scholarly journals THE VALIDITY OF HEMATOLOGIC MARKERS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF NEONATAL SEPSIS

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 240
Author(s):  
Aqeela Ayub ◽  
Akmal Laeeq Chishti ◽  
Khwaja Amjad Hassen
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Term Neonates ◽  
Clinical Sepsis ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Sepsis Screen ◽  
One Year ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Written Informed Consent

AbstractObjective:To determine the validity of haematologic markers for sepsis screen (absolute neutrophil count (ANC), immature/total leukocytes ratio (I:T), platelets count (PC), C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum ferri-tin), both individually and in combination for early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.Methodology:This cross sectional analytical study was conducted in Neonatal Section of Paediatric Medicine Unit II, Mayo Hospital Lahore for one year. One hundred neonates presenting with clinical sepsis were included through non-probability, purposive sampling after written informed consent. Blood sample was collected for full hematologic screening as mentioned above along with blood cultures. Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS Version 17.Results: There were 68 male and 32 females including 31 preterm and 69 term neonates. 45 neonates were <1 day age, 40 neonates 1 10 days age, 15 neonates 11 30 days age. Mean weight of study cases was 2.35 0.69 Kg. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of ANC were 77.3%, 100% and 90%, for I/T ratio were 81.8%, 81.4% and 81%, for CRP were 75%, 83.9% and 80%, for platelet count were 84.1%, 71.4% and 77%, for serum ferritin were 88.6%, 69.6% and 78% respectively. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of combination of SF + I:T was 81.8%, 82.1% and 82%, for combination of SF + ANC + I:T were 93.2%, 71.4% and 81% for combination of SF + CRP + I:T were 93.2%, 67.9% and 79%, for combination of SF + I:T + PC were 90.9%, 58.9% and 73%, for combination of SF + CRP + ANC were 95.5%, 69.6% and 81%. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of combination of all markers were 90.9%, 76.8% and 83% respectively.Conclusion:Results of our study showed that we can safely rely on hematologic markers for confirmation of neonatal sepsis both singly and in combination. We suggest that these tests may help to diagnose neonatal sepsis earlier.Key Words:Neonatal Sepsis, Diagnostic accuracy, Lethargy, Prolong rupture of membrane, Temperature instability, Hematologic markers.

scholarly journals Diagnostic and Prognostic Validity of Proadrenomedullin among Neonates with Sepsis in Tertiary Care Hospitals of Southern India

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raja Kannan ◽  
Suchetha S. Rao ◽  
Prasanna Mithra ◽  
B. Dhanashree ◽  
Shantharam Baliga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Clinical Sepsis ◽  
A Value ◽  
Sepsis Screen ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Introduction. To evaluate Proadrenomedullin (Pro-ADM) as the diagnostic and prognostic marker in neonatal sepsis. Materials and Methods. In this cross-sectional study, Pro-ADM levels were estimated in 54 neonates with clinical sepsis and positive sepsis screen (cases) and 54 controls without clinical sepsis. Repeat Pro-ADM levels were estimated after 72 hours in cases. Pro-ADM levels were compared with the clinical outcome. Results and Discussion. Median Pro-ADM levels in cases were 31.8 (IQR: 27.8-39.4) pmol/ml which was significantly higher than controls 5.1 (IQR; 3.1-7.7) pmol/ml. From the constructed ROC curve, a value of 14.5 pmol/ml was taken as the cut-off for sepsis. Pro-ADM had 100% sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPV) in detecting sepsis at 14.5 pmol/ml. Among cases, a decrease in Pro-ADM level by 10 pmol/ml was associated with 99% survival. Pro-ADM value of 35 pmol/ml had 100% specificity and PPV in predicting mortality. Conclusion. Pro-ADM can be used as a single biomarker for detecting neonatal sepsis, predicting clinical outcome and prognosis.

scholarly journals Haematological Parameters in Neonatal Sepsis in a Tertiary Care Centre Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (13) ◽  
pp. 751-754
Author(s):  
Pruthvi D ◽  
Pavan Ramarao Kulkarni ◽  
Uma Raghavendra Jamkhandi ◽  
Shivakumar Sanganagouda Inamdar
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Absolute Neutrophil Count ◽  
Neutrophil Count ◽  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Neonatal Septicaemia ◽  
Sepsis Screen ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Culture Positive

