scholarly journals Albumin Paclitaxel Plus Platinum With or Without Pembrolizumab for Metastatic Primary Pulmonary Lymphoepithelioma-like Carcinoma: a Retrospective Multicenter Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hejing Bao ◽  
LingZhen Ma ◽  
Xiaoli Lin ◽  
Boshen Zhang ◽  
Juan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tp53 Mutation ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Retrospective Multicenter Study ◽  
Better Than

Abstract Objectives Primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PPLELC) is a rare subtype of primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the first-line therapy for metastatic PPLELC patients remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) combined with chemotherapy(CT) compared with traditional chemotherapy in these patients. Methods A total of 168 patients with metastatic PPLELC came from six grade A hospitals from August 2018 to August 2020 were selected. 17 patients were enrolled in the ICI group and received 200mg of Pembrolizumab plus albumin paclitaxel and carboplatin every 3 weeks. 34 patients with chemotherapy alone were assigned to the CT group and received albumin-paclitaxel combined with carboplatin every 3 weeks. Results As of June 1, 2021, the median PFS was 14.9 months for ICI group and 6.4 months for CT group [Hazard Ratio (HR), 0.29; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.15-0.55; P < 0.05]. ORR was 64.7% in ICI group and 35.3% in CT group [HR, 0.65; 95%CI, 0.39-0.90; P=0.047]. The median OS of ICI group was not reached, while that of CT group was 13 months. In the ICI group, there were 8 cases (47.1%) of grade 3 treatment-related adverse reactions and 5 cases (29.4%) of grade 4 treatment-related adverse reactions. In the CT group, there were 9 cases (26.5%) of grade 3 treatment-related adverse reactions and 8 cases (23.5%) grade 4 treatment-related adverse reactions. FBXW7 mutation were negatively and TP53 mutation, MRE11A p.V198S mutation, PTEN p.T319FS mutation were positively correlated with the efficacy of immunotherapy. Conclusions In patients with metastatic PPLELC, the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy was significantly better than that of chemotherapy alone, and adverse reactions were acceptable.

scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Bladder Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Antonio Lopez-Beltran ◽  
Alessia Cimadamore ◽  
Ana Blanca ◽  
Francesco Massari ◽  
Nuno Vau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

A number of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved as first-line therapy in case of cisplatin-ineligible patients or as second-line therapy for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) of the bladder. About 30% of patients with mUC will respond to ICIs immunotherapy. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression detected by immunohistochemistry seems to predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with mUC as supported by the objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) associated with the response observed in most clinical trials. Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, demonstrated better OS respective to chemotherapy in a randomized phase 3 study for second-line treatment of mUC. Nivolumab, a PD-1 antibody, also demonstrated an OS benefit when compared to controls. Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, and Avelumab antibodies targeting PD-L1 have also received approval as second-line treatments for mUC with durable response for more than 1 year in selected patients. Atezolizumab and Pembrolizumab also received approval for first-line treatment of patients that are ineligible for cisplatin. A focus on the utility of ICIs in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting, or as combination with chemotherapy, is the basis of some ongoing trials. The identification of a clinically useful biomarker, single or in association, to determine the optimal ICIs treatment for patients with mUC is very much needed as emphasized by the current literature. In this review, we examined relevant clinical trial results with ICIs in patients with mUC alone or as part of drug combinations; emphasis is also placed on the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. The current landscape of selected biomarkers of response to ICIs including anti-PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is also briefly reviewed.

scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Vaccines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 616
Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Abd El Aziz ◽  
Antonio Facciorusso ◽  
Tarek Nayfeh ◽  
Samer Saadi ◽  
Mohamed Elnaggar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Despite the advances in screening protocols and treatment options, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still considered to be the most lethal malignancy in patients with liver cirrhosis. Moreover, the survival outcomes after failure of first-line therapy for unresectable HCC is still poor with limited therapeutic options. One of these options is immune checkpoint inhibitors. The aim of this study is to comprehensively review the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with HCC.

