Recent use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) appears to be associated with an increased risk of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP),

2008 ◽  
Vol &NA; (1226) ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
&NA;
Keyword(s):  
Proton Pump Inhibitors ◽  
Proton Pump ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Increased Risk

scholarly journals The risk of community-acquired pneumonia in children using gastric acid suppressants

2021 ◽  
pp. 2003229
Author(s):  
Linda J.T.M. van der Sande ◽  
Quirijn Jöbsis ◽  
Michiel A.G.E. Bannier ◽  
Ewoudt M.W. van de Garde ◽  
Jan J.M. Coremans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Disease ◽  
Proton Pump Inhibitors ◽  
Proton Pump ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Receptor Antagonists ◽  
Increased Risk

With the increased use of acid suppressants, significant potential complications, such as community-acquired pneumonia are becoming more apparent. Paradoxically, in spite of an increased focus on potential complications, there is an increased use of acid suppressants in children and a lack of data specifically targeting the association between acid suppressants and community-acquired pneumonia. Our main objective was to evaluate the risk of community-acquired pneumonia in children using acid suppressants (proton pump inhibitors and/or histamine-2-receptor antagonists).We performed a cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. All patients aged 1 month to 18 years with a prescription of acid suppressants were included and matched to up to 4 unexposed children. Time-varying Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of community-acquired pneumonia. The cohort consisted of 84 868 exposed and 325 329 unexposed children.Current use of proton pump inhibitors and histamine-2-receptor antagonists was associated with an increased risk of community acquired pneumonia, adjusted hazard ratio 2.05 (95% CI 1.90 to 2.22) and 1.80 (95% CI 1.67 to 1.94), respectively. The risk was even greater in patients with respiratory disease. Long term use >211 days of proton pump inhibitors and histamine-2-receptor antagonists led to a significantly greater risk of community-acquired pneumonia compared to short term use <31 days. After cessation of therapy, the risk remained increased for the following 7 months.The use of acid suppressants in children was associated with a doubled risk of community-acquired pneumonia. This risk increased with chronic use, respiratory disease and remained increased after discontinuation of therapy.

scholarly journals Long Term Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors: Where to Draw the Line

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-35
Author(s):  
M. Manzurul Haque
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Proton Pump Inhibitors ◽  
Proton Pump ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Ulcer Disease ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Prospective Trials ◽  
Evidence Based Therapy ◽  
Clostridium Difficile Associated Diarrhea

Proton pump inhibitors are the leading evidence-based therapy for acid related upper gastrointestinal disorders including dyspepsia, GERD and peptic ulcer disease. These are among the most frequently prescribed drugs globally. However, PPIs have been subjected to studies and have been associated with increased risk of adverse effects like Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, community-acquired pneumonia, bone fracture, reduced intestinal absorption of vitamins and minerals, and more recently kidney damage and dementia etc. In this review the recent literature regarding these adverse effects and their association with long-term proton pump inhibitor treatment is discussed. The objective of this review is to analyse the potential adverse effects of long-term PPI use and summarize the clinical implications. We documented a considerable increase in the use of PPIs over the last decade. This increase is due to over-prescription and use of PPIs for inappropriate indications. On the other hand, some patients may have had PPI therapy discontinued abruptly or inappropriately due to safety concerns. However the patients with a proven indication for a PPI should continue to receive it in the lowest effective dose for a shortest possible time. Finally, in most cases and based on the available evidence, PPIs benefits seem to outweigh potential adverse effects. Large randomized prospective trials are required to more firmly establish direct cause and effect relationships between PPIs and adverse events.

scholarly journals Meta-analysis of proton pump inhibitors induced risk of community-acquired pneumonia

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 292-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phung Anh Nguyen ◽  
Mohaimenul Islam ◽  
Cooper J Galvin ◽  
Chih-Cheng Chang ◽  
Soo Yeon An ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Proton Pump Inhibitors ◽  
Proton Pump ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Purpose Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), one of the most widely used medications, are commonly used to suppress several acid-related upper gastrointestinal disorders. Acid-suppressing medication use could be associated with increased risk of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), although the results of clinical studies have been conflicting. Data sources A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane library and Database of Systematic Reviews from the earliest available online year of indexing up to October 2018. Study selection We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to evaluate the risk of PPI use on CAP outcomes. Data extraction Included study location, design, population, the prevalence of CAP, comparison group and other confounders. We calculated pooled odds ratio (OR) using a random-effects meta-analysis. Results of data synthesis Of the 2577 studies screening, 11 papers were included in the systematic review and 7 studies with 65 590 CAP cases were included in the random-effects meta-analysis. In current PPI users, pooled OR for CAP was 1.86 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.30–2.66), and in the case of recent users, OR for CAP was 1.66 (95% CI, 1.22–2.25). In the subgroup analysis of CAP, significance association is also observed in both high-dose and low-dose PPI therapy. When stratified by duration of exposure, 3–6 months PPIs users group was associated with increased risk of developing CAP (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.22–3.45). There was a statistically significant association between the PPI users and the rate of hospitalization (OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.83–3.66). Conclusion We found possible evidence linking PPI use to an increased risk of CAP. More randomized controlled studies are warranted to clarify an understanding of the association between PPI use and risk of CAP because observational studies cannot clarify whether the observed epidemiologic association is a causal effect or a result of unmeasured/residual confounding.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Risk of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: An Updated Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110392
Author(s):  
Xuejiao Xun ◽  
Qifan Yin ◽  
Yuhao Fu ◽  
Xueru He ◽  
Zhanjun Dong
Keyword(s):  
Proton Pump Inhibitors ◽  
Proton Pump ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Published Evidence ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Comprehensive Literature Search

