Enhanced nutrient removal MBR system with chemical addition for low effluent TP

2011 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 1298-1306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-jun Liu ◽  
Zhi-rong Hu ◽  
R. L. Walker ◽  
P. L. Dold
Keyword(s):  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Model Simulation ◽  
Chemical Precipitation ◽  
Pilot Test ◽  
Activated Sludge Model ◽  
Effluent Quality ◽  
Precipitation Model ◽  
Optimizing Design ◽  
Dynamic Loading Conditions ◽  
P Removal

A pilot study was conducted to test an membrane bioreactor (MBR) process for combined biological and chemical P removal to achieve a very low effluent total phosphorus (TP) concentration of 0.025 mg P/L. With the data from the pilot test, a simulation study was performed to demonstrate that: (1) the pilot system behaviour (effluent quality, MLSS, etc.) can be modelled accurately with an activated sludge model combined with a chemical precipitation model; and (2) with the calibrated model, simulation scenarios can be performed to further understand the pilot MBR process, and provide information for optimizing design and operation when applied at full-scale. Results from the pilot test indicated that the system could achieve very low effluent TP concentration through biological P removal with a limited chemical addition, and chemical addition to remove P to very low level did not affect other biological processes, i.e., organic and nitrogen removal. Simulation studies indicate that the process behaviour can be modelled accurately with an activated sludge model combined with a chemical precipitation model, and the calibrated model can be used to provide information to optimize system design and operation, e.g., chemical addition control under dynamic loading conditions is important for maintaining biological P removal.

Calibrating a side-stream membrane bioreactor using Activated Sludge Model No. 1

2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (10-11) ◽  
pp. 359-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Jiang ◽  
X. Liu ◽  
M.D. Kennedy ◽  
J.C. Schippers ◽  
P.A. Vanrolleghem
Keyword(s):  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Biological Behaviour ◽  
Activated Sludge Model ◽  
Effluent Quality ◽  
Side Stream ◽  
Steady State Operation ◽  
Autotrophic Biomass ◽  
Biological Performance ◽  
Activated Sludge Processes ◽  
Influent Wastewater

Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) are attracting global interest but the mathematical modeling of the biological performance of MBRs remains very limited. This study focuses on the modeling of a side-stream MBR system using the Activated Sludge Model No. 1 (ASM1), and compares the results with the modeling of traditional activated sludge processes. ASM1 parameters relevant for the long-term biological behaviour in MBR systems were calibrated (i.e. YH = 0.72gCOD/gCOD, YA = 0.25gCOD/gN, bH = 0.25d−1, bA = 0.080d−1 and fP = 0.06), and generally agreed with the parameters in traditional activated sludge processes, with the exception that a higher autotrophic biomass decay rate was observed in the MBR. Influent wastewater characterization was proven to be a critical step in model calibration, and special care should be taken in characterizing the inert particulate COD (XI) concentration in the MBR influent. It appeared that the chemical–biological method was superior to the physical–chemical method. A sensitivity analysis for steady-state operation and DO dynamics suggested that the biological performance of the MBR system (the sludge concentration, effluent quality and the DO dynamics) are very sensitive to the parameters (i.e. YH, YA, bH, bA μmaxH and μmaxA), and influent wastewater components (XI, Ss, Xs and SNH).

Modelling of the Secondary Clarifier Combined with the Activated Sludge Model No. 1

1992 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 285-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
René Dupont ◽  
Mogens Henze
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Simple Model ◽  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Wastewater Treatment Plants ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Activated Sludge Model ◽  
Effluent Quality ◽  
Secondary Clarifier ◽  
Hydraulic Load ◽  
Flux Model

Modelling of activated sludge wastewater treatment plants is today generally based on the Activated Sludge Model No. 1 combined with a very simple model for the secondary settler. This paper describes the development of a model for the secondary clarifier based on the general flux theory for zone settling, which can be used in combination with the Activated Sludge Model to form a dynamic computer model/program for a wastewater treatment plant. In addition to the flux model, the developed model includes a simple model for predicting the contents of paniculate components in the effluent This latter model is a purely empirical model, which connects the effluent quality with the hydraulic load, suspended solids load and the nitrate load. The paper describes the model and gives some basic examples on computer simulations and verification of the model.

