scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Bladder Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Antonio Lopez-Beltran ◽  
Alessia Cimadamore ◽  
Ana Blanca ◽  
Francesco Massari ◽  
Nuno Vau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

A number of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved as first-line therapy in case of cisplatin-ineligible patients or as second-line therapy for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) of the bladder. About 30% of patients with mUC will respond to ICIs immunotherapy. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression detected by immunohistochemistry seems to predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with mUC as supported by the objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) associated with the response observed in most clinical trials. Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, demonstrated better OS respective to chemotherapy in a randomized phase 3 study for second-line treatment of mUC. Nivolumab, a PD-1 antibody, also demonstrated an OS benefit when compared to controls. Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, and Avelumab antibodies targeting PD-L1 have also received approval as second-line treatments for mUC with durable response for more than 1 year in selected patients. Atezolizumab and Pembrolizumab also received approval for first-line treatment of patients that are ineligible for cisplatin. A focus on the utility of ICIs in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting, or as combination with chemotherapy, is the basis of some ongoing trials. The identification of a clinically useful biomarker, single or in association, to determine the optimal ICIs treatment for patients with mUC is very much needed as emphasized by the current literature. In this review, we examined relevant clinical trial results with ICIs in patients with mUC alone or as part of drug combinations; emphasis is also placed on the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. The current landscape of selected biomarkers of response to ICIs including anti-PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is also briefly reviewed.

scholarly journals Treatments of Advanced Non‑Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in an Italian Center: Drug Utilization and the Treatment Costs of Innovative Drugs

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francovito Piantedosi ◽  
Raffaela Cerisoli ◽  
Ciro Battiloro ◽  
Francesca Andreozzi ◽  
Fabiana Vitiello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Target Therapy ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line

AIM: To provide an updated picture of the therapies most commonly used in the advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) setting, together with the relevant costs.METHODS: This study considered the clinical records of patients affected by stage IIIb and IV NSCLC treated in the AORN dei Colli - Plesso Monaldi in Naples during the period January 2016-July 2017 and diagnosed since 2014, as well as the pathology lab database. Multivariate analyses were performed in order to identify the main predictors of time to next treatment and the main cost drivers.RESULTS: Data were collected on 575 patients, who were mainly affected by adenocarcinoma (62%) and squamous cell carcinoma (34%). 64% of patients were reported having been tested for molecular biomarkers (among the patients tested, 13% were EGFR+, 4% Alk t, and 1% ROS1 t). In accordance with the international guidelines, chemotherapy – as single agent or platinum-based doublets – was the prevalent first-line treatment, except among EGFR+ and ROS1 t patients, for whom the target therapy was authorized as first-line therapy. As second-line treatment, the target therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab) were the most commonly used treatments. Drug expenditure per patient was remarkably higher in mutated patients (€ 29,053) versus wild-type patients, or patients with unknown mutational status (€ 11,854), who received just chemotherapy. The costs sustained in 2017 are proportionally higher than those sustained in 2016, mainlydue to the increasing eligibility to target therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors and the wider biomarker analysis performed. From multivariate analyses, among the predictors of a longer time to next treatment (TTNT) were a better performance status and target therapy both in first and second line. The therapy for squamous cell carcinoma and other nonadeno histotypes turned out to be less expensive in patients treated just in the first line than that for adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the second line results in increased costs compared to the use of chemotherapy. Also the target therapy in the first line results in an increase in the total costs with respect to chemotherapy in patients who received just a first-line therapy.CONCLUSIONS: Generally, in this study population, the treatments administered are in accordance with the international guidelines. The costs borne by the Health Systems are higher for the target therapy and the immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Landscape of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16632-e16632
Author(s):  
Dmitrii Shek ◽  
Scott A. Read ◽  
Adnan Nagrial ◽  
Bo Gao ◽  
Golo Ahlenstiel
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Forest Plot ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advanced Hcc