Background: Some studies suggested an increased risk of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) among proton pump inhibitors (PPI) users. However, the published evidence is inadequate to define the association between PPI use and the risk of CAP. Objective: The aims of our meta-analysis were to systematically assess the association between the risk of CAP and PPI use in adults to reduce the adverse effects of PPI and ensure the safety of medication for patients. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted, published between January 1, 2004, and February 1, 2021. The primary outcome was the incidence of CAP. This meta-analysis was performed using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs as effective measures; 13 studies including 2 098 804 patients were enrolled in our meta-analysis. Results: Our study revealed that the incidence of CAP was higher in PPI users than non -PPI users [OR = 1.37 (95% CI = 1.22–1.53)], especially for PPI duration < 30 days [OR = 1.49 (95% CI = 1.34–1.66)]. Compared with non-PPI use, PPI use increased the incidence of CAP in the stroke disease population [OR = 1.52 (95% CI = 1.33–1.75)], but not in the liver disease population [OR = 1.13 (95% CI = 0.98–1.30)]. Conclusions and Relevance: Using PPI could increase the risk of CAP when compared to not using PPI. PPI use increased the incidence of CAP in patients with stroke. Clinicians and clinical pharmacists should weigh the benefits before medication and strictly control the indication of the prescription, so as to reduce adverse reactions.

scholarly journals Intermittent concurrent use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors did not increase risk of adverse clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with coronary artery disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanbing He ◽  
Xiaorong Shu ◽  
Enyi Zhu ◽  
Bingqing Deng ◽  
Yongqing Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Proton Pump Inhibitors ◽  
Proton Pump ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Asian Population ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Clinical Event ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Concurrent Use ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are frequently prescribed to patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) under antiplatelet therapy to prevent gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. However, its clinical impact is still under debate, especially in Asian population. This study was undertaken to explore the effects of concurrent use of clopidogrel and PPIs on the clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with CHD in secondary prevention. Methods A single-center retrospective study was conducted in 638 patients with CHD on consecutive clopidogrel therapy for at least 1 year. After 18-month follow-up, adverse clinical events were collected. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the effect of PPI use on the outcomes. A total of 638 patients were recruited from 2014 to 2015 in this study, among whom 201 were sustained PPI users, 188 were intermittent PPI users and the remaining 249 were non-PPI users. Results Compared with sustained PPI users, intermittent use of PPIs was associated with a lower risk of stroke, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and net adverse clinical event (NACE) (stroke: adjusted HR: 0.109, 95% CI 0.014–0.878, p = 0.037; MACE: adjusted HR: 0.293, 95% CI 0.119–0.722; p = 0.008; NACE: adjusted HR: 0.357, 95% CI 0.162–0.786, p = 0.011). Subgroup analysis further revealed the benefit of intermittent PPI use was significant in male CHD patients over 60 years old, with hypertension or chronic kidney disease, and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention during hospitalization. Conclusion The current findings suggest that the intermittent concurrent use of PPIs and clopidogrel is not associated with an increased risk of 18-month adverse clinical outcomes, and intermittent use of PPIs is associated with a lower rate of MACE and NACE.

scholarly journals Association of proton pump inhibitors and concomitant drugs with risk of acute kidney injury: a nested case–control study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e041543
Author(s):  
Keiko Ikuta ◽  
Shunsaku Nakagawa ◽  
Kenji Momo ◽  
Atsushi Yonezawa ◽  
Kotaro Itohara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Proton Pump Inhibitors ◽  
Proton Pump ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Renal Diseases ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Nested Case Control ◽  
Control Study

ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess whether the combined use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or antibiotics (penicillins, macrolides, cephalosporins or fluoroquinolones) was associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI).DesignA nested case–control study.SettingA health insurance claims database constructed by the Japan Medical Data Center.ParticipantsPatients were eligible if they were prescribed a PPI, NSAID and antibiotic at least once between January 2005 and June 2017. The patients who were new PPI users and did not have any history of renal diseases before cohort entry were included (n=219 082). The mean age was 45 and 44% were women.InterventionsCurrent use of PPIs, NSAIDs, or antibiotics.Primary outcome measuresAcute kidney injury.ResultsDuring a mean follow-up of 2.4 (SD, 1.7) years, 317 cases of AKI were identified (incidence rate of 6.1/10 000 person-years). The current use of PPIs was associated with a higher risk of AKI compared with past PPI use (unadjusted OR, 4.09; 95% CI, 3.09 to 5.44). The unadjusted ORs of AKI for the current use of PPIs with NSAIDs, cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, compared with the current use of PPIs alone, were 3.92 (95% CI, 2.40 to 6.52), 2.57 (1.43 to 4.62) and 3.08 (1.50 to 6.38), respectively. The effects of concurrent use of PPIs with NSAIDs, cephalosporins or fluoroquinolones remain significant in the adjusted model. The analyses on absolute risk of AKI confirmed the results from the nested case–control study.ConclusionsConcomitant use of NSAIDs with PPIs significantly increased the risk for AKI. Moreover, the results suggested that concomitant use of cephalosporins or fluoroquinolones with PPIs was associated with increased risk of incident AKI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document