Modelling of full-scale wastewater treatment plants with different treatment processes using the Activated Sludge Model no. 3

2001 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Wichern ◽  
F. Obenaus ◽  
P. Wulf ◽  
K.-H. Rosenwinkel
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Wastewater Treatment Plants ◽  
Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Activated Sludge Model ◽  
Treatment Processes ◽  
Biological Phosphorus ◽  
P Removal

In 1999 the Activated Sludge Model no. 3 (ASM 3) by the IWA task Group on Mathematical Modeling for Design and Operation of Biological Wastewater Treatment was presented. The model is used for simulation of nitrogen removal. On the basis of a new calibration of the ASM 3 with the easy degradable COD measured by respiration simulation runs of this paper have been done. In 2000 a biological phosphorus removal module by the EAWAG was added to the calibrated version of ASM 3 and is now serving the current requirements for modelling the enhanced biological P-removal. Only little experiences with different load situations of large-scale wastewater treatment plants were made with both new models so far. This article reports the experiences with the simulation and calibration of the biological parameters using ASM 3 and the EAWAG BioP Module. Three different large-scale wastewater treatment plants in Germany with different treatment systems will be discussed (Koblenz: pre-denitrification; Hildesheim: simultaneous denitrification with EBPR; Duderstadt: intermediate denitrification with EBPR). Informations regarding the choice of kinetic and stoichiometric parameters will be given.

scholarly journals Optimizing water and resource recovery facilities (WRRF) for energy generation without compromising effluent quality

Water SA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (2 April) ◽  
Author(s):  
George A Ekama
Keyword(s):  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Energy Generation ◽  
Resource Recovery ◽  
Biological Nutrient Removal ◽  
Effluent Quality ◽  
P Content ◽  
Primary Separation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Final Effluent ◽  
P Removal

The primary separation unit (PSU) splits the organic load on the water and resource recovery facility (WRRF) between the primary sludge (PS) anaerobic digester (AD), where energy can be generated, and the biological nutrient removal (BNR) activated sludge (AS) reactor, where energy is consumed. With a CHONP element mass-balanced plant-wide stoichiometric and kinetic steady-state model, this paper explores quantitatively the impact of four cases of increasing organics removal efficiencies in the PSU on (i) settled wastewater characteristics, (ii) balanced solids retention time (SRT) of the Modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) and University of Cape Town/Johannesburg (UCT/JHB) systems for lowest economical effluent N and P concentrations, (iii) reactor volume, (iv) energy consumption for aeration, pumping and mixing, (v) energy generation by AD of PS and waste activated sludge (WAS), (vi) N&P content of the PS and WAS AD dewatering liquor (DWL) and (vii) final effluent N and P concentrations with and without enhanced biological P removal (EBPR), and looks for an optimum WRRF layout for maximum energy recovery without compromising effluent quality. For the low biogas yield from the WAS AD, decreasing as the SRT of the BNRAS system gets longer and with the added complexity of N&P removal from the digested sludge DWL, makes AD of WAS undesirable unless P recovery is required. Because the wastewater biodegradable particulate organics (BPO) have a low N&P content, it is better to divert more biodegradable particulate organics to the PSAD with enhanced primary separation than digest WAS – the PSAD DWL can be returned to the influent with relatively small impact on final effluent N and P concentration.

Improvement of nitrogen removal at WWTP Zürich Werdhöelzli after connection of WWTP Zürich-Glatt

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 35-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Siegrist ◽  
L. Rieger ◽  
Ch. Fux ◽  
M. Wehrli
Keyword(s):  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Nitrogen Removal ◽  
Substantial Reduction ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Operating Costs ◽  
Effluent Quality ◽  
In Series ◽  
Nitrogen Elimination ◽  
Anammox Process ◽  
P Removal

Optimisation of nitrifying activated sludge plants towards nutrient removal (denitrification and enhanced P-removal) leads to a substantial reduction of operating costs and improves effluent and operating conditions. At WWTP Zürich-Werdhöelzli, initially designed for nitrification only, an anoxic zone of 28% of total activated sludge volume was installed and allowed 60% nitrogen elimination besides several other optimisations. In 2001 the operation of WWTP Zürich-Glatt was stopped and the wastewater was connected to WWTP Werdhöelzli. To improve nitrogen removal, WWTP Werdhöelzli co-financed two research projects; one for separate digester supernatant treatment with the anammox process operating two SBRs in series and the other applying NH4 sensors for aeration control in order to decrease energy consumption and raise effluent quality. The results of both projects and the consequences for WWTP Werdhöelzli are discussed in this paper.