BACKGROUND Neonatal septicaemia is a bacterial infection with positive blood culture in first four weeks of life. The early sepsis screen is vital as it detects earlier and benefits the clinician to treat the infection reducing neonatal mortality and morbidity. We wanted to evaluate various haematological screening parameters and C-reactive protein (CRP) in blood culture positive neonates in sepsis. METHODS This prospective study was conducted for a period of one year. Blood samples from hundred clinically suspected neonatal septicaemia cases were subjected to aerobic culture and sepsis screen tests like C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation ratio (ESR), total WBC count, absolute neutrophil count, immature / total neutrophil count (I / T) ratio and platelet count. The culture results were correlated with the sepsis screen tests. RESULTS Of the hundred cases studied, 18 % were blood culture positive and 66 % were males. Early onset septicaemia was more common, seen in 64 % of cases than late onset septicaemia (26 %) cases. Staphylococcus aureus was the commonest organism isolated in 38.46 % of cases followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae & E. Coli. Among the haematological parameters, the positivity was best with Creactive protein (94.44 %) followed by immature & mature neutrophil ratio (I / M) (94.44 %), I / T ratio (88.88 %) and the least with absolute neutrophil count (66.0 %). Any two or more parameters were positive in 94.44 % of the subjects. CONCLUSIONS Sepsis screen has good sensitivity, specificity and is a valuable aid for early diagnosis of neonatal septicaemia. Sepsis screen is simple, cost effective, less time consuming and easy to perform. As an individual test C-reactive protein has shown highest sensitivity, specificity and is a sensitive and responsive indicator of neonatal sepsis. KEYWORDS Blood Culture, Neonatal Septicaemia, Sepsis Screen

scholarly journals Diagnostic Accuracy of C-Reactive Protein in Neonatal Sepsis

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidra Younis ◽  
Muhammad Ali Sheikh ◽  
Amjad Ali Raza
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Operational Definition ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Capillary Refill ◽  
Neonatal Deaths ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Sepsis is the most common cause of neonatal mortality and is responsible for 30-50% of total neonatal deaths each year in developing countries. The objective of the study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of Creactive protein (CRP) in neonatal sepsis. Fifty nine consecutive patients with risk factors and clinical features suggestive of CRP sepsis were selected as per operational definition and fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Detailed physical examination was carried out. Blood sample for culture and CRP was taken from all the patients. Results of blood culture and CRP were noted down in the performa. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS software version 16. Among selected patients 31/59 (52.5%) were male whereas 28/59 (47.5%) were female. Mean age of all patients was 15.47+7.26 days and mean weight was 2.94+0.63Kg. Temperature instability was present in 79.7%, Tachypnea in 69.5%, Tachycardia in 66.1%, delayed capillary refill in 64.4% and oliguria in 55.9%. Blood cultures were positive in 64.4% and raised CRP was found in 64.5%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive of raised CRP was found to be 97.3%, 95.2%, 97.3% and 95.2% respectively. In conclusion this study show that C-reactive protein has high sensitivity and specificity for establishing the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis which is comparable to that of blood culture results.

scholarly journals Does Static Intra Access Pressure Monitoring of Arteriovenous Fistulas Predicts Intra Access Stenosis?

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abaid ur Rehman ◽  
Muhammad Imran Khan ◽  
Omer Sabir ◽  
Muhammad Mohsin Riaz ◽  
Mubashar Dilawar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Doppler Ultrasonography ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulas ◽  
Doppler Us ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Male To Female

The initiation of hemodialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires vascular access formation. The choice of vascular access for individual patient depends on various factors however arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is conventionally considered to be the vascular access of choice. Once hemodialysis is initiated through a mature AVF, there is an ongoing need for surveillance of the AVF to ensure adequate function and prevent vascular access issues among which flow obstruction (both inflow and outflow) remains the most important. AVF stenosis can potentially lead to inadequate dialysis delivery and thrombosis thus leading to access loss. Physical examination and AVF Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) are useful for evaluation of stenosis in the  arteriovenous connection and the outflow tract. Periodic assessment of the AVF with Static Intra access Pressure (SIAPR) determination may be a reliable means of predicting vascular access stenosis. Material & Methods  A cross sectional study carried out at Department of Nephrology, Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore from July 2018 to December 2018. In total 113 patients were included, and all patients underwent SIAPR assessment and Doppler Ultrasound of AVF. Results Mean age of the patients was 56.81±9.38 years, male to female ratio of the patients was 1.8:1. In this study the SIAPR was suggestive of  stenosis in 87(76.99%) patients. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of SIAPR against Doppler US of the AVF for detection of stenosis was 75.86%, 22.62% & 36.28% respectively Conclusion SIAPR has low specificity and diagnostic accuracy compared to Doppler US for detection of AVF stenosis.

scholarly journals ACCURACY OF THE UPPER LIP BITE TEST;

