The Effect of Newly Introduced Bleaching Agent Listerine versus the Conventional Carbamide Peroxide on the Ultrastructure and Microhardness of Tooth Enamel

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-99
Author(s):  
Marwa El Shafie ◽  
Laila Ghali ◽  
Rasha Taha
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Asmawati Asmawati ◽  
Irene E. Rieuwpassa

Objective: Carbamide peroxide 10% is commonly used in home bleaching procedure. Effectiveness of carbamide peroxide bleaching process as a home bleaching has no successor yet, but its use is still being debated due to the effects on oral cavity. Strawberries are one of natural ingredients that currently used to whiten decolorized teeth because it contains ellagic acid and malic acid. On contrary, malic acid is said to be involved in the process of erosion. The aim of this study was to compare tooth enamel hardness after application of dental bleaching agent carbamide peroxide 10% and strawberry gel.Material and Methods: Sample consists of 30 maxillary incisors were divided into 3 groups. The first group as control soaked in aquades. The second treatment group were applied with carbamide peroxide 10%  and a third group applied with strawberry gel. Before and after the sample application, tests were performed to determine the hardness of tooth enamel as measured using Universal Hardness Tester.Results: Based on Friedman test, p-value = 0,000 (p <0,05; significant). This means that there was a significant difference in tooth enamel surface hardness of each group and treatment group using bleaching carbamide peroxide 10% and strawberry gel.Conclusion: There was a decrease on tooth enamel hardness after application of carbamide peroxide 10%  compared strawberry gel.


2014 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 160-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Cristina G. Bandeira de Andrade ◽  
Roberta Tarkany Basting ◽  
José Augusto Rodrigues ◽  
Flávia Lucisano Botelho do Amaral ◽  
Cecilia Pedroso Turssi ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objectives: The present study aimed to investigate the effect of staining solutions on microhardness and shade changes of a nanofilled resin composite, which had been previously in contact with bleaching agents. Materials and Methods: A total of 135 disk-shaped specimens (10 mm × 2 mm) were fabricated with a nanofilled resin (Filtek Supreme) and photocured with a Light Emission Diode (LED) unit and then allocated into three groups to be bleached with 10% or 16% carbamide peroxide (CP) bleaching agents or a 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) product. Following bleaching, specimens within each group were subdivided into three groups to be immersed in coffee, red wine or distilled water. Microhardness and color were monitored at baseline, after bleaching and after staining. Results: Analysis of variance for split-plot design showed lower microhardness values when the composite had been in contact with HP (P < 0.0001). The specimens immersed in red wine and coffee provided lower microhardness values than those immersed in distilled water, regardless of the bleaching agent to which the composites were previously exposed. Kruskal Wallis and Dunn tests demonstrated that the composite was lighter after bleaching with a 35% HP agent (P < 0.0500). Conclusion: The composite was darker as a result of being immersed either in red wine or coffee, regardless of the bleaching agent.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Necla Demir ◽  
Muhammet Karci ◽  
Mutlu Ozcan

Objective. To determine the influence of the home bleaching agent, Opalescence PF, on the surface roughness and microhardness of glazed glassy matrix CAD-CAM ceramics. Materials and Methods. The 28 sintered leucite- and lithium disilicate-reinforced ceramic specimens (IPS Empress CAD and IPS e.max CAD) were divided into control and bleached groups. The home bleaching agent was applied to specimens of bleached groups for 7 days. The surface roughness and microhardness of all specimens were measured. A scanning electron microscope was used to evaluate the surface properties. The data were statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Results. The control e.max CAD showed the lowest surface roughness values. For both Empress and e.max CAD, surface roughness was significantly higher for the bleached group (p<0.05). No significant differences in microhardness were observed. Conclusions. According to our study, patients should be careful when using home bleaching agents because whitening agents can affect the mechanical properties of full ceramic restorations like e.max CAD and Empress CAD. Ceramic polishing may be required in clinical situations where ceramic restorations are accidentally exposed to bleaching gels.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 451-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Tarosso Rea ◽  
Ana Carolina Cabral Roque ◽  
Ana Paula Macedo ◽  
Rossana Pereira Almeida

2002 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 906-909 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. S. GOMEZ ◽  
R. de CASTRO ALBUQUERQUE ◽  
R. A. DUTRA ◽  
W. A. VASCONCELLOS ◽  
D. A. REIS ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
AT Abe ◽  
MN Youssef ◽  
ML Turbino

SUMMARY This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the nanohardness of tooth enamel, composite resin, dental adhesive, and enamel hybrid layer exposed to 35% hydrogen peroxide-based bleaching agents and analyze the tooth-restoration interface using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). This study used 40 crowns of bovine incisors, which were embedded in epoxy resin. A 2 × 2 × 2-mm cavity was prepared in the medial third of the flattened buccal surface of each tooth and restored (two-step etch-and-rinse Adper Single Bond 2 + nanocomposite resin Filtek Z350 XT). The specimens were polished and divided into four groups (n=10), corresponding to each bleaching agent used (TB: Total Blanc Office, pH=7.22–6.33; HPB: Whiteness HP Blue, pH=8.89–8.85; HP: Whiteness HP, pH=6.65–6.04; PO: Pola Office, pH=3.56–3.8), applied in accordance with manufacturer protocols. The nanohardness of the substrates was measured before and immediately after the bleaching procedure and after 7-day storage in artificial saliva with an Ultra-Microhardness Tester (DUH-211S, Shimadzu). Loads used were 100 mN for tooth enamel and composite resin and 10 mN for adhesive and enamel hybrid layer. For SEM analysis, epoxy replicas were prepared through high-precision impressions of the specimens. For nanohardness, the statistical tests two-way analysis of variance and Tukey (p&lt;0.05) revealed that the agent with the lowest pH value (PO) was the only one to decrease the nanohardness of enamel and the enamel hybrid layer immediately after its application; however, after 7-day storage in artificial saliva, the nanohardness levels of these substrates returned to their original values. SEM analysis revealed small gaps between tooth enamel and adhesive after the exposure to all bleaching agents; however, the most evident gap in the tooth-restoration interface was observed immediately after application of agent PO. No bleaching agent used changed the nanohardness of the composite resin and adhesive layer.


2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 463-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. Barcellos ◽  
P. Benetti ◽  
V. V. B. Fernandes ◽  
M. C. Valera

Clinical Relevance According it has been demonstrated that dental substrates can recover from mineral loss after 14 days from the last bleaching agent application, there is no scientific information about this effect on the dental substrate-adhesive restoration interface.


2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 189-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Mahringer ◽  
Monika Fureder ◽  
Markus Kastner ◽  
Andreas Ebner ◽  
Peter Hinterdorfer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document