scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF FACTORS ADHERENCE TO SAFE INJECTION PRACTICE PROCEDRUES AMONG NURSES HEALTHCARE CENTER QATAR.

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 295-304
Author(s):  
Sobur Setiaman ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Injection Practice ◽  
Healthcare Center ◽  
Safe Injection ◽  
Safe Injection Practice

scholarly journals Analysis of Factors Adherence to Safe Injection Practice Procedures among Nurses Healthcare Center Qatar

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Sobur Setiaman ◽  
Syahfirin Abdullah ◽  
Kholil Kholil ◽  
Kohar Sulistyadi
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Intervention ◽  
Analytic Description ◽  
Needle Stick Injury ◽  
Medical Procedure ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Injection Practice ◽  
Healthcare Center ◽  
Safe Injection ◽  
Safe Injection Practice ◽  
Injection Practices

Injection practices was common medical procedure done by nurses according doctor’s prescription. In nursing process, injection practice is part of nursing intervention, but injection practices was risky for the health care workers. Needle stick injury was happened to the nurses, 18% due disposal of the needle, and 15% while draw the blood for laboratory study. Adherence to the work procedure influence by few behavior factors. Aim of research of the research were to finding out of the factors influence of adherence to safe injection practice among the nurses at healthcare center X Qatar. Type of the research was observational analytic quantities of the analytic description, using cross sectional approach. 9 variable latent with 56 variable indicator. Size of sample were 114 nurses. Data analytic with using PLS-SEM. T-statistic value on variable culture 2.94; environment 1.99; work procedure 3.81 and supervisory 3.10. T-statistic of Individual characteristic, work facility, attitude, and knowledge bellow 1.96. R2 variable adherence were showed 96.05% with Q2 87.07%. Culture, environment, work procedure and supervisory influenced of the adherence safe injection practice among the nurses. (96.05%) variable independent influence of the adherence safe injection practice among the nurses, within 87.07% showed good predicted.

scholarly journals Assessment of safe injection practice among nurses in Port Said General Hospital

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 232
Author(s):  
Karim Farag ◽  
Ahmed El-kiki ◽  
Ahmed Emam ◽  
Ahmed Mourad ◽  
Alaa Abdelrahman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Hospital ◽  
Injection Practice ◽  
Safe Injection ◽  
Safe Injection Practice ◽  
Port Said

scholarly journals Safe injection practice (Safe-1 program)

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 929-929
Author(s):  
T. U. Sukumaran
Keyword(s):  
Injection Practice ◽  
Safe Injection ◽  
Safe Injection Practice

scholarly journals Strategies and challenges for safe injection practice in developing countries

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudesh Gyawali ◽  
DevendraSingh Rathore ◽  
PRavi Shankar ◽  
KC Vikash Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Injection Practice ◽  
Safe Injection ◽  
Safe Injection Practice

scholarly journals Rapid assessment of safe injection practice in a tertiary care hospital of Eastern India

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (10) ◽  
pp. 3576
Author(s):  
Sadhu Charan Panda
Keyword(s):  
General Population ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Rapid Assessment ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Injection Practice ◽  
Safe Injection ◽  
Safe Injection Practice ◽  
Unsafe Injection

Background: Unsafe injection practice is harmful to the patients, providers and community especially in a tertiary care hospital. On this backdrop, a rapid assessment of injection practice has been conducted with aim of identifying determinants and indicators of safe injection practice. Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted among 20 providers, 20 prescribers, 100 prescriptions and 120 general population by convenient sampling as per WHO from November 2016 to April 2017 in the hospital of VSS Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Burla using interview, observation method and analysis of prescriptions. Results: Knowledge about possibility of transmission of HCV due to unsafe injection practice was 80% among providers and 40% among general population. All providers were using sterile syringe and needle though 60% of them were seen not using gloves in case IV Injection/blood transfusion and needle recapping was done by half of them 100 per cent of injection providers reported that they have access to a sharps waste disposal facility. Needle recapping was done by half of them. OT8 indicator was 26.7(%). Average number of injections per person based on the population data was 1 injection per annum. Conclusions: Unsafe injection practice has to be tackled by CME among prescribers about rationale use of injections, antibiotics from essential drug list, regular supply of equipment and hub cutter and education of providers and people about injection safety will prevent avoidable communicable diseases. 

scholarly journals Assessment of injection safety in Ha Dong General Hospital, Hanoi, in 2012

F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phan Van Tuong ◽  
Tran Thi Minh Phuong ◽  
Bui Thi My Anh ◽  
Trang Huyen Thi Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
General Hospital ◽  
Target Population ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
The Body ◽  
Lower Amount ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Injection Practice ◽  
Safe Injection ◽  
Injection Safety

