclusion Based on our study findings, NIPPV appears to be a potentially effective and safe therapeutic modality for managing patients with ARF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document