e16632 Background: The WHO estimates that liver cancer will cause 1 million deaths by 2030. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a primary liver malignancy causing 4.3% of all cancer deaths in 2019 in Australia. Kinase inhibitors are standard of care (SoC) for metastatic HCC with median overall survival (mOS) of < 13 months. This meta-analysis primarily aimed to determine objective response rate (ORR) of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced HCC. Methods: Potentially relevant clinical studies were identified through PUBMED, Scopus, ASCO and ESMO databases. Studies evaluating ICIs in patients with HCC and reporting efficacy outcomes were considered as eligible. Publication bias was assessed with Funnel plots. Data analysis was performed employing fixed and random effects model depending on study heterogeneity evaluating by I2 statistic. STATA v16 software was used for all statistical considerations. Results: 12 single arm phase II/III studies and 2 randomized clinical trials on ICIs in HCC were included into this analysis. First-line ICI: Primary forest plot established the median ORR was 26.2% (95% CI 24.7 to 27.9) in patients treated with first line ICIs monotherapy; in comparison, ORR of current SoC sorafenib is 2-3% and lenvatinib 18.8%. Moreover, nivolumab resulted in 9.8 months of OS in Child-Pugh class B (CPB) patients, previously eligible only for supportive care due to a low efficacy of sorafenib (mOS < 4.5 months). Second-line ICI: Secondary forest plot established that nivolumab at 1 mg/kg with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg Q3W resulted in mOS of 23 months with ORR of 32% in sorafenib-progressors. In comparison, current second line SoC regorafenib has mOS of 10.6 months and ORR of 17%. Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that ICIs may be superior (ORR) to SoC sorafenib in advanced HCC, particularly nivolumab. Secondly, nivolumab with ipilimumab were confirmed to provide higher OS in sorafenib progressors as compared to regorafenib. Of note, many of the studies included were only available in abstract form and final reporting is pending. Nevertheless, our results support higher efficacy of ICIs in HCC patients.

scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Vaccines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 616
Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Abd El Aziz ◽  
Antonio Facciorusso ◽  
Tarek Nayfeh ◽  
Samer Saadi ◽  
Mohamed Elnaggar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Despite the advances in screening protocols and treatment options, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still considered to be the most lethal malignancy in patients with liver cirrhosis. Moreover, the survival outcomes after failure of first-line therapy for unresectable HCC is still poor with limited therapeutic options. One of these options is immune checkpoint inhibitors. The aim of this study is to comprehensively review the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with HCC.

scholarly journals Cancer immunotherapy-associated hypophysitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (27) ◽  
pp. 3159-3169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franklin Castillero ◽  
Omar Castillo-Fernández ◽  
Geiner Jiménez-Jiménez ◽  
José Fallas-Ramírez ◽  
Marco P Peralta-Álvarez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Event ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

The advances in cancer therapy have included the development of drugs that inhibit immune checkpoint ligands. Two types of immune checkpoint inhibitors, both antibodies that target CTLA-4 and PD-1, have been approved for its use in NSCLC and melanoma as first-line or second-line therapy. Sadly, not desirable consequences of immunotherapy are immune-related adverse events. immune-related hypophysitis is the most common endocrine adverse event after thyroid disfunction. The particularity of endocrine immune-related adverse events is their non-reversibility, with incidence and prevalence destined to increase in the coming years, particularly if this form of therapy is used in the future for earlier stages of cancer. Therefore, hypophysitis represents a challenge for the physician, sometimes occurring without specific symptomatology and which should be considered for clinical management. In this review, we describe the current data regarding the pathophysiology and management for immune-related hypophysitis.

scholarly journals Treatment Strategies and Metabolic Pathway Regulation in Urothelial Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (23) ◽  
pp. 8993
Author(s):  
Huang-Yu Yang ◽  
Chao-Yi Wu ◽  
Jia-Jin Chen ◽  
Tao-Han Lee
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Metabolic Pathways ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Comprehensive Review

For a long time, cisplatin-based chemotherapy had been viewed as first-line chemotherapy for advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, many patients with UC had been classified as cisplatin-ineligible who can only receive alternative chemotherapy with poor treatment response, and the vast majority of the cisplatin-eligible patients eventually progressed, even those with objective response with cisplatin-based chemotherapy initially. By understanding tumor immunology in UC, immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeting on programmed death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) pathways, had been proven as first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible metastatic UC and as second-line treatment for patients with platinum-refractory metastatic UC by the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In 2020, JAVEIN bladder 100 further reported that PD-L1 inhibitors showed benefits on prolonged survival and progression-free survival as maintenance therapy. Besides targeting on immune checkpoint, manipulation of the tumor microenvironment by metabolic pathways intervention, including inhibition on tumor glycolysis, lactate accumulation and exogenous glutamine uptake, had been investigated in the past few years. In this comprehensive review, we start by introducing traditional chemotherapy of UC, and then we summarize current evidences supporting the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and highlight ongoing clinical trials. Lastly, we reviewed the tumor metabolic characteristic and the anti-tumor treatments targeting on metabolic pathways.

Urothelial carcinoma in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immunotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Khalife ◽  
Claude Chahine ◽  
Manal Kordahi ◽  
Tony Felefly ◽  
Hampig Raphael Kourie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Invasive Disease ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Muscle Invasive

Bladder cancer is the seventh most frequent cancer worldwide. The majority of patients present with nonmuscle invasive disease, while 20% of the patients are diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The treatment of nonmuscle invasive disease is endoscopic resection followed by intravesical adjuvant treatment for high risk patients. The standard treatment of localized muscle-invasive disease is neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the first-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma as second-line treatment or first-line in platinum-ineligible patients. Recently, pembrolizumab have been approved in BCG-refractory nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. This review summarizes the current evidence concerning immunotherapy in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document