Background: Injection is one of the most frequently used medical methods to introduce drugs or other substances into the body for purposes of treatment or prevention. Unsafe injection can cause adverse outcomes, such as abscess and anaphylactic shock, and increases the risk of blood-borne transmission of viruses to patients and health care workers, as well as the community. Recognizing the importance of injection safety, in 2000 the Vietnamese Ministry of Health (MOH) collaborated with the Vietnam Nurses Association to launch the “Safe injection” program throughout the country, including Hanoi. Methods: This cross-sectional study, combining quantitative and qualitative analysis, was conducted from February to August 2012 in Ha Dong General Hospital using a structured questionnaire and observation checklist. The target population of the study was 109 nurses working in clinical departments and 436 injections were observed. Results: The percentage of nurses who are familiar with injection safety standards was found to be 82.6%. The proportion of practical injections that met the 23 standards of injection safety set by the MOH amounted to 22.2%. The factors related to safe injection practice of nurses who are younger age group (OR=3.1; p<0.05) and lower amount of working years (OR=2.8; p<0.05). Conclusions: A low proportion of nurses performed correct safety injection practice, which raises the need for further training about this issue, especially among older nurses.

Mycobacterium massiliense outbreak after intramuscular injection, South Korea

2012 ◽  
Vol 140 (10) ◽  
pp. 1880-1887 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. KIM ◽  
Y. CHO ◽  
S. LEE ◽  
Y. KOOK ◽  
D. LEE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intramuscular Injection ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Host Factors ◽  
Post Injection ◽  
Epidemiological Evidence ◽  
Mycobacterium Massiliense ◽  
Injection Practice ◽  
Route Of Transmission ◽  
Per Se ◽  
Safe Injection Practice

SUMMARYWe conducted an epidemic investigation to discover the route of transmission and the host factors of an outbreak of post-injection abscesses. Of the 2984 patients who visited a single clinic, 77 cases were identified and 208 age- and sex-matched controls were selected for analysis. Injected medications per se were not found to be responsible, and a deviation from safe injection practice suggested the likelihood of diluent contamination. Therefore the injected medications were classified according to whether there was a need for a diluent, and two medications showed a statistically significant association, i.e. injection with pheniramine [adjusted odds ratios (aOR) 5·93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2·97–11·87] and ribostamycin (aOR 47·95, 95% CI 11·08–207·53). However, when considered concurrently, pheniramine lost statistical significance (aOR 8·71, 95% CI 0·44–171·61) suggesting that normal saline was the causative agent of this outbreak. Epidemiological evidence strongly suggested that this post-injection outbreak was caused by saline contaminated with Mycobacterium massiliense without direct microbiological evidence.

scholarly journals Assessment of Insulin Injection Practice of Nurses Working in a Tertiary Healthcare Center of Nepal

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Shital Adhikari ◽  
Ramesh Sharma Poudel ◽  
Laxmi Rajbanshi ◽  
Shakti Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Injection Site ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Insulin Injection ◽  
Injection Technique ◽  
Demographic Information ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Injection Practice ◽  
Healthcare Center ◽  
Tertiary Healthcare ◽  
Self Administered Questionnaire

Introduction.Sound knowledge and good practice on insulin injection technique are essential for nurses in order to administer insulin correctly and to educate patients or their relatives adequately. This study aimed to assess the insulin injection practice through the use of insulin pen among nurses working in a tertiary healthcare center of Nepal.Materials and Methods.A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among 67 nurses working in one of the tertiary healthcare centers of Nepal. Demographic information and insulin injection practice of nurses through the use of insulin pen were assessed using self-administered questionnaire. Each correct practice was scored “1” and incorrect practice was scored “0.”Results.The median (IQR) insulin injection practice score of nurses was 11 (9-12) out of 16. Thirty-seven (55.2%) nurses store insulin pen filled with insulin cartridge at room temperature while 57 (85.1%) nurses store unopened cartridge at refrigerator (2-8°C). The practice of hand washing and injection site cleaning was mentioned by 92.5% and 82.1% of the nurses, respectively. However, just over half of the nurses mix the premix (cloudy) insulin and prime insulin pen before each injection. Thirty-four (50.7%) nurses do not lift skin during injection and more than half of the nurses keep needle beneath the skin for less than 5 seconds after completely injecting the required dose of insulin. One out of ten nurses massage injection site after injecting insulin. Most of the nurses (86.6%) use single needle more than once and the median (IQR) frequency of needle reuse was 6 (3-12). Similarly, systematic site rotation was performed by 59 (88.1%) nurses and twenty (29.9%) nurses claim that they use single insulin pen for two different cartridges.Conclusion.The insulin injection practice of nurses assessed through the use of insulin pen was suboptimal and highlights the need for urgent educational intervention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document