scholarly journals Efficacy and predictive factors of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592094092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutian Zou ◽  
Xuxiazi Zou ◽  
Shaoquan Zheng ◽  
Hailin Tang ◽  
Lijuan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Cd8 T Cell ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown encouraging treatment efficacy for metastatic breast cancer in several clinical trials. However, response only occurred in a small population. Evidence predicting response and survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer following ICI treatment with existing biomarkers has not been well summarized. This review aimed to summarize the efficacy and predictive factors of immune checkpoint therapy in metastatic breast cancer, which is critical for clinical practice. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, www.clinicaltrials.gov , and meeting abstracts were comprehensively searched to identify clinical trials. The outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), treatment-related adverse events (trAEs), immune-related adverse events (irAEs), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: In this review, 27 studies with 1746 patients were included for quantitative synthesis. The pooled ORR was 19% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 12–27%]. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive patients had a higher response rate [odds ratio (OR) = 1.44, p = 0.01]. First-line immunotherapy had a better ORR than second-line immunotherapy (OR = 2.00, p = 0.02). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) ⩾5% (OR = 2.53, p = 0.002) and high infiltrated CD8+ T-cell level (OR = 4.33, p = 0.006) were ideal predictors of immune checkpoint therapy response. Liver metastasis indicated poor response (OR = 0.19, p = 0.009). However, the difference was non-significant in ORR based on age, performance status score, lymph node metastasis, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level. In addition, the PD-L1-positive subgroup had a better 1-year PFS (OR = 1.55, p = 0.04) and 2-year OS (OR = 2.28, p = 0.02) following ICI treatment. The pooled incidence during ICI therapy of grade 3–4 trAEs was 25% (95% CI = 16–34%), whereas for grade 3–4 irAEs it was 15% (95% CI = 11–19%). Conclusions: Metastatic breast cancer had modest response to ICI therapy. PD-L1-positive, first-line immunotherapy, non-liver metastasis, and high TIL and CD8+ T-cell infiltrating levels could predict better response to ICI treatment. Patients with PD-L1-positive tumor could gain more survival benefits from immune checkpoint therapy.

Managing immune checkpoint-inhibitor-induced severe autoimmune-like hepatitis by liver-directed topical steroids.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3073-3073
Author(s):  
Mirjana Ziemer ◽  
Eleni Koukoulioti ◽  
Jan-Christoph Simon ◽  
Thomas Berg
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Topical Steroid ◽  
Continuous Treatment ◽  
Systemic Steroids ◽  
Grade 3

3073 Background: The CTLA4-antibody ipilimumab, and PD-1-antibodies pembrolizumab as well as nivolumab have revolutionized antineoplastic therapies. Induction of autoimmune-like drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is within the spectrum of adverse reactions of these new drugs and has been observed in about 1-5 % of patients, developing predominantly within the first 6 to 12 weeks after start of treatment. Immediate application of systemic steroids and a permanent discontinuation of immune checkpoint-inhibition therapy are recommended for any alanine aminotransferase increase ≥ WHO grade 3. In severe autoimmune-like DILI the permanent discontinuation of the immune checkpoint inhibitor is recommended, as drug re-exposure might be associated with a significant risk of a fulminant DILI. Methods: We report six patients with severe grade 3 autoimmune-like DILI (according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.3) treated with long-term application of budesonide, a liver-directed topical steroid. Results: Immune checkpoint inhibitors were stopped and methylprednisolone was applied initially with a dose of 1 mg/kg body weight and tapered thereafter. To reduce systemic steroids and to minimize the exposure time to systemic steroids, the topical steroid budesonide 3 mg three times per day was additionally given in combination with N-acetylcysteine and ursodeoxycholic acid. Under this multimodal approach transaminases normalized and the respective immune-checkpoint inhibitor could be re-started without re-manifestation of DILI under the continuous treatment with budesonide. Conclusions: Budesonide - a liver-directed topical steroid - might be an interesting approach to target liver related autoimmune adverse reactions induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors without compromising their anti-cancer effect. We were able to safely and effectively re-introduce and continue immune checkpoint inhibitors under the continuous application of the topical steroid without showing any further liver toxicity.