Considerations in the Process Design of Nutrient Removal Activated Sludge Processes

1983 ◽  
Vol 15 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 283-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
G A Ekama ◽  
I P Siebritz ◽  
G V R Marais
Keyword(s):  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Nutrient Removal ◽  
Concentration Ratio ◽  
Oxygen Demand ◽  
Biological Nutrient Removal ◽  
Nitrogen And Phosphorus ◽  
Effluent Quality ◽  
Biological Nitrogen ◽  
Activated Sludge Processes ◽  
P Removal

The average influent wastewater characteristics - (i) the COD concentration, (ii) the TKN/COD concentration ratio, (iii) the rapidly biodegradable COD concentration, (iv) the maximum specific growth rate of the nitrifiers at 20°C attainable in the wastewater, (v) the maximum and minimum temperatures, and (vi) the P/COD concentration ratio - are shown to govern the design of, and effluent quality from single sludge activated sludge processes for both biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal. The TKN/COD ratio governs the selection of the process type: For the Phoredox process, complete denitrification is essential to obtain excess P removal, and this is shown to be feasible only for TKN/COD ratios less than 0,07 to 0,08 mgN/mgCOD; as the TKN/COD ratio increases above 0,08, complete denitrification becomes increasingly unlikely, and the UCT or Modified UCT processes are appropriate because in these processes complete denitrification is not essential to achieve excess P removal - in these processes N and P removal can be traded off against each other depending on the critical nutrient to be removed. Primary sedimentation significantly reduces the biological nutrient removal potential of activated sludge process because it increases the TKN/COD and P/COD ratios and reduces the COD load; however it significantly reduces the process volume and total oxygen demand.

Performance Stability of Small Biological Chemical Treatment Plants

1990 ◽  
Vol 22 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 275-282
Author(s):  
R. Storhaug
Keyword(s):  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Chemical Treatment ◽  
Chemical Precipitation ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Precipitation Process ◽  
Chemical Plants ◽  
Effluent Standards ◽  
Main Portion ◽  
Rotating Biological Contactors ◽  
Number Of Treatment

Biological and chemical treatment plants constitute a main portion of the overall number of treatment plants in Norway. The biological and chemical plants are divided into three process groups, simultaneous precipitation and activated sludge, combined precipitation and rotating biological contactors (RBC) and post precipitation and activated sludge. Aluminium sulphate or ferric chloride are the commonly used flocculants in the chemical precipitation process. Effluent data from 174 Norwegian biological chemical treatment plants are evaluated. Compared to the effluent standards for each process group, post precipitation shows the best performance. On an average these plants have the lowest actual utilization of the design capacity. The most important factors that cause the treatment plants not to meet the effluent standards are, poor quality of the sewer system, improper design of the plant and organizational problems. Satisfactory separation of particles, flow equalization and proper operational management, are the basic demands to achieve low effluent concentrations for tot-P and BOD7.

Evaluation of Small Wastewater Treatment Plants in the County of Århus – Denmark

1993 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 33-41
Author(s):  
Jes la Cour Jansen ◽  
Bodil Mose Pedersen ◽  
Erik Moldt
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Constructed Wetlands ◽  
Biological Treatment ◽  
Wastewater Treatment Plants ◽  
Chemical Precipitation ◽  
Common Type ◽  
Treatment Efficiency ◽  
Effluent Quality ◽  
Different Types

Influent and effluent data from about 120 small wastewater treatment plants (100 - 2000 PE) have been collected and processed. Seven different types of plants are represented. The effluent quality and the treatment efficiency have been evaluated. The most common type of plant is mechanical/biological treatment plants. Some of them are nitrifying and some are also extended for chemical precipitation of phosphorus. Constructed wetlands and biological sandfilters are also represented among the small wastewater treatment plants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document