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (01) ◽  
pp. 132-138
Author(s):  
MUHAMMAD ATIF ◽  
MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH ◽  
MUHAMMAD JAVAD YOUSAF ◽  
Khalid Buland
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Difficult Intubation ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Upper Lip ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Objective: To compare the accuracy of Upper lip bite test with modified Mallampati classification for predicting the difficultlaryngoscopic intubation. Study Design: Cross sectional Study. Place and duration of study: The study was carried out at Department ofAnaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain management, Combined Military hospital, Rawalpindi from September 2008 to August 2009.Patients and Methods: Four hundred patients undergoing elective surgery meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria were enrolled afterwritten informed consent. The airways of the patients were evaluated by using the modified Mallampati classification (MMP) and theUpper lip bite test (ULBT). MMP class 3 or 4 and ULBT class 3 were considered as indicators of difficult intubation. The laryngeal view wasgraded by Cormack and Lehane classification (Gold standard). Grade 1 or 2 was considered to represent easy intubation and grade 3 or 4to represent difficult intubation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy werecalculated for both the tests separately by using the 2×2 table. Results: ULBT had a higher accuracy of 94%, specificity of 99.2% andpositive predictive value 70% compared to MMP accuracy of 82.7%, specificity of 84.4% and positive predictive value of 22.7%.Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of the Upper lip bite test was more than the modified Mallampati classification. We suggest that itbe compared with the other prevailing tests as well which are often used to assess difficult intubations.

Sepsis Screen Questioned

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-153
Author(s):  
Patrick R. Murray
Keyword(s):  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate ◽  
Sedimentation Rate ◽  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Erythrocyte Sedimentation ◽  
Leukocyte Counts ◽  
Sepsis Screen

The article by Philip and Hewitt (Pediatrics 65:1036-1041, 1980) on the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis was interesting, but their conclusions may be misleading. They demonstrated that when at least two of five screening tests were positive (band/total neutrophils, leukocyte counts, latex C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and latex haptoglobin), neonatal sepsis could be accurately predicted in 28 of 30 (93%) infants. Two or more tests were also positive for 43 of 346 (12%) infants without proven sepsis.

TLR2 and TLR4 expressions in late-onset neonatal sepsis: Is it a potential novel biomarker?

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
R. Rohsiswatmo ◽  
M. Azharry ◽  
T.T. Sari ◽  
Y. Bahasoan ◽  
D. Wulandari
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Complete Blood Count ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Tlr4 Expression ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Reactive Protein

BACKGROUND: Late-onset neonatal sepsis (LONS) detection is problematic as no single examinations (blood culture, c-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT)) are reliable. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which detect the presence of pathogen-associated molecular patterns is a promising novel biomarker, but less studied in LONS. This study aimed to determine neutrophils and monocytes TLR2 and TLR4 expression in LONS and their diagnostic value. METHODS: A cross-sectional study conducted in May and June 2017 involving 52 neonates with clinical late-onset (>72 hours of age) sepsis. We examine complete blood count, I/T ratio, CRP, PCT, as well as TLR2 and TLR4 expression to compared with blood culture as the gold standard. We classified cases into proven or unproven sepsis. RESULT: The incidence of LONS was 32.6% in the subjects. The expression of TLR2 was low in LONS, while TLR4 was high. TLR4 neutrophil expression has 88.2% sensitivity, 20% specificity, 34.9% positive predictive value (PPV), 77.8% negative predictive value (NPV), and an AUC of 0.541. TLR4 monocyte expression has 92.1% sensitivity, 11.4% specificity, 34% PPV, 80% NPV, and an AUC of 0.528. The AUC of CRP is increased from 0.608 to 0.843 after combination with TLR4, comparable with CRP + PCT (AUC 0.829). CONCLUSION: The increase in TLR4 expression has good sensitivity but low specificity. TLR4 expression, in combination with CRP, could become a reliable biomarker for the diagnosis of LONS.

scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detection of intra-axial gliomas

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sohbia Munir ◽  
Sohail Ahmed Khan ◽  
Hina Hanif ◽  
Maria Khan
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Post Contrast ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detection of intra-axial gliomas in suspected cases keeping histopathology as gold standard. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Dow Institute of Radiology, DUHS from October 2017 - April 2018. Patients of either gender aged 30-70 years presenting with headache were included. Patients already diagnosed and referred for follow up were excluded. MRI was performed on 1.5T scanner by a trained MRI technician. T1, T2, FLAIR, diffusion weighted and T1 post contrast images were acquired and reviewed by two radiologists having more than five years post fellowship experience. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of MRI for intraaxial gliomas was calculated taking histopathology findings as gold standard. Results: Mean age of the patient`s was 51.71 ±10.85 years. Positive intraaxial gliomas on MRI were observed in 123 (79.90%) patients while on histopathology, positive intraaxial gliomas were observed in 131 (85.10%) patients. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in detection of intra-axial gliomas taking histopathology findings as gold standard showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value (PPV), negative predicted value (NPV) and overall diagnostic accuracy as 89.31%, 73.91%, 95.12%, 54.84% and 87.01%. Conclusions: MRI has high sensitivity, moderate specificity and high diagnostic accuracy in detection of intraaxial gliomas. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.2489 How to cite this:Munir S, Khan SA, Hanif H, Khan M. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detection of intra-axial gliomas. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(1):125-130. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.2489 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document