scholarly journals Expectations and Challenges of First-Line Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 501
Author(s):  
Tadahiro Shoji ◽  
Chie Sato ◽  
Hidetoshi Tomabechi ◽  
Eriko Takatori ◽  
Yoshitaka Kaido ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Targeted Drugs ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

The incidence of ovarian cancer, which has had a poor prognosis, is increasing annually. Currently, the prognosis is expected to improve with the use of molecular-targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors as maintenance therapies after the first-line chemotherapy. The GOG218 and ICON7 studies reported the usefulness of bevacizumab and the SOLO-1 and PRIMA (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of Niraparib Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer Following Response on Front-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy) studies have reported the usefulness of olaparib and niraparib, respectively. The ATHENA study investigating the usefulness of rucaparib is currently ongoing. Although clinical studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors are lagging in the field of gynecology, many clinical studies using programmed death cell-1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies are currently ongoing. Some biomarkers have been identified for molecular-targeted drugs, but none have been identified for immune checkpoint inhibitors, which is a challenge that should be addressed in the future.

MO153RENAL FUNCTIONS OUTCOME IN METASTATIC NON SMALL LUNG CARCINOMA PATIENTS: THE RISK OF AKI IN FIRST LINE THERAPY

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Trevisani ◽  
Federico Di Marco ◽  
Francesco Fiorio ◽  
Monica Cattaneo ◽  
Erika Rijavec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Overweight And Obesity ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
First Line ◽  
Metastatic Nsclc ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Abstract Background and Aims The optimal use of immune and target therapies, the optimal use of standard chemotherapy (CT) is of paramount importance, especially for patients affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD) who require dose adjustment according to the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to avoid acute kidney injury (AKI) establishment. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) are options for the palliative treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, CT in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitors has become the treatment of choice for this setting of patients. Therefore, it is fundamental to investigate the potential nephrotoxic effects of both treatments and their potential additive effects on renal function. Aim of our study was to compare the nephrotoxic effect of both ICIs and CT (cisplatin and carboplatin-based) in a consecutive cohort of patients affected by metastatic NSCLC. Method A consecutive cohort of 126 patients treated in first-line for NSLCL was enrolled in a single tertiary Hospital between 2018 and 2020. Inclusion criteria were: age (&gt; 18 years old), eGFR (&gt; 15 ml/min/1.73), histological diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC. Each patient underwent immunotherapy or CT according to clinical conditions, comorbidities and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status. eGFR (using CKD-EPI formula 2009) was detected at baseline and after each cycle of immunotherapy or CT (using cisplatin or carboplatin) in order to determine the correct renal status using the K-DIGO 2012 guidelines for AKI stages and CKD classes. Pts were subdivided into CKD categories G according to their eGFR values before and after the treatment. AKI onset was evaluated by rise in creatine levels according to K-DIGO criteria. Clinical stage according to cTNM (AJCC TNM system-2019) was collected at baseline before the first treatment. Comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, blood hypertension, overweight and obesity) were also included. Comparison between numerical variables was performed using linear regressions; between groups using Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test for numerical variables and Pearson’s Chi square test for categorical variables. Log rank test was used to test differences between groups in terms of AKI onset during the therapy. Results Clinical and pathological characteristics are reported in table 1. From the analysis, no significative differences were detected between Immunotherapy and CT group for age, gender, basal serum creatinine, basal eGFR, basal BMI, diagnosis of diabetes, hypertension, basal CKD G group or overall AKI onset. Treatment cycles were significantly different between the two groups (p&lt;0.001) with a short median number of cycles for the CT group. No significative difference in terms of decay of eGFR calculated as final-basal values was detected (p=0.8). AKI onset over cycles was significantly different between the two groups (p=0.02), observing a higher risk of developing earlier AKI for CT group (cisplatin or carboplatin) (13,9%) with respect to immunotherapy (7,4%) (figure 1 and 2). Conclusion Our study highlights that both cisplatin and carboplatin-based CT displays an augmented incidence of AKI development after a lower number of therapy cycles in respect of immunotherapy. The nephrotoxic effects of combined therapy for NSLCL should be always evaluated by nephrologist during the treatment of NSLCL patients to avoid an augmented risk of AKI derived from the combination of immunotherapy and CT